[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / firechan / girltalk / htg / hypno / srz / u / vore ][Options][ watchlist ]

/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

All about ageplay!
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

[–]

 No.38995>>38996 >>39006 >>39373 >>39526 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

Why you guys think that nowadays most parents dress their children as a sort of mini adult instead of a child? And this piss you off? Because it does to me haha

Photo of an exception, totally loved her dresses.

 No.38996>>39010 >>39014 >>39423 >>39538

>>38995 (OP)

Why are you thinking about other people's kids? You some kind of pedophile or somethin?


 No.39000

Where are you going with this OP?


 No.39006

>>38995 (OP)

I haven't noticed that to a great extent, but it is more enjoyable to see kids dressed in cute clothes.

It does slightly annoy me when parents dress their kids up like fashion models. Those kinds of clothes can't be comfortable to play in, and it says a lot about the kind of values and priorities the parents are passing onto their kids.

I don't have any strong opinions on the matter though.


 No.39010>>39011

>>38996

You do know that how other people raise their kids can easily affect you, your own kids, or someone else you know/care about as well in the long run man right?

Still, sorry that the system has fucked and brainwashed you so bad that u think someone just wondering about how people are raising the next generation makes them a pedo though just cause it isn't their part of it.


 No.39011>>39030

>>39010

Parents don't always dress their kids. Kids will often chose their own outfit these days.

Besides one parent's decisions doesn't affect the overall society your child grows up in. Unless that parent is acting the same as every other parent of your child's friends; in which case maybe, you're in the wrong?


 No.39014

>>38996

Yes my American friend!! You are not allowed to think! Be a good patriot and stop thinking!!!

I love America so much!!!!!


 No.39030

>>39011

First of all that is a fallacy, actually two. That aside, you're self-reflective as fuck. A society, which incidentally contains some sort of mechanism that has people tuning in erotically with childhood sanitary products, which is further more on the rise. Think about you silly cunt.


 No.39373

>>38995 (OP)

I haven't noticed any real difference apart from the lack of light up running shoes and heelies. Why are we talking about kids, anyway?


 No.39377>>39381 >>39431

I kinda get where he is coming from as kid's fashion will decide the future of ABDL basically. When the kids grow up and some of them become ABDL they will want to wear what they wore as kids. That said you cannot complain as ABDL wear changes per generation. Now bulky diapers and more 90s wear is popular. Before it was bulky cloth diapers with old fashioned dresses, next will probably be thinner diapers copying pampers current designs etc.


 No.39381>>39424 >>39526

>>39377

I think this is true. It's exactly why, even though I don't really care what parents make their kids wear, we still have to acknowledge that it's going to affect the ABDL community.

I do think that there's a modern trend with parents to treat their kids less like kids, and more like tiny adults. Most parents just don't like kid stuff. I read one time that some big diaper manufacturer like Pampers or Huggies started manufacturing cloth-backed disposables, not because it was more effective or useful, but because parents were requesting diapers that resembled diapers less, and looked more like underwear, it's also why you see so many baby diapers that have designs like briefs.

Most modern parents don't want stuff reminding them that they have children, they don't want "baby" products necessarily, so there's a big movement in the baby products industry to dress baby products up to look more generic and adult.


 No.39423

>>38996

Why are you posting on a diaperfag board? You some kind of pedophile or somethin?


 No.39424>>39469

>>39381

I disagree on the supposed impetus behind parents that treat their children as small adults.

Remember that the concept of "childhood" is a modern one. For millenia upon millenia, children were just stupid, small humans in need of training. The idea that it's a time of innocence and fun is modern and ridiculous- just go read Lord of the Flies.

The parents that regret/don't want kids, dress them up in frilly things because it's the only good thing they get out of them, otherwise they ship the brats off to daycare or put them in front of a T.V.

The parents who care about their children and really want them to be happy, prepare them from day 1 for adulthood which will, after all, be 80% of their life. Childish things don't help you get a job and feed yourself but parents will someday die and the ones that care about their kids want their kids to be ready when it comes to that.


 No.39431

File (hide): 70733a0bc0663c6⋯.png (721.34 KB, 985x941, 985:941, 1434177156112.png) (h) (u)

>>39377

Shit, this must be why I dug snuggies and SDK (which I do remember having the baby version of as a kid) so much, compared to some real thikk fancy diapers.

I also dig the cinderella goodnites (hoping they are still kicking around for a while) because they remind me of the princess pullups I first had the balls to grab as a teenager, back in 05 or so.

< This latest goodnite s/m size batch seems to stretch/fit way better than the first ~2012 tinkerbell limited edition ones, for anyone who was on the size cusp. The sides also breathe way better.


 No.39442>>39454 >>39456

File (hide): 887ba6562dc48f5⋯.jpg (630.88 KB, 750x1000, 3:4, 20170726_091453(1).jpg) (h) (u)

I must be an unusual abdl. Despite growing up in disposables, I actually like cloth more. Partly because the dispoosables of <2013 sucked. The other part is I'm always conflicted, I like diapers but they have an impact on the environment. So I tend to use cloth for sleeping and disposables for when I leave the house.


 No.39454

>>39442

Ach, i hear you. There are so many possibilites for cuteness if you can sew your own diapers. If I didn't live in a flat and had my own machines, I'd switch to cloth.


