4b279a No.574700
Happy 81st birthday, Holy Father!
35bac2 No.574709
>>574700
Birthday cakes are pagan.
35bac2 No.574715
>>574711
geg xDDDD
idz judz a brangk bro ;DDD
73472a No.574723
>>574718
What is going on in this image, I need to know
73ae94 No.574725
73472a No.574727
>>574724
That's actually really cool. I disagree with Francis but no one can doubt his piety.
4b279a No.574728
>>574725
His Holiness would probably forgive you for saying that.
>>574727
Definitely!
f08933 No.574729
>>574700
>papists
>Christian
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) 217a3a No.574731
73ae94 No.574733
>>574728
Mate he's gone against the word of christ on numerous occasions
03190c No.574763
>>574707
Jesus, that looks like a fucking Protestant emofest. What the hell happened to the Catholic Church!?
3390e7 No.574765
>>574700
Cute fluffy girl on the right.
8e38af No.574773
>>574763
there is something in what you saying
even in my full catholic country people embrace this protestant american style vision of christianity dont know why
maybe its time to
begom ordodox xD
03190c No.574777
>>574773
Orthodox have an intellectual tradition about as deep as a puddle of water. Nice liturgy that compares favorably to the TLM, but they don't even come close to matching the intellectual firepower of Catholicism.
03190c No.574782
>>574781
Also they think sexualized cartoon children aren't degenerate.
73472a No.574791
>>574781
let's not post that anime here please
4b279a No.574800
>homo anime posters in my Papa Francisco birthday thread
GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEE
5a19f7 No.574901
>>574709
So is underwear but i dont hear you complaining bout dat.
5a19f7 No.574903
>>574709
>>574901
Why so silent anon? Do you in fact, deny that the pagan masses wore underoos?
2a46a5 No.574904
Thank you but my birthday was isn't until April and I'll be 91.
03190c No.574905
>>574904
Fuck this evil kike-lover. At least Jorge Bergoglio doesn't pretend to be a conservative.
35bac2 No.574919
>>574903
>>574901
I've never worn underwear a day in my life.
5a19f7 No.574927
>>574919
And I have never worn a birthday cake. But that is not the matter that is at hand. We are here to discuss the tradition of pagans wearing underoos. Are you in fact a pagan sir that can comment on this issue?
e689eb No.574931
>>574782
Neither of those girls are sexualized, though.
a99a7b No.574932
>>574919
That's a well trained dogger, also happy birthday to the Pope. That was a weird sentence.
35bac2 No.574961
>>574927
All I can say is that as a non-pagan, I cannot stop free-ballin.
250364 No.574962
81 diapers for super Bishop
a68aa2 No.574972
>>574800
>Yung Lean becomes a Catholic
250364 No.574974
>>574972
lmao
turns out he’s still making music. his latest release sounds pretty good imo
88a356 No.574985
What's with Francis doing nice stuff like >>574718 and then turn around and do political movies like attacking traditional Catholics like the knights of Malta and then attacking the mass with his stance on allowing divorced to take the eucharist?
782a77 No.575003
wtf are you talking about, Benedict XVI´s birthday is on 16 April and he is already 90.
987243 No.575005
987243 No.575006
>>575005
francis is not only an impostor, he is an heretic too:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correctio_filialis_de_haeresibus_propagatis
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) 53d0c7 No.575033
>>574700
This venomous snake is going to burn in hell.
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) 0285e2 No.575713
>>575033
i agree
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) a99a7b No.575899
>>575005
Is there a translation for those who don't speak bocce ball
d586d6 No.575918
everyone knows francis is openly homosexual
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) b63e2c No.575923
>>574700
praise be to pope whorehay bernholeio
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) a99a7b No.575954
>>575899
Ah, ran it though autotranslate. Some conspiracy tier bull of which you should be ashamed.
