/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

It would mean the Catholics are very progressive indeed.

A pope would never pick the name Peter for his papal name. Other than that, the :

>Pope x dies

>Pope y XXII is new Pope

Is a pretty basic pattern.

>>625080

>Cardinal Robert Serah

>Progressive

>>625081

I picked that name because of Saint Malachy's prophecies

>>625082

Kek.

>>625088

But I don't insult him! It was not to mock him or the Church, it was more a reference to the Prophecy of the Pope

>>625078

According to all the doomsday prophets and protestant larpers, Francis I is the last pope. So …

>What would that means?

It would mean those people are WRONG!

>published 4 and a half centuries after the pope's death

The prophecy was fake alright.

>>625131

>Praying for death

Nice heresy

>>625171

Wth, he pray for his election not for the Siege to become vacant

>>625171

I pray for the death of leftists every day. My prayer is granted every day.

>>625090

that prophecy is a faux: it was written by a Benedictine monk to scare the cardinals into voting the one he was hoping to instal onto the Holy See.

http://youthapologeticstraining.com/malachy-prophecy-debunked/

>>625176

>"The concern I have is that many Christians are being taken by this Roman Catholic Saint Malachy prophecy and it is lending credibility to the Catholic Church."

>site considers Freemasonry and shamanism to be equivalent to Catholicism

Don't fall for this site.

>>625173

"You know now what spirit you are of." Don't disrespect the Holy Father.

I used to be opposed to Sarah potentially becoming the next Pope, just because the one we have now is not of the Occident, and I'd dislike having two in a row. Now, it's a kind of a silly concern I think.

In any case, he sadly has no chance of becoming Pope. And even if he were to become Pope, I am sure they would do everything to try and (((assassinate))) him. All that said, I'm just speculating. God's will will be done regardless.

>>625195

>"You know now what spirit you are of." Don't disrespect the Holy Father.

He was joking, stop virtue signalling.

I posted this in the other thread

>arch-conservative/traditionalist pope

This is unlikely to happen since the College of Cardinals is packed with ultra-liberals and unironic liberation theologians, and Pope Francis is continuing to promote and install liberal cardinals.

John Paul II wasn't really a conservative per se (supported dual covenant theology, did nothing to promote TLM/Tridentine, basically ignored sodomite priests) and neither was Benedict XVI (again made only baby steps on the extraordinary form, and made little progress on reform-of-reform). There is unlikely ever to be a Pius XII-style Pope ever again, simply because Liberals Popes will appoint Liberal Cardinals and those Cardinals will pick Liberal popes.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/04/pope-planning-retire-say-allies-hes-appointed-enough-liberal-cardinals

>>625211

What will happen to the Church?

We can't let them without doing nothing… However if this is God's will, then so be it.

>>625211

This. The best we can hope for it a pro-VII conservative like Burke or Schoenborn, but not a Pius X or Innocent III, not for at least another few generations.

Maybe once our generation matures, we can have such men, but not currently.

>>625216

You might call it complacency, but I am not personally worried by it, since the Church has had much, much worse going on. If it can survive Arianism, in which virtually every diocese in Christendom apostatised, and the 9-11C Saeculum Obscurum, in which we had a literal demon worshipper as Pope, then the Gates of Hell really never, ever will prevail over the Church.

Abp Cdl Sarah would be a good Pope, though I'm not Church of Rome. He has the right view of the presbytery and the episcopate.

Thoughts on cardinal arinze for pope?

https://youtu.be/Jsfo0H7EgI4

>>625131

heresy

1 a : adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma (see dogma 2) They were accused of heresy.

b : denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

c : an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2 a : dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice To disagree with the party leadership was heresy.

b : an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

>>625171

Wew lad. That photo.

>>625211

I still don't understand this liberal cardinals thingy. Did they say or do anything wrong?

God gives us the clergy we deserve.

orthodox cardinals and traditional priests/bishops is something we don't deserve but desperately need.

>>625394

Aw fuf. I switched the post ids

>>625398

Or cardinals and bishops that respond quickly to the lies of anti-christian media at least. I don't think I've seen deviations in our teachings, it's just they're not responsive enough to societal needs.