 No.39456

>>39442

Nah. When I have more money I want to buy some cute fabric and start making my own cloth diapers. I have a sewing machine and know how to sew other stuff. Just gotta learn how to sew cloth diapers and I'm good to go.


 No.39469

>>39424

>Remember that the concept of "childhood" is a modern one. For millenia upon millenia, children were just stupid, small humans in need of training. The idea that it's a time of innocence and fun is modern and ridiculous- just go read Lord of the Flies.

This is true. Roman girls became women at 14 and boys became men at 16. In the middle ages anyone past 12 or 13 was seen as an adult. And in a lot of historical eras, kids would have spent most of their time helping their parents farm. From cuckapedia

>Toys became more widespread with the changing attitudes towards children engendered by the Enlightenment. Children began to be seen as people in and of themselves, as opposed to extensions of their household and that they had a right to flourish and enjoy their childhood. The variety and number of toys that were manufactured during the 18th century steadily rose; John Spilsbury invented the first jigsaw puzzle in 1767 to help children learn geography. He created puzzles on eight themes - the World, Europe, Asia, Africa, America, England and Wales, Ireland and Scotland. The rocking horse (on bow rockers) was developed at the same time in England, especially with the wealthy as it was thought to develop children's balance for riding real horses.[7]

And mind you child labor laws weren't around until the start of the 20th century. The idea of a "teenager" is a roaring 20s invention when companies figured out they could market things like clothes a demographic that were older than children but still not legal adults


 No.39526>>39537

>>38995 (OP)

>Why you guys think that

People do it because they want to live through their children and force them to wear what they think is pretty, and because normal people are sick and demented, that's gross adult things.

Plus the whole """sexualization""" of children thing normies do.

Yeah it pisses me off because I like cute kids, and just fucking kids, not mini adults with makeup and shitty adult clothing, which seems to come with a bitchy attitude. Fucking yuck.

>>39381

>I do think that there's a modern trend with parents to treat their kids less like kids, and more like tiny adults.

Well it's not.

It's a trend to be psychotic and ignore your kids and just throw electronics at them. That's not treating them like tiny adults, that's neglecting them.

They still bark commands at their children like they're pets and beat them or force them to do what they want them to do (USA).


 No.39537>>39547 >>39551 >>39642

File (hide): 772e7d281abcc01⋯.jpg (528.47 KB, 2292x2196, 191:183, 1458666396610-1.jpg) (h) (u)

>>39526

Yeah, when you actually take a step back and try to look at our society in an objective fashion, it's kind of horrifying how kids are treated. Adults expect unquestioning obedience and respect from children, but don't offer the slightest shred of respect in return. Children really are treated like pets. Also the education systems of almost every country are terrible at actually teaching kids to think clearly and solve problems. Parents don't give a fuck about teaching that kind of thing, and then schools just aim to crush children's spirits and enforce obedience.

Good to see you again. You're one of the few tripfags I actually like.


 No.39538>>39539 >>39551

>>38996

Typical English/American response.

Brainwashed to be obsessed about paedophiles - don't trust your neighbour.

Meanwhile, your government is fucking the shit out of thousands of kids every year in their private parties.


 No.39539

>>39538

Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of kids who are suffering due to poor policy decisions and cuts to public services.

It's probably best not to let the thread get too derailed into politics though.


 No.39547

>>39537

It's the all-about-me age. We're not having children because we want to raise children, we do it for status, and then we get upset when our children assert that they are indeed people with their own agency. All we want is a model for a our instagram account. I have a hunch the social generation is going to be highly (and distressingly) empathetic because they'll be wired to focus on their parents needs and emotions. They may be very screwed up, and/or even end up creating a better world (by exterminating millenials and older)


 No.39551>>39559

>>39538

The most ridiculous thing about it all is that statistically pedophiles are less likely per capita to molest kids, and more likely to molest 1-3 kids rather than the typical 7-13 non-pedophiles molest when they molest.

"Jew" aka elites media really fucked society with anti-pedo hysteria.

Literally the worst thing to ever happen to society. People have lost their mind calling for pedos to be cleansed from the gene-pool, even normies (non-/pol/), failing to realize us pedos are the majority of the good and decent caregivers and they'd literally murder and abuse their kids en-mass even more than they do now if we were gone.

>>39537

At least kids are starting to fight back a little and resist their parents…sadly they do not understand that they can completely defy them and simply leave the house to go be with who they want…yet.

It's in the benefit of both the schools and the parents to try to keep kids from being competent, as if they let them be then their positions are threatened.

Sadly idiots like on /pol/ think that we need to be more stern and protect our kids from the Jews and pedophiles by…keeping them inside and away from others…even though they don't want to play with them, which means television or other actual propoganda "Jew" stuff.


 No.39559>>39561

>>39551

Source? On all of that?


 No.39561>>39562 >>39564 >>39569

>>39559

What specifically?

