/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Reported for duplicate thread

>>671739

Don’t bump OP’s stupid thread. What are you doing???

>>671740

sorry

GET GOING

>>>/KJV/

>>671744

stop tossing words without understanding their meaning

Also, nice picture encouraging smoking and drinking at the same time, destroying your liver.

>>671749

Or rather smoking at all

>>671744

Well, let’s start out with your hypocrisy. Don’t piss and moan about profanity when you’re uploading memes with profanity in them as well. Piss off

>>671757

>The 2 pics with profanity that I posted in the OP were examples of the exact profanity I was accusing this board and its users of

Don’t post it, dumb fu¢k. That’s like complaining about pornography on 8chan, and then uploading examples to prove your point. Bumbling MORON.

>>671757

>sede

Oh boy ;s But know what ? I agree regardless. The board's quality has been free falling for a long time now, precisely since tutor abandoned the board for matters of faith and family (which I fully support, don't get me wrong) and the two Euro mods simply can't be here all day, not even the biggest portion of it. Your concerns, however, are just going to be met with insults and ridicule - with the memes and attitudes you despise so much.

If you're serious about your faith, you leave the board. Everyone serious about their faith should be doing that, me included. Once the Rosary thread dies it's time to leave.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have Mercy upon us sinners.

>>671766

He's most likely Orthodox already, a Romanian one, who may be the same person who opened this >>>671042 thread, judging from the pictures he uses.

>>671769

eh >>671042

Just me or the devils are working overtime to divide up this board lately, stirring inter-denom bickerings left and right.

>>671777

oh alright then, I messed up again with duplicate post

>>671736

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>671771

Ah, so (you) really are a sede. Well…that really says a lot. Also, no, I did not insult (you), just provided a logical observation from (you)r posts that reeks with autism.

Also, one that criticizes memes, (you) really seem to base (you)r faith and opinions on memes too while also being member of a literal meme denomination. And dont even know meanings of the words such as, "demon possessed", "heathen", "heretic", "modernist" and so on. In fact, I'll just assume that (you) are a LARPer that wants to sabotage name of sedevacantists. The saddest part is that (you)r points about profanity in original post is right but it is completely ruined by (you)r autistic temper tantrums.

Here's my last (you) to (you). Have a nice day, friend.

>>671760

>you said something to me that I didn’t like

>you must be demon possesed

Using “profanity” is never declared a sin in the Scriptures, but bearing false witness is. Thanks for the second display of hypocrisy

>>671781

>using profanity is never declared a sin in the scriptures

Depends on what you mean by profanity, if you are talking about the definition in ezekiel 22:26

>Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.

Then yes that's a sin because of God ordering us to be holy, that is seperate, in 2 timothy 2:16

>But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.

>>671787

<What would Jesus do?

<He would not use obscene

There's absolutely nothing in the Bible forbidding obscenity, nothing.

>swear words. Thats enough evidence that you shouldnt do it, my man

2 peter 2:16

>But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

I'm sure Jesus would say the words "dumb ass" in quoting 2 peter 2:16 for our edification. When you refer to "swear words" are you talking about taking an oath or forswearing yourself like Jesus mentions not to do in matthew 5:33-37 ?

>Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:

>But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:

<Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.

>Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

>But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

It's called art, last time I checked we aren't muslims that can't even draw a silly sand man.

>>671794

>Depends on what you mean by profanity

I’m talking about “curse words.” Such as f**k, sh*t, hell, damn, etc. basically all of the words that man arbitrarily decided were “bad.”

>>671787

>He would not use obscene swear words.

Based on what, exactly? Who defines an “obscene” word, anyway?

>>671754

Huh? Why was my file deleted???

>>671797

OP is right though now that I think about it relating to pictures as exodus 20:4

>Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:

The "any likeness of anything" part seems to include all pictures and selfies, don't "make unto thee" said graven pictures/"images" or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:.

>>671736

<I have even seen pictures where our LORD JESUS CHRIST is outright blasphemed by presenting Him as some funky meme persona

Actually it would be more expedient to point out that said depictions do not match the description of Jesus' flesh in revelation 1:12-16

>And I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks;

>And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.

>His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

>And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

>And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.

Not one person ever seems to depict Jesus' with "hairs were white like wool, as white as snow;".

