b2bb8d No.16268405
I fear for the absolute state of the future of gaming which will inevitably gravitate toward streaming (Games as a Service - GaaS). And if all control input latency issues can be 100% mitigated, you will eventually be telling your children of a time when you actually owned a physical or digital copy of your game.
All the casuals will be jumping on the streaming bandwagon because that's just the kind of shit casuals do. Additionally, with the emergence of dirt-poor millennials who are lucky to have a pot to piss in (let alone an expensive gaming console or rig), the demand for streaming games will be driven even higher. As demand for consoles and $3000 gaming rigs goes down, the prices of those items will be driven up which will further decrease the demand for physical gaming hardware as more and more gamers jump ship in favor of less the less-costly streaming option. The cycle will repeat until gaming hardware is too expensive for even the most privileged richfags.
It's inevitable. Being an oldfag who's been around since the Commodore/Atari eras, I've seen our games slowly slipping from our grasp as we went from physical copies to mostly digital copies and now heading toward not even owning a digital copy at all. Soon will be gone the days of pulling out an old console or building a retro gaming rig so you can play your old games. Once the rightsholders decide they want to make a game disappear, they just remove it from the streaming service and it's gone for good.
So fuck the future basically. It's going to suck for gaming and you cannot prove me wrong.
9a114b No.16268409
Everyone I’ve seen talking about the Stadia has nothing but bad things to say about it.
I don’t think you need to worry OP.
315a03 No.16268410
Is this a post from 15 years ago?
b63fd2 No.16268417
>So fuck the future basically. It's going to suck for gaming and you cannot prove me wrong.
How the fuck you expect anyone to prove you wrong here, you're on fucking /v/. Everyone hates the idea of gaming as service, some people even have hateboner for steam just because it isnt physical
5f1d2a No.16268420
>>16268405
Old good new bad
2e2755 No.16268421
I’m not to worried about it. More and more I find myself playing older games anyways and all the IPs I care about either were killed off or actually got their last entry. New games just don’t interest me and there’s so many good old vidya that I don’t think I’ll be able to play them all in my life time.
386e80 No.16268427
I honestly dont think think this shit gonna kick off. Ok lets start with the name; Stadia. What the fuck does this even mean? With xbox or playstation they have instant brand recognition. And a child could ffigure oout what it means but with stadia even your normalnigger friends will associate the name with "std" with it and it will turn into the aids machine.
00b4ed No.16268431
>>16268427
It means Australia
645746 No.16268444
>>16268436
The only people praising it are:
>dipshit journos being paid to do so, won't buy cause they will get a review machine for free
>rainbow hair retards that don't play videogames and won't buy it
>casuals that think the idea is cool but won't buy it because they don't care about videogames
This will flop
b2bb8d No.16268447
>>16268409
There's plenty of good to come out of Stadia -
>no downloads
>no installs
>no load times
>much more realistic graphics/physics
>vastly-improved multiplayer experience
>pretty much any device can become a console
>great FPS as high resolutions
>many more too numerous to list
But I still don't like where it's all headed as far as losing control of our gaming experience. I like owning copies of my games. I like mods. I like not requiring an internet connection. We will lose all of that and more if gaming moves completely to streaming.
b2bb8d No.16268459
>>16268427
>I honestly dont think think this shit gonna kick off.
If input latency is reasonably mitigated, it will be a massive success. Imaging being able to play a game as effortlessly as watching a video on YouTube. Google could name their service Mark's Butthole and it would still be a success.
588a5d No.16268462
>>16268405
This logo should be used as jizz spurt on Stadia-tan's face
9468ae No.16268466
9a114b No.16268471
>>16268436
Are you fucking kidding me blackpillfag, jewtube and twitter are filled with people shitting on it
The only people remotely hyped for this are game journos
b2bb8d No.16268475
>>16268467
>Google is guaranteed to be working on it right now
They're probably working on subspace communication as we speak so that they can deliver the controller input signals to the cloud faster than the speed of light.
9a114b No.16268476
>>16268447
Oh I see, you’re a shill
It all makes sense now
Check em
6be12e No.16268487
So basically Jewgle's new console is paying to borrow/rent a game that they own and you never will?
That seems retarded to me. Gaming in general has become very retarded.
I knew I FUCKING KNEW Microsoft's Xbox would mark the beginning of crony capitalism destroying gaming and now Google will nail the final nail in the coffin.
Fuck all of you queers. I wish I could say it's been nice. but every last one of you deserves to be brutally murdered.
d0c23d No.16268502
reminder that Valve pioneered Gaming as a Service, also Microtransactions
every valve game post Orange Box is Live Service games with constant updates, some more than others, but they are all microeconomies
91eecb No.16268511
Thinking about this, I see lots of potential for the blackpill. I'm not going to post them. However, there is the matter of who is going to make these games if people can't afford the hardware to run them? You can't just not test your games. Well, you can do the bare minimum, as we've seen with broken AAA garbage. But they still had to be tested to even run. If you say, oh well that's easy - only the top hebrews will make games because they're the only ones rich enough or with the connections to obtain hardware to develop games with, you're wrong. People aren't going to accept that they can't make games. If that happened, what you would see instead is people would start making games that run on the average thin client toaster netbook. Which would probably be more of a hobbyist thing and therefore would produce less shitty games, and normalfags might be less interested sure to the lack of processing power and amount of optimization needed to make said games. In other words, there would be a renaissance of indie games since there would be less casuals and less pajeet quality indies. The only problem is that a large amount of games will still have leftist propaganda, but that's already the case right now.
910c21 No.16268519
>>16268405
>GaaS - Gaming as a Service
This term (or more correctly Games as a Service) has been floating around for many years and has a loose definition. First time I had heard it referred to games that had continual content adding updates. Specifically it had been attributed to Minecraft and Terraria because content was added incrementally. This practice seems only beneficial to the consumer. It did though, get into murky water when the term was extended to early access games. However, OP is referring specifically to streaming games. It seems unlikely that this service could ever take off. Only a small portion of the US has internet capable utilizing google's proposed service. Furthermore anyone who could afford to live in these places and the internet probably could afford a computer of their own. This is not to say that this service will fail without causing harm. Anyone who has ever tried to play a fighting game online knows that latency unbearable. A possible solution to this is to dumb down games by making inputs simpler with bigger time windows. If game developers were to develop with this in mind games would be fit for those who stream it, but easier for those who play it through the traditional means. Games would becoming dumbed down would be a consequence of this service. Which might be made more prevalent by google providing incentives for developers to make their games compatible with their service.
bfbfc8 No.16268522
So this is basically just the OnLive 2.0?
d578aa No.16268533
>>16268427
>Stadia
In Polish it's plural for stages of a disease.
