No.877762
How large is too large for a romantic interest?
When does ecchi become full fetish from the artists point of view?
No.877765
>>877762
>How large is too large for a romantic interest?
The moment they fill more than a handful.
No.877766
>>877762
I don't mind hugeness, but then again, I'm one of those weirdo fetishists that serve as Synechdoche's target audience.
No.877776
>>877765
>handful
Disgusting. Girls should be flat, nothing more than the nipple is necessary.
No.877777
No.877808
>>877776
This, when the breasts begin to bud she’s past her good years
No.877837
When it's so large that it rolls over and becomes negative.
No.877839
I wouldnt mind bigger tits but its got to fit the body, so its gotta be a on a girl linear with the height.
No.877841
Big breasts are moe, especially when the character who has them is clumsy or inconvenienced by them.
No.877843
>>877776
>Disgusting
>being gay
Tall tomboy with a small supple chest that fit comfortably in your hand are the best, specially if they're embarrassed by it.
Still, the best chest is the chest of the girl you love. Without the girl it's just fat. Big and small are all great, we should all just unite, love cute girls and agree that there are no bad breasts except veiny breasts.
No.877844
>>877762
I can only hope the future holds more large romantic anime interests.
No.877845
>>877776
How flat is too flat? because there comes a point where it might as well be a shota.
No.877858
>>877845
>How flat is too flat?
I... What? Is English not your first language or something because I'm having a lot of difficulty trying to understand what you're saying here.
No.877862
>>877843
>veiny breasts
I don't think I've ever seen a 2D girl with that.
No.877867
File: 196469980cab870⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 723.85 KB, 1339x962, 103:74, __hatoba_tsugu_hatoba_tsug….jpg)
>>877860
>trash opinion
>gives example of trash character from trash anime
Everything checks out here.
>>877862
That's because it's ugly and generally 2D strives to be beautiful. You sometimes see it in 2D drawings that are on the more realistic side but those are usually drawn by westaboos or actual westerners who think they can draw "anime style". I think the only example in anime is when SHAFT had breast veins on some character in one of their monogataris, and that makes sense because SHAFT is very passionate about being inaesthetic.
No.877874
>>877867
>westaboos or actual westerners
I thought it was usually Korean or Chinese that did weird sort of psuedo-realism thing
No.877880
>>877874
Chinks and gooks are huge westaboos, gooks especially. There are a few chink artists who are really good at emulating Japanese artstyles and could pass as Japanese to all but the most well-trained eyes and an even smaller number of gooks, but most of them take more inspiration from western "aesthetics" than eastern.
No.877883
Boobs are too big as soon as they curve down or fold at the bottom. The ideal size is just before that happens.
No.877885
>>877867
There's no need to be so cruel, we probably have more similarities than differences.
No.877886
>>877862
>I don't think I've ever seen a 2D girl with that.
My sweet innocent child.
No.877889
>>877762
>How large is too large for a romantic interest?
When it's extremely painful.
No.877893
No.877904
I don't recall any case where the girl with the biggest knockers (95+cm) is the main heroine or actually wins a MCbowl.
At least in anything that isn't an eroge but those come with multiple routes anyway.
No.877906
>>877883
That's the size that is the optimal balance between cute and sexy. They can still fall below that line while being exquisite, for me. The point of no return is when the tits are so big they can't sit side by side properly and splay out sideways outside of the frame of the body.
No.877910
Large breasts are fine if the body looks like they can support them. Like if they are extra huge, make the girl a bit more wide or thicker.
>>877844
Manyuu Hikenchou was at least 5 years ahead of its time when the anime came out
No.877936
>>877913
Oh yeah, Rakudai Kishi.
One day I'll read the LN, the manga and anime were neat.
No.877940
>>877910
>Tfw something finally uses your BE fetish for something other than gag boobs
>Never finished
>Never translated
>Never again
No.877957
All breasts are good. Thick or thin, flat or fat.
No.877960
>>877867
>trash character from trash anime
Truly this board is devoid of taste. Shame on you.
No.877961
>>877843
>Still, the best chest is the chest of the girl you love. Without the girl it's just fat. Big and small are all great, we should all just unite, love cute girls and agree that there are no bad breasts except veiny breasts.
No.877967
>>877843
How veiny is "veiny"?
No.877978
>>877967
>is the vein on the surface like an erection
a line has been crossed.
No.878048
>>877777
Wasted quints on this filthy lie.
Flat is nothingness. Flat is the refusal to grow, change, and evolve. Flat is stasis, the absence of progress. Flat is sameness. Flat is avoiding differentiating yourself from your counterpart. Flat is stubbornly refusing to let go of the past and move on. Flat is the suppression and binding of femininity. Flat is far from justice.
