[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / general / htg / leftpol / maka / radcorp / sonyeon / startrek / waifu ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: f9d56e500a0b816⋯.jpg (64.38 KB, 283x400, 283:400, thalalaios.jpg)

f7a8d1 No.549667

How can a modern protestant do sola scriptura if he doesn't understand the actual meaning of words in their ancient context? Like "love" being agape, or Logos, or whatever.

Seems like they would need secondary sources or a teacher to help them interpret scripture accurately.

742cc5 No.549670

>sola scriptura

define your term


b1d024 No.549671

>>549667

Because he is his own ultimate authority and can determine whether or not what you mentioned matters


b6e931 No.549673

>>549667

Do you know what the historical-grammatical method is?


f7a8d1 No.549676

>>549673

which verse defines it?


742cc5 No.549689

alright, since OP refuses to give the definition he's operating from, i'm going to post the definition from wikipedia for you guys to refer to in future posts.

this discussion usually brings a lot of shitposting ( >>549671 ), two sides talking about two different things.

>Sola scriptura (Latin: by Scripture alone) is a Christian theological doctrine which holds that the Christian Scriptures are the sole infallible rule of faith and practice.

>The Scriptures' meaning is mediated through many kinds of secondary authority, such as the ordinary teaching offices of the Church, the ecumenical creeds, the councils of the Christian Church, and so on. However, sola scriptura rejects any original infallible authority other than the Bible. In this view, all secondary authority is derived from the authority of the Scriptures and is therefore subject to reform when compared to the teaching of the Bible. Church councils, preachers, Bible commentators, private revelation, or even a message allegedly from an angel or an apostle are not an original authority alongside the Bible in the sola scriptura approach.


f7a8d1 No.549691

>>549689

That's fine but that doesn't resolve the issue at hand. How would one distinguish valid secondary sources in line with what a verse means if they don't understand what the verse/word means in its original context?

Youre assuming the reader already knows the true meaning, I'm saying what if the reader isn't an infallible authority and is still learning and doesn't understand a word/verse/paragraph?? Who does he go to?


b6e931 No.549695

>>549691

>what if the reader isn't an infallible authority

What if the reader is a pope?


26c8ae No.549697

>>549667

Sola scriptura doesn't mean not to interpret scripture, in fact, it means the opposite. All sola scriptura means is that your final authority with regards to doctrine. Where did this retarded meme come from that sola scriptura means everything must be literal and nobody can study scripture? The whole point of sola scriptura is that you need to study scripture! I don't get how a simple doctrine that you can understand with just a cursory glance at its Wikipedia page gets so misunderstood by catholics. Once again, catholics hate The Bible because they can't read


742cc5 No.549700

>>549691

>Youre assuming

the only thing i assumed was that the catholic guy's post was shit. (i actually meant to delete that before posting, but forgot)

all i did was give you a definition.

not really interested in participating in this discussion, just wanted to make sure it starts off with a solid foundation, an agreed upon definition.


da835e No.549710

>>549697

Because tbh, "sola scriptura" is not well-defined and can cover anything from a weak version of "prima scriptura," to "dude the Bible interprets itself lol." And similarly, "prima scriptura" is not well-defined and can cover anything from a strong version of "sola scriptura," to "uh, yeah, the Bible's not THAT important, you know, but we read it sometimes anyway."


b6e931 No.549718

>>549710

>"dude the Bible interprets itself lol."

I don't think you understand the scripture-interprets-scripture principle. It doesn't mean the bible contains its own commentary, it means we should interpret parts of the bible in light of other parts of the bible, especially with difficult passages

>"sola scriptura" is not well-defined

Why don't we use the definition the Protestant reformers themselves functioned on?


b22e4e No.549751

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>549667

>What is hermeneutics

I can swear, you Roman catholics are pulling thinner straws each year whenever you object to something about protestantism.

I'm gonna this the pope franky effect.


5a13ed No.549754

File: 635f6075276a72e⋯.png (74.61 KB, 607x571, 607:571, Tricky.png)

Because KJV is like Theopneustus and is the only inerrant infallible Word of God. In English at least.

>B-but how do you know that?

Inspiration of the holy spirit and faith in the finished work of Christ.


f68471 No.549762

>>549718

>Why don't we use the definition the Protestant reformers themselves functioned on?

Then this thread would not exist


65b559 No.549765

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


d4c782 No.549790

File: e40757abe2225ce⋯.jpg (39.79 KB, 640x360, 16:9, d4d7b0483da099fe9732a45fcf….jpg)

>>549667

Essentially all the protestant Reformers were Humanist in the historic christian sense scholars who understood the necessity of understanding the text of scripture as the author would have intended it to be understood by its audience.

But for the most part vernacular translations, and robust study aids are sufficient for the laymen.


d1b2c6 No.549974

every prot is his own pope sadly


991f52 No.550141

>>549697

>The whole point of sola scriptura is that you need to study scripture!

This


b574e6 No.550143

File: 56d87e951551bb2⋯.png (32.33 KB, 240x240, 1:1, 147729020030236.png)

>>549754

>Inspiration of the holy spirit and faith in the finished work of Christ.

How can you say that when the KJV authors believed in baptising babies(RELIGION OF DORKNESS) and checking other bible translations for reference?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / general / htg / leftpol / maka / radcorp / sonyeon / startrek / waifu ]