69e03a No.575969
I see nothing worth liking in this modern, eco-centered, ecumenical, "we are the world", social justice warrior, leftist "Pope"
de7a46 No.575989
5c00ee No.575990
everyone knows that pope francis has blue skin
88a356 No.576015
Everyone should read the book "The dictator pope".
69e03a No.576035
>>574763
>>574707
at least the asian girls are nice
the rest look like numale fags
7dc6f6 No.576089
4b279a No.576090
>>576089
what do you call your father
14d8d1 No.576091
>>576090
>literally making the commandment of God of none effect
try again m8
a1d70c No.576093
>>576090
Pope Francis is your biological dad? I thought he was a virgin with a vow of chastity
2b87da No.576094
>>576089
Well, the official list of titles of the pope, in the order in which they are given in the Annuario Pontificio, is:
Bishop of Rome
Vicar of Jesus Christ
Successor of the Prince of the Apostles
Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church
Primate of Italy
Archbishop and Metropolitan of the Roman Province
Sovereign of the Vatican City State
Servant of the servants of God
No "Father"!
a1d70c No.576096
2b87da No.576098
>>576096
Not an official title.
However, if you want to take it further:
"And he said, Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken; The God of glory appeared unto our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Charran," Acts 7:2
"And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;" Romans 9:10
Straight outta the KJV! Call no man "father" indeed.
7dc6f6 No.576099
>>576090
My father because he literally is my father.
Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
7dc6f6 No.576100
>>576098
Because they do descend from Abraham and Issac you papist
91be74 No.576102
4b279a No.576104
>>576099
>>576100
How hard is it to understand that priests are our spiritual fathers?
St Paul's statement on the theology of the spiritual fatherhood of priests:
>"I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel" (1 Cor. 4:14–15)
St Peter similarly refers to St Mark as his son:
>"She who is at Babylon, who is likewise chosen, sends you greetings; and so does my son Mark" (1 Pet. 5:13).
The apostles sometimes referred to entire churches as their children, such as St Paul here:
>"Here for the third time I am ready to come to you. And I will not be a burden, for I seek not what is yours but you; for children ought not to lay up for their parents, but parents for their children" (2 Cor. 12:14)
>"My little children, with whom I am again in travail until Christ be formed in you!" (Gal. 4:19)
St John:
>"My little children, I am writing this to you so that you may not sin; but if any one does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous" (1 John 2:1)
> "No greater joy can I have than this, to hear that my children follow the truth" (3 John 4)
St John even addresses men in his congregations as "fathers":
>13 I am writing to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning. I am writing to you, young men, because you have overcome the evil one. I write to you, children, because you know the Father. 14 I write to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning. I write to you, young men, because you are strong, and the word of God abides in you, and you have overcome the evil one. (1 John 2:13–14).
By referring to these people as their spiritual sons and spiritual children, Peter, Paul, and John imply their own roles as spiritual fathers. Since the Bible frequently speaks of this spiritual fatherhood, we Catholics acknowledge it and follow the custom of the apostles by calling priests "father." Failure to acknowledge this is a failure to recognize and honor a great gift God has bestowed on the Church: the spiritual fatherhood of the priesthood.
Now, please leave my thread if you don't have anything positive to contribute to the Holy Father for his birthday.
a1d70c No.576106
>>576098
It doesn’t say you can call men your father if it’s not an official title, it just says not to call men your father. People call pope father, and it’s wrong. As for your example of Abraham and Isaac, men you descend from are your father. If you descend from Abraham and Isaac, call them your father. Random old people aren’t your father. Read the whole passage in context to see what Jesus meant when he said to call no man father
>The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
>All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
>For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
>But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
>And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
>And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
>But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
>And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
>Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
So he’s clearly talking about spiritual leaders, not physical fathers. This is why Jesus affirmed the fatherhood of David and of Abraham
8964dd No.576107
More birthdays to come. I hope he does more Good and will do more good. Thank you for your work.
7dc6f6 No.576121
>>576102
Well do you descend from pope francis?