No.878104
>>878048
>Flat is the refusal to grow, change, and evolve. Flat is stasis, the absence of progress. Flat is sameness
I always knew that those that hated DFC were followers of Tzeentch.
No.878170
>>878104
By that token, would that make DFC devotees followers of Nurgle?
Or since we’re focusing on breasts, aren’t we all followers of Slaanesh?
And the violence between DFC and Large Breast enthusiasts be pleasing to Khorne?
Is breast argument and discussion Chaos Undivided?
No.878189
>>878170
>>878104
Khorne likes flat chests because breasts are a sign of receptive femininity, which in his eyes is weakness.
Nurgle likes big fat cow tits because he represents the natural order of death and rebirth, meaning he's linked to fertility just as much as death.
Slaanesh is the omnifetishist who can, and will, fap to absolutely anything of any size. Yes, that includes floor tiles and backpacks.
Tzeentch doesn't give a shit about proportions as long as someone is getting NTR'd.
No.878214
>>877762
>When does ecchi become full fetish from the artists point of view?
As soon as they're large enough to actually get in the way of daily activities or hinder you from doing certain things. Then it becomes more comedic and fetishistic. There's also certain combinations or features which are obvious signs of the author pushing their fetish. School swimsuits on petite girls, pantyhose on nice legs, cakes with sweaters, skin tight clothing that normally isn't, skirts that are so low that they should show something but don't, and clothing not common for someone's age.
No.878217
Just wanna throw this out there, I like tits and regardless of the oppai piggus vs cutting boards I win.
No.881354
>>877762
When it's large & green...
No.881487
>>877762
>trying to generalize something that is purely subjective depending on personal tastes
No.881523
>>881487
>purely subjective depending on personal tastes
There is no such thing. Now stop trying to be an intellectual try-hard and tell us your favorite tit size, so I can say whether it's correct or not.
No.881557
Flat chest is disgusting but cow tits are just asking to sag like an African refugee once she hits the wall. C size.
No.881599
If she's larger than a B cup she instantly goes to the ham slicer get that solved.
No.881806
>>881523
>there is no such thing
What a compelling argument. Maybe letting you out of kindergarten was a mistake.
No.881809
>>881806
He's right though. Subjectivity is how we got people smearing shit or period blood on a canvas and calling it "art." Just as there are objective standards of what is beautiful, there are objective standards of what is too big.
No.881810
>>881557
I prefer actually size like 40 in/100cm.... the letter cup-size changes per country
No.881820
>>881809
You're oversimplifying the issue. There may be a single objective standard of beauty, or of something of which beauty is a subset, but that does not mean all observers will rank everything the same way within the constraints of that standard. Subjective personal taste is compatible with overall objectivity.
Consider the special theory of relativity. Under SR, every observer agrees on certain objective facts (e.g. the speed of light). Subject to the conditions of their own specific reference frame, observers will disagree with each other on other measurements. But knowing how the other observers' frames relate to your own, the results in one frame will agree with those of another when the correct (objective) transformation is applied. Observer A might observe two events to be simultaneous, while observer B might observe one to happen shortly before the other. Both are reflective of the same underlying objective reality, and neither has a claim to being "more right" than the other. There are also impossible observations, where no reference frame can be constructed that might observe them (e.g. violations of causality), and it is also possible to know objectively whether a normally-valid observation someone reports is actually what they observe from their frame.
Likewise, it's possible for two breast fans to value different things about breasts, and both have a valid point. It is possible for one person to prefer flat chests and another to prefer G-cups and have them both be valid preferences, without it being a contradiction. But at the same time it is possible to be objectively wrong; someone who describes his love for youthfulness, modesty, innocence, and subtlety in the female form, yet concludes that gigantic breasts are better than small, is clearly wrong, and even someone with a justified preference for large breasts can conclude so.
In the case of your shit on a canvas, it is unlikely but perhaps possible that one can contrive a valid "reference frame" in which it is beautiful, much less likely that it would be one a human might actually possess, and essentially impossible that the people claiming it's beautiful actually observe it to be so. Which is what we both know to be the case: it is exactly because they do not think it is (or could realistically be) beautiful that they pretend it is and claim that you should find it beautiful too. And that is what makes them objectively wrong.
No.881877
Akane Owari is my benchmark. Her breasts are as big as breasts ever need to be. Any bigger than this is just too much. My ideal size would be smaller than this, but it is the max that is acceptable.
