>>603125
>The celebrant faces the altar
eh, not always or even usually. I've never seen a lutheran pastor consecrate ad orientem at all in real life honestly.
>The Eucharist is often received at the altar
Typical method is at the rail, not the altar itself. How close to the altar you are depends on the architecture of the building.
>I think a well-celebrated Lutheran Mass is more reverent than Novus Ordo at the very least.
certainly, but this hinges on "well-celebrated"…by the same token, though, your local lutheran church's idea of a "traditional service" is probably is closer to a "decent" novus ordo mass than it is to some grand high extraordinary form mass. Thinking about my own church, we only have better looking services because of the architecture – we have an old building since the region is historically lutheran, the catholics have a modernist building. The order of the mass isn't much different between us.
Novus Ordo isn't as shitty as extraordinary form fags and sedes make it out to be either. Sure, there's weird ass abuses like clown masses and all that, but go to your local Bishop's cathedral and attend the mass. Even if it's novus ordo, it's likely going to be more reverent than what you see in the parishes simply due to the circumstances.
Also, lutherans have something far worse than novus ordo – being influenced by other protestantisms, many lutheran churches hold outright low services, with no liturgy at all, guitars, and all that other nonsense. Sometimes they hold them side by side at different times, and sometimes they hold only the modernist services.
so, all in all, everyone has their fuckups.