[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / dcaco / had / htg / hwndu / leftpol / sw / tttt / vg ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: ec455b8fe3d4e76⋯.jpg (7.44 KB, 236x214, 118:107, download (5).jpg)

12a051 No.658884

Something that has been bothering me for a while is that while Aristotle has been credited for brushing up to the sacred mysteries before they were revealed to us, I've never seen anything about Zoroaster. He was obviously wrong about a great many things (literally all but one), but one thing that shocked me was the fact that he had made prophecy that the Savior of the world would be born of a virgin. It especially makes me take a doube take when you realize that Zoroastrian priests are called Magi… And the Magi came to Our Lord as an infant and recognized Him as the Messiah.

Is this just a coincidence that I'm reading into?

c2d917 No.658891

Orthodox tradition identifies the Magi as Zoroastrians.


9b5fd8 No.658899

Zoroaster is interesting also because his revelations come from angels, not from God Himself, which is a practise which is attested in Scripture, as he was coming out of a river (a crude form of baptism?) and he also preached about the The End of Time and the Judgment.

I don't think it is a coincidence that "Magi" visited the Lord. Knowing they believed in the virgin bith, it would make sense that these would be some of the first to know of the Incarnation, as though the Lord was saying to them "You see, my word has been truly fulfilled".

Christian-Zoroastrian history is really interesting though, especially since Christendom fought its first holy war against them to recover the stolen True Cross.


1f3def No.658937

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. You couldn't make a religion or culture or worldview out of nothing but pure lies. It would fall apart. All religions contain some truth. God has likely given private revelation to some people besides the tradition recorded in the Bible, but they don't have the full picture. (Neither do Christians yet, as there are many mysteries.) And many memories of such revelations became corrupted or twisted in the passage of time. No, truth is not relative. No, not all religions are equal. Most of paganism is the work of demons and charlatans and ignorance. Then there's people using their God-given reason and working with what little information they have and doing their honest best and arriving at some modicum of truth. These discoveries are part of God's plan for human history. We can appreciate the good and recognize the bad in all schools of thought by light of divine revelation.


86084e No.658941

Of course they weren't Christians and therefore not prophets. But that doesn't mean that they wouldn't be able to undestand some face of the Logos. Because the Logos makes as much sense as 1+1=2, it is possible to understand SOME (keyword) of it through human intellect.

Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics did scratch the basis for absolute morality. It just conforms to natural law, which is set by God. And by that, it conforms to God's Will to some extent.

A lot of philosophers could have been saved in the harrowing of hell, but I think that's a stretch we shouldn't rely on.

We must be careful to not mechanize God, very difficult in the current era, and to think since they didn't tick the Christian box, they are 100% wrong in their philosophy.

God is not an autist and neither should you be one.


12a051 No.658942

>>658941

>Of course they weren't Christians and therefore not prophets

Yeah I know that. But there were prophets among the gentiles as well - Job, Baalam, etc.


c53835 No.658966

Zoroastrian scripture wasn't written down until the 3rd century A.D. and the oldest copy of it is from the 14th century, so it's likely a lot of Zoroastrianism had already been influenced by Christianity, or even just the book of Isaiah, by the time the Avestas were written.


9b5fd8 No.658967

>>658966

Don't forget that some Hebrew teachers and even Prophets like Daniel would have had encounters with them, so it's likely that they could have been given special knowledge of Revelation through these contacts.


de54db No.659012

File: 04378b49067efc7⋯.jpg (113.71 KB, 441x623, 63:89, Jeremiah-The-Bible-Collect….jpg)

>>658884

OP, I believe your confusion stems from the word prophet. A prophet is not one who simply predicts the future. There can be a false prophet and yet still correctly predict a future event, a false prophet can even perform signs and wonders (e.g. those magicians that turned rods into snakes in front of Moses). The Book of Revelation talks about a false prophet who does signs and wonders that will accompany the Son of Perdition in the Last Days. So what exactly is a prophet? What makes a true prophet? Read the Bible and think about it.


8e526f No.659017

>>658966

Actually most of Zoroastrian scripture was written down before the Roman Republic even existed. Thing is, Alexander the Great burned down the city of Persepolis, and made sure to destroy every copy of the Avestas he could get his hands on.


a57e40 No.659152

File: 60c17a41680ce3f⋯.gif (966.07 KB, 500x579, 500:579, 1528527765344.gif)

>>659017

>Actually most of Zoroastrian scripture was written down before the Roman Republic even existed. Thing is, Alexander the Great burned down the city of Persepolis, and made sure to destroy every copy of the Avestas he could get his hands on.

Do you have any evidence of this? Because this sounds awfully similar to the Baptists hidden texts and practitioners surviving ebil catholics. Or the Gnostics and their hidden knowledge…. basically it sounds like revisionist history.


15378a No.659163

The magi were almost certainly Zoroastrians. My theory is that they must have split from the OT Jews and devolved their religion from there.


22bdf3 No.659164

File: 3ce18b0e432bae2⋯.jpg (74.9 KB, 564x960, 47:80, King James The Best.jpg)


7ec8e6 No.659169

>>659152

Claiming that an organized religion that used a sacred language to write their works down that in the second oldest Indo-European language in the world only started writing things down almost two thousand years after their organized religion began is revisionism. They had the stuff written down but never compiled it into something like the bible until we did it first.


ffa2bb No.659177

File: b7ebccf6b33dd57⋯.png (318.33 KB, 680x673, 680:673, fb46866bf07ac3f8f2a80e2a1a….png)


8bcca2 No.659185

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


7adf89 No.659188

>>659169

I'm not claiming that they didn't have some of their text written down, but the way the poster phrased it made it seem that they had a completed text that was destroyed.


22bdf3 No.659199

File: 3af075d5f8d8cd4⋯.jpg (109.66 KB, 620x388, 155:97, Bunyan_2381396b.jpg)




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / dcaco / had / htg / hwndu / leftpol / sw / tttt / vg ]