910c21 No.16268536
>>16268522
Lets hope. Hope that it fails the same way OnLive did.
b66dd9 No.16268539
>>16268519
So we can say goodbye to any game that isn't dumbed down to shit. It's fucking over for this medium. We lost.
>>16268487
Iktfb. Feels so fucking bad to accept that it's over but we have to do it. Streaming is the future.
7b72d2 No.16268540
>>16268539
You always lose because you don't have the printing presses on your side. ((( They ))) can print unlimited money to get their way and people like accept the false money.
c9249a No.16268544
>>16268447
Where are you getting this information from? There will still be loading screens, graphics will be the same, and frame rate will most likely vary. You're being too optimistic. Not only that, but if you ever tried anything like PSNOW, you know it's not going to work out.
ba3328 No.16268546
>>16268447
>0.01 shekels have been diposited into your account
fe3656 No.16268554
>>16268495
Did you notice that the center doesn't include any of the circles?
So
>People who don't like… ownership of the things they buy
>People who don't play anything under 100 ping
Are those good now? They look dumb.
At the same time
>People with no data-caps and a very good router
Is that bad now?
How do I even interpret this chart? What does it mean?
6f6955 No.16268556
This also goes beyond games. I've seen production software go from owning the disk to requiring a log in account, to subscription, and now stream only. Streaming also restricts the creation of homebrew software as you cannot develop home made games and mods for your systems, which is legal to do in most places.
Microsoft has thrown around the idea that the next generation of Windows will be streamed from the cloud. As software becomes serviced based you will be bound to terns of service or be subjugated to a hardware ban from the service and therefore operating system. As free speech laws do not apply to software services this will also restrict users from creating content that they want because of hate speech policies, aka we ban you because you're more popular than us and are also white CIS male. Manufacturers could benefit from stream only systems as well. Because as the average consumer had less and less spending money hardware manufacturers will prioritize multi-million dollar corporations to find them in the future. Also the manufacturer gets PR protection from the big corporations that censor user feedback as well as no longer having to waste money in retail rental space storing products for the consumer.
People say streaming is the way of the future in computer software. This is only true if you live on a space ship with all the information on the ship's computer and latency is non-existent. Streaming is about hoarding resources and power to keep computer software and hardware out of the consumer's hands. It is about absolute control over who is and who is not allowed to develop hardware and software. It's monopolizing the competition to be about selling the service itself rather than produce good software for work and play.
More importantly cloud stream only future is about adding yet another middleman to internet communication. What do I mean? Well first you have the ISP's ToS to comply with as a legally binding contract. Then you have social media ToS like Facebook and Twitter ToS you need to comply with or else you cannot sell your resume, goods, or service to the public. Stream only services adds another layer of privacy scanning and ToS before you can use it. Right now Stadia is with the Goolag suite. What happens when your own web browser is locked behind a streaming paywall that prevents you from browsing the web without signing up for the service? Visit 8chan or any site delisted from Goolag, banned from stream due to ToS violation. That's okay, I'll boot up Pale Moon and… Oh shit, you can no longer browse the web without a stream service due to websites whitelisting only stream service's verified IP list.
A stream only future is a dystopian nightmare. If there is still a way for consumers to communicate without these services on their own devices things wouldn't be as bad. However most corporations are in favor of cutting out consumer voice and restricting actions only to the cloud computing echo chamber.
This isn't a matter of it. It's a matter of when internet browsers and HTTP protocols are restricted behind cloud computing stream services with a ToS that adds another layer of censorship.
Welcome to Web 3.0.
910c21 No.16268558
>>16268554
It means nobody would want to buy their service.
d578aa No.16268562
>>16268554
it means you're a fucking retard, lurk for a decade.
bae3e1 No.16268570
>>16268495
Just need to fix those circles, they all need to intersect at the center, not leave an empty space.
I can't fix since for some reason GIMP is gimped and I can't open png or jpg files.
d578aa No.16268580
>>16268570
>>16268565
Is this bait?
cb4fa8 No.16268605
>>16268409
>>16268444
Get out of your 8chan / alt-media hugbox and go check some normalfag news sites with comment areas. At least half of the public are hyped for it, and most of the other half are just skeptical that Google will be able to deliver on the technical side, but if it does they'd have no problem with it.
>>16268427
>I honestly dont think think this shit gonna kick off. Ok lets start with the name; Stadia
Yeah, the name is retarded but I'd just like to remind you that people said the same thing about Xbox and Wii, their names were also ridiculed and used as a reason why they would fail when they were first revealed.
6e8790 No.16268622
>>16268570
>>16268565
>So used to seeing Venn Diagrams intersect in the center that they don't bother actually reading the content and understanding that it doesn't make any sense to the context of the image to have them intersect.
7fad26 No.16268624
>>16268447
>no downloads
Except you're streaming which is the same thing.
>no installs
I'll take installs over streaming
>no load times
There will be load times, games will still need to stream in some needed content between what would be loading screens.
>much more realistic graphics/physics
Compared to what? If you have shit hardware maybe.
>vastly-improved multiplayer experience
Yeah, multiplayer will be improved with everyone streaming at the same time as playing. A lot people have shit ping now, imagine them streaming the game on top of that.
>pretty much any device can become a console
So? This means nothing.
>great FPS as high resolutions
With input delay and that's best case scenario.
18e44f No.16268625
As long as Australia exists then Streamed gaming won't catch on because we simply can't run this shit
15a704 No.16268638
>>16268605
>Get out of your 8chan / alt-media hugbox and go check some normalfag news sites with comment areas.
Is twitter normalfag enough for you?
7b72d2 No.16268645
>>16268625
focus on streaming what is important.
386e80 No.16268654
>>16268605
Agreed my fellow redditor! The lugenpresse told me hillary had a 99% chance of winning the election and a million other things the jewish media told me said would happen didnt happen, oh wait…
dac2e5 No.16268656
>>>/v/16268649
>broom
Laying the bait on too thick there buddy.