>>671794

>>671796

>>671803

Oh, (((you))) are back, I see…

>>671803

I think you missed the whole point. It's art, anyone can draw whatever they want, as long as people don't worship it and claim it to be God Himself it shouldn't really matter. Because when you start to claim that we can't do art of people, that's when you become a second-degree islamist.

>>671800

>I’m talking about “curse words.” Such as f**k, sh*t, hell, damn, etc. basically all of the words that man arbitrarily decided were “bad.”

Well those words can be ==used== badly depending on the context. First let's look at the Bible's usage and definition of cursing in 2 samuel 16:5,7-8

>And when king David came to Bahurim, behold, thence came out a man of the family of the house of Saul, whose name was Shimei, the son of Gera: he came forth, and cursed still as he came.

>And thus said Shimei when he cursed, Come out, come out, thou bloody man, and thou man of Belial:

>The LORD hath returned upon thee all the blood of the house of Saul, in whose stead thou hast reigned; and the LORD hath delivered the kingdom into the hand of Absalom thy son: and, behold, thou art taken in thy mischief, because thou art a bloody man.

This "Shimei" "cursed" david without saying any of those words you mentioned. Also see job 3:1-9

>AFTER this opened Job his mouth, and cursed his day.

>And Job spake, and said,

>Let the day perish wherein I was born, and the night in which it was said, There is a man child conceived.

>Let that day be darkness; let not God regard it from above, neither let the light shine upon it.

>Let darkness and the shadow of death stain it; let a cloud dwell upon it; let the blackness of the day terrify it.

>As for that night, let darkness seize upon it; let it not be joined unto the days of the year, let it not come into the number of the months.

>Lo, let that night be solitary, let no joyful voice come therein.

>Let them curse it that curse the day, who are ready to raise up their mourning.

>Let the stars of the twilight thereof be dark; let it look for light, but have none; neither let it see the dawning of the day:

Here Job wishes evil upon the day he was born saying "Let the day perish wherein I was born". So cursing is to wish evil upon something. Now back to the so called "curse words", you can bless someone using the word "hell". For example, I bless and wish for your soul not to go to hell. You also can curse without using the word "winnie the pooh", such as an example of: I wish for you to rot inside the dirt. That was just an example, I do not truly wish for such a thing.

>>671757

>sedevacantist

>calling others heretics

Seriously though, why don't you just become Orthodox?

>>671816

But you're a heretic though.

>>671819

No, orthodox are the heretics. They left the Church

>>671820

>claims the sede that left the Church

>>671823

sedevacantists are the true catholics that remained in the Church as a remnant, while the vast majority left it by believing the heresies of Vatican II and its antipopes

>>671824

No, you're just a heretic that acts like a muslim when it comes to art. Thanks for your input though.

>>671816

>Bishop of Rome decides to break communion with the Easrern Churches

>somehow it's the Eastern Churches who are the schismatics

1 corinthians 3:4-7

>For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?

>Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?

>I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.

>So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

1 corinthians 1:12-13

>Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

>Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

<I am of ortho

<I am of luther

<I am of pope

Reminder that denominations don't matter and serving Christ is what matters.

>>671841

you just indirectly called the Sacred Heart of Jesus art effeminate for the sake of winning an argument in favor of anime? Do you really want to go to hell?

>>671844

Cover the beard with your finger and tell me he doesn't look like a woman in that picture. I'm not sure how me disliking this one work of art is supposed to send me to hell. Did the art come directly from God? You're entitled to your opinions about Christian art and so am I.

>>671844

That isn't an accurate depiction of Jesus since the hair isn't white in line with what revelation 1:12-16 states. It is decietful.

>>671848

In all seriousness, that doesn't look like a women to me either. Not that it matters because all it is, is a picture.

>>671833

>But if youre referring to the anime drawings of Mary and Jesus then youre just stupid

>uhhh that's not art because I don't like it

Then all of it's evil, there's no in between here.

>>671853

>That isn't an accurate depiction of Jesus since the hair isn't white in line with what revelation 1:12-16 states. It is decietful.