No.881910
"Just big enough that you can get your hand under" is a good standard of maximum size.
>>881877
I really like it when anime eyes have circles within them. I don't know why, but it gives them a good aesthetic.
No.881911
>>881910
Circles or spirals, that is.
No.881931
>Fatfags or undercover flatfags attempting to conflate big tits with fatties
I'm on to your tricks
>>881910
>>881911
These posts were made by Al Bhed
No.881943
>>878048
>Flat is nothingness
Wrong. Flat is everything. You build on flat ground, not on rocky and curved ground. The LHC required extensive construction of a flat platform so they could discover massive things about the universe. We write on flat surfaces. We machine things from flat benches on machine tools. Flat is everything. Can you say your waifu is capable of hosting a particle accelerator on her chest? I can. Can you use your waifu's chest to true a surface? I can. Flat is the foundation of everything, and remember, even cow tits were flat once. Flat is the beginning and the end. Flat is justice.
No.881945
>>881943
Flat is the barren beginning but not the end in any way, as soon as you build upon the flat it changes, is molded into what you require. Flat may be where it all begins but on its own it has no use, no application until it changes into something beautiful with skilled application of only the best architecture required to create the marvels such as those particle accelerators. On the flat workbench we seek to create true beauty in the curves and contours of our work, moving beyond the simple and mundane flatness to the curvature and bountiful nature of our creations, emulating the beauty of nature around us. The perfect curve may be subjective, but nonetheless I think we can all agree that flat is merely the basis it is built on, not the end result.
No.881958
>>881945
Wrong again, things you build on the flatness do not become part of it. You wouldn't say your waifu is no longer flat because you came all over her chest. That is true beauty. The flatness shapes your relationship to the waifu, and as a result, you can be closer to her heart than with vulgar tits.
No.881962
>>881958
But your waifu does grow from flat to curved naturally, and the very basis of this nature is to change and grow, representing the growth you experience with your waifu. Without it, it merely remains simple and dull, barren and incomplete.
No.881968
>>881962
>But your waifu does grow from flat to curved naturally
Not if she's an eternal loli, which is the best kind of waifu.
> and the very basis of this nature is to change and grow,
Waifus aren't natural, and that's why they're better. They are the constant to shape yourself around.
No.881970
>>881820
>all that shit
So what you're saying is cow-tits are best
>>881962
>But your waifu does grow from flat to curved naturally
Excuse me? My waifu has been the same exact way for years and years. That is what makes her 2D. You aren't some filthy 3D-lover, are you?
No.881975
>>881962
>grow from flat to curved
Do you believe in the tooth fairy too?
No.881976
>>881970
>Excuse me? My waifu has been the same exact way for years and years. That is what makes her 2D.
More responding to the following:
>Flat is the foundation of everything, and remember, even cow tits were flat once
Further:
>>881968
>They are the constant to shape yourself around.
Developing yourself is still developing (as a result of) your waifu, this is still a representation of the same concept. If you haven't changed and developed as a person as a result of meeting your waifu, you've made a terrible mistake somewhere.
No.881981
>>881976
>breast size is in proportion to your change as a person
Okay Tzeentch, I've heard enough.
No.881984
>>881976
>Developing yourself is still developing (as a result of) your waifu, this is still a representation of the same concept.
Wrong, like the milling machine, you are on a flat plane in order to be shaped into a well-rounded individual. Not only that, but all waifus are flat because all waifus are 2D. Cow tits are an attempt at compromise with higher dimensions, and thus heretical.
No.882008
A flat chest is not another form of breasts, but actually a lack of breasts.
No.882009
>>882008
Breasts are a form of corruption. As girls develop breasts they begin to menstruate and grow body hair among other bodily changes that take them further and further away from the 2D ideal. Therefore a lack of breasts is perfectly acceptable.
No.882017
>>882009
>remember the 2D/3D barrier
No.882019
>>882008
Breasts are breasts.
Flat is just breasts with no fat.
No.882020
>>882017
The developments he mentioned apply to 2D girls too.
No.882044
>>882009
The ideal is for them to develop everywhere but their breasts. That way they remain pure and can still give birth to more lolis.
No.882060
>>882017
2D girls grow body hair/bleed too, fag unless the specific series states otherwise or it's a high school RomCom. LNs and manga mention puberty and the anatomy of grown women and such occasionally, and it even slips into anime once in a while. See lolicon meido. Now if we're talking about the disgusting stuff like body odor and such, then that would be 3D shit.
Just one more reason flat chest/small chest is superior.
No.882063
>>882060
There are plenty of stinky 2d characters, even without getting into hentai.