0cb5bf No.16268658
>>16268649
yes goy just pay a 100$ dollar fee forever plus all the extra data when it goes over your cap every month
its not gonna add up nonono
b3982f No.16268664
>>16268649
>spend $200 dollars on game streaming
>8 years later
>cant play anything from it
>spend $150 dollars on an old console and a bunch of games
>can play that till the end of time
You're right tor-friend (Can't let your google managers see where you're browsing?). I truly see the value now in throwing away my money.
cb4fa8 No.16268665
>>16268638
>2 tweets from literally whos
>he thinks this completely disproves my point somehow
I don't know who these people are but from their reactions alone they're obviously not that much of normalfags, especially the second one.
>>16268654
Look fucker, I wish for streaming to fail as much as anyone here. But just burying your heads in the sand will not change the outcome of things.
I'm not a blackpill fag but at the very least, looks like things will get much, much worse before they start getting better.
7b72d2 No.16268669
>>16268665
I can't wait for game streaming either.
d8531c No.16268675
Normalfags will eat it up, and this will be the way gaymen will go. It's very sad, but there's nothing worth saving anymore besides big tiddied games and neptunia.
15a704 No.16268681
>>16268665
>show me a normalfag's opinion
>no anon, those aren't REAL normalfags
cb4fa8 No.16268692
>>16268681
Yeah, well, for our sakes I really hope you guys are right and I'm wrong. But I'm not too optimistic for what I've been seeing, seems like now there will be a coordinated effort from all NSA and CIA companies to shove streaming down everyone's throats. If gaming works out, the next step will be apps and the operating systems themselves.
49e185 No.16268699
Anons have been telling you to get a new hobby for years. When will you finally listen?
d578aa No.16268820
<Sup faggot, here's your Games as a Service content drip enjoy.
8c0897 No.16268858
>>16268471
>The only people remotely hyped for this are game journos
And it's completely out of touch game companies like Ubisoft or Sega. Basically anybody that's ever included denuvo would probably like this idea has its technically piracy proof. Although I have they said how the revenue split works? Is it like steam or Epic? I have to imagine that Google will give companies a pretty good deal for the first few years to get the platform off the ground
a9dc83 No.16268884
>>16268624
>Except you're streaming which is the same thing.
it's actually much, much, MUCH worse
a2f13d No.16268898
>>16268622
Except the content makes it clear they should overlap, otherwise you're saying Stadia is made for people who play games under 100 ping, do have data caps and enjoy owning their own products which is clearly not the intended message.
faf972 No.16268907
You'd have to literally violate the laws of physics to make 99% of what's popular even playable.
Fuck off google, nobody wants your shitty 100ms on every input horseshit.
5e917a No.16268908
Fuck off blackpillers.
>>16268870
Especially you. If gaming becomes a dystopia because of streaming, what does that mean for old fashioned PC?
HOBBYIST UTOPIA LIKE THE GOOD OL' 90s BABY!!
I hope conventional gaming dies in a stream of piss so that we can have good games made by autists again.
fe3656 No.16268910
a9dc83 No.16268923
ffc853 No.16268976
>>16268405
>>16268409
>>16268447
Hide shill threads, report as faggots.
b2bb8d No.16269031
>>16268976
>I fear for the absolute state of the future of gaming which will inevitably gravitate toward streaming
>Hide shill threads, report as faggots.
>being against something is actually shilling for it
a45a8f No.16269033
>>16268649
Your computer still needs to be able to actually run the game
>muh remote streaming
nigga you're practically doing twitch plays pokemon at that point
6f6955 No.16269145
>>16268908
The downside is idiots need tech to survive the job market. So naturally they will go with the cheapest, but not really, option. In an economy that encourages spending over saving streaming may seem like the better option. I'm going to stick with my old hardware until burgers go full retard and crash the hardware market. Then I'll buy as many parts as I can to build my own multimedia studio.
71b5af No.16269151
Someone stated that the computer still needs to run the game…
It reminds me of a failed project that had potential but no big backing.
2013, I was an IT manager for a communications company.
A company pitched us a "remote" OS idea.
Basically, they provided us with a Super Small Form Factor that was just a network card with HDMI for the monitor and bluetooth for the mouse/keyboard.
The device would turn on and log into a cloud server and all the "computing power" necessary for whatever was there on the company side.
The company would have saved a ton of money on resources and utilities in each branch.
However, the other company did not have the funding it needed for launch, ultimately, and we didn't go with that at the time (enter AWS later on).
The reason I mention that is because if streaming would be "actual" streaming, it would not play locally, but more like logging into the remote location to play it there.
6f6955 No.16269159
>>16269145
Gotta clarify. This market encourages spending everything now instead of saving thanks to dope instagrads. So I predict most consumers opt into service plans rather than invest in hardware.
c361ce No.16269174
>>16269151
Based retarded boomer delivers yesterday's insights today
8af496 No.16269235
>>16269151
>The company would have saved a ton of money on resources and utilities in each branch.
Then lose a ton of money as soon as any of the dozens of things that can go wrong with streaming goes wrong.
211d54 No.16269271
>>16268459
>Imaging being able to play a game as effortlessly as watching a video on YouTube
So worse than what I have now?
c303e5 No.16269275
>>16268447
>You don't actually own the game you bought
>But there's technically no download time! You can play a game as effortlessly as watching a video on Youtube, and other selling points ripped directly from this packet I'm reading!
That's like saying a home robbery is a good thing because now there's more room in your house. I hate shills so much, they can't even pretend to talk like normal people.
b2bb8d No.16269297
>>16269275
Holy shit. I am OP and I wrote that post. Pointing out the positives in something along with the negatives is not shilling. And if you would only read the last paragraph:
>>16268447
>But I still don't like where it's all headed as far as losing control of our gaming experience. I like owning copies of my games. I like mods. I like not requiring an internet connection. We will lose all of that and more if gaming moves completely to streaming.
>I like owning copies of my games.
Shitty analogy, too. Try harder.
db3742 No.16269337
>>16269313
we have that already, though
RTFM
c303e5 No.16269370
>>16269297
>There's way too many good points of the Google Stradia too list! Check it out, fellow channers!