Revelation is full of apocalyptic imagery, it's description of Jesus isn't supposed to be an accurate description of what he looked like on earth. He was only 33 when he died, it would have been odd if he had white hair. Judas wouldn't have had to kiss him to identify him to the Romans, he could've just pointed out "He's the only young guy with completely white hair".

>>671857

< it's description of Jesus isn't supposed to be an accurate description of what he looked like on earth

Are you saying that the book of Revelation of the Bible, the word of God that cannot lie according to titus 1:2, is lieing? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. romans 3:4

<He was only 33 when he died, it would have been odd if he had white hair

First how did you come to the conclusion that God is only 33 years old when he died the second time as of about 2000 years ago since no prophecy of scripture is of a private interpretation according to 1 peter 1:20? Also are you referring to the first testament/death or second testament/death i.e hebrews 9:16-18? Second Jesus is not dead see revelation 1:18

>I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.

Third have you not considered that in the days of Jesus' walking on the earth that white hair was a common thing? And that perhaps the (((modern day fake jews))) in (((babylon/fake israel))) are all liars who lie about what Jesus and the biblical jews actually looked like?

>>671865

Traps are gay and I try to avoid them like the plaugue unless they claim to supposedly be Christians in which case rebuke with leviticus 18:21-23.

>>671877

God is in heaven and not in a graven image upon the earth. 1 john 2:21-23

>I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.

>Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

>Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: [but] he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

>>671884

no true christian can deny that the Shroud of Turin is an image of our Lord Jesus Christ

>>671887

he is no true Christian, he is an infamous hafizposter that pollutes this board with heresies. He was banned several times already, but evades it constantly.

>>671887

>shroud of turin

(((They))) who took physical red blood samples never found the john 19:34-35

>But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.

>And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe.

Jesus came by water and blood 1 john 5:6-8

>This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.

>For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

>And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

And thusly it could not be the same Son of God's red blood and water blood which we should wash ourselves within in revelation 7:14

>And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

Obviously it is not the red blood as then our robes would be scarlet, but rather the water blood. But said (((researchers))) in (((babylon))) found none of the water blood.

>I have also seen memes where the Most Blessed Virgin Mary is presented as an anime character. I have even seen pictures where our LORD JESUS CHRIST is outright blasphemed by presenting Him as some funky meme persona(including on the board banners).

Agree with you on this.

Anime fags should be burned at stake.

My brother was wearing two types of fabric yesterday. I nearly beat him to death.

>>671831

Actually it was the Pope who excommunicated the Patriarch of constantinople, and then he "excommunicated" the Pope.

How could catholics be the schismatics if we were the ones who kicked you out for being retards (not as much as prots).

>>671757

>Im a sedevacantist

Kys prot

>>671907

>>671913

>Kys prot

your pope loves the prots more than catholics. Whos the prot here?

>>671916

>your pope loves the prots more than catholics.

Nice sourceless claim.

Either way you guys deserve love as well.

>>671919

Im the sede. Do I still deserve some?

>>671922

Of course. We must pray for everyone in the world to repent and join the Catholic Church, the only One that saves.

>>671925

You see I pray for those who believe the false doctrines of Vatican II and the apostasies of the antipopes too. God bless you sir

>>671877

That face looks way more masculine than the rosy cheeked, narrow jawed cherub in the pic I posted.

>>671932

Nothing wrong with that image though. And if anyone claims there is something wrong with it, let them be anathema

>>671881

>Are you saying that the book of Revelation of the Bible, the word of God that cannot lie according to titus 1:2, is lieing? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. romans 3:4

No, it's not lying, it's not intended to be taken literally. Look up 'apocalyptic literature' online.

>First how did you come to the conclusion that God is only 33 years old when he died the second time as of about 2000 years ago since no prophecy of scripture is of a private interpretation according to 1 peter 1:20? Also are you referring to the first testament/death or second testament/death i.e hebrews 9:16-18? Second Jesus is not dead see revelation 1:18

Died a second time? What do you mean? Jesus only died once. His physical body was 33 years old when he dies, of course he pre-existed as a spirit before that.

>Third have you not considered that in the days of Jesus' walking on the earth that white hair was a common thing? And that perhaps the (((modern day fake jews))) in (((babylon/fake israel))) are all liars who lie about what Jesus and the biblical jews actually looked like?