No.882064
>>882060
>if we're talking about the disgusting stuff like body odor and such, then that would be 3D shit.
Wrong. 2D girls still have body odour, it's just a better and more wholesome smell.
No.882065
>>882063
>There are plenty of stinky 2d characters
No.882070
>>882063
After all, 2D girls are made from sugar and spicey pits and all things nice.
No.882106
All about the width; ultimately the only factor in a majority of cases. As long as you can see about half of their arms, it qualifies withing the aesthetic zone; and is acceptable. Any further and it's either unrealistic or obece.
Exceptions are obviously made for landwhales and other abnormailties. Veiny and Saggy are also obvious dropouts.
No.882126
>>882065
Don't be mean.
Arisu is a good girl. She smells like flowers and talcum powder.
No.882131
>>882126
She smells of flowers alright, carrion flowers.
No.882132
>>882126
>She smells like flowers
No.882133
>>882106
>Saggy
Don't remind me of that fucking doujinshi.
No.882143
>>882106
That chart doesn't apply to 2D. 2D breasts can be as big or as small as one can imagine. Or even more big or more small than one can imagine!
Don't let the unreasonable limitations of reality hold you back, anon.
No.882145
>>882143
>That chart doesn't apply to 2D.
>2D doesn't have breast width
No.882146
>>882145
2D breast width doesn't necessarily determine their aesthetic quality.
No.882150
>>882146
But they do determine their size in relation to the body, which can cause the breasts to be "too big".
No.882163
>>882150
2D breasts can never be too big. 2D breasts are always exactly as large as they need to be.
No.882164
>>882163
That's simply not true in a world where the concept of oppai loli exists.
No.882172
>>882163
See >>881806
>>882164
Also this. Oppai loli is good for paizuri, but I wouldn't waifu one, neither would most in this board.
No.882173
>>882172
Oppai loli is good for paizuri in the same way a well-done steak with ketchup on it is good for nutrition.
No.882182
File: 1856a7e74ab218d⋯.gif (Spoiler Image, 863.65 KB, 300x248, 75:62, 1856a7e74ab218dca75ccf2c35….gif)
File: 9aa5464c09fab6d⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 476.29 KB, 815x815, 1:1, 9aa5464c09fab6d1afb55566e7….jpg)
File: 00b54b252efba91⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 149.94 KB, 711x994, 711:994, 00b54b252efba915d616742d6f….png)
File: aea0e279f98c067⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.09 MB, 1000x1050, 20:21, aea0e279f98c0677bf0e5b4ff8….jpg)
File: 1da6124ad2997da⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 104.67 KB, 750x1000, 3:4, 1da6124ad2997da6df4b5ce28e….jpg)
>>882173
They're good every once in a while.
Steak with ketchup is never good.
No.882196
>>882182
Oppai lolis are the best
No.882205
No.882259
>>882196
Oppai loli is both the best oppai and the best loli.
No.882270
>>882196
>>882259
You are both wrong. It's like ice cream and pizza. You don't eat them together.
No.882278
>>882126
Change your diaper, Alice.
No.882300
>>882270
>he as never had an pepperoni, sausage, and ice cream pizza with gummybears and frosting.
Count yourself lucky. My friend is disgusting
No.882477
>>882300
Are the meats on the pizza hot or cold? Is the crust ice cream and the sauce is frosting?
No.882490
>>882477
We went to a pizza shop where you can put whatever toppings you want on your pizza. He got everything they had and once it was cooked started adding shit like sprinkles, gummy bears, frosting, and ice cream. He somehow managed to eat the whole thing. They actually ended up putting limits on that shit because of him.
No.882492
>>882490
So its a hot pizza with the usual breast, sauce, cheese, and way too many of the usual toppings. Then he decided to put sweets on it. Thats an affront to both pizza and sweets but it all loses taste after a while so I would try it eating a piece too.
Getting back on topic, is there a line between fetish and non-fetish for artists? They can and will draw whatever they want and are unlikely to draw what they don't like so wouldn't everything made by the artist be considered their fetish? This is referring to doujin art, not paid work. Personally this >>877883 is the hard limit where breasts start to look unnatural. Flawlessly flat where it is found, like Tamate, is ideal but anything between those bounds is fine.
No.882509
>>882492
>breast
<on a pizza
That's just vile.
No.882525
>>882509
Decent images but those bites are too small.
No.882659
>>882106
I don't understand this
No.882726
It's not about the size, it's about the shape. So long as they're nice and perky, they can be itty bitty fleabites or bigger than it fits in the palm, it's all gravy.
No.882728
>>882726
Finally a good answer.