The fact that you listed terrible things, or things that are outright lies, as good things in order to hook people is some hard evidence that you are being paid to promote this shit machine.
No one here would think "Any of your home devices can become a console!" is a good thing or a natural thing for anyone to say in a conversation, the same way a bunch of piano enthusiasts wouldn't be excited over a piano simulator on an iPad. But it's something that your higher ups told you to say, because they, like you, are so incredibly out of touch and disingenuous that you think a console where you don't actually own the games you purchase can be sold to people who actually play video games, not just talk about profit margins of video games.
In short, go fuck yourself with the 13 cent check you got from this and I hope someone puts sugar in your gas tank.
111c24 No.16269379
are you ready for the future guys?!
287d93 No.16269820
>>16268447
>no downloads
<what is a continuous video downlink
>much more realistic graphics/physics
<at the expense of gameplay cis white men
>vastly improved multiplayer experience
<Benjamin Riegelstein with a symmetric 5Gb/s fibre connection living 7 miles from the nearest Goolag resulting in a 6ms client-server ping will have no advantage over Anon in Alaska on a shitty 16mbps DSL connection, especially not in multiplayer first person shooters
>pretty much any device can become a console
<and that's a good thing ;-)
>great FPS at high resolutions
<compounded by dogshit video quality, high latency, bandwidth drainage and the inability to play games offline
287d93 No.16269887
>>16268556
Sometimes I wonder how bad things would be today if the dotcom crash of 2000 hadn't occured.
a45a8f No.16269932
>>16269820
>Anon in Alaska on a shitty 16mbps DSL connectio
Anon in Alaska here, the internet out here actually manages to be half-decent, assuming you aren't out in the villages helping the natives get their booze/money for booze, and you don't mind spending $100/month
GCI still has data caps and awful customer service, and ACS is relatively sluggish, but both manage to put out better offers than I've been told Comcast does
15606b No.16270099
>>16269887
If it makes you feel any better, microsoft went with the still retarded, but less retarded try to phase out windows executables on the modern version of windows (10) by 2021 and pay devs to not make executables of their software anymore.
Ironically the only thing this accomplished was lighting a fire under Valve and a lot of software devs collective asses to try and get shit working on Macs and Lunix.
Tfw even with bribing the supreme court into not letting Win 7 get forked microsoft still manages to lose
dbc08f No.16270277
Games are dead and have been so for years. This is not news. Name 5 good western games that came out in the last 3 years. I can't. I don't really give a fuck tho. I have a backlog of thousands of games that I really doubt I'm gonna finish in my lifetime.
402df5 No.16270292
>>16270277
>>16270281
Overload
.
.
.
All I got.
7d0706 No.16270315
>>16270309
Anon, it's the blackpill nigger. The irony is that he's so impotent he is reduced to Tor for shitposting.
11f41a No.16270354
>>16268638
god when will people understand, if everything becomes streamable you dont own anything!!!!
last I checked my money got me a physical copy that was in my possession and never left my library. I need to start re-collecting the shit I love again before it all disappears
d578aa No.16270369
5fed90 No.16270552
>>16268405
>Additionally, with the emergence of dirt-poor millennials who are lucky to have a pot to piss in (let alone an expensive gaming console or rig), the demand for streaming games will be driven even higher.
But this sort of service works best with a good connection that's still very expensive (if available at all) in many places. On the other hand, a solid gaming PC can be built pretty cheap. So the financial angle doesn't really mean much.
4ba6e3 No.16270571
>after charging consumers $60 we should also nickel and dime our customers further by fifty and sixty dollaring them.
why are developers so entitled?
f98063 No.16270595
>>16270571
Because retards keep giving them money
e7f433 No.16270667
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
So, if I play Oblivion on this service, how am I supposed to get the data files to run in OpenMW?
1e1a4a No.16270685
>>16268677
yeah dude i just keep buying the newest card from nvidia every year because if it don't my games won't work anymore!
i saw a lot of TORpedos in here but you are the biggest retard of them all, every time i see that ID i'm expecting the lowest intellect subhuman born in this world and i'm always right.
092b0d No.16270700
Aren't all these 'services' investor-bait snake oil?
d60a9f No.16270734
>>16270292
>>16270281
>>16270277
Everyone agrees, literally every game is shit now. Nobody can debate this. Why cant plebs just realize that there are literally no good games anymore
>u jis gatta luk diipr XD
Yeah and find more shit games lmfaoooo
e78e54 No.16271081
>>16268405
Digital distribution is gaming as a service, you are paying for everything but the game, such as the ability to download the game from their "special" servers.
>you actually owned a physical or digital copy of your game
Fucking kill yourself Valve drone, streaming is the next logical of digital distribution, by paying for digital distribution you voted for streaming.
Streaming games wouldn't even be given serious consideration right now if pc gamers didn't cuck out to digital-only first. It was inevitable once Steam was accepted. I tried to get people to boycott Valve into bankruptcy when they launched Steam but no one listened.
>>16268417
Fuck Valve
189508 No.16271108
>>16268405
I'll offer my experience: If anyone of you has tried out the Steam Link anywhere feature, you'll know that this tech is a piece of garbage. Alternatively future games will slow down even more to compansate. Pic related. Go over the demo footage and look at the massive input latency
fc0696 No.16271346
>less-costly streaming option
Long term, a renting will always be way costlier than buying, especially if you have to keep paying to not lose your shit. and that's not even counting the fabulous internet connection bills.
>future of gaming
what the fuck, no one who's actually in technology agrees. since the 60's technology users have dreamed of devices like the Personal Computer. The day you'd stop queueing up to run a batch of programs paying for the computing time used, the day you wouldn't have to dial in from a dumb terminal to run your programs on a remote computer, the day you could run your shit on site/at home. All this cloud and streaming crap are a clear regression to the state of 50 years ago.
>>16268676
whatever you save on a modern cucksole you lose on the $60/year PSN/XBL online fee. same with this streaming shit's fees (and the higher internet fees). moreover they'll likely milk the normalfag niggercattle by releasing games gradually so they'll keep paying to get to the end
6ecb25 No.16271537
>>16268405
yall deserve this shit
fuccin nigger gamer ass retards who cant connect two dots and think for more than a second
6ecb25 No.16271568
>>16268699
i havent played a game for months all i do now is just watch the ship sink
1b01f6 No.16271623
>>16270667
How are you supposed to mod it at all? For that matter, you don't even get any say in what version you can run! Want to abuse the weakness to magicka glitch? Too bad. And as is being demonstrated time and time again with video streaming, they typically don't retain licenses to them forever.