>>576104
Only Gid the Father is the spiritual Father
7dc6f6 No.576123
>>576121
Also Jesus compares it with don't be called "rabbi" which is a title that religois leaders use
4b279a No.576131
>>576121
how do you explain what the apostles said, then
5b8984 No.576133
>>576123
Call no man Father. Yet Apostles call themselves fathers.
Call no man Master. Yet Apostles call Christians masters.
Call no man Rabbi. Yet Apostles call themselves and others teachers.
I gonna trust apostolic interpretation of Christ word.
6feb44 No.576134
>>574700
Literally and unironically a satanist. If only you knew what kind of unspeakable evil he and his masters are behind.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) bf6df8 No.576146
>>574700
HE'S 81?!?!?!
Daaaaayum. don't look a day over 75
2b87da No.576147
>>576123
Rabbi means Teacher in Hebrew.
Doctor means Teacher in Latin.
Hope you're not calling anyone "Doctor".
bf6df8 No.576148
>>576133
>Yet Apostles call themselves fathers
requiring proof of that claim
>>576121
>Only Gid the Father is the spiritual Father
Good ole "Gid", aye?
2b87da No.576149
>>576146
That's because he's /fit/. He worked as a bouncer when he was younger.
bf6df8 No.576150
>>576149
>He worked as a bouncer when he was younger
srsly?! I hope not on some gay club in BA
2b87da No.576151
7dc6f6 No.576174
>>576133
Besides they didn't. I don't remeber them calling someone besides Jesus rabbi
7dc6f6 No.576176
>>576174
Also you realize the apostles were sinners also right?
34b9f5 No.576184
>>576176
THE SCRIPTURES ARE THE INSPIRED WORD OF GOD. THEY CAN'T HAVE WRITTEN A BLASPHEMOUS REQUEST IN THE BIBLE BECAUSE GOD LITERALLY WROTE IT THROUGH THEM
URRRR
DURRR
5b8984 No.576190
>>576148
>requiring proof of that claim
Six posts above >>576104
>>576174
Rabbi means teacher.
2 Timothy 1:11 Wherein I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and teacher of the Gentiles.
1d0398 No.576191
>>574700
He may be near heresy but is not in it. (According to some of the best scholars out there). And, he may not be the best pope. He is a typical liberal in every field.
But still, Happy birthday Francis!
7dc6f6 No.576195
>>576184
I mean when they're talking to someone. People in the Bibke lie all the time(the jews)
7dc6f6 No.576196
>>576190
Uh yeah he teachers the gentiles. That's not Christians calling him rabbi. Like the person that teaches me math at school is a teacher, not a rabbi
95cf48 No.576199
Baptists are fucking retarded. This is what happens when 90 IQ peasants try interpret the Bible using translations.
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) 7dc6f6 No.576200
>>576199
>he meant the opposite of what he said
4b279a No.576202
>>576200
literally ignoring what i wrote here >>576104
Obviously if you use snippets of verses, you can put together any narrative you want, that's why there's thousands of Protestant denominations.
You have a guy come out every couple of months and pick out a verse here and there to put together a new ecclesial community, it's ridiculous.
The Church Fathers and the Early Church also support the theology of the spiritual fatherhood, feel free to look into it.
If you're going to continue posting autism, please leave the thread.
81a00b No.576204
God have mercy on our dear leader.
7dc6f6 No.576206
>>576202
Most of those aren't people calling them father as a title given to religious leaders and when ge says my children it doesn't seem like he means his spririt chikdren. Also not KJV and what did Jesus then mean? He meant something
7dc6f6 No.576216
>>576206
Also technically it was the HG talking who is God
5b8984 No.576218
>>576196
>Uh yeah he teachers the gentiles. That's not Christians calling him rabbi. Like the person that teaches me math at school is a teacher, not a rabbi
Teacher and Rabi are the same thing. Even more in case of Paul since he is teacher of religion. And not even that, he is Hebrew from Pharisees' school of thought
7dc6f6 No.576232
>>576218
Bo one calls him rabbi. Again he teaches people so he's technically is a teacher but so is my math teacher, and I'm not calling either of them rabbi
81a00b No.576233
He and the surveillance teams must have gotten this from a Roman Catholic translation. (Sarcasm intended.)
