That's an interesting question. In the sense of national identity, Miguel Serrano occupies a privileged place in the literary world, however, it is hidden by omission by the intellectual elite of the left, the ruling order in literature (Huidobro, Pablo de Rokha, Neruda, Mistral, Zurita, Bertoni, Lihn, Parra, although they are not all ideologically homologous, they have their bars pointing in similar directions), for being an intellectual dissident with ideas totally opposed to the thought that is the norm.
The concept of "esoteric Hitlerism" provokes laughter. It is not understood. It is rare to speak of Reich concepts in Latin America. And perhaps that is the great problem of MS, it never needed Nazism to be able to develop its nuclear concepts.
Why seek to create a belief system that is the negative of the Jewish Cabal (Orphic) Why mention Hitler as the last avatar if he could have abstracted more and created new forms? For loyalty to the Reich? And where does that loyalty come from? That romance for the promised land of the NSDAP order?