Size doesn't matter, breasts need to feel good and size doesn't determine firmness or texture, they need to feel good to play with and use. As opposed to things like hips or a penis size isn't an indicator of quality.
No.887264
No.887281
>>882509
>tfw you order a quarter pounder but instead she cuts off one of her boobs and puts it between two buns
I'm going to burger king next time.
No.887355
>>882728
Cutting boards don't cut it if you're into paizuri.
>>881809
This is the only objective standard on that matter. I'm down with all sizes generally but prefer large.
No.887681
>>877762
>How large is too large for a romantic interest?
No size is too large outside of looney toons proportions, however vidya devs hate big tits and you will NEVER EVER get mega milk, let alone Ara, as a love interest.
Dragon Quest XI would have been fantastic all around if they let you choose the girl you wanted from the start, the one with the most plot and character importance, but her tits were too big.
Some anons say the Switch version will have her available since the 3DS version let you marry her but we will see if and when.
If you want mega milk/Ara you better expect to get into visual novels or else go play Growlanser or Persona 5
No.887698
All titcows begin as glorious washboards. Titcowism is corruption.
No.887718
>>887698
And the more innocent and pure something is, the more delicious and satisfying it is to corrupt it.
No.887719
>>887355
>Cutting boards don't cut it if you're into paizuri.
>he has never heard of naizuri
No.887721
>>887719
I have, but so what? That might as well be rubbing against her back. It's not comparable to having it buried inside a pair of chest pillows.
>>887718
Someone post that chart of purity vs. porn output.
No.887727
>>887721
With large tits you don't get to appreciate the subtle pleasure of rubbing against her sternum and ribs as she futilely tries to push whatever little padding she has to rub your dick.
No.887731
>>887727
I'd rather the girl play to her strengths than that. Plus I still get images where she stares lovingly at you while doing it.
No.887983
The perfect breast size belongs to the girl you love the most.
No.887985
>>887731
If you were asking for naizuri to begin with, wouldnt the strength be the flatness?
No.888000
>>887985
If. I'd ask for thighs and such.
No.889097
>>877765
Have you ever tried to fuck a box?
No.889183
>>889097
I've tried to fuck a toilet paper roll (sans toilet paper).
No.889186
>>889183
Hasn't every guy tried that in puberty?
I hope for your sake you weren't successful though; you'd have to be pretty lacking in girth for it to work.
No.889187
>>889186
I suppose, I think I recall that knocking the knot out of a piece of wood was also common in the days before toilet paper rolls.
It didn't work. I tried coating the inside with vaseline and that didn't help and then I tried putting it in flaccid and letting it grow into it but it was way too tight to use like an onahole.
No.889202
>>887681
Fuck off back to /v/.
No.891250
>>889202
Congrats on killing the thread.
No.891252
The question is not how big. But how sensitive.
No.891262
>>891253
Look what you've done. Now I must dump it.
No.891266
Concludes chapter 1 of Harlot Begone
No.891303
>>891262
The way the eyes and hair are drawn reminds me a little of Onio.
No.891399
>>891303
Can't be him. Because this one isn't axed.
No.896431
E's are the ideal boob size
No.901510
How about asymmetrical boobs? Or uni-boobs?
No.901803
If you think there is such a thing as too large breasts, you're a faggot.
No.901805
>>901803
I can agree with this sentiment.
No.902053
I duno, but this is okay, and her breast size is plot-relevant.
No.902054
>>902053
Unless the plot is about those titties getting milked I fail to see how they'd be relevant
No.902055
>>902054
Acutally they do get milked and it assists in demon-slaying.
Also: Has there ever been a doujin where a flat chest was specifically a plot device? Asking for a friend.
No.905148
>>901510
The only good uni-boob.
>>902054
Seikon no Qwaser does that.
No.909454
>>877762
Pic related is fine.
No.909483
>>902053
I don't remember seeing this image, maybe I skipped pages while reading this.
>>902054
The mangaka is unable to draw small tits and it is relevant.
No.910440
big(ger) boobs are important, because proud girls getting their pride stamped on by the next big fish is one of the main pillars of society.
No.910444
>>877839
The objective truth was stated as the seventh reply, yet this post somehow gathered 154 replies in total.
A really is retarded sometimes.
No.910445
>>877762
I honestly don't think it matters.
No.910462
>>910440
And then you build her back up with copious amounts of boob worship, right?
No.910463
>>902053
Get a load of those brows
No.911098
>>910462
Only if she knows how to use them better.
No.914876
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>882106
>kenny loggins
An excellent choice in ememe