/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

I recall being a teenager going on to one of those chats. I was genuinely surprised to see a 8/10 Stacy there. Unfortunately she never said anything and didn’t even look at the screen, really. The rest of the people were fat and/or beta autist fags chatting about the best diapers or some shit. I ended up leaving when the Stacy logged off.

>>51889

Shame. Nowadays all you find are feminists if you find a girl on there at all.

>>51888 (OP)

I'll talk to you. Are you a girl?

>>51911

The only females in this fetish are those you get into the fetish *cough* my mommy *cough*

she be into femdom and pegging so having her baby me was not tooo far fetched and we are now both into diapers!

>>51964

None of this is true

>>51980

encyclopediadramatica.rs/Onideus_Mad_Hatter

>>51998

Yeah, looks like it's Shyanne Garrett, cause he started sperging the fuck out with the spam posts the second I posted here…

>>51980

That dude is all shades of fuckin crazy…

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Crinklemon

>>51964

There are almost no women in this fetish at all, the ones who are generally get into it because their boyfriend got them into it.

Are you some elaborate troll or something, because I never really liked this board too much other than for porn purposes but you are quickly making it unreadable

>>51964

I shouldn't believe this but I do.

>>52006

DDLG is different from ABDL. Go into the DDLG threads on /soc/ and count the posts that mention diapers, almost none of them do. DDLG is just another trend for submissive girls, it has really no connection with being sexually attracted to diapers.

>Might uh… might interest you to know that there are places where male AB/DLs aka "Littles" are actually considered the MINORITY.

I've heard this before, never seen any evidence of it. The only attractive girls I've ever seen wear diapers online had a paypal account or were obvious attention whores.

I'm not saying there are absolutely no women in the fetish, but they are such a tiny minority that they are severely outnumbered even by transgender ABDLs

>>52006

That really isn't all that much though. Not even the guy that you responded to

>>52008

I got bored halfway through listing them.

Also all the ones I listed are very much into diapers, despite what that other guy seems to think.

He seems to be confusing the lolita community for the DD/LG community. The former has always been pretty anti-diapers, to the point of even doing some hilarious videos where they try and pout out the difference between bloomers and diapers.

On the flip side the DD/LG community is primarily BDSM based and diapers are a HUGE part of that community. To the point where the BDSM community itself has been largely sort of "appropriating" the AB/DL interest on almost all levels.

There are even a some videos where BDSM fetishists outright try and lay direct claim to the AB/DL fetish, saying that we're an offshoot of them, or that our entire interest revolves around BDSM or kind of a "light" version of their sexual fixation.

Blah, blah, blah… lots of fetish politics… it's fun to poke around at them from time to time.

>>52011

>Also all the ones I listed are very much into diapers, despite what that other guy seems to think.

I know for a fact that you're wrong about that. I have spoken personally with this Scottish girl:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKnJAmqLPg3OewEreM2M2tA

She constantly posts on /r9k/ and /soc/. Before she started posting pics of herself in diapers she constantly posted pics of herself naked. Then she started wearing BDSM stuff, then she saw she got a big reaction from wearing diapers so she started doing that exclusively. She's an attention whore, that's all she is. I even asked her if she's into diapers and she flat-out told me that she just does it for attention, I've seen her say the same thing to other anons on /soc/ who weren't into diapers and wanted to know why she was.

Another one of the girls you posted literally has a paysite. If you're getting paid to wear diapers then I don't exactly consider you to be ABDL, or at the very least I'm skeptical.

>On the flip side the DD/LG community is primarily BDSM based and diapers are a HUGE part of that community.

Utter nonsense, go talk to DDLGs, they absolutely disagree with you.

Honestly though what do you think the ratio is? 50/50? Anywhere even close to 50/50? In my estimation the ABDL community is decidedly male-oriented, and I think a conservative estimate is probably 95/5 or MAYBE 90/10.

>>52012

Are some of them cam whores… well, yeah, obviously.

But, you're missing the greater point. They're influential. They're basically breeding an entire generation of girls who think this shit is perfectly normal, who largely don't even understand the cam whore aspect… and the older they get, and the more involved they get, the greater their numbers increase.

It's hard to really put any solid numbers on anything because shit is changing so gawd damn fast… I mean the YouTube channels like the ones I listed… they cycle through so fast I can barely keep up with archiving them. Here today, gone tomorrow, six new ones popping up in their place by next week.

Going by Tumblr accounts and YouTube accounts… it's predominantly women, I'd say upwards of 70%… but then keep in mind women already make up the majority of social networking sites as it is, so you have to keep that in mind if you're trying to come up with any kind of real world ratio (which is probably close to 50/50).

The other big thing though is that it's EASIER for women. I mean girls can do all sorts of incredibly babyish shit on a day to day basis and most people won't even think twice about it. Women AB/DLs can often, essentially, hide in plain sight.

