>>611468
>presuppositionalism
No idea what you're trying to say
I could take your post to mean that you're asserting that cathbros are presupposing that Mary makes pretty lights in the sky and that therefore this was an example of that miracle.
I could also likewise take you to be saying that presupposition is behind the protestant doubters, that because we refuse to bestow co-redemptrix and mediatrix superpowers on Mary, we therefore presuppose the impossibility of any miracle should could be responsible for and therefore no amount of photographic or other evidence will convince us.
Finally, you could be a fedora mocking the very basis of miracles as presupposition on the part of believers, and that therefore the whole notion is eminently mockable. However, this guy >>611524 doesn't apparently believe that's what you're saying.
Postscript-ally, you could be rah-rah-ing for presuppositional apologetics, but that would only be confusing since that neither supports nor rejects the notion of some miracle at some place.
If you had a point, it is not fully explained by attaching that video.
>>611524
Good and relevant (for the OP) video