Seems unlikely. There would be some mention in the historical record about people's hair colors changing so dramatically. Hair going gray and then white has always been associated with aging.

"The glory of young men is their strength, And the honor of old men is their gray hair"

-Proverbs 20:29

>>671934

>Nothing wrong with that image though. And if anyone claims there is something wrong with it, let them be anathema

Not really your place to declare people anathema is it? What makes this one work of art so special that anyone who dislikes it is damned?

>>671928

>>671928

>false doctrines of Vatican II

Lol what? Have you actually read the documents?

I agree the language they use is a softer one unfortunately but they still reaffirm the bimillenar dogmas of the Church.

And before you sperg out with muh satanic mass, keep in mind that liturgical changes have no dogmatic value.

You guys are literally prots who can't obey authority and interpretate the stuff by themselves. Sure some popes post Vatican II were not very good, but bad popes existed in every single century (perhaps except in the 19th century and in the first 4 or 5 of course).

Everytime there's a council there's always butthurt retards who schism from the church.

Who to blame then? I blame the (((winds of change))) and the spirit of Vatican II, not the council in itself (the council is only shit in liturgical and disciplinary stuff not dogmas).

It is true the Church is infected with modernists that it winnie the pooh hurts and the excommunications aren't being applied for most cases.

But the church will never fall. Saying the Catholic Church isn't right anymore is just being like Luther who too believed is church was right.

I'm who should I belive?

The Catholic Church with 2000 years of unbroken succession or some random dudes who say some random council is false? It happened so many winnie the pooh times. With nestorians, old catholics etc just to name a few.

Why should I belive in you and your friends? Might as well become a Baptist.

>>671945

http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html

>>671945

>The Church, therefore, exhorts her sons, that through dialogue and collaboration with the followers of other religions, carried out with prudence and love and in witness to the Christian faith and life, they recognize, preserve and promote the good things, spiritual and moral, as well as the socio-cultural values found among these men.

So in your opinion a Christian shouldn't talk with people of other religions and befriend them in order to put them in the right path? Hello Judaism.

>The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,(5) who has spoken to men; they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, His virgin Mother; at times they even call on her with devotion. In addition, they await the day of judgment when God will render their deserts to all those who have been raised up from the dead. Finally, they value the moral life and worship God especially through prayer, almsgiving and fasting.

Conveniently lefts out the part where it says that people who don't aren't Catholic are going to hell just like the people who refused to listen to Peter and Paul.

>>671947

Also nostra aetatis still reaffirms the Church is the Truth. Don't know what's your problem. Because it doesn't say plainly that tiggers who aren't Catholic are going to hell and their religion is fake and gay? Although this is true I bet you would convince lots of them to become catholics.

Did Paul go full autistic when talking with the pagans in Athens?

Acts 17:16

Now whilst Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was stirred within him, seeing the city wholly given to idolatry.

Of course he was mad and hated paganism but it didn't make him to behave like an autist

Acts 17:22-28

But Paul, standing in the midst of the Areopagus, said: Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things you are too superstitious. For passing by and seeing your idols, I found an altar also, on which was written: To the Unknown God. What therefore you worship without knowing it, that I preach to you: God, who made the world and all things therein, he being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands. Neither is he served with men's hands, as though he needed any thing: seeing it is he who giveth to all life and breath and all things: And hath made of one, all mankind, to dwell upon the whole face of the earth, determining appointed times and the limits of their habitation. That they should seek God, if haply they may feel after him or find him, although he be not far from every one of us. For in him we live and move and are: as some also of your own poets said: For we are also his offspring.

In my opinion the problem with you guys is lack of humility.

You close yourselves in your closed cult in the name of "tradition" instead of going out and to do charity to your neighbours for exemples where are sedes doing missionary work? Or helping people in shitty countries and teaching them the faith? Or support men and women who sin, who got pregnant before marriga, who came from prostitution rings etc. Why aren't you guys saving those souls or trying to like a regular Catholic?

Faith and works are needed, not autistic ramblings about a council that didn't change any dogma.

>>671881

>using echos while explicitly referring to the Jews

This thread is complete garbage and cancerous retardation. I’m done with this abomination.

[-]

>>671777

>I don't feel like staying

See you tomorrow, sedememer

>>671739

then anderson shouldn't exist