The pedo things?

http://www.europsy-journal.com/article/S0924-9338(14)77731-4/pdf

>Only a small part (16,2 %) of sexual offenders against children meet the criteria (DSM-IV-TR) for pedophilia. There is significant difference inoccurrence of other psychopathological features between groups of 'pedophiles' and non-pedophilic 'child molesters', i.a. alcoholabuse/dependence, sexual dysfunction, personality disorder, increased aggressiveness, mental deficit, etc

To translate: only 16.2% of the test group had any arousal whatsoever to the stimulus that had naked photographs of children (medical) with a sexual tape being played.

Of these 16.2% they had significant differences overall to the rest, notably not being alcohol abusers, having personality issues, or being mentally deficient/lacking.

A note that was on this study when I originally found it months ago was that of the 16.2%, it is unclear what percentage are indeed pedophiles due to the limitations of the tests, and that it is likely between 4-12% of them may not be genuine pedophiles, but rather that they may get off to the situations.

Essentially all studies I've found say between 83.8% -> 98.5% of child molesters are not pedophiles. That's the one I found first in my google search, and that was the lowest one I've seen yet.

Got another one.

http://www.europsy-journal.com/article/S0924-9338(13)75803-6/pdf

>Conclusions:

>1. Pedophilia was diagnosed in 1,3% of the sample, revealing no specific personality traits except of more notable independence.

>2. Sexual offences against minors are perpetrated equally by pedophiles, people with other mental problems and the mentally sound, so prevention and education are indispensable while serving the punishment and afterwards.

To translate: Only 1.3% of the child sexual offenders could be definitively classified as pedophiles, and of that group they did not show any particular abnormalities or dysfunctions.

Furthermore, we conclude that pedophiles are no more likely than any other group, mentally well or otherwise, to molest a child.

I can't seem to find the study that says pedos molest 1-3kids, (averaging like 1.2) and non-pedos molesting 7-13 (averaging about 11.3), so yeah…but it makes sense.

If I was going to sex some cuties it'd be my little girlfriend, and probably only her, despite me babysitting tons of little girls. Non-pedophiles don't have that love for a child or any sense of it being a relationship, but instead just get horny and will use a child whenever they feel like it, which would likely mean, if they were in my position, they'd just fuck all the cuties (and rudely so) as they'd likely get bored or horny sometime and, having less self-control on average and more sexual lust, they do it.

Furthermore, they typically get off on multiple victims as it's a power/destruction thing often times, as well as muh virginity normie bullshit, then on top of it all they have no respect for the child, and thus, like when I sleep with girls, they would touch them in their sleep. I don't care to, and don't, and simply cuddle-cuddle them.

That'd be why.


 No.39562>>39565

>>39561

i think your frustration is coming from simple semantics. to most people, anyone who molests a child is a pedophile, psychology be damned. so when people freak out about pedos, they're really just concerned about their kids being molested period.


 No.39564

>>39561

Oh and to elaborate, as you must then conclude based off these findings…

Pedophiles are less likely to molest per capita as studies show a MINIMUM of 1-2% of society are pedophiles, while most placing the figure between 2-5% for exclusives and 4-12% for non-exclusives included.

To do the math, even the lowest figure, with the lowest margin of error they concluded would be 11%, including non-exclusives, and if you take the less conservative side, that's way less.

If you take where the majority sit, which is around what the second study mentioned, (upper 90s, typically 1-3%) then it's abundantly clear that pedos are less likely to molest than even normal people.

Which when you factor in what I mentioned/explaiend regarding "victim" count, it's literally irrational to not accept a pedophile as a caregiver to your child when compared to another person, as a pedophile may strike a couple times at most, while a normal person statistically will strike nearly a dozen times, and do so likely very unlovingly and likely forceful or violent, not to mention they generally would not give as good of child-care due to not genuinely loving your child and children, but meerly doing so for $$$.


 No.39565>>39572

>>39562

Well yes, I know that; I'm completely out to many women, including some who's kids I babysit, including one woman who just has a baby (early toddler now) daughter who I babysit.

None of them mind in the slightest, and neither does my mother, who actually helped me get my first babysitting job with my cousin, babysitting my soon-to-be little girlfriend.

That doesn't take away that the hysteria has only made things worse, as not consensual relationships sexual or otherwise are extremely hard to have, and often dangerous for both parties, and more normal people consider the option of using a child for sex as they hear about it more, when otherwise they'd never imagine it.

Furthermore it makes pedos more likely to lose their fucking minds, which is obviously potentially dangerous, etc.

Normies love pedos, they just have no clue what a pedophile actually is and how most/tons of the good parents or people who work with kids are full-blown pedos.


 No.39569>>39577 >>39597 >>39603

File (hide): 430b0f9fc6f3500⋯.jpg (177.81 KB, 596x1055, 596:1055, HangYourself.jpg) (h) (u)

>>39561

Keep trying to justify the fact that you are a pedophile and that you are harmless, the rest of us here in reality will continue to realize the only thing you deserve is a rope to hang yourself so you don't fuck up a child's life forever when you just can't help satisfying your urges!

>People have lost their mind calling for pedos to be cleansed from the gene-pool, even normies (non-/pol/), failing to realize us pedos are the majority of the good and decent caregivers and they'd literally murder and abuse their kids en-mass even more than they do now if we were gone.

I'm REALLY sorry society has made it harder for you to rape a 5 year old you SWEAR was attracted to you!

