/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

>>67902

What an absolutely absurdly bad shop

>>67901 (OP)

I have some cloth diapers, but they always leak and aren't very discrete. Are these usual problems?

>>68038

I wonder what it is that makes Drynites so comfy.

>>68038

The latest Depends have a closer feel to them than other adult pullups but there's just something about drynites/goodnites that's special.

>>68038

I think it is probably a combination of companies not trying to emulate that feel, and also it might just be really difficult to so, since the anatomy and proportions change so much after puberty. Like>>68102 said, I think we are slowly getting closer to a good replica.

Also, I love the idea of cloth. I would get a pair, but I dont have a good way to wash them, as I dont live on my own. Would love to know how it feels to wet or mess cloth.

>>68147

I´d also like to know that feel. Don´t you have a laundromat anywhere in your town or around? Would probably be a safe way to get them cleaned anonymously, if you got a car available I mean.

I don´t have any around, so I´ll have to stay with disposables, which I can´t properly hide anywhere because I also don´t live on my own..

>>68149

>I´ll have to stay with disposables, which I can´t properly hide anywhere because I also don´t live on my own..

I know this feel. It's getting to the point where one of the main reasons I want to move out ASAP is to just be able to enjoy my fetishes without paranoia.

Sage for offtopic

>>68215

Are you talking about the Silhouette stuff or big plastic tape-on diapers? I'm talking about the former.

>>68228

What's the name of the company? I'm always looking for cute new cloth stuff.

>>68228

The tag on it says "Baby G's" but I can't find anything under that name online.

There's a super thick cloth diaper on Rearz' site that I've been eyeing but it's $100 and shipping which is entirely too much for just one diaper regardless of how thick it is and its reusability.

>>68372

where can I get this?!

>>68400

Rearz

>>68150

This is one of the reasons I prefer cloth for non-usage situations.

>>68372

I wish more women wore little girls clothes. Imagine seeing your crush drop a pen in the hall after class and when she bends over to pick it up you see the a frilly waistline of pink panties covered in butterflies

>>68652

I think that's from baby pants, not superundies

>>68723

http://www.baby-pants.com/training_Pants.php#p7GPc2_6

>>68788

Oof cute as they are, I wouldn't order them from such a dodgy looking site

>>71817

What makes you think that looks dodgy?

>>71802

wearing what exactly? Which trainers? whats the picture related to?

Anyone have experience with these?

https://www.abdlmarketplace.co.uk/nru-purrty-training-pants

Anyone tried these?

https://www.abdlmarketplace.co.uk/one-size-adult-pocket-nappy-buttons-blue

https://www.abdlmarketplace.co.uk/white-4-layer-microfiber-insert

They look really cheap. Whats the exchange rate between US dollars and pounds or euros?

They also look really cute.

>>68788

Shitty quality. Looks like it was made decades ago, doesn't have a logo, picture of real babies up top (which I bet the don't have the copyright to use), images of stock are poorly lit as if some guy did it in his bedroom or sometjing.

I wouldn't risk giving that site my card details.

>>72030

Rearz, Cuddlz, and NRU do equivalents.

>>72030

https://www.amazon.com/Baby-Pants-Adult-Training-Dinosaur/dp/B004QPGVWQ/ref=sr_1_6_a_it?srs=3017809011&ie=UTF8&qid=1544926725&sr=8-6&th=1

>>72030

The lack of SSL by default is pretty bad, but the rest of it is pretty much what I'd expect from any small business site. I've seen much worse web design errors from even fairly major and reputable retailers.

I don't know what your objection to the SSL certificate is - it's not self-signed and it includes the relevant domain names.

The lack of a social media presence is, if anything, a positive. Facebook/Twitter/etc. are awful. I'd much rather communicate via email.

>>80170

Where did you get those pink ones from?

>>80211

Looks like Rearz to me.

>>72030

It seems the owner of the page has done a few updates in the mean time. The "product reviews" link seems to be gone, some of the copyright notices have been changed from 2008 to 2008-2019 and they actually now have a certificate with the sitename as the common name.

No news on the PHP JS or CSS side; and one needs to go out of band to know these dudes are calafornian; form still sent over whatever connection you have now, so possibly (likely) unencrypted)

TOS and PP are worth a little read though; technically you are not allowed to view the website or its contents due to copyright. You may download it noncommercially; but when you are buying something; that seems a lot like a commercial endavour to me. Unless you have a job at any business or organisation, then you may also do it for educational purposes.

they'll share your information with people they have contracts with; or technically perhaps even anyone how you want to read the line "Other third parties with your consent or direction to do so."

