f6cf8e No.640253
I just read the entire Bible through, Genesis to Revelation. The version was KJV. This was my first time reading through the Bible. I don't go to church though. What now?
d0e4ab No.640254
4c3ba1 No.640256
>I don't go to church though. What now?
Go to Church brother
Well what did you think of it?
7a133c No.640258
Go to your nearest Catholic church.
7cbbef No.640260
Now you start intensely studying specific books.
512b38 No.640265
>>640253
Go read the Deuterocannon.
e5b577 No.640268
e5b577 No.640269
ffa327 No.640317
>>640253
It's one thing to read the Bible, but do you put any of what Jesus preached into practice?
890451 No.640354
>>640253
>I red the Bible, now what?
Heed Jesus' command and baptize all nations in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Preach the good news (Gospel) to everyone.
But most importantly:
Love God & Love your neighbors
also, begome 🅱aptist
f6cf8e No.640364
>>640258
>>640354
>>640329
>>640345
>>640269
Wait, which sect do I know is right though?
42e7cf No.640367
>>640364
>wad shuld i begome?! XXXDDDD
MAYMAYS
led membs deside, pig d onse whos memsyou lige
LARP hear undill u ged bord, dond nead 2 ethan hav faif
890451 No.640381
>>640364
Research all of them, and pray to God that he gives you the right path into your journey, than sleep on it. Also, read the Book of John again, its popularly known for being the evangelizing book.
spoiler alert
Mormons are the wrong answer
as well as any Church that compromises the scriptures
>Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law.
>Psalms 119:18
>10 With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander from thy commandments.
>11 Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.
>Psalms 119:10-11
7a133c No.640392
>>640364
>which sect do I know is right though?
Brah. Did you not read the Gospel of Matthew?
>And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Jesus founded a church. There are literally only two possible contenders to be that church, and only one is directly connected to Peter. You know the already know which sect is right.
947f43 No.640410
>>640392
Bruh, did you even read Nostra Aetate? It's full of heresy. The gates of hell sure did prevail agianst the Vatican, but not Jesus' people.
82d20f No.640425
>>640410
"Jesus' people" how incredibly open you are d&c shill, let me guess ur a most meme monastery cultist?
890451 No.640598
>>640425
Yet, you still haven't even looked at Nostra Aetate. Go back to Rome, papist. Im sure one of the many "celibate" sodomite clergymen would love to "educate" you.
8d59ac No.640599
>>640598
Nostra Aetate states the obvious; that not all Jews killed Christ, nor could all Jews be responsible for deicide.
And it's true, otherwise, Christ's 11 apostles' (minus Judas) were responsible for His death.
It defined the anti-Christian Judaists on theological terms, not racial.
e989e6 No.640604
>>640253
Get a Douay-Rheims and try to find a traditional Catholic Church.
890451 No.640605
>>640599
It also says they don't have to convert in order to be saved. That God still holds them as their "chosen people" even though (((they))) broke every covenant with God and were so blinded by their pride that they killed Jesus.
Vat 2 also goes agianst Jesus' command to
>Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost
>Matthew 28:19
How are catholics supposed to do that if their are taught heretical things like Nostra Aetate? The jews aren't God's chosen people, christians are.
>But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
>Matthew 10:33
This is what jews, muslims, Buddhists, and ath*ists do on a daily, yet they are just as right as Christianity? They too will see The Father in heaven? Or their (((father))) in hell?
8d59ac No.640608
>>640605
>It also says they don't have to convert in order to be saved
Where does it say this, you viper?
>The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. Indeed, she proclaims, and ever must proclaim Christ "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), in whom men may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself.(4)
This is the closest thing I could find that mirrors what you said, and it merely confirms that it recognizes any truth that conforms with that of Christ's teaching, but that IT ONLY HAS THAT OBJECTIVE TRUTH THROUGH CHRIST'S TEACHING.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
Here is the document; anyone who has eyes can read it and see you lie.
e989e6 No.640609
>>640605
citation needed. i have never read ANYWHERE in the bible that says Jews don't need to convert.
ef9ca7 No.640613
go to catholic church and get baptised
c6c7cb No.640614
>>640608
>>640609
Not him, but I did see somewhere in the Catechism mention of jews as God's chosen people and how we need to preserve judaism. It really made me start to doubt Vatican 2.
e989e6 No.640616
>>640614
i would think it probably said something along the lines of "We shouldn't try to convert Jews with the use of violence or force", which is something the Church would say about anybody. Not defending VCII, but i don't think it was THAT cucked when they wrote the CCC.