>At least kids are starting to fight back a little and resist their parents…sadly they do not understand that they can completely defy them and simply leave the house to go be with who they want…yet.

And now you can get out the free candy van to get some fresh meat, you sick fuck.

>Pedophiles are less likely to molest per capita as studies show a MINIMUM of 1-2% of society are pedophiles, while most placing the figure between 2-5% for exclusives and 4-12% for non-exclusives included.

"I didn't mean to rape the kids your honor, statistically I was less likely to!"

>Which when you factor in what I mentioned/explaiend regarding "victim" count, it's literally irrational to not accept a pedophile as a caregiver to your child when compared to another person, as a pedophile may strike a couple times at most

I mean sure, you leave a known burglar in your house and they are stastically less likely to take all your shit, right?!?!?!!

>To translate: only 16.2% of the test group had any arousal whatsoever to the stimulus that had naked photographs of children (medical) with a sexual tape being played.

ONLY 16%! Thank fuck they are locked up where they can get raped every night!

>I can't seem to find the study that says pedos molest 1-3kids, (averaging like 1.2) and non-pedos molesting 7-13 (averaging about 11.3), so yeah…but it makes sense.

There is no non-pedo you delusional waste of oxygen, if you molest a child, you ARE a pedophile.

>If I was going to sex some cuties it'd be my little girlfriend, and probably only her, despite me babysitting tons of little girls.

I don't care about society at large, but ANYONE who thinks it's OK to be sexually attracted to CHILDREN and then acts on that urge needs to fucking die. You sick fucks have NO IDEA the marks you leave on your victims to satisfy your urges, especially when you say "Oh, that 5 year old was attracted to me!"

Seriously, fucking kill yourself.


 No.39572>>39574 >>39577

>>39565

fascinating. A lot to take in. I could express my aversions but they're likely nothing you haven't heard before. Though when you say it's irrational to not hire a pedophile as a caregiver, it seems more rational to hire someone who won't strike at all, but can care for and love one's child anyway. Of course, that's under the presumption one has a perfect judge of character. I myself would not hire you as a babysitter, but hey, if you haven't harmed any kids, good on you. You remind me of Paarthurnax's line in Skyrim. (A dragon who seeks spirituality to abate his destructive nature.) "What's better? to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature with great will."


 No.39574

>>39572

I'll admit, you've truly had me testing that vidya character's piece of wisdom


 No.39577>>39580

>>39572

>Though when you say it's irrational to not hire a pedophile as a caregiver, it seems more rational to hire someone who won't strike at all, but can care for and love one's child anyway.

I don't think you understand.

As a baseline us pedos are no more likely to "strike" at all than a normal person, as well as is more likely to actually care for and love your child as if they were their own.

Because of this it's irrational to choose non-pedos if you had the choice as they're fundamentally worse caregivers in general and they're fundamentally more violent and harmful to children than pedos are.

In other words, if you were a good parent and you needed a babysitter, I should be your first choice, as no matter on what level you know me on and them on I'll always be the better person for the job.

>>39569

In other words, "I have no argument and am triggered as hell so here, have my bag of fallacies."


 No.39580>>39582 >>39597 >>39603

>>39577

Look, faggot, I don't give a shit what you tell yourself to get over the fact that pedophiles do nothing but ruin the lives of innocent children to satisfy their own sick fantasies.

You can try and talk about your cute little statistics all you want, you can say you're a better caregiver all you want, but in the end you're still a piece of shit who deserves to be killed and have your corpse rot in the ground.

If you want sympathy or understanding, Salon.com is -> that way. Otherwise, kill yourself and make the world a better place.

I'm sure you're just b8ing at this point.


 No.39582>>39583

File (hide): e9c659908834473⋯.mp4 (3.41 MB, 480x480, 1:1, 20488058_1975919386025382_….mp4) (h) (u) [play once] [loop]

>>39580

>the fact that pedophiles do nothing but ruin the lives of innocent children

lol yeah goddamn me playing with cute little girls, making them giggle, and protecting them from their abusive siblings, and most of all, treating them like a human being with feelings and respecting them, which their parents never do, THE HORROR.

Sorry you're a miserable dispicible individual and are so full of rage and anger. It's typical for normal people to feel psychotic thoughts it seems now a days. Maybe it's because most are treated like pets and have no good friends or lovers in their youth.


 No.39583>>39584 >>39597 >>39603

>>39582

>lol yeah goddamn me playing with cute little girls, making them giggle, and protecting them from their abusive siblings, and most of all, treating them like a human being with feelings and respecting them, which their parents never do, THE HORROR.

The horror begins after you rape them because you can't control your own urges. Then you've given the child a whole lifetime of therapy because you are a piece of shit who doesn't deserve to live.

>Sorry you're a miserable dispicible individual and are so full of rage and anger.

Naw nigga, I'm full of sympathy and empathy for the innocent children YOU fuck up because of your sick, disgusting, regressive and terrible pedophilia.

> It's typical for normal people to feel psychotic thoughts it seems now a days.

Is that what you tell the children after you rape them?

> Maybe it's because most are treated like pets and have no good friends or lovers in their youth.

Or maybe it's because some fucked up pedophile didn't kill himself and instead made sure to show children what rape feels like!


