[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4am / btwitter / caos / imouto / kennedi / lds / miku / new ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

ddaaf6 No.585569

Pope Francis Once Again Encourages Mothers To Breastfeed In The Sistine Chapel

>There are many spaces where women are discouraged from breastfeeding in public. Museums, airlines, and even hospitals have come under fire for not giving new moms enough support, or admonishing them for breastfeeding or pumping. But Pope Francis is a proponent of the practice, even in Catholicism's holiest places.

>In an annual baptism ceremony in the Sistine Chapel Sunday, the Pope encouraged mothers to feed their babies if they were hungry during the two-hour-long service.

>"Babies have their own dialect," he added. "If one starts to cry the others will follow, like in an orchestra." He said that if the babies were "starting a concert" of crying because they were hungry, mothers should "go ahead and feed them," for this too is a "language of love."

>This isn't the first time Pope Francis has encouraged mothers to breastfeed in the Sistine Chapel. Last year at the same ceremony, the Pope made similarly supportive remarks, saying mothers should feed their children as "Mary breastfed Jesus."

>NPR's Rebecca Hersher reported that even though Pope Francis has "repeatedly justified his position in the most traditional terms possible — harking back to the infancy of Christ himself," not all Catholic churches have followed the same logic.

What do you think about breastfeeding in the church?

Post last edited at

f875ee No.585572

File: 1cf47b313a65727⋯.jpg (55.12 KB, 564x752, 3:4, 25e62a6c0e20c24d5b7f0b7843….jpg)

Considering art like this exists, I'd say it's fine.


ca7936 No.585573

Finally, Francis and Anderson agree for once


7ff408 No.585576

I'd say there are worse things that can go on in a Church. Kids playing with toys or phones, or running around, or going to "Children's Liturgies" for example.

Good for him, though.


dc409c No.585577

>>585572

This tbh


d5e685 No.585579

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


1e1f12 No.585581

Literally a non issue


28fff3 No.585582

i'm for it.

i don't even really see breasts as something inherently sexual, i think they're just fetishized because they're hidden in our culture.

>>585572

>there is art depicting it, so it's fine

that's a bizarre criterion


16591d No.585592

>>585579

I don't say this often so it's worth saying but I agree with pastor Anderson 100%. I feel like if I were a mother I'd be super uncomfortable breastfeeding a child in public though.


16591d No.585593

>>585569

There's something really off about this video though, I guess it's the way she looks at the camera makes me feel like I'm watching this on her snapchat story


a17fd8 No.585618

how old is this kid?


e4f6b1 No.585631

>>585579

I kind of want to try that blanket thing


25dd05 No.585635

>>585582

Breasts are seen as sexual because of biology, large breasts indicate fertility, thus provoking arousal


28fff3 No.585651

>>585635

>[things] are seen as sexual because […] [things] indicate fertility, thus provoking arousal

you could make this same argument about a number of other things (voice pitch, healthy looking skin, healthy gums, healthy teeth, etc)

no one would consider any of those things as inherently sexual, breasts may look nice and help you attract a mate, but they're there to feed your baby, they don't directly play a part in making one.

if we were both puritans we could be having this same conversation about women's calves.


4fbbc8 No.585680

He's right. Remember to discard the (((formula))) for babies. No human should have to be feed from powder and other unnatural shit. Give your son the teats or force your give to do it.


50771b No.585681

>Mods actually deleted the video

Wait the mods aren't Catholic?


798d0a No.585686


4fbbc8 No.585691

>>585681

Link it please. Also, a thread looks ugly without an image or a video.


a17fd8 No.585721

File: d53df708cbf11b2⋯.png (45.21 KB, 778x512, 389:256, 1514747742.png)

>tfw you see a woman breastfeeding


ddaaf6 No.585730

https://www.liveabout.com/arousal-orgasm-and-breastfeeding-2982417

>In one study of people who were breastfeeding, 40.5% of the participants reported feeling sexually aroused at some point during infant suckling. 16.7% reported being aroused frequently during breastfeeding. In another paper that reviewed several studies between 33-50% of respondents described breastfeeding as erotic (25% of those responded that way said they felt guilty about it).

Apparently it's very common for women to feel aroused and even orgasm while breastfeeding. Are orgasms something appropriate in a church?


6f2282 No.585735

File: 8b4a77f872bcf62⋯.mp4 (254.65 KB, 320x240, 4:3, whats-wrong-with-you-youre….mp4)

>>585569

>Pope Francis Once Again Encourages Mothers To Breastfeed In The Sistine Chapel

And?

Why should I care to comment on this?

Will God, who made all things, be offended by boobies feeding babies?

What the actual finaeglstein is OP trying to illicit here?


55592d No.585749

>>585730

>breasts meant to indicate fertility go on to encourage further fertility when used properly

big if true


196d86 No.585994

File: 8fac67ba9d3b8e9⋯.png (3 MB, 1314x1755, 146:195, c868ca9944541f0dbdadb454f7….png)


e86036 No.586025

>>585635

Actually large breasts indicate pregnancy.


53afae No.586026

I'm starting to want to be a mod but only so I can delete porn and Gnostic posts on sight since i'm a neet & have the time on my hands to police the board


63a040 No.586027

File: 115cfcb331bb710⋯.jpg (83.18 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 4zwT6fJ.jpg)

>>586024

>shadman


88c2e4 No.586028

>>586026

Too many mods spoil the broth. No question about porn, but over moderation is bad. Start banning controversial conversation and interesting people will leave, leaving only groupies and toadies.


7d482e No.586036

>>586024

>shadman


05da6a No.586055

>>586025

In animals, not humans. Women have swolen mammaries all the time, not just while pregnant.


f4b11a No.586059

File: 3da4929f14430d0⋯.jpg (108.79 KB, 654x881, 654:881, 17499492_10155172280859204….jpg)

>>586028

The only time we delete posts is when there is porn or something too graphic for a Christian board (usually lewd anime). Controversial conversations are also usually left alone for discussion unless the discussion starts boiling down to blatant shitposts, trolling or bait that breaks any of the rules.

Looking at a recent example, there has been no attempts from the Gnostic posters to have any sort of productive discussion. From their side, there have only been low-quality bait threads or bait comments throughout the active threads usually consisting of a sentence or less.


196d86 No.586209

>>586059

what's this pic and why's there a cowhat and a cane?


809f77 No.586268

>>586209

well, the hat and the can could be a symbol for Jesus being the good Shepherd who goes out to look for the lost sheep (in this case the sinner who approaches Him in the sacrament of Reconciliation through a priest).


196d86 No.586364

>>586268

ah, makes sense, thanks.


a48502 No.586679

>>585569

Anything to stop babies from crying during a service. I'm all for it.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4am / btwitter / caos / imouto / kennedi / lds / miku / new ]