>>558657
Well, I went to a public school in Germany, so my experiences are german ones. Here's what I "learned":
>Luther was a liberal reformer of the faith
When he was very authoritarian and wanted to reform all "paganism" from the Church.
>The Civil Rights Movement was somehow not infiltrated by Marxists
>There was never a genocide against Germans
Well, that one was rather a lie by omission. Two million Germans were killed in democidal actions and
>The Allies did nothing wrong
Churchill sabotaged the German resistance movement, FDR supported Stalin on the "hunch" that he respected democracy and peace, and the Morgenthau-Plan and the demand of unconditional surrender against Germany and Japan dragged the war our.
>There's a valid middleground between socialism and capitalism
There just isn't.
>Democracy democracy democracy
>Pluralism
>Multiculturalism
>The European Union is great
And so on. All ideas that ought to be controversial at the very least. And when I have kids, they'll have to suffer the same crap as I did unless I emigrate to Switzerland.
There's a reason why Napoleon and the Prussians were among the first supporters of compulsory schooling. And the ideas of the Fabians in the US were nothing more than chilling. These were people that wanted to take all children away from their parents for fifteen years and raise them in an egalitarian environment, but they got haggled down "merely" to compulsory schooling. So… a bunch of totalitarians and dictators accidentally came up with a liberal idea? That`s very unconvincing.
>>558659
I believe I said the opposite. It's hard, because the state made it hard.