>ROME-The newly-elected Pope Peter II, nicknamed by the media "the Black Pope," wowed crowds gathered in St. Peter's Square this morning with his proclaimation that the Roman Catholic Church is reconstituting itself as the Endtimes Counter-Church.

>Many critics questioned the public relations wisdom of rebranding the 2,000 year old organization with such a controversial moniker, but Peter II in his address dismissed such concerns as having been "[spoken] by those who have not yet recieved the Mark," a curious statement that commentators have attributed to the Supreme Pontif's intention to give hardcover editions of the Gospel of Mark as gifts this Christmas season.

>The leader of the Catholic faithful appears to have fully recovered from the massive, lethal head trauma he suffered during the entire College of Cardinals' assassination attempt upon him during his election. In his speach, the Pope attributed his speedy recovery to "diet and exercise."

>The address was cut short when a four meter tall talking beast took the pulpit and began uttering strange incantations, and the entire crowd fled in terror, resulting in serveral deaths from trampling. The Vatican confirms that Italian animal control officials were contacted and handled the situation swiftly.

>The Pope is next scheduled to appear in New York on Friday, December 13th at the United Nations as the master of ceremonies for the inaugeral Celebration of Universal Human Godhood Through Technology and Sorcery alongside the Mahdi. (Associated Press)

>>625078

what do you think it means?

>>625400

No, but we got what we deserve: we’ll become a small, humble Church once more…and we can hope haters will come towards us.

>>625479

(Haters who will try to kill what little is left, not to join us, of course)

Read Soloviev's story about the antichrist:

http://www.goodcatholicbooks.org/antichrist.html

>>625400

No

Begome ordodox :DD

>>625258

>a literal demon worshipper as Pope

?

I've seen this thread before.

>>625171

For all I know, Pope Francis may abdicate, therefore no anticipation of death was hinted to in my post.

>>625644

We didn't call medieval the dark ages for nothing.

>>625644

>He made a ten year old a cardinal

Outrageous.

>>625645

the only dark age is in your brain

>>625645

We call it like that because of french revolution propaganda.

But I bet the two world wars and the genocides that happened in the modern age were so much brighter.

>>625653

Renaissance anon, the term was devised by Petrarch

>>625659

Yes, you're right it's from the humanism and then the "lumières", the revolution just came from it. So it became common propaganda under this regime.

>>625645

What a retard

>>625666

Don't be silly, why would french propaganda popularize a term in english? That cuck Gibbons and lying Victorian writers who wanted to insult their ancestors to make themselves look good are far more to blame.

>>625692

And? I know you french like to think you're the center of civilization but even cursory look at the topic shows you neither coined nor popularized the idea of the dark ages in Britain.

>>625696

>I know you french like to think you're the center of civilization

This was useless anon

>cursory look at the topic shows you neither coined nor popularized the idea of the dark ages in Britain.

The idea of the dark age mainly come from the lumières that come from France and have resulted and found an ally in the french revolution. It doesn't mean it invented it, but that this movement popalarized this idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumi%C3%A8res

english nobility used to speak french so don't insult your big brother

>>625650

>>625653

>>625659

>>625666

>>625668

>>625671

>>625686

>>625692

>>625696

John XII was part of the Saeculum Obscurum (the Dark Age) AD 904-964 which refers to a series of corrupt popes. That time was dark as in "bad." That sense of the term and its application to the early 10th century originated in the writings of Cardinal Caesar Baron in the 16th century. I don't think anon strictly erred in calling John XII's reign part of the Dark Age(s). You can cut him some slack.

The wider term "the dark ages" referring to the early Medieval period started as a neutral description of the relative lack of surviving textual material written in the early Medieval period compared to Ancient or more recent times, which resulted naturally from the social and economic chaos in the wake of the collapse of the Roman Empire. This periodization meant dark as in "obscure." Later writers of course conflated it to mean "bad" for political reasons, as you describe perfectly. The modern view of the Middle Ages is indeed much dimmer than that era itself was, so historians have largely stopped using the name because of its negative and misleading connotations.