[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / agatha / animu / cafechan / htg / kpop / lds / leftpol ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 91a5958145b9ed6⋯.jpg (79.35 KB, 400x338, 200:169, Fathers.jpg)

d22a4a No.598981

I'd like to start reading the works of the church fathers but I don't know where to begin.

Are there more important books that I should read first?

Are there some books I should read in a certain order as not to get confused?

e833e6 No.598983

Start with the Bible.


d22a4a No.598986

File: 849f44e82faad96⋯.jpg (3.82 KB, 188x212, 47:53, >tfw.jpg)


096130 No.598988

>>598981

St. Ignatius of Antioch is a must


d22a4a No.598989

>>598988

Thanks!

Is there a book of his I should read first?


84c0f8 No.598991

Start with the Greeks :^)


34d233 No.598992

http://www.ccel.org/fathers.html

Just ignore the notes.


4e652a No.598993

>>598981

>I'd like to start reading the works of the church fathers but I don't know where to begin.

Chronological order best order

>Are there more important books that I should read first?

Bible. Or if you are in mood of staying Orthodox some commentaries about them though I not guarantee this.

>Are there some books I should read in a certain order as not to get confused?

If someone is praised as someone successor then read him after one that he succeeded. For example, read Polycarp before Irenaeus and Ambrose before Augustine.


4e652a No.598995

>>598989

All of his letters in chronological order

>>598991

Ackchyually start with Hebrews. St. Barnabas and Didache. Then Greeks, Polycarp and Ignatius.


fc892a No.598997

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/ has a good compilation of writings! Best of luck!


a34565 No.599617

Is there a good physical compilation of the Church Fathers? Something like "The Essential Church Fathers."


5c689d No.599633

>>599617

I remember seeing a complete Church Fathers set, but it was like 800USD


ec3e41 No.599697


783e0a No.600077

>>598981

I would personally suggest Luke, then Acts. Then read the rest of the Gospels in order, then read the letters in order. Then read it all again. Then the old testament in order.


ad03bc No.600942

>>598983

Fpbp

Reminder that the disciples said there were false teachers in the church while they were still alive.


e66ae0 No.600952

>>599617

Not really, since there were many, many church fathers and some of the works they wrote are too long to be contained in a volume with other works, like St. Augustine's "City of God". A good starting point is "The Apostolic Fathers in English" which contains the writings of the first generation of Christians after the Apostles.

>>599633

Yeah, in the 1800s Philip Schaff put together a huge compilation of almost all the Ante-Nicene, Nicene, and Post-Nicene Christian writings(the most glaring omission being the writings of Cyril of Alexandria.) It's going to cost hundreds of dollars if you want the physical books, but you can buy them all digitally for less than 15$ altogether. Or, since they're all old enough to be public domain, you download them all for free here http://www.ccel.org/node/70


ca3094 No.601101

When do you get to the Syriac Fathers?


4d625a No.601148

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>598981

The Didache is a good start, it's a fairly short book written by the 12 Apostles themselves. Pastor Rick Wiles gives a good introduction to this subject.


7d0b85 No.601193

File: 86a23d0f3567bd2⋯.jpg (608.57 KB, 1187x1600, 1187:1600, the-three-holy-hierarchs-s….jpg)

>>598981

First you start with the 3 Hierarchs. Then read the Philokalia, you'll find many references from there.


3cd377 No.601196


6a2e3f No.611561

>>601196

Dumb question, but I see some [GNOSTIC] tags on those, does that mean I should steer clear of those? Wasn't sure if the Roman Catholic Church had a different meaning for that tag.


66d048 No.611603

On the Incarnation - Athanasius the Great

On the Holy Spirit - Basil the Great

On the Unity of Christ - Cyril of Alexandria

On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ - Maximus the Confessor

On the Divine Images - John of Damascus


66d048 No.611606

^^^

These works correspond to the controversies of the Seven Ecumenical Councils starting with Athanasius the Great


9b4d32 No.611616

>>598981

I think st. Justin the Martyr's writings are the oldest we have outside the Bible. It's a good overview of what the early Christians believed. It's not theology really, it's about practical belief.