On the flip side, if you're a guy and you do anything even close to babyish and… you'll stick out like a sore thumb. I mean, I guarantee if you're a guy and you start using baby powder scented deodorant… that's not gonna go unnoticed and you'll probably be gettin all sorts of weird looks.

>>52012

>>52011

>>52014

Can we all just admit that this stems from a desire to have a girl in diapers? Who cares about how popular this is becoming? I thought it was well-established that if we ever want a decent girl to wear diapers with us, we'll just have to find some girl IRL and introduce her somehow and hope she reacts well to it. No girl who is actually into this (well, maybe a few out there) would ever actually be sane enough to be in a healthy relationship with.

>>52014

> They're basically breeding an entire generation of girls who think this shit is perfectly normal,

That's not the way fetishes work. My dick didn't start becoming hard to diapers because I saw a DPF message board, it did because it just did.

>Going by Tumblr accounts and YouTube accounts… it's predominantly women, I'd say upwards of 70%… but then keep in mind women already make up the majority of social networking sites as it is, so you have to keep that in mind if you're trying to come up with any kind of real world ratio (which is probably close to 50/50).

Just absolutely nonsensical> We have DONE polls, surveys and even semi-scientific surveys that all indicate the ratio is likely 90+% men. To say that MORE women are ABDL than men is just patently, flat out ridiculous. I know that the data collection is spotty and that we really can't find a true cross-section of such an amorphous community, and I understand why women are generally underrepresented on most dating sites, but we literally have ZERO data to indicate that women make up a significant portion of the ABDL population. Going by Tumblr accounts is also just ridiculous, those are porn accounts, them being women is further evidence that most ABDLs are men because they represent the market for ABDL porn.

Go to conventions. Go to meetups. Go to munches. If you find more cis women than even trans women then I'd be shocked. I went to Capcon and I saw 5 girls there, I got to know a few, and they were kinky BDSM faghags who were there with their gay friends, who actually were ABDL.

Women are far less likely to have fetishes in general, that is an established fact that is acknowledged by all sexologists who research this topic. Diaper fetishists are even more predominantly male than other fetishes.

https://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2014/4/2/why-do-men-have-more-unusual-sexual-interests-than-women

>>52016

Yes I would agree whole-heartedly with that. If oyu want a girl to engage in diaper play with you, I would not recommend ABDL meetups. Find a nice girl who you connect with, who seems open, and break the news to her when the time is right. If she thinks highly of you then she'll be willing to engage in diaper stuff. That is a far more likely scenario than finding a sane diaper girl in the ABDL community.

>>52034

I would rather have a girl to introduce this to and who enjoys diapers the way I do, than get some whore who treats this fetish as a "collector's item." I love this fetish and it's very personal, and it's not just something to wear on your wrist like a piece of jewelry.

>>51892

I actually tried one for the first time for a few minutes a few days ago. Was a girl there.

>>52078

But was it a good-looking girl?

>>52082

Left to fast to really gauge. They were talking about disney princesses. I say she was a meh. Not terrible but wouldn't get with.

>>52005

>>52003

The guy you're replying to is absolutely fucking bonkers.

Do not even trust a word that comes from his mouth.

>>52034

People didn't suddenly get attracted to feet just because foot fetishism became more mainstream. These people LARPing as diaper fetishists just to boost their tumblr profile are not actual diaper fetishists.

>And your "polls" and such… LOL, yeah, sorry, but self reported survey responses over the Internet are NOT in any way "science". Your bullshit is about on par with this nonsense…

Are you fucking dense or something? I told oyu IN MY POST that the polls were sketchy, but they all indicate a preponderance of evidence that the vast majority of ABDLs are male. It would be interesting if you could refute these by showing any data indicating that women make up a large portion of the populace, but that simply does not exist so all you can do is call into question the polls that I already told you are not perfect, but they're all we have.

>You're old (culturally), which is why you just stuck with the fetish you knew

I have no idea how you can possibly think of fetishes as something you can "branch into new ones" - it's like saying that gay people are stuck with just being attracted to cock without branching out into fucking a vagina

>>52087

Oh I know, I've read the Onideus entries on encyclopedia dramatica, I realize I am "debating" with an insane person, but I also know that there are many mistaken ABDLs out there who will defend the position that women are a significant portion of the community to the death, and I just want to demonstrate how patently ridiculous that belief is.

>>52091

Actually people suddenly started getting attracted to feet when we started COVERING THEM UP. Same with diapers… the AB/DL fetish was largely nonexistent until diapering became something pleasant instead of a torturous experience where babies were left in makeshift rag diapers for days on end.

Most fetishes are effectively created through social interaction/experience… we know this to be an absolute fact simply by examining prevalent sexual interests and fads over human history… they have definitely NOT been static.

One generation continually affects the next generation as well, as their interests and knowledge shape the way they bring up their babies/kids which in turn creates a continuous evolution of fetish.

If you want an easy, directly relatable example… just look at diaper preferences in THIS community. In Europe for example you can find small subsets which are greatly fixated on those "snibbs" diapers. And many older ABs traditionally gravitated more towards cloth diapers and younger ABs gravitated more towards disposable… in fact at one point back in the 90s there were some incredibly lengthy discussions regarding these differences within the community and the nature of their origins.