>>80170

Those look hella cute

But could they hold a bladderfull?

Sounds like a lot of reusables can't.

>>90583

>>86963

I think so. unlike the cloth 'training pants' SU/TA have some heavy duty elastic. I still have and use ones I bought 7 years ago. as they age though they leak through the front seams.

But.. I use them as my daily underwear now, especially since they went from terry to microfiber. So now I'm Training pants at work Cloth Diapers at home and Disposables on the weekend and nights out.

I really want to get a cloth diaper, but I don't have access to a washing machine or dryer that would be discreet enough. Is it possible to just wash them in the shower or something?

>>93622

Have to go to a public mat or live with others that lack discretion?

Depends on whether it's #1 or #2 cause one is way easier than… two. In any case you could try a solid hand washing with a little detergent and tiny amount of bleach. After words you could try hiding it in a shirt or something and toss it in with your regular loads for a proper clean and then drying.

>>93622

>>93632

Also double check the tag or material to make sure it's not hand-wash or cold wash only or something like that.

>>93633

>>93632

I would be interested in trying "#2" in cloth, but I certainly wouldnt do so before I had my own place with a washer and dryer, so for now I would only be using it for #1.

Unfortunately I dont have a license so I cant go to a laundry mat, and usually my mom washes my cloths while Im at home (I do my own laundry at university of course).

>>93632

I say this at risk of sounding like a basement dweller/weeb/bottom feeder, but some of it (like the license) is largely a consequence of circumstance, bad timing, and lack of true need.

>>93622

Also, I tried a while back trying to make my own DIY cloth diapers. I just used a few hand towels and wrapped myself in them, then made a makeshift pair of plastic pants and it seemed to work pretty well. I think I did this twice, and the second time it ended up causing pretty significant skin irritation and I ended up taking it off because of that. After I was done using it, I would just take the towels into the shower with me and soak and wring them out a few times really well. I have a fish tank in my room and I keep a few of them in there to clean up spills and drips when Im changing the water or cleaning and stuff, so I often would use those.

Can someone who has a cloth diaper post pictures of the inside/outside both before and after wetting it? I dont know why but I really want to see the comparison.

>>93686

think its this pic

https://t.co/2TtDBgsMFi?amp=1

>>95877

huh? wrong thread?

>>93615

whenever I try to order them, they are sold out.

>Not even a Black Friday sale

smh

Why has nobody made an ABDL product that is basically a cloth/reusable outer shell which is made really well, and then sell inserts for it which are basically glorified booster pads made to fit it perfectly? It seems like it would lower cost per diaper a lot, since you only need to make a few of the outer layers. The outer shell handles the waterproofing, tapes, general sturdiness, etc, and the inserts deal with the actual absorbancy, possibly having their own built in leak guards since those tend to get messy if you go #2 in them.

Like, I get the argument that this cheaper product would mean less money for the companies making it, but think of it this way. Whoever makes this thing can make inserts specially designed to fit into it just right, and so could gain the majority of the market for said inserts. Could you use any old insert? Sure, but it wont fit or feel the same. Also, yes the inserts may be less expensive than the same number of good ABDL grade diapers, but there are lots of ABDL's who dont buy as many diapers as they otherwise would because of the cost, or at the very least buy cheaper alternatives. Plus, you could gain a bit of the environmental advantage. Even though the inserts are still disposable, the outer shells would take the place of the plastic used in lots of regular disposable diapers.

You could even still go with a plastic based design if that was the feel you were going for. Just make it a REALLY rugged and sturdy design that is meant to last maybe 5 or 10 or 20 uses, then disposed of as it starts to wear out. Something reusable doesn't have to be designed for hundreds of use cycles necessarily. You could have a really super high quality design that would be too expensive to make for each individual diaper, but could be viable if it gets used maybe 2, 5, 10, 30 times, or however many they end up lasting/being designed for. Like a "semi-reusable" outer shell.

Thoughts?

>>101245

i got two pairs about a month ago, they're surprisingly absorbent for training panties

I've considered the idea of using cloth diapers instead of disposables. Is there any advice I should read before I buy anything? I know nothing about these diapers but it's a better option.

>>99376

thinking seriously about getting them, but paying 35 plus shipping is too much for me atm.

>>103513

Yeah, same general idea, but more substantial, better leak guards, etc. Meant for more sustained use rather than a few little kid-sized accidents.

Just figured I’d add to the thread by mentioning Omutsu Bulky nighttime cloth diapers from Rearz (they act as the perfect diaper cover, but also function to make you feel more in your little space)