038c4d No.611640

>>598995

The writings of Barnabas in the NT? Or are there other sources?


dfaf5b No.611932

File: 1e19ffc2dc3464c⋯.png (16.83 KB, 911x196, 911:196, (((Higher Criticism))).png)

>>611561

From what I see the ones that are tagged that are actual Gnostic books so in that case you *could* read them, but they're still heretical forgeries based on/retconning actual divinely inspired Scripture. The general theme with Gnostic writings goes like this usually -

>textual forgeries based on actual biblical scripture, no older than 1st century at best, 2nd and 3rd century usually

>uses actual biblical figures

>these said biblical figures reveal a revelation of the universe and it's machinations

>these revelations and underlying morals/ethics are antithetical to actual scripture mostly, and they retcon actual Scripture (good example of this is the idea of the OT God being a malevolent demiurge, which we know is false considering Christ revealed himself to be YHWH)

The most important thing to the Gnostics was knowledge (gnosis), but they didn't differentiate themselves from actual Christians despite having radically different theology and texts making them a subversive and poisonous force to early Christianity.

This is one of the points I took note of that give me confidence in the actual biblical canon, if it was so insignificant and wrong like some people say then why does everything try to rewrite and retcon it of all texts? Why not give the same treatment to Hindu texts, Zoroaster texts, Buddhist texts, hell even the Quran doesn't get this treatment!

Gnosticism does this, Freemasons do this, New Age shit does this, Alchemy does this, Goetia does this, so many heresies and occultist beliefs stem from this presupposition that the Bible is a false book but they still have to rely on it's basis and characters to form their beliefs.

It's almost as if there's some kind of force out there trying to deceive people and make them think that hell is an ice house and all knowledge is truth! It's almost as if the Bible was right all along!


dfaf5b No.611935

File: 6efcaa97a2305f6⋯.jpg (213.15 KB, 800x818, 400:409, 6efcaa97a2305f6bd385af1674….jpg)

>>611561

So in all cases, in all senses the Gnostic texts are of no value outside of seeing what the cancer the Church Fathers had to fight against was. No theological value, no moral value, no ethical value. Every bit of it is complete bullshit, and I take none of it seriously.


4e652a No.611977

>>611640

Barnabas is silent in Scriptures. But there is letter of his supposed authorship that deals with old and new covenant and have somewhat good interpretation of the Law


6a2e3f No.612247

>>611935

Thanks, I guess in a sense it's the cancer we all have to fight against even to this day.


dfe8c6 No.612830

>>601148

Rick Wiles' pronounciation of Didache ("Dee-ay-da-kay"..) is surely off the mark?

"Dida-shey"..anyone?


bfe3c4 No.613266

Hi,

I have seen that "Against Heresies" of Saint Irenaeus is present on some "Church Fathers" reading list. Is it a good read and helpful in general ? I ask this because I read that It was focused on proving gnostics wrong so I wonder how relevant could it be a for christian of our day.


e303e3 No.613287

>>613266

You want something against heresies today? The most prevalent one is protestantism, so I'd recommend a book called the Catholic controversy by st. Francis de Sales, you can get it for free on archive.org. He was the bishop of Geneva when Calvin was rampaging and managed to convert tens of thousands of people back to the faith.

https://archive.org/details/catholiccontrove00sain

As for st. Irenaeus, I'm not sure how relevant that is today. If you want to see what the earliest Christians believed, read st. Justin the martyr.


bfe3c4 No.613430

>>613287

Oh thanks. Fun fact, the original title in french is "Open letters to protestants". Also, it's Saint François de Sales.

hon hon hon :^)


e303e3 No.613434

>>613430

>"Open letters to protestants"

Oh, didn't know that. I only know he wrote extensively because he wasn't allowed to speak by Calvinists so he walked around at night and pushed his leaflets under people's doors.


d0853e No.613437

>>613266

Against Heresies is 10/10, and shows how early a lot of the more profound Christian theology is. It also destroys Calvinism, incidentally.

>>613287

Why do you like Justin Martyr over Irenaeus? If anything, the Dialogue with Trypho and Against Heresies complete one another (one being against Judaism and the other being against Gnosticism, the two big early heresies).


e303e3 No.613442

>>613437

Because st. Justing talks more about the actual practice of early Christians. For example, in his Fisrst Apology he wrote:

>And this food is called among us Εὐχαριστία [the Eucharist], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined.

>For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh.

Also, his writings are the first real apologetics of Christianity.


4e652a No.613444

>>612830

Dee-da-ke


4e652a No.613446

>>613266

Against the Heresies is manual to BTFOing Gnostics of all sorts. Beautiful really, I love when it shows up in Liturgy of Hours. But unless you deal with new-age faggotry then it might be a little to specific.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1cc / agatha / animu / cafechan / htg / kpop / lds / leftpol ]