Partner Knowledge and Involvement in Adult Baby/Diaper Lover Behavior.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 12 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 98516657d0517a3⋯.jpg (77.81 KB, 1031x374, 1031:374, IMG_20170613_064759.jpg)

Partner Knowledge and Involvement in Adult Baby/Diaper Lover Behavior. Anonymous 06/13/17 (Tue) 10:42:44 No.37097

93% male respondents:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28605271?dopt=Abstract

Can a University lad unlock this and give us a peak?

Anonymous 06/13/17 (Tue) 11:25:22 No.37098

File: d5310f4c14d98f7⋯.pdf (203.28 KB, CTLS-2016-03.13-20.pdf)

There you go.

Looks like meme-science.

Methodology is highly flawed, respondents are not even remotely representative for anything.

But for role-playing purposes it seem useable enough?

Then again what would you expect.

Anonymous 06/13/17 (Tue) 17:22:28 No.37116

>>37098

It faces the same problems as research into pedophilia. That is, it's basically impossible to recruit a completely representative and unbiased population for study because nobody knows what the real population is like and there is a strong stigma against people coming forward to participate in the research.

That doesn't make it "meme science", whatever that's supposed to mean. Even incomplete and unrepresentative data is better than no data.