>>38250
>Consider this hypothetical: if you were to be born in hell, would you realise it was hell if nobody told you? Or would you believe it's normal life, especially considering that's what everybody else is saying?
You think even babies who know nothing consciously can't tell the difference between pain and pleasure? That's why they cry. Hell is perpetual and unending torment, the fact that we're not in perpetual torment in this life is a definite proof that we're not in hell. Otherwise to say "this is hell" is meaningless, since the concept of hell stands in contrast to earthly life.
>>38288
>Orthodox science says that consciousness is generated by the brain, so it can't survive death
But that's just nonsense, there is no scientific theory that even remotely explains consciousness, you're confusing the half-baked conjecture of scientists with science itself. Show me the scientific evidence that says consciousness is generated by brainstates. You can't, firstly because it doesn't exist, and secondly because it is incoherent to think that it could. Consciousness is metaphysical, and science is by definition testable hypotheses about the physical world, ergo science has nothing to say about consciousness.
Also
>Christ was a violent revolutionary
Well, other than being mostly non-violent, condemning revolution in general, and going willingly to his wrongful execution before his resurrection I guess. Amazing what fringe tards will come up with in order to libel the faith.
>>38300
Again, amazing how ignorant all the fringe faggots are of Christianity while supposedly having "esoteric knowledge". The whole premise is absurd, that the embodiment of love and self sacrifice could ever be of the same "character" of the father of lies is worse than idiotic.
>>38256
>Can you explain what makes it so true?
The obvious moral truth of Christianity is the explanation. You can't impart spiritual truth and life to the callous and self-concerned as though it were merely brute logic, it's like asking "how do I know I'm feeling love?" It's asinine to ask for a purely logical expression of such truth because spiritual truth transcends the logical, God's love for us isn't a thing of pure reason. Christ's story of endless love and self-sacrifice, and a chance for human redemption, that has so moved and entranced the spirit of the Western world for so long is it's own witness. It's a spiritual gift that you can only accept or reject, who are you that speaks back to your maker, demanding more than this?
>>38287
>they're severely ignorant and arrogant and don't accept any outside criticism or ideas and even refuse to address their own flaws
<Yeah, it's their /christian/-hugbox that gives them their confidence. It reminds me of the dark-ages.
Yeah as opposed to dimwit eastern "spiritualist" faggots like you, who are clearly so skilled in addressing the contradictions of your nonsense half self-invented gook fetish gobbledygook. But of course you're also that special brand of retard who also thinks that with "advanced technology" we'll one day gather enough science power to break through the barrier into the "spirit realm". You're not a transcendent esoteric yogi, you're just a dumb faggot who watched too much star trek, get a clue.