In any case nothing will convince me to play a game that is online-dependent, not even things like MMOs. A lot of mobile shit falls into that category on top of its generally scummy practices.
02ce83 No.16271625
>>16268405
I'm pretty excited to be honest.
cb4fa8 No.16271673
>>16271081
> I tried to get people to boycott Valve into bankruptcy when they launched Steam but no one listened.
Me too, I did that when HL2 first came out, since back then I was still foolish enough to have conversations with normalfags. But whenever I brought the topic on why everyone should boycott HL2 and Steam, all I got was the fluoride stare.
>>16271346
>All this cloud and streaming crap are a clear regression to the state of 50 years ago
There's a reason we often call these people regressives.
1b01f6 No.16271683
>>16271673
Hello fellow spirit. Half-Life 2 when I was playing it back in its heyday was with the target21 crack/installer because needing to go through Steam and updates on a 56K modem is pure suffering.
9bf306 No.16271700
>>16271081
>streaming is the next logical of digital distribution
This is incorrect. All video games are digital products. The only difference is the storage medium and how it's distributed. However a game that's streamed to you is effectively just your inputs being played on an external server.
>Streaming games wouldn't even be given serious consideration right now if pc gamers didn't cuck out to digital-only first
This is extremely incorrect streaming is being done because it's a trend. It took off for films and television to the point where Disney bought 20th Century Fox entirely because of a streaming service it's launching this year.
>It was inevitable once Steam was accepted.
>accepted
Digital is a trend across all software. Valve wasn't the only digital client that cropped up several others came and completely died. Like remember Direct2Drive? Remember Games for Windows Live? They all died because of Steam's dominance. But had Steam not been there one of them would've taken over. The market was always there for digital it was just a question of which company would take over and it was Valve. Digital was always going to happen as it did across all software.
>I tried to get people to boycott Valve into bankruptcy when they launched Steam but no one listened.
>Boycott
>Into bankruptcy
You're either extremely delusional or underage. Even if Steam had died back in 2004 they were rolling in so much dosh at the time they would never have gone bankrupt. They still put out retail releases on other platforms like console. Gabe Newell said in an interview had they not made Steam they would've just kept making more Half-Life sequels rather than shifted their focus toward Steam centric titles.
>>16271673
>But whenever I brought the topic on why everyone should boycott HL2 and Steam, all I got was the fluoride stare.
Because the only reason you did it was a vague sense of sentimentality toward retail that nobody else shares because digital is far more convenient. You're trying to appeal to sensibilities extremely few people share (only vidya collectors and they primarily collect really old games not new ones) and you're trying to use fear tactics like "These companies MIGHT do XX YY if we start buying these products" when the boogieman of Steam "taking all our games away" hasn't happened.
171d33 No.16271732
>>16268405
>anyone on /v/ ever having children.
15606b No.16271762
>>16271081
Digital distribution isn't really the issue, or at least how it is is more of a symptom than a cause.
Really what we have is severely out of date consumer protection laws, and unfortunately, laws meant to protect against forgery got fucked into the Kike Zone and were weaponized against people that actually buy shit.
15606b No.16271772
>>16270700
Generally, yeah. It's also publisher bait, like DRM companies that promise shit like a zillion billion extra sales if you install shitdick executable protection.
cb4fa8 No.16273036
>>16271683
Fun times. I still remember how the first crack didn't fully remove the drm and would break during the elevator cutscene.
>>16271700
While I did mention that Steam could take their games away without a moment's notice - and that was a legitimate risk back then, with such a new service on a relatively young company, my main points were that if you had an internet outage you couldn't play your games (l remember in the beginning Steam would do mandatory online checks every time you tried to run the game, thankfully they at least fixed that), and especially that when you go digital, you don't own nothing goy. But people just didn't care.
9acc27 No.16273054
>>16271732
>/v/
>having children
lol, /v/ is made of children or those creepy uncles that end up raping their nephews
092b0d No.16273065
>>16273036
You are never going to win at making people want to go outside or wait patiently for things in the mail.
a7b21c No.16273092
Mostly play weebshit, don't see that going streaming only.
Mainstream games industry is not very important to me.
5fed90 No.16273106
>>16273072
>They will be asked to buy a box for $100 plus $20/mo just to use it before data charges.
If I understood it right, Stadia is just a service. If you have a PC good enough to play videos from Youtube, that's all the hardware you need. They only sell an optional gamepad.
76fd69 No.16273157
>>16268405
>google wants me believe there will not be severe input lag while gaming
>humans have yet to reach the moon and want me to believe strwaming stupidity
Question is, will this move bankrupt google or just severely hurt their warchest?
878ea0 No.16273161
359204 No.16273183
>>16273072
>Google only failed at that because they simply gave up, their investors and board of directors decided they would rather pocket extra dividends than reinvest in the company.
This may as well just be another stockholder scam.
758b8d No.16273192
>>16268623
no you're retarded, this is how it should be
fc0696 No.16273212
>>16273072
>Unless Google negotiates a great data deal with ISPs to lower the connection cost
<what's (((Zero Rating)))
you think they haven't thought this through? well you're wrong.
we can only hope this crashes and causes the death of digital distribution the not owning stuff part and streaming
>>16273192
that's the same diagram as >>16268495 except it has overlap between x, y, and z, which I'm rather doubtful exists.
5fed90 No.16273227
>>16273212
The POINT is that the center doesn't overlap.
fc0696 No.16273245
>>16273227
>the center doesn't overlap
then you should get glasses because the diagram at >>16273192 shows an overlap at the center.
737c9b No.16273257
3 major issues with this game stream service garbage.
The first issue is that modding will die, lets be honest here, you obviously can't fucking mod a stream, unless you're a retard from twitch putting widgets all over your screen which doesn't even count as modding, but either way say good bye to all the possibilities of altering your game.
Second issue is connectivity, people who lives in rural areas with limited internet speeds will get fucked the hardest, good luck trying to get proper connection in the middle of fucking nowhere, especially if you're a third world shithole individual, that service is no good.
