>>620979
From reading about the book (which I will now read), I think he just thinks it's a good novel that may have some good lessons in it, with a lot of humor. Clearly it's not trying to be a legitimate Gospel, so it's not entirely accurate to call it a "false gospel" when it is a novel. But it is interesting that he would teach from this.
The question is how did he teach from them? Did he just point out things accurate in the book or did he seem to think it was a good source on its own? Did he show how Saints and the Bible, etc, agreed with a point, or what?