5b8984 No.576238
>>576232
You would if you were hebrew. But even if you insist that you would not then Paul is still calling himself father.
d513d3 No.576257
>>576238
Then what did Jesus mean by it if he didn't mean what it clearly says?
c73287 No.576260
>>576257
If you worshiped Christ instead of a book compiled in 1611, then you'd know the answer to your question. Get your nose out of the KJV and turn instead to Christ, who wrote no Bible, rather built a Church.
5b8984 No.576264
>>576257
About teacher/rabbi: Christ blames Pharisees' pride, and vanity in affecting such titles, rather than the titles themselves.
For he says: But be not you called Rabbi. For one is your master (didaskalos); and all you are brethren.
And yet he says to Nicodem, Christian, Art thou a master (didaskalos) in Israel, and knowest not these things?
Now, there is one teacher, Christ. And i him all Christan teachers are one, for they teach one faith in contrary to sects.
About father and master: The meaning is, that our Father in heaven is incomparably more to be regarded, than any father upon earth: and no master is to be followed, who would lead us away from Christ. But this does not hinder but that we are by the law of God to have a due respect both for our parents and spiritual fathers, (1 Corinthians iv. 15,) and for our masters and teachers.
Nothing is here forbidden but the contentious divisions, and self-assumed authority, of such as make themselves leaders and favourers of schisms and sects; as Donatus, Arius, Luther, Calvin, and innumerable others of very modern date. But by no means the title of father, attributed by the faith, piety, and confidence of good people, to their directors; for, St. Paul tells the Corinthians, that he is their only spiritual Father: If you have 10,000 instructors in Christ, yet not many Fathers. (1 Corinthians iv. 15.)
d513d3 No.576271
>>576260
>who wrote no Bible, rather built a Church.
I don't remeber the verse where Jesus gets oit a hammer and some wood to build a church. I get what your saying but it's stupid.
>>576264
But he doesn't say don't be prideful when using the title he just says don't use it
5b8984 No.576300
>>576271
>I don't remeber the verse where Jesus gets oit a hammer and some wood to build a church. I get what your saying but it's stupid.
<Church=bulding where Church is
>But he doesn't say don't be prideful when using the title he just says don't use it
And yet he himself use this title for Nicodem.
Context m8, this is not some stand alone quote, it's part of larger discourse about Pharassies and how they are hypocrites.
ab92f5 No.576304
>>574724
That's kinda cool
7fa019 No.577583
>people getting warned just for stating that the Pope is a satanist
/christian/ damage control in full effect.
bd078f No.577680
how sinful am i for wishing his death? i dont do that out of hatred, he seems to be causing more harm than good
pray for me and our pope
0580df No.577776
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Holy
cccae1 No.578244
The mods want to protect the differences in denominations, sadly i'm sure many Catholics themselves disagree with the a lot of what the pope has said.
I personally would like a catholic's perspective on this disconnection between the other denominations. The majority of my family is catholic (and i was born a catholic, despite not using the label, as well as being a cold christian) yet i can't ask them about these obvious world government figures because they only get offended about it or are missing a lot of context.
There is a lot Catholics could inform us about yet only choose to be offended about it, like that the prayer to Mary is biblical.
0aa9e9 No.578401
>>578244
>that image
False witness is a sin, as is detraction.