890451 No.640618
>>640608
> Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures. All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ.
>implying it isn't nesscary to evangelize them
http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651028_nostra-aetate_en.html
>Then answered all the (((people))), and said, His blood be on (((us)), and on (((our children.)))
>Matthew 27:25
890451 No.640619
>>640609
What part of "Baptise all Nations" didn't you understand? The 'all' part?
c56d58 No.640620
>>640253
Go to any Church but the Roman Catholic one. Orthodox if you can manage.
e989e6 No.640624
>>640619
i… that's exactly my point. the Jews NEED to convert, but most of them can't because God has blinded them until all the Gentiles that are gonna convert do. doesn't mean some of them don't.
c6c7cb No.640629
>>640616
Unfortunately, it was THAT cucked. Is there a pre Vatican 2 Catechism or did the church use something else?
e989e6 No.640634
>>640629
in the US there was the Baltimore Catechism, although technically the official one was the Roman Catechism from the Council of Trent. Honestly, the best one i've heard of is "This is the Faith" by Rev. Canon Francis Ripley.
890451 No.640635
>>640629
The SSPX sect is a great place to look, but if you insist on sticking with being in communion with Rome, Tridentine Latin Mass is for you…
or, you know, you could just
Begome Baptist
e989e6 No.640636
>>640635
This Baptist meme needs to stop unless you're talking Calvinist Primitive Baptist. I can say that as a Catholic.
d00181 No.640640
>>640636
>Baptist meme
>believing in Jesus is a meme
890451 No.640644
>>640636
>be Catholic
>think Calvin was right
Tigga wat?
4f261d No.640647
>Open some online room
>On some of the numerous group viewing programs
>Have it play a book of the bible
Does this count as going to church?
92e876 No.640671
>>640605
>It also says they don't have to convert in order to be saved. That God still holds them as their "chosen people" even though (((they))) broke every covenant with God and were so blinded by their pride that they killed Jesus.
No, Vatican II never said that infidels, heretics or schismatics are saved. Jews are still the "chosen people" as an entire race. All that means is that God has set them aside for a special purpose, not that they are saved. This is what Paul teaches in Romans.
>For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes. For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
890451 No.640703
>>640671
>Jews are still God's chosen people
Re-read Jerimiah and Ezekiel, because you are surely mistaken.
Also:
>3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,
>implying the Islamic moon demon = God the Father
>Since the spiritual patrimony common to Christians and Jews is thus so great, this sacred synod wants to foster and recommend that mutual understanding and respect which is the fruit, above all, of biblical and theological studies as well as of fraternal dialogues.
>ignoring John 2:23, Matthew 10:33, 1Corinthians 15:33, and Proverbs 13:20
ed7c68 No.640714
8d59ac No.640825
>>640618
>not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures.
and how do equate this with "the Jews have a valid covenant t. gathlig church xD", liar?
8d59ac No.640829
>>640703
over and over and over, all you people do is lie! are we reading the same document?
nostra aetate re-affirms that the true Church has a mission to convert Jews; but, also that we should respect the Jews' right to exist (by not winnie the pooh kill them or trying to destroy their temples or etc)
we're not IFB's where we can have some looney toon as pastor, the Church defines Christian behavior. quit lying, viper.
890451 No.640849
>>640829
Keep thinking what you want. If you want to put the word of the elders over the word of God, fine. Dont come crying to me when the mudslimes and jews betray you for your ignorance, reprobate.
8d59ac No.640854
>>640849
What in the world are you even talking about? I've thrown every lie you've said in this thread straight back at you. Everything you accused Nostra Aetate of saying IS NOT IN THERE.
8a77e0 No.640855
>>640253
How long did it take?
8a77e0 No.640858
>>640703
Moon demon thing is a meme. Christian Arabs still call God Allah.
890451 No.640861
>>640858
Wow, just wow.
APOSTOLICS YES!
