/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>637357

Same. Full nutrients, literally Heavenly taste. I think all other food would be ruined for me after one bite of that pre-cursor to the Eucharist.

>>637360

Who knows; if we all get hounded underground by the forces of the anti-christ maybe God will provide it for His people again.

>>637357

FEED ME TIL I WANT NO MORE

[-]

>>637364

>maybe God will provide it for His people again

Jesus is our manna doe.

I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.”

>>637357

I am the true bread from heaven. Whoever eats my flesh has life eternal.

You taste real manna every sunday

>>637439

[+]

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the Hebrews get tired of it? Not saying it wouldn't be great, just a little insight into their fickleness

>>637357

Is it just me, or does anybody find it amazing that the Israelites lived off this stuff for 40 years in the barren wilderness and experienced the plagues God unleashed upon Egypt, the parting of the Red Sea, and they still disobeyed God and got Him to a point where He almost exterminated them?

>>637357

A Navajo Christian Priest once blessed some water for a relative of mine that he left at my house and forgot all about. When I was having a hard time and sick I saw the Holy Water sitting on the shelf, so I figured I'd just pour it all over my head and maybe feel better. It started burning the winnie the pooh out of my face, scalp, eyes, and skin to the point where I had to wash my head off with the hose. However…I did spend a night with a self-professed "satanist" chick who was into blood play during sex. Freakiest coincidence ever.

Was it just bad water that had some weird chemicals in it or…was it because that chick smeared her blood all over myself and her after cutting herself while wearing an actual pentagram necklace? Weird eh?

>>637697

>implying you wouldn't be just as wretched a sinner as they in that situation

>>637697

It never happened.

>>637774

Biblical revisionists need to go and stay go.

>>637778

I'm not a Biblical revisionist, I'm a Christian, I simply have extreme doubts about that whole episode in the Bible. It doesn't bother my faith though.

>>637780

>I'm not a biblical revisionist!

<revises bible

Yeah you should go

>>637833

Go imbibe some lethal poison and survive then, literalist.

Don't be a Judaizer.

Christ is our heavenly manna.

>>637835

exodus 17:1-2

>AND all the congregation of the children of Israel journeyed from the wilderness of Sin, after their journeys, according to the commandment of the LORD,and pitched in Rephidim: and there was no water for the people to drink.

>Wherefore the people did chide with Moses, and said, Give us water that we may drink. And Moses said unto them, Why chide ye with me? wherefore do ye tempt the LORD?

Matthew 4:5-7

>Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,

>And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

>Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

<why not test/tempt God and intentionally drink the posion anon

>Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

>>637840

>I think the bible is a fact and revisionists must go

<Drink poison you will be safe

>N-no that's tempting god lol I'm good I do't wanna tempt anyone here lol lol llolllololllhahaha

<you can tempt the true records of the words of an almighty god when it's clearly written that you will be safe not even perhaps safe but 100% safe

>>637843

<you can tempt the true records of the words of Jesus when it's clearly written that you will be safe not even perhaps safe but 100% safe if you just jump off that cliff

<jump off the cliff and temp God goy

>>637844

I'm not a bible literalist, stop deflecting and start chugging.

Another potentially good thread ruined by autistic bickering.

>>637853

>admits he is a revisionist and would try to tempt Jesus to jump off the cliff if he had the chance

matthew 4:10

>Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

>>637854

<thread ruined

>by talking about the Bible

Really makes you think. Also this >>637466

>>637780

>I'm not a Biblical revisionist, I'm a Christian

You can call yourself whatever you want and slap on that cute little "Christian" flair you have on the r/Christianity subreddit, but it doesn't mean you are saved. Only God knows your heart. Plenty of pastors end up in Hell for blaspheming against the Holy Spirit.

>>637833

>>637885

How am I revising the Bible? I'm not taking books out I don't like, I simply doubt the happening of the events. It's on the level of not believing the Earth was made in 6 days. How is it blaspheming the Holy Spirit? Explain it to me, and I'll seek repentance for my sins.

>>637853

>(USER WAS WARNED FOR RULE 2: ENCOURAGING ENDANGERMENT OF PERSON)

There is no danger, you dumb faggot.