And, again, your polls are outright garbage, not even worth mentioning… they were garbage then, they're garbage now. Back when those polls were taken… that was so long ago that men actually vastly out numbered women on social networking platforms! And on sex based social networking platforms, at the time, it was nearly 100% men… sooo… yeah, not a huge fuckin surprise that your garbage poll resulted in garbage results.

PS - I'm glad you think so highly of Encyclopedia Dramatica… I really am…

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Infantilism

>>52105

I don't think highly of encyclopedia dramatica, but I don't see any reason why they would lie about you

There is no definitive reason why foot fetishists exist, there are many competing theories, one of the most promising being that the wiring in the brain gets messed up as the sensations for the feet are closely mapped to the sexual sensations. The VAST majority of diaper fetishists that I have met (including myself and I imagine it's the same for you even) had the fetish from the time they were a young child, prior to having any sexual feeling whatsoever.

I know this subject is not definitively studied to the proper extent so really we're just debating what-if scenarios, but there is absolutely no data I have seen that shows women (actual women not trannies) making up a significant portion of the ABDL community. My own personal experiences at munches, online, at conventions has shown that to be the case time and time again. I even recently hooked up with a fetish girl who enjoys "mommyplay" and she told me she was the only female on the diaper fetish website she joined in the entire city. That's pretty commonplace on all ABDL dating or community sites.

The polls are not perfect, but there is no data whatsoever to indicate what you are saying.

>>52113

"I don't see any reason why they would lie about you"

…you're talking about people who once plastered my social security number across the page and directly attempted to incite people to vandalize my property and SET MY HOUSE ON FIRE!

…riiiiiight. No malice there… I mean, it's not like the guy WHO SHOT UP A SCHOOL back in December wasn't posting crazy fuckin shit all over the Internet where in he directly blamed me for 'ruining encyclopedia dramatica'.

If you knew anything about ED you would know full well that I'm the most hated/despised out of every admin whose ever been on the site. I've probably racked up more death threats in that particular community alone than I have anywhere else on the Internet.

You must be a complete fucking moron to think those kids have no reason to lie about me. They, MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE ONLINE have every reason imaginable to want to try and slander and libel me.

Hell ALL of the people who were suddenly remade admins in the past month in the recent wake of Zaiger's downfall were ALL originally kicked off the server… because of me.

And some of them, like Phobos, even did JAIL TIME as a direct result of my reporting their stupid illegal shit to the FBI.

Zaiger himself once went on a screaming tirade about how I "deserved" my article because of all the horrible/unforgivable things I supposedly did to them and their friends and how they SHOULD lie… in fact I think there's even a segment somewhere in one of the talk page sections where Zaiger ~explicitly~ tells people to make shit up in my article.

>>52124

Reminder that you paid good money to be an admin there

>>52125

I gave Zaiger like… a dollar… once… and that was like a month before his complete meltdown.

I did give Ryan some money, like $50, but that was after he got arrested and was for his legal fund (nothing to do with ED).

>>52124

This might come as a shock to you, but I'm not very well versed with the drama of encyclopedia dramatica admins, nor do I fucking care. All I know is that you have made this board completely terrible with your fucking narcisstic faggoty posts recently. I would suggest you drop the fucking tripfag but I think we all immediately recognize you by your autistic posts.

>>52149

This might come as a shock to you, but I am specifically going out of my way to use a name in order to give you and easy opportunity to NOT see any of my posts if they're so "triggering" to you.

If I was posting anon, first of all, my writing style is unique enough not be mistaken for anyone else and, second, you would be forced to see all my stuff at that point whether you wanted to or not.

So don't complain, just put your baby blinders on and shut yourself the fuck up already, Whiner Baby.

>>52124

tl;dr ^_^

>>52154

censoring your name doesn't stop a plethora of replies to your attention whoring shitting up threads.

i know you don't care that everyone here hates you, but you're absolutely making this place shittier.

>>52149

I don't think anyone here even knew who he was until someone dropped the ED link so we could all see how awful he is. I hope the admin steps in soon or something, or he just gets bored and moves on

>>52200

I knew about him since 2006 during the height of Foxtailtimes and abdl story forum. Hey Mad Hatter….what your opinion on this person.

twitter.com/diaperedmother

>>52200 (checked)

Yeah, he's kind of irrelevant. I don't know why anyone here would know who some editor on ED is. Are any of the mods very active here? I haven't seen even a warning or something from them.

>>52204

I still don't know who he is, nor do I really care. Seems like an attention hungry autist who doesn't have a real home so he wanders around to different boards like a creepy old hobo making everyone feel uncomfortable.

I just filtered him and went on about my business. It made the board much more enjoyable once all of his post were gone, I recommend that to anyone tired of him.

>>52201

That is a VERY masculine looking woman… let's uh… let's just leave it at that.