Third and the most important issue is how they can dictate how you play your game on singleplayer, these guys will monitor your shit with neuro learning AIs, not only that but if you're playing a game like GTA 5 and you decide to kill jews and minorities, some faggot will block all your access to those games, surely they will monitor the shit out of you therefore they know how you play your game, so if you customize a character in dark souls to look like adolf hitler, prepare to get banned and axed out of all your game for ironically shitposting on a singleplayer experience.
there is nothing good about this service, any devs planning on using this should be hanged.
e7f433 No.16273264
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16271623
Basically, everyone should be backing up their Skyrim files to run in OpenMW ten years from today while they can. Got it.
758b8d No.16273271
>>16273227
don't even bother trying to reply to fc0696, his retardation is terminal
cb4fa8 No.16273311
>>16273072
>They will be asked to buy a box for $100 plus $20/mo just to use it before data charges.
No, there won't be a box. See >>16273106
>Unless Google negotiates a great data deal with ISPs to lower the connection cost, most people are not going to be interested in spending $120 for a spotty connection that eats their data cap.
I believe second worlders and third worlders are a big segment to their target public with this. Gaming PCs and consoles are too expensive for most of them. Keep in mind that nowadays, most second world and many third world countries have better landline internet than USA and Western Europe, with comparable speeds and, almost universally, no data caps at all.
cb4fa8 No.16273335
>>16273257
>people who lives in rural areas with limited internet speeds will get fucked the hardest, good luck trying to get proper connection in the middle of fucking nowhere, especially if you're a third world shithole individual, that service is no good.
To the urbanite regressives who are now running the asylum, if you don't live in a commie block in a dense metropolitan area, you are not people. Those who live in rural areas are not people. They don't count.
737c9b No.16273349
>>16273335
that could be a bad thing for them, but what I care about is modding and pajeets dictating how I play my singleplayer games, if they think i'm shooting black people over a singleplayer sandbox game they will obviously ban my access.
fc0696 No.16273455
>>16273311
>better landline internet than USA
<south spicland
<25-100mbps download, 3-8mbps upload
<250-350GB monthly cap depending on your plan, no unlimited option
<company "reserves the right" to cap speeds to 6mbps/1.5mbps after that
<$40-$60/month (median monthly wage is $500)
only good thing is they're not jewish enough to charge overage fees YET.
cb4fa8 No.16273471
>>16273349
Yeah well, that's so obvious that goes without saying. Say goodbye to any kind of modding (unless they come up with some service that runs on a full featured Windows virtual machine that gives you desktop/admin access like in AWS vms, but I doubt that'll ever happen), and be prepared to get locked out of your single player game if you display problematic behavior.
cb4fa8 No.16273482
>>16273455
This sucks anon. But that's why I said "many", not "all" or even "most".
e7f433 No.16273527
>>16273471
The only recourse we have is taking all of that into our own hands. If we have to rewrite the fucking engine for every game that's got tons of mods, then that's what we're going to have to do. Work on getting Oblivion, Fallout 3&NV, and even Skyrim running in OpenMW has already started.
It's not impossible to make ourselves independent of this GAAS trap, even if the majority of normalfags embrace it; but it's going to take a lot of time, and a lot of autism.
737c9b No.16273625
>>16273527
should alert all the normalfaggots that enjoyed skyrim about GAY ASS stream service, alert them that if they endorse something like it they can say good bye to all their shitty mods.
191285 No.16273662
>>16268405
Nah. It's trying to get ahead of more anti-consumer laws and men are faster than current production.
6f6955 No.16273669
You bet streaming services won't let you mod your games with resources outside their server. That's if they let you upload original files to their server after all.
191285 No.16273696
>>16273665
It's the power of the cloud, don't have to explain it.
02ce83 No.16273731
>>16268405
The major problem with most game streaming services like liquidsky is the low amount of data centers. Google has a ton of data centers so this hopefully won't be a problem.
I don't really think 'always online' is a problem. Its pretty obvious that the service will be just online only and I don't think that's bad. Most games now are always online, even single player games and almost everyone in developed nations have WiFi that is decent.
Also to anyone saying that 'people love owning a disc no way this will ever become popular' , physically owning your game already a thing of the past. Most games can be bought on Steam and many stores don't sell PC games on discs and Microsoft is making a digital only Xbox one S. Many games can be bought digitally. There are many types of gaming subscription services like Xbox gold, Xbox game pass, PlayStation plus, Nintendo Online and many more services. No one is really complaing about these services compared that 'you don't own them, they can take it from u' crowd. I don't think that will be a problem to be honest. This sort of thing has happened to movies, TV shows and many more forms of entertainment and this will happen to videogames. Owning a physical video game will become a thing of the past and many more companies will move to making games only available to buy online. It's only a matter of time until this happens.
Also mods, why did you delete my thread, again
818ad7 No.16273738
>>16273731
Still didn't answer, shill-kun.
Games like PT and Scott Pilgrim got pulled by developers for various reasons and are inaccessible nowadays.
Games like Darkspore were always online and are now inaccessible, even in singleplayer.
As such, what will happen to Stadia games the moment the developer, the publisher, a licenser or Google themselves decide it's not worth it? What makes you think those games will not be removed? Because Google is "nice"?
a8a5a5 No.16273742
>>16273731
Even a ground level nigger knows what a fallacy this is on a networking end. I just can't wait for the reviews of that fucking controller.
b164df No.16273748
>>16273731
Fuck off shill, we already detonated your last two threads.
cb4fa8 No.16273755
>>16273731
Good post young Dinesh, $0.13c have been added to your account.
02ce83 No.16273762
cb4fa8 No.16273769
>>16273762
Reminder that ironic shitposting is still shitposting
f74eaa No.16273779
<<16273762
You spent more time making that "bait" than everyone else did reading one line, disregarding the rest, and laughing at you. 4/10.
a8a5a5 No.16273780
>>16273762
I don't fucking care, as I said. I cannot wait for reviews of that controller. Any faggot that's been hands on with it I'd like to see from.
02ce83 No.16273781
>>16273779
I made it to laugh at the responses
a8a5a5 No.16273796
I know at least one little faggot here went to GDC.
125594 No.16273803
>>>/v/16273731
>I don't really think 'always online' is a problem.