 No.39584>>39592 >>39599

>>39583

>because you can't control your own urges.

lol because 4years of babysitting little girls, alone, and bathing, changing, cuddling/sleeping, feeding, etc, them, and I haven't molested them despite being in my youth where I should be more horny and out of control, buuuuut somehow I'm going to RAPE some poor kid.

You're hilarious mate.

Besides, being pleasured sexually doesn't cause somebody to need therapy. Sickos like you who shame them and tell them how damaged they are, and how they were never loved and just used, that's what fucks them up.

Not a little lick and rub :3


 No.39585>>39591

File (hide): 739e914ce2f4863⋯.png (38.05 KB, 625x626, 625:626, 02984fyqjcf.png) (h) (u)


 No.39591

>>39585

I'm not baiting tho


 No.39592

>>39584

>Besides, being pleasured sexually doesn't cause somebody to need therapy. Sickos like you who shame them and tell them how damaged they are, and how they were never loved and just used, that's what fucks them up.

Is that what happened?


 No.39597>>39603

>>39583

>The horror begins after you rape them because you can't control your own urges.

Yes, everyone knows that anyone who can't satisfy their sexual desires in real life will eventually become a rapist. That's why permavirgin NEETs are the most common rapists, not chads who have sex every week.

That was sarcasm, in case it wasn't obvious.

Seriously though, it's funny how spectacularly enraged and offended normalfags like >>39569, >>39580 and >>39583 get when faced with evidence that many pedophiles aren't the monsters society believes them to be. It's like the reaction of devoutly religious person when you start to pick holes in their holy texts. They don't even consider adjusting their beliefs to be self-consistent. It's much easier for them to just denounce you as a liar working for the devil.


 No.39598>>39619

File (hide): d007e085b055713⋯.png (4.61 MB, 2396x1600, 599:400, IMG_1669.png) (h) (u)

Meanwhile in an alternative timeline women keep dressing as little girls, during their whole life.

Things like"sexier" are replaced by cuter.

Women who try to dress in way that we in our timeline would consider "adult" like mini-skirts, are ridicularized.


 No.39599>>39622

>>39584

U sure u pedo? Maybe you have your feelings labelled wrong in your head?

I mean are you gonna call every parent a pedo cause they love their kid?

Also it is possible to love and care for others w/o being attracted to them.


 No.39603>>39604 >>39605 >>39622 >>39638

>>39597

>Seriously though, it's funny how spectacularly enraged and offended normalfags like >>39569, >>39580 and >>39583 get when faced with evidence that many pedophiles aren't the monsters society believes them to be.

What "evidence" Cherrypicked statistics don't count.

You ARE a monster, not a victim. You only deserve a rope or bullet, you are a waste upon society. The Christians aren't to blame for society hating pedophiles, pedophiles make that happen just fine by existing.

It's sick, disgusting and depraved to be attracted to a child that is too young to understand what is happening emotionally and physically, you sick fucks will NEVER understand that because you are too selfish fulfilling your own desires and not thinking of your victims.

God, could your pathetic ass play victim any harder?

This victim narrative is PRECISELY WHY there should be an open hunting season on pedophiles. You are so fucked in the head, you don't even realize the simple fact that it is WRONG TO BE ATTRACTED TO CHILDREN. This isn't religious non-sense (in fact, religions are far more likely to BE havens for pedophiles), it's about common human decency.

Again, Salon.com is that way if you want sympathy for being a sick, pathetic, fucked up, regressive pedophile in need of a metal jacketed sleeping pill so you stop fucking society up.


 No.39604

File (hide): 675fc5535c3c0fb⋯.jpg (85.4 KB, 324x324, 1:1, 1442418257730.jpg) (h) (u)

>>39603

Yes, yes, we could see you're furious from your previous post(s). I know I'd never hurt a child and I know myself better than you do, so I don't know what you hope to gain by typing out rants like that. I guess if it helps you vent and makes you feel better then it's a good thing. Just try to remember that you're advocating for the execution of a few percent of all children born into the world regardless of their actions.


 No.39605

>>39603

Sorry for bursting your little bubble, but do you have any objective proof?

How do you measure and prove your claims?

This is going to be a hard wake up call. Welcome to the real world, kiddo.


 No.39619

>>39598

>that fucking jew nose


 No.39622>>39638

>>39603

>Cherrypicked statistics don't count.

Okay, so then what does?

Where are the non-cherry picked statistics that show what I am saying isn't true.

Come on, I coughed mine up, searched them up real quick on the spot.

Can't you?

Can you cite me what nerve ending that little cuties have down there that lets them know if it's sexual, and to hurt them if it is?

Because sorry, but kids like (consensual) sex, that's a fundamental fact. That's just how humans are.

Why don't you go back to /pol/ where all the mentally unstable degenerates reside?

>>39599

Most parents in the west at least do not love children, even their own, especially men.

This is why abuse is rampant and they often beat their children, definitely yell at and neglect them, and sometimes even rape them.

You may say they do, but that's just not the case. They don't genuinely love them. It's often founded it obligation, it's rarely if ever unconditional, and generally they show no signs of it. It's just something they say because they're supposed to, but it's not actually love.

