[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / bestemma / fast / htg / leftpol / polmeta / rule34 / sw ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 807243cd70f3839⋯.jpg (199.63 KB, 469x600, 469:600, 807243cd70f3839fb481f079b0….jpg)

6a3f4d No.653663

I am conflicted about the Old Testament. I began to feel this way after reading an essay by Julius Evola where he talks about Antisemitism and Judaism in antiquity. He says that the Jews of the Old Testament were actually bad.

In Esther 3:8 Haman says

>There is a certain people scattered abroad and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of thy kingdom; and their laws are diverse from all people; neither keep they the king's laws: therefore it is not for the king's profit to suffer them.

This is something we see of the Jews today. They spread withing the host nation and act differently to the rest of the nation. It seems to me God's people were like this from the beginning and God was aiding them until the New Testament. So the questions I'd like to ask are the Jews of the Old Testament the same Jews of today? And are The Jews of the Old Testament really the bad guys? I have heard the Khazar theory but this has me doubting it a little. Go ez on me. I'm just a newfag trying to learn what's right and what isn't.

Pic kinda related.

d5ca1b No.653664

File: e2c3951cb0a34ef⋯.webm (8.26 MB, 640x360, 16:9, The Talmud on JC.webm)

>>653663

>are the Jews of the Old Testament the same Jews of today?

(((Judaism))) is based on the T*lmud and (((modern Jews))) are not Israelites, neither in blood nor in tradition.


225ba3 No.653667

>>653663

Read the OT again, specifically Ezekiel and Jeremiah. God definitely wasn't on (((their))) side.


d4619b No.653671

The (((Old Testament))) has absolutely nothing to do with Christianity.


d5ca1b No.653676

>>653671

>|

>|>

>|3

>|


6a3f4d No.653678

>>653664

I understand perfectly that the Talmud is Anti Jesus. I accept it wholeheartedly. But I am asking why were the Jews of the OT acting like the Jews we know of today. Were they the bad guys and did God abandon them because of that?

>>653667

Thank you for a clear and concise answer. Will definitely do.

>>653671

I dunno about that one. I'm pretty sure you have to believe in the entire Bible to be a Christian.


6f3bab No.653692

>>653678

>But I am asking why were the Jews of the OT acting like the Jews we know of today.

Because they have always been an isolationist group, they have always done stupid shit(which is why the OT is basically "stop worshiping other gods, and doing other blasphemous and evil crap that pisses Me offf" every 2 pages), and they exist in cultural continuity with that age.


ae78af No.653699

>>653663

Couple things here. First things first, to somewhat answer the scripture you mentioned, you should keep in mind what it says a couple verses before where it explained that Haman did these things because he had scorn toward Mordecai. That personal antipathy being the reason, he might not be a completely reliable witness. Just keep that in mind as I continue.

Haman certainly had a point that the Jews, which came from the original kingdom of Judah, at the time did not always observe the laws of the land. We see a similar scenario play out in Daniel chapter 6, where the presidents and princes cause the king of Persia to pass a law designed so that Daniel can't obey it. Notice what it says right before they hatch the plot:

>Then the presidents and princes sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the kingdom; but they could find none occasion nor fault; forasmuch as he was faithful, neither was there any error or fault found in him.

>Then said these men, We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel, except we find it against him concerning the law of his God.

So then we see that at this time, Daniel for one was not found to be breaking any current laws. But the point is they were still able to craft a law to intentionally conflict with his God's higher law, and thus still cause him to be thrown into the lion's den. Therefore we can see that Haman speaks some level of truth, but, at least according to the narration of the Old Testament, it isn't seemingly the problem that he makes it out to be.

We can also see that the doctrine of submitting the government is consistent in the NT, spelled out in Romans 13, also with the story of Jesus telling the Herodians and Pharisees to render to caesar the things that are caesar's and to God the things that are God's. The opposite is condemned, see for instance 2 Peter 2.

>But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord. But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption; And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

So then if we assume the Bible is consistent in showing the correct doctrine, then it is clear that this has always been the standard God wanted people to follow. Now the standard is one thing, but whether the anyone actually kept it is the question. The answer is that the vast majority of Jews never kept this standard. In fact large sections of the Old Testament involve God rebuking and indicating his wrath at what the Jew's are doing at all various times and how he will bring enemies to swing down the sword on them for these things. And the ultimate rebuke is that they are finally replaced as the people of God after they full well reject and crucify God's Son, Jesus Christ. The people of God switches to the elect from then on, meanwhile certain sects of Pharisees set up opposition to all these ideas, making themselves the polar opposite to the truth. In Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 they are identified with a name, the synagogue of Satan, them which say they are Jews and are not, for even that is a lie. And even if they were, it wouldn't help them. So they are this kind of very strange bizarro-cult that manages to be wrong on every level simultaneously, and it confuses people to no end, to this very day. I would thus advise you not to even spent time listening to anything they have to say, once you've identified one. They will be wrong on so many levels, you will likely end up misled about something without even realizing it, unless you simply don't let it affect you at all. So I would advise against listening to them, once you've identified what they are. And you know very well how to find them, I'm sure. That's how you got here.


b7eef8 No.653720

>>653663

Both the good Israelities and the bad Jews of today acted differently than the people of other nations. The same can be said of Christian minorities. Jews aren't bad because they're different than the majority, they're bad because they hate Christ. Pagans like Evola belong in the same category as the Jews.

>>653664

This. Modern Jews are crypto-Satanists. Most unknowingly.

>>653667

You shouldn't be conflating the Israelites with the Jews of today. The Israelites had a mixed history. God was on their side when they did good and against them when they did evil. The murder of Christ was what finally ended their special relationship with God (and the Old Covenant) for good.

>>653671

Yeah I suppose all those references to the Old Testament in the New Testament, and the importance of the Old Testament in all Christian denominations, is annulled by this meme post of yours.


96a738 No.653748

>>653671

>Dude I'ma build a house with no foundation




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / bestemma / fast / htg / leftpol / polmeta / rule34 / sw ]