Stop reading right there. Not even going to give you a (you)
8172ae No.16273805
f74eaa No.16273812
>shitposter gets off on repeatedly being called a faggot
a7b21c No.16273856
I don't often agree with my fellow gamer goyim but streaming games is CANCER.
I can see why devs would love it
>no mods
>no cheating
>no piracy
>no used games
>no ban evading (better not say the N word)
>no more sales (pay up paypiggy)
92063e No.16273909
>>16273856
>no piracy.
Give it time. There are already 4k releases of itune movies popping up which were thought to be unattainable before. Now, replicating the infrastructure of it could be a problem if they're taking advantage of this cloud gaming the keep marketing.
There's also the problem of no offline play. I doubt they'd give a download option if their main selling point is streaming. Can anyone honestly expect their won't be problems of downtime and maintenance with an always online system?
e7f433 No.16273913
>>16273909
Do I need to explain to you how a series of images and audio is different from a program?
fc0696 No.16273938
>>16273731
Tell your faggot corporate overlords that people will never consider it acceptable to be stripped of the ability able to execute 1's and 0's on the device of their choice this includes shit like games tied to a device or XBL/PSN/Nintendo/etc. account.
>>16273665
good going anon, but you're missing a couple more 9s there.
a8a5a5 No.16273948
>>16273922
Go any farther and welcome to a report ban. Nice ones you have there.
df8b99 No.16273982
>I'm an oldfag thats been around for six trillion years goyim
>But I conveniently forgot about OnLive and the other 10 times this streaming service garbage flopped
>Just give up, like me! Look how credible I am!
The input delay is simply insurmountable. Google would have to design a newer and better networking bus so that the time cost of accessing your network interface from the CPU isn't as steep. Until they do that, this service will simply never be acceptable for anything but turn based games.
0da25c No.16273995
>>16273922
>Occam's Razor suggests that Google's investors are just plain stupid and will get pushed over once reality sets in.
Googles investors are venture capitalist Jews whose profession is going on spending sprees in Silicon Valley.
They will be the first to be bailed out during the next economic downturn. Unless we stop using their system of economics.
If I were you I'd withdraw your money from your bank. You don't have to buy gold/silver whatever metal the goldbugs are screeching about, just keep it safe or invest in something you think is a safe investment.
If you keep your money in a large bank 9 times out of 10 it's going to be taken out and moved around for (((their))) investments behind your back.
b2bb8d No.16274060
>>16273856
>>no piracy
All you will need to do is record a few hours of gameplay with a DVR or such device. The binaries will automatically be downloaded through the stream and you can play locally without the latency.
230307 No.16274071
Did everyone forget about OnLive and how bad it flopped due to the horrible input delay? What's really bothering me is (((Electronic Arts)))'s subscription service, Origin/EA Access, which is basically Netflix for games. You still have to download the game files, but no subscription? No Origin Access™ games, goy.
If it gets popular to the point we won't be able to buy the games separately then circumvent the copy protection anymore, we're screwed.
4d04a8 No.16274072
>>16268405
>oh noes, cant play shitty games in the future
Go fuck yourself if you think the future still holds any good games.
>muh oldfag
Kill yourself
96b2d1 No.16274088
>>16274060
>All you will need to do is record a few hours of gameplay with a DVR or such device. The binaries will automatically be downloaded through the stream and you can play locally without the latency.
Or you can just buy the physical copy of the game in the first place?
b2bb8d No.16274093
>>16274088
whatchu gonna do, willis, when the game is exclusively on a streaming service?
125594 No.16274112
>>16273913
>he wouldnt break inside the data center and steal all that vidya
9e989b No.16274115
>>16271732
>He doesn't know about the /v/ father of the year (all years), creating his daughter when he can in video games including eroge
e7f433 No.16274131
>>16274112
Modern vidya that I cant just run in an emulator, or something like OpenMW or GemRB? Fuck no I woudn't.
843ff4 No.16274240
>>16274115
truly the greatest father.
91e114 No.16274269
>Google doesn't want you to own your games.
>Google's face when
a8a5a5 No.16274282
>>16274071
Nigger, I'm a GameTap and OnLive veteran. It's been long enough they can shovel it uphill again.
a8a5a5 No.16274304
Teens and tweens fucked in the mind by social media is going to be a hell of an an actual. They'll be wondering why they were in that fugue state and heard tale of.
7a9f05 No.16279563
>>16273665
>the joke that the audience for stadia doesn't converge in the venn diagram the other anon made on the previous thread flew over everyone's head
I feel insulted that you "corrected" something that was already correct
f24b30 No.16279615
>>16279563
I really didn't think it would be this difficult to understand.
2eb053 No.16279849
Switched to (pedo)weeb games a few years ago. Let the mainstream industry burn. Nuke it from orbit. Its the only way to be sure.
1f052c No.16279869
>>16279849
>Implying that the nips won't be infected next when CY+4 industry burns.
We already see Netflix trying to poz anime and (((localizers))) fucking with nip games; you can't bury your head in the sand and pretend it isn't going to happen.
b63d2c No.16279884
>>16268544
>There will still be loading screens, graphics will be the same, and frame rate will most likely vary.
He's not really wrong. Assuming games will exclusively become services and not be tied down to anyone's hardware like it is now on console or PC, your hardware limitations are practically non existent since Google has retarded amounts of servers and hardware, allowing for much prettier graphics, higher frames (which comes at the cost of higher internet demand, of course) and lower loading times if they do something as wild as having games loaded on RAM drive.
040d75 No.16280577
>>16273856
>we're at the point where the interests of the developers are directly antagonistic to the interests of the customers.
And the market should have crashed long before.
000000 No.16280850
>>16268405
Google can't get 1080@60 on yt to play instantly on a 20mbps connection but they will get games with no lag running. This same company cant get hangouts to work properly in nearly 10 years.
Right, anyway, OP is wrong about the target market tho, the people using this will be the ones playing a game on a cheapo laptop on 720x480, not the ones with a $1000+ rig
The real problem is if this shit adopts the netflix model of one fee=unlimited games. You just cant compete with that shit, everybody will jump in.
Worst part is that if that happens all devs will start developing for stadia hardware first meaning games might never be ported for native play at all.