The only non-pedophiles who do, from my findings, are some hippie women who are into attachment parenting, co-sleeping, baby-wearing, etc, which realistically due to the denial of pedophilia in women and the culture that pretends like that's normal for women, they're more than likely pedophiles as well who simply do not acknowledge the full sense of what they feel.

You probably don't understand still though.

Essentially, non-pedophiles rarely enjoy kids long-term and consistently. They get annoyed, they get frustrated, they consider it boring, they desire to do other things.

When they do not have someone to redistribute their kids to, they typically lash out at them, yell at them, hit them, or even rape them.

Pedos don't have that issue.

I can literally be surrounded by little girls, toddlers, babies, or regular ones, and I won't get annoyed, I won't get frustrated or angry, I won't be wanting to something else, I won't be on my phone, none of it.

I'm sure I'm a pedophile because of that, and other things that are similar.

>To put it short and simply

Yes, as my view on kids is way different and I don't fall in love with or find anyone else attractive.

While normal people may "love" kids, they essentially never actually love them. They "love" them like you love your second cousin who's older than you who you didn't hang out with much but you know and see a few times a year.

It's not a deep true love, it's more of a "well they're my family and I am supposed to protect them and care about them" thing.


 No.39632>>39637

File (hide): ff94913a27534a6⋯.jpg (3.35 KB, 200x123, 200:123, download (1).jpg) (h) (u)

$20

Solves all your problems.


 No.39637>>39639 >>39741

>>39632

Castration doesn't do anything to actual genuine pedophiles like myself, as our desires do not come from lust, but rather love.

I don't want to have sex with little girls because I want to cum on them, or in them, or because I want to feel powerful or defile them, nor because I want to use their soft bodies or holes.

No, that's normie shit.

I want to have sex with a little girl because I love them and I know they'd love sex, and that it'd feel really good to them and bring us even closer, and solidify our bond even further.

That's why my/our desires do not revolve around penetration/innercourse, or cum/dick-things whatsoever, but rather are all about them. We want to lick them, rub them, caress them, kiss them, and do whatever makes them feel good.

That's what gets us off. I'd bet my life on it that I could cum doing any one of those things to a little girl in a sexual/super-intimate way, without ever taking my pants off, or even hers. Hell, I might not even get hard and still cum, it's not unheard of.

Castration changes nothing for people like me, at least nothing in a way you'd consider positive, or we would, as some who have tried experience a more "empty" feeling and generally feel off and out of touch, which in other words it makes them unstable.

And I don't mean out of touch as in not finding girls attractive, I mean they just do not feel like their self anymore, they feel like less things matter, and they often begin to think violent thoughts.

That's no good.

Us Girl-Lovers need to be happy and content to be safe, yet alone productive, and thankfully that's extremely easy to make happen as all you need to add is some girl-time once in awhile :3


 No.39638>>39641

>>39622

>Where are the non-cherry picked statistics that show what I am saying isn't true.

>Come on, I coughed mine up, searched them up real quick on the spot.

>Can't you?

Its funny how u say this but then say this:

>Most parents in the west at least do not love children, even their own, especially men.

Think about that please.

>This is why abuse is rampant and they often beat their children, definitely yell at and neglect them, and sometimes even rape them.

People learn and do what they are taught, chances are their were yelled at, beat, neglected, and sometimes even raped as well (thought that last one is by far the rare one)

One thing that people are taught is how they should act around people as well.

>I can literally be surrounded by little girls, toddlers, babies, or regular ones, and I won't get annoyed, I won't get frustrated or angry, I won't be wanting to something else, I won't be on my phone, none of it.

So can plenty of other people. Pretty sure they don't all find some attractive. I also don't see how the idea of "I am suppose to protect and care about them thing" isn't a form of love as well.

>Yes, as my view on kids is way different and I don't fall in love with or find anyone else attractive.

I don't find anyone else attractive as well but I find myself certainly caring for people, actually caring about what happens to them, and enjoying their company. I happen to have years of experience as well with working around people of all ages even. Young to old.

Also I don't know if those pics you are posting are of kids you actually work with but I'd advice you not to do that due to HIPAA if you are man. For sure on a website on a board like this.

>>39603

>there should be an open hunting season on pedophiles.

um no


 No.39639>>39642

>>39637

>I want to have sex with a little girl because I love them and I know they'd love sex, and that it'd feel really good to them and bring us even closer, and solidify our bond even further.

Oh, it will REALLY solidify your bond later when that poor girl is going to therapists because you raped her!

The sad thing is, you'll never realize WHY this is so fucked up.

>That's why my/our desires do not revolve around penetration/innercourse, or cum/dick-things whatsoever, but rather are all about them. We want to lick them, rub them, caress them, kiss them, and do whatever makes them feel good.

Seriously, kill yourself and stop samefagging to give the appearance that anyone here agrees with you.


 No.39641

File (hide): 3a6d17cd12d41f1⋯.mp4 (7.81 MB, 854x480, 427:240, Fighting Back Against the ….mp4) (h) (u) [play once] [loop]

>>39638

>Think about that please.

I coughed up the ones that were relevant and asked for.

Nobody asked for those or even hinted at it, and regardless it'd be intellectual dishonest to ask for such a citation as it's an observation which cannot be verified clinically due to the nature of the culture/society.