If you are baptized and believe that the bible is the true word of god then you are 100% safe from otherwise lethal poison.

Thus are the recorded words of the lord god creator.

The only people not safe are people who don't think the bible is literally true, like me.

But to call someone a revisionist, which implies the belief that the bible is right and the true word of god, and then refusing to actually believe it in the next breath is winnie the pooh retarded.

Gas yourselves, the lot of you dishonest wretches.

If you believe the bible to be literally true then you do not tempt god by drinking poison because you are GUARANTEED to be safe from them, provided you meet the requirements.

You fork tongued, turncoating bastards.

The gall to even warn me about this instead of saying: You know, I shouldn't have lambasted the revisionists. I wouldn't drink this shit because I don't believe it's the truth or else I would obviously be doing it.

But no, you winnie the poohs have to go shuck and jive and spew your beloved false witness intead of manning up like that.

Into the pit, you dishonest, fraudulent wretches.

>>637955

>I could be wrong because nobody but God was there when He laid the foundations of this world

Wrong indeed

proverbs 8:15-16,23-30

>By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.

>By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.

>I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.

>When there were no depths, I was brought forth; when there were no fountains abounding with water.

>Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth:

>While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.

>When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:

>When he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the fountains of the deep:

>When he gave to the sea his decree, that the waters should not pass his commandment: when he appointed the foundations of the earth:

>Then I was by him, as one brought up with him: and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always before him;

>>638009

>The only people not safe are people who don't think the bible is literally true, like me.

I also believe the Bible to be literally true in the context of itself, but that doesn't change God literally said not to tempt/test Him in matthew 4.

>If you believe the bible to be literally true then you do not tempt god by drinking poison because you are GUARANTEED to be safe from them, provided you meet the requirements.

Anything not of faith is sin romans 14:23. Do you think it is faithful to test/tempt God even when God said not to?

>>638084

>so it is foolish for you and me to be so presumptuous that we know everything.

Indeed, that's why christians are supposed to discern as said in hebrews 4:12 and 1 corinthians 2:10-14 ish. The knowledge of good and evil and the fruit thereof is forbidden to us in genesis 2-3. Hence why knowing is evil but discernment is enouraged in herbrews 5:13-14 as it implies we consult God first.

>The Bible is mean to be taken literally, and the Bible is the Truth.

Indeed, I think you are confusing me for another poster. Remember to check the ID fields as they show who is who in posting. Also re-read proverbs 8:15-16

>By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.

>By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.

Who is King of kings and Lord of Lords? Who is the Word in John 1? Why was that Word with God in the beginning in john 1? Now read proverbs 8 again with all of that in mind.

>I should have rephrased my original reply, what I meant was to repeat the Book of Job where the LORD declares that nobody was there when He laid the foundations of the world

Where in Job does it state this? Show me the chapter and verse, or you are decieved, do lie, and or both.

>>638009

>plebbit spacing

>cancer post

Lurk moar.

>>638121

>Lord of Lords

Should be

>Lord of lords

>>638009

GG, plebbit autist

>>638273

I right.

>>638274

>Breaking rule 2

>In the right

No.

>>638272

The long ending of Mark is possibly a later addition to the Gospel and not inspired. If we do assume it is inspired, there is no reason that we should assume that this ability to survive poisons was a universal ability, but rather a particular miracle associated with the Apostles. The Apostles were definitely unique, and were given gifts which the average Christian does not have.

>>638279

>how can you be right if you got banned for it

How can Christianity be right if Romans threw them to the lions?

Into the pit you go. All of you.

>>638744

>he thinks I was joking that you hypocrites will go into the pit every time.

>>638777

The pit, "tartaroo", is solely reserved for fallen angels. It's not the same place as Gehenna. Read your bible, silly.

>>638810

>None will go into the pit.

>Until that happens, you got into the pit.

>No exceptions. Not a single one.

Imagine being this incoherent.

>>637946

>I simply doubt the happening of the events.

Why do you doubt that these events happened? Is it easier to believe that a man was raised from the dead when compared to the Earth being made in six days or the manna that Jews ate in the Wilderness? You are selecting the miracles that you want to believe.

Luke 16:30-31

But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’