>>585136
><citation (council if nicea), king james reformation, lutheranism.
Luther and the "King James Reformation" were Roman? What?
You are right though, that Anglicanism and Lutheranism were created to consolidate order and to justify more secular orders which sought to move away from the Church, which was nothing short of treason against God. The Catholic Church, however, was not, and this forced meme of "Constantinianity" is trash.
>isnt it odd that centuries after the bible was alleged to be written, certain portions were deemed 'apocryphical' and censored from pyblic eye to maintain social order?
No, it's not. Public Revelation is considered to have ended with the death of St John at the end of the 1st Century AD. What this means is that anything written after this point which purports to be scripture is automatically eliminated as inauthentic or at best, not divinely inspired. In fine, it's not scripture, and much of what I assume you are talking about, came after this time, so it has no place in the NT. As for apocryphal/uninspired texts written before this time, the Church discerned this through the Holy Spirit.
Further lot of these texts, like the Acts of Peter, the Protevangelium of James, the Epistle to the Laodiceans and others still freely and openly circulated, and helped to influence a lot of Christian Culture well up until the Renaissance. Social order only came into when heretics attacked the Church on bunk accusations such as the ones you make.
>notice its not called "endarkenment"?
So?
><pagan citation: yule festival=xmas; pope hat=posideons hat, ishtar (goddess of fertility)=easter=beltaine=fertility festival
>source: your ass
Try again.
<the way to kill a god is to never remember him or say his name
If a tree falls in a forest, does it make a sound?
>if you were created in god's image, doesnt that mean, you have god-like qualities, and god-like abilities?
Yes. Memory, intelligence and understanding, the power to know (and do) good or evil (i.e. free will).