>People learn and do what they are taught

That doesn't excuse their behavior, nor justify it.

I was beaten as a child very brutally & yelled at constantly and I can't so much as spank a child lightly, yet alone make them cry or yell at them.

The only reason they are okay with doing that is because, as I said, they don't really love them and see them more as pets/objects than people, partners, lovers, or friends.

>So can plenty of other people.

It's not very common, and it's basically unheard of among men, and statistics for pedophilia in the population line up disgustingly well with my observations of that now that I think of it.

It's very rare somebody fits all those things as well as enjoys them, and most of all can do it every single day. The only group that's like that that aren't pedos, that have any chance at it, are babywearing ultra-hippie co-sleeping gentle-parenting mothers, which literally fit the mold for pedophiles perfectly, so their position there is questionable imo.

Maybe they're not though, can't really say for sure, although it'd odd how they're so different.

>I find myself certainly caring for people

I know, it's just that love isn't the same tier as one to the ones you're attracted to, and due to what I've previously said I don't see that extended to children for most people, and really to anyone they do not like personally, as most of them don't enjoy their company (kids) for long or any of that, and thus that bond is neigh-impossible.

I don't take pics or have any pics of the kids I babysit, so no, I also have roaming gangs of crazies that track me, such as the pizzagate people, so that'd be too risky.

>Webm related


 No.39642>>39647

>>39639

Lol sex at any age feels good and releases chemicals that promote bonding, love, relaxation, good hormones, etc.

If I had sex with my little girlfriend, or the daughter I'll likely adopt in 5~ years, then we'd have a relationship established, trust each other, and we'd have experiences and be happy together.

She'd never need therapy, as there's nothing to get over or talk about.

>stop samefagging to give the appearance that anyone here agrees with you.

Lol so I samefagged all the way back up to >>39537 before ANYBODY on this board responded to me? Clearly I don't/didn't need to do that to make you pissed, so if that was my goal, which that's the only reason someone would samefag, I certainly didn't need to as you spazzed the fuck out with no issue as you're a sick fuck.

I'll never kill myself and leave little girls to trash like you, nor leave my little girlfriend to her abusive father, brother, etc. She's needs somebody to love her.


 No.39643>>39646

As I thought, you do not have an actual argument (zero replies to my post).

Once again you have failed in the shadow of my intellect.


 No.39646

>>39643

Who are u again?


 No.39647>>39650

>>39642

>Lol sex at any age feels good and releases chemicals that promote bonding, love, relaxation, good hormones, etc.

>If I had sex with my little girlfriend, or the daughter I'll likely adopt in 5~ years, then we'd have a relationship established, trust each other, and we'd have experiences and be happy together.

>She'd never need therapy, as there's nothing to get over or talk about.

You're going to prison


 No.39650>>39676 >>39762

>>39647

Lol I'm going to prison for being informed about the anatomy of a child and the affects of sex?


 No.39676>>39683

>>39650

Ok, so unrelated to the current discussion, but I have a question for you admitted-pedophile-tripfag-anon.

What are you doing on an ABDL board? It doesn't sound like you're an ABDL at all? Aren't there other places you could talk about this stuff, without changing every conversation you participate in to a discussion about you and your desires?

Why even come here?


 No.39683>>39732

>>39676

It consistently popped up recently and I was going to ask a few questions, then I found some threads I could /contribute/ on.

Then normies spazzed, that's their fault and doing, not mine.

I don't even like diapers although I like toddlers/babies most of all


 No.39732>>39740

>>39683

I admit that people get pretty flamed up when you post here, and that's not necessarily your fault, but with that said could you please leave?

No offense meant, but you hanging out on an ABDL board, casts a misrepresentative picture of all of us, and tends to derail every conversation you participate in.


 No.39740

>>39732

>casts a misrepresentative picture of all of us

I seriously doubt that as I specifically say I don't like diapers specifically or any of it, and I am on literally every active board that isn't gaming-based at this point on most chans and always have.

Go look at /r9k/ for example.

I think the threads I'd be posting in are mostly dying, because that normie got triggered and regardless lgf gets back from her trip out of state tomorrow and it's monday, so I'll be "back on duty" anyways.

I'll mostly stay away, and post less qts, but I can't say my hand won't crawl here occasionally if someone is being an idiot about kids like they are in those other threads right now.


 No.39741>>39774

File (hide): 8d405525fbc2a97⋯.png (50.29 KB, 300x300, 1:1, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)

>>39637

>but rather love.

Would you still love them when they are no longer little girls? When they have become adults?

If the answer is "no" .. You don't really love them. You just love a temporary ephemeral state of them.

You would be loving a passing moment..

I'm not 39638


 No.39762>>39774

>>39650

You're going to prison for raping a child. There's zero scientific evidence that children desire sex with adults. When children laugh and smile, that's not flirting. That's just them playing. You see it as flirting because you have a mental illness


 No.39774>>39900

File (hide): fe7d096e82116ac⋯.jpg (66.48 KB, 480x640, 3:4, IMG_8579.JPG) (h) (u)

>>39741

>Would you still love them when they are no longer little girls?

>When they have become adults?

Love them? Yes.

Want to have sex with them? Maybe, if I was already sexing them I'm pretty sure yes, as I'd be eased into it and feel comfortable with them and used to the activity, etc.

