[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / arepa / boers / cafechan / kc / leftpol / tacos / vg / zenpol ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: b0d23792f2a3378⋯.jpeg (25.39 KB, 300x400, 3:4, th (14).jpeg)

149ebf No.632884

Is that so?

d7c2e6 No.632949

why do you need an introduction to NT anyway?


0f960a No.632965

File: fe99a8c9504cb0b⋯.jpg (59.31 KB, 750x598, 375:299, 27751842_599554127065025_7….jpg)

It was the main book on my reading list for the new testament as part of my theology degree. It's great but very detailed so don't be discouraged if it take's you a while to get through as it's over 800 pages.

Pic unrelated.


149ebf No.632995

>>632949

I want to start a scholarly study of the bible.


149ebf No.632996

>>632965

>It's great but very detailed

You talk as if this is a bad thing.


e0e175 No.633017

>>632995

Ask God for guidance.


149ebf No.633027

>>633017

Duh, he is the one who will bless me with the graves to understand and open my mind but still there are other people who have walked in the Lord longer than I have and I can learn from them.

Also, I'm just a nerd.


d6c860 No.633050

>In a detailed 1965 article in the journal Theological Studies[14] examining whether Jesus was ever called "God" in the New Testament, Brown concluded that "Even the fourth Gospel never portrays Jesus as saying specifically that he is God" and "there is no reason to think that Jesus was called God in the earliest layers of New Testament tradition." He argued that "Gradually, in the development of Christian thought God was understood to be a broader term. It was seen that God had revealed so much of Himself in Jesus that God had to be able to include both Father and Son."

>Thirty years later, Brown revisited the issue in an introductory text for the general public, writing that in "three reasonably clear instances in the NT (Hebrews 1:8-9, John 1:1, 20:28) and in five instances that have probability, Jesus is called God," a usage Brown regarded as a natural development of early references to Jesus as "Lord".[15][16]


149ebf No.633058

>>633050

I'm aware. I read the Wikipedia page too. But you gotta listen to the other sides argument before you refute them


625315 No.633093

>>633050

I don't see anything wrong with that. He never says (according to the paraphrase) that Jesus is not divine or consubstantial with God the Father. The argument seems more to be that the word "God" in the NT refers primarily to God the Father. The Father and the Son are distinguished as God and Lord. But those are just names or titles, not a statement about divinity.


5079b3 No.633426

>>632995

Check out NT Wright's stuff on the New Testament. Terrific literature.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / arepa / boers / cafechan / kc / leftpol / tacos / vg / zenpol ]