50ff7f No.640873
>>640861
>"Allah" means "curse" in Hebrew
You can just use Google translation to check that it's wrong, but whatever
50ff7f No.640875
>>640861
>Would God forbid poetry
>Their book is filled with poetry
Do you get information from Facebook or something?
Also it's a fact that Arab Christians use that term as God, even before Islam.
ffa327 No.640878
>>640858
>>640873
>>640875
I get that Mormons claim to also believe in God and Jesus Christ, even though we all know they're referring to completely different definitions which is probably what Arab Muslims and Arab Christians have as well. However, as a Christian, your duty should be to love your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ instead of sowing confusion and discord like that. I hope you understand why he was upset >>640861 and I do completely agree with everything he posted, the Son of Perdition will most likely be a Muslim.
50ff7f No.640880
>>640878
Arab Christians as well? What?
4feb52 No.640884
>>640858
>>640861
He right tho. The arabic word for god whether you're talking about God of Abraham, Ahura Mazda, or even freaking Zeus, is "allah". And having lived among muslims, I'm just gonna say it now, some muslims act like better christians than some christians. And I've confirmed it with my Pastor, the lack of actual genuine charity among people in the Church can be appalling at times. Having heard Muslim Imams, Jewish Rabbis, and Christian pastors/priests, they're not far from each other. Maybe there's a connection. What a head scratcher.
890451 No.640886
>>640875
>>640873
>3. The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth,
>implying the Islamic moon demon = God the Father
You papists aren't getting it. I have no quarrels with arab christians, I have issues with your tolerance of Islam and their moon demon!
Stop listening to the catholic elders and think for yourselves!
Also:
אלה , alah (“curse” in Hebrew) and , Allah (“God” in Arabic) are pronounced the same
aece73 No.640898
>>640886
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%94
Literally nothing says about "curse"
Stop believing Facebook maymays
890451 No.641144
92061b No.641172
>>640354
>1 Timothy 3:The saying is sure: If any one aspires to the office of bishop, he desires a noble task…
>Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher, no drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, and no lover of money. He must manage his own household well, keeping his children submissive and respectful in every way; for if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how can he care for God’s church? He must not be a recent convert, or he may be puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil
Same in the KJV.
>1 Timothy 3:6 Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
Who is this child preacher, and who recommended that he should do this?
d68ed5 No.641174
>>640253
1.Read it again and go to church
2.Get Baptised
6c1338 No.641175
I'm Catholic. Why is DRB better than, let's say, NASB or KJV?
7a133c No.641313
>>641175
Why DRA is better than KJV and NASB
Luke 1:28 DRA
>And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
Luke 1:28 KJV
<And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
Luke 1:28 NASB
<And coming in, he said to her, “Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you.”
There are many things wrong with both the KJV and the NASB. This is but one demonstrative example.
37c4e1 No.641341
>>641313
>wrong with
What is there wrong with them? The DRV sounds more elagent, but it doesn't mean the KJV is wrong/untruthful nor the NASB based off that one verse. Don't even get me started on how the NASB would make God a liar titus 1:2 if it were true, which it is not i.e mark 1:2 and malachi 3:1. Maybe I should go check the DRV…..
>>641172
>novice
novice =/= young. It means not very experienced, novice. You could be a 119 year old man just coming to Christ, that man would be a novice.
03b13f No.641391
>>641313
>accurately translating the Greek is bad
512b38 No.641487
>>641391
Well considering that the original Greek word is the feminine perfect participle of the word "charis" which the KJV and NASB actually translate as grace in multiple instances, I have to side with the Catholics on this one. At least in their assertion that it should include the word "grace." Do keep in mind that the KJV and the NASB are protestant bibles and the Catholic's veneration of Mary was an enormous point of contention for them. Regardless of your stance on whether or not she should be venerated, they were definitely being intentionally exclusive with how that scripture was translated.
03b13f No.641493
>>641487
The word grace means unmerited favor, it is not an inaccurate translation
512b38 No.641498
>>641493
Then why not use the word grace as they did every other time it is directly applied to a person in the same case and tense? I'm not even trying to defend the Douay-Rheims version over the other two. All three have problems, and I'd even go as far to say that every English translation of the Bible has problems.