Otherwise I can't say I could perform sexually if we started sex after puberty started, or much after it at least. I'd try if she wanted to after, but I just can't say, especially if the goal isn't pregnancy, as that's the only sorta fetish type thing I have, although it's still not a lustful desires…I can't explain it. Probably is some way for me to manufacturing more babies to cuddle if times are desperate.

Regardless, that's really a non-issue as generally girls in this society want to go their own way in early puberty, which is something we've come to accept, that we'll likely be shafted and have to get another girl when that one goes her own way and we become just a memory and maybe a close friend.

>>39762

I have never raped a child and never will though you silly goose.

>There's zero

There is plenty of logical, adaptive, and anatomical evidence that would say so. There's no scientific studies saying otherwise either.

Kids desire intimacy, things that feel good, physical affection, etc.

Sex fills all of those things. Of course they want sex.

>that's not flirting

Yes, I agree, however doing severely inappropriate things on their own without any coercion or experience, such as straddling you and trying to kiss you a lot, that's suggestive.

Saying "will you marry me for real and be my boyfriend/husband" and then holding that you're her real one and that she's actually married to you for not just the day, or a few days, but indefinitely in front of her family, even when they shoot it down, and with strangers, EVEN WHEN YOU AREN'T THERE, now that's something special.

When they ONLY kiss you on the lips, despite you always trying to kiss them on the cheek, that's something odd.

I can go on, but if you're not retarded you've got my point by now.

Kids don't know what the fuck they're specifically doing, but they know what is intimate and they know what is relationship things and can commit to it, even as small very young toddlers who can barely talk.

One may not mean anything, but tons of things stacking like they do with little girlfriend does. She doesn't flirt really, she knows I love her extra-much-so and am different, and she loves me back extra-much-so and differently than others as well.

That's why she's my little girlfriend.

And no, I don't let her straddle me and makeout.

I stop her and tell her we can't do that, and then she compromises for something less "inappropriate" but still affectionate and intimate, such as simply me holding her "tight" or in general, or whatever it may be that time that she asks for.

I know what she wants and is looking for and needing in that moment, so I let her satisfy her needs, which top mine up as well nicely enough (what a great couple!), even if that means holding her for hours.

She's been gone from me for a week and a half cross-country with her parents on a trip to see her relatives, and I'm sure when she gets home later today she's going to be in my arms and won't let me go, and will definitely be coming into my bed in the middle of the night, or honestly maybe even straight away as her parents will likely be tired from the drive and not have the energy to tell her no.

Tomorrow she'll probably be all over me too, and she'll probably want me to take her babysitting with me, and being tomorrow just a babysitting a 1yo babygirl thing lone, that's definitely no problem.


 No.39900>>39904

>>39774

i have a question for you: do you have any sources of testimonials from people who are aware they were raped (call it normal sex or whatever you want, legally it's rape) as a child and DIDN'T experience any trauma from it later in life? something like "sure i remember uncle lester 'playing games' with me in the laundry room when i was young, it never affected my mental health or development at all." not trying to argue or call you out (don't have the patience for e-arguing but the rest of you please carry on), just genuinely curious if such people exist and i figured you would be the first to know


 No.39904

>>39900

There's many videos of teen girls and a few women on youtube saying they liked it, loved them, etc, have no issue.

https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Accounts_and_Testimonies

That page has some text things and historical ones as well.

It's rare you find such stories as the majority of kids who are molested are molested by non-pedophiles, and thus typically genuinely raped.

However that's also because in a culture that says all the bad things, trauma is often to develop later in life due to being shamed and frankly brainwashed by society.

But also because, quite frankly, if you come out as a guy (or even a girl) and say you were molested and liked it, what will happen?

They'll say you're "justifying pedophilia" that you're a "pedophile" and/or that you were "brainwashed and have stockholm syndrome."

That's the main one.

Tons of women I've spoken to, and some I've came out to, say they were molested and liked it and didn't mind at all, and seem to have no issue with it. They just rarely speak as it's not seen as acceptable or something people want to hear, and thus they get abused rather than appreciated if they speak out.

I was also molested by a teenage boy from across the street when I was young, and it never really bothered me or seemingly caused issues.

It was annoying during the time, and thus I told my mother eventually. Apparently he did more than I remembered, as in it was more than behind a shed and he'd touch me in the pool too, but still I never had an issue about it.

Basically forgot about it till people brought it up so much regarding pedophilia. I'd only think of it once and awhile and neutrally so, like "I wonder how he's doing" even though he wasn't nice and it wasn't fun for me.

I always thought, what if he WAS nice and he did make ME feel good?

Probably would have loved it.


 No.40616

File (hide): 3f0aec7caeb45f2⋯.jpg (669.03 KB, 1079x809, 1079:809, 11 years old dyed pink hai….jpg) (h) (u)

Allow me to resurrect this thread for a second.

I was just Google around, and I found out this image a couple days:

> 11 years old

> dyed pink hair

> pretty adult-like clothes

I just hate generation Y. And I hate their parents (so probably I hate generation millennium too).




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
67 replies | 19 images | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / firechan / girltalk / htg / hypno / srz / u / vore ][ watchlist ]