>>39921
Too much baseless speculation and arrogance, but there's some interesting information mixed in. I agree that satyrs probably existed. According to Plutarch a sleeping satyr was captured by Roman soldiers in the year 84 and brought in front of Sulla, who had various interpreters attempt to communicate with the strange being. The satyr however was unable to answer any of their questions and only managed to utter something unintelligible, with a voice between a horse's neigh and a goat's bleating, much to Sulla's horror. Plutarch says that the satyr looked similar to those portrayed by painters and sculptors.
His theory that every evil in the world can be blamed on human/ape hybrids is obviously false. Even if we discard every ruler and tyrant, the executioners and the killers, the ideologues and philosophers, what we'll be left with is still nothing 'noble'. Since he thinks Nietzsche was a subhuman, I suspect that his definition of noble is quite different from mine, anyway. He's probably right that Nietzsche struggled with feelings of inferiority during the early part of his life, but then again, most people do. It's not a mark of subhumanity, quite the opposite in fact.
>>39928
I remember reading that in Indian mythology, racemixing causes people to become less human and more animal-like over time, and some people believe that apes are actually the degenerated descendants of ancient human races. There is a surprising amount of archeological support for the idea that humans are more ancient than apes, as documented by Michael Cremo in his monumental book 'Forbidden Archeology'.