>>640029
So you would be fine with a good, Christian state taxing people to support part of the military to go and bomb several poor Nigerian farmers' lands because Islamic murderers reside there, and no compensation will be made unless a mistake happened? Would at least threaten American businesses to not do any business with or in Nigeria until that state repents and reforms to fight Islam? You're now fine escalating what was originally a mere clandestine spec-ops into a more thorough operation? If yes, then you invalidated your silly principle, which isn't Biblical anyway. If no, then why are you here if you don't want anyone but a corrupt Nigerian state that has sympathies at the moment with the Islamists try to help our brothers and sisters.
Just to be clear: I'm perfectly fine with a Christian state using power, if it possess it, to protect Christians abroad, if possible. That's all I'm going to say on the matter since I'm not going to devolve this thread further into an authoritarian vs. libertarian fight.
To keep this on topic, has anyone heard any news about Trump dealing with persecution, outside the recent criticism of Turkey for the trial of the American pastor?