7c174b No.578508
COMMUNION FOR THE DIVORCED AND REMARRIED
e27698 No.578511
>>578508
…. is something His Holiness is strongly agaisn't :)
7c174b No.578513
4b279a No.578514
>>578513
using "novusordowatch" as a source about the pope is like using /pol/ as a source about black people
7c174b No.578515
>>578514
>The most offensive portion of the Buenos Aires Guidelines is this one: “If one arrives at the recognition that, in a particular case, there are limitations that diminish responsibility and culpability…, particularly when a person judges that he would fall into a subsequent fault by damaging the children of the new union, Amoris Laetitia opens up the possibility of access to the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist
4d66ea No.578516
>>578514
You do realize that that document was also posted in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, right?
2b87da No.578518
>make birthday thread about the Pope
<90% protestant kvetching
Works as intended.
7c174b No.578520
2b87da No.578522
>>578520
We get it, son. You don't like the guy. Whining and bawwing on 8chan isn't going to make him stop being Pope. Go play in your own yard.
7c174b No.578526
>>578522
If that's what you want, stay in the darkness. I won't pity you because you don't deserve it, but I'm definitely not going to stop "Whining and bawwing"
e3c340 No.578794
>>578401
I can't find the same site, but http://archive.is/86ru8 this other article about him pushing the world religion has the quotes about him saying that different religions are meeting God in different ways.
http://archive.is/MyEEH
http://archive.is/sjyzB
http://archive.is/jvh8Y
Feel free to call me a liar because the sources aren't subjectively good enough, while ignoring the actual quotes.
>False witness is a sin, as is detraction.
>Ephesians 5:11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.
Why even bother lying that i'm lying, when it's pretty well established that the pope shills these world religon/government themes pretty consistently.
>Galatians 4:16 Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?
64c2f9 No.585100
90e2c9 No.585110
>>578794
>Prophecy in the News
>Prophecy News Watch
lel
>Zionist shite
>Reliable
Pick one.
f324cb No.585182
90e2c9 No.585184
>>585182
>Not an argument.
Correct, because you can't argue with total fabrication.
My other comment was not so much to do with "reliable" MSM/media in general as to do with the fact that any source of information which is also insansely Zionist is a huge red flag. Indeed, Zionists calling anyone "antichrist" when they support the Synagoge of Satan is just looney tunes.
>TheVigilantChristian
>Reformed Apologetics
lel
fb4906 No.585193
>>585182
As it seems you are still active here, I'm going to respond to the accusations about Francis' supposed actions to bring about One World Religion above; since this is a load of material to debunk and lazyness is a big vice of mine, I'm making this post as a reminder and motivation for myself to get to work relatively quickly.
eb3b7e No.585211
>>585184
>Correct, because you can't argue with total fabrication.
The problem is you don't prove this for the non-Jewish sources.
>>TheVigilantChristian
>lel
Whats wrong with TVC?
>>585193
My objective is to find the truth, not to offend my Catholics brothers, if what i posted here is wrong somehow, than i would benefit from the correction.
90e2c9 No.585214
>>585211
>The problem is you don't prove this for the non-Jewish sources.
That's because they don't exist. Because it's total fabrication.
>Whats wrong with TVC?
He's a conspiracy theorist who either says nothing which can be substantiated, or misrepresents stuff beyond reason. That first video, for example, is supposedly about Pope Francis saying people who have a personal relationship with Jesus is "dangerous" is blatant falsehood. Francis is talking about those "I love Jesus but hate religion!" types who think you can just take "Love thy neighbour" and leave the rest of the Bible to one side. Do you believe this? I mean Fracnis literally says that we can't call ourselves Christians and followers of Christ if we ignore the Church He established. Is this the best you can do?
I mean come on man, even the links in the descriptions of his videos redirect to either other videos he made, or equally unhinged junk from YT.
d17ad4 No.585300
Congratulations Your Holiness
I pray that God can put some sense into your head, unless you're playing 4d chess with the Jews. If that's the case keep going you're doing a great job.
d17ad4 No.585301
>>574724
Jesus Christ what happened to his skin?
May God help that poor man.
bfdde4 No.586741
>>585214
>That's because they don't exist. Because it's total fabrication.
>>578820