000000 No.16280872
>>16273731
>Google has a ton of data centers
Yes but not nearly enough, it would require a huge investment akin to buying an established company to do this and on top of that goolag has a bad history of dropping projects halfway, see the ARA phone for example. Like it or not to work properly this thing is going to need the kind of connection and network gear only people who already owns high-end rigs have, and thats not the target audience.
c2ec97 No.16280920
>Now the rumormill says Walmart wants to do a streaming box
http://archive.ph/eoQdR
I don't believe it, "anonymous" sources mean fuckall without proof. But finally they have revealed their attempt to kill vidya amd the problems the pesky goyim give them, like piracy, emulators, and playing older games for free.
f9271e No.16281064
>>16268405
Who at Google thought that advertising their product next to infamous gaming failures was a good idea?
203956 No.16281069
>>16281064
>dreamcast next to powergrove and the et meme
F|UCK YOU JEWGLE
d752b4 No.16281091
>>16268533
>stadia
>stages of a disease
What did they mean by this?
767e57 No.16281106
>>16281064
Is this a joke?
8a86bc No.16281110
>>16268405
>All the casuals will be jumping on the streaming bandwagon because that's just the kind of shit casuals do.
But they don't, casuals still buy physical/download movies and music. The only time streaming is accepted is when it's paying a monthly fee for access to thousands of titles like Netflix. If casuals are unwilling to pay $20 for a stream only movie they are not going to pay $60 for a stream only game.
>$3000 gaming rig
The fuck? Are you retarded?
>it's inevitable, take the blackpill
Fuck you fag.
43874e No.16281111
>>16281064
>Anything you dream can be built
How can one BUILD a COLLAPSE?
7c14ab No.16281121
>Once the rightsholders decide they want to make a game disappear, they just remove it from the streaming service and it's gone for good
oh no how will I ever load my roms again
23b9da No.16281123
>>16281064
Is this some kind of crazy new marketing technique I'm not privy to? Deliberately lumping your product in with failures and garbage so that people buy it ironically or something?
43874e No.16281136
>>16281123
women have been doing this for millennia
c2ec97 No.16281140
>>16281064
>Making a failure that crashes the industry so you can it take over
Great foreshadowing.
ec3ae3 No.16281152
>>16268665
>oy vey if they're not paid by jews to post their ✡opinions✡ they aren't telling the truth
Why are these marketers allowed to post here.
ec3ae3 No.16281156
>>16281123
>Deliberately lumping your product in with failures and garbage so that people buy it ironically or something?
>>16281136
>women have been doing this for millennia
Do you mean that women have "friends" who they know are shit only to serve as a way to highlight their own qualities?
43874e No.16281191
>>16281156
yes, the ugly girlfriend of the group
b6c6eb No.16281306
>>16281110
Normalfags are stupid but if this is $€30 per month they will do the math and just buy a PS4.
9b7416 No.16281340
03da15 No.16281715
>>16268405
>you will eventually be telling your children of a time when you actually owned a physical or digital copy of your game
You know, I still watch my old movie collection of DVDs and VHS tapes. I also still play my old cartridges and games discs from various console gens. I never liked how my sister or cousins' were wasting their money monthly on Netflix. The idea of "buying" something you "don't own" is something only suckers fall for.
0da25c No.16282618
>>16279537
Adored is an upstanding guy but please don't shill Jewtube here.
f9271e No.16282821
>>16281340
https://please use archive.is2019/3/16/18268217/google-cloud-gaming-gdc-2019-announcement-event-hardware-news
ffdac2 No.16282977
>>16268405
If gaming ever becomes a streaming-only or streaming-focused service, I'll quit. I'll just load up a PC with all the old games I enjoy playing and just stick with that. There's no way in hell I'd put up with someone else having control of my property like that.
07defb No.16283009
71207c No.16283027
>>16268405
Commifornia soyboys will lap this up as they loved being cucked. Now they can be cucked while playing video games as well.
d8531c No.16283044
>>16281715
I pirate all my games and have backups on my home servers. It is pretty nice because I'm a poorfag but still can enjoy all these games. Now imagine when there are zero physical releases or even digital releases to rip from your console's HDD. Such a terrible world. I'll probably be playing old-ass PC games for the rest of my life.
818ad7 No.16283251
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Shitposts take time to make, it seems.
The Stadia seriously worries me, though. The only two things holding this thing back are developers who maybe would not want their games to be essentially free, assuming Google uses a Netflix-like payment system, and the absolutely abysmal internet infrastructure in many places.
97734c No.16283295
>>16283251
>shilling your shit
Stop.
f9271e No.16283352
>>16283251
>The only two things holding this thing back
There are a lot of problems with it, anon. Even under test conditions, there were major problems with response time. The latency issues alone are going to kill it. That's not considering the fact that it is literally turning games into a service (ala EA's business model), which people are growing increasingly hostile to, and the DRM issues are going to turn even more people off, myself included
818ad7 No.16283357
>>16283352
Holding it back from mainstream adoption, anon. I'm aware of all of it's shortcomings.
Do you think normalfags care about any of that? Some, sure, but not many. They're perfectly willing to eat any other shit that the industry throws at them. If this had a Netflix payment model, they would eat it up.
767e57 No.16283358
>>16283352
>that webm
Not trying to defend this piece of shit, but can we get a comparison with the game running on a PC/console, for all I know, that's just how the game behaves, because of muh momentum.
f9271e No.16283394
>>16283357
>Do you think normalfags care about any of that?
If the games are literally unplayable, then they absolutely will care about it.
f9271e No.16283397
767e57 No.16283440
>>16283397
Ok, that's better, here are the vids, in case the videos get deleted, and a merged one(don't know how it got so big, not good with this stuff).
41bca9 No.16283463
>>16283440
>>16283440
yeah.. i don't see how they can defy physics.
345433 No.16283475
Devs can't even get games to run well when they are saved on your fucking local harddrive, how the fuck would they ever get it to work anywhere near acceptable levels when it is being constantly streamed from possibly hundreds of miles away? It just can't work.
3c1731 No.16283476
>>16283044
Yeah I'm getting demoralized. First America censored my Japanese games and now I have to stream games. Maybe I should look into drugs.
79a8c0 No.16283496
>>16268447
>no downloads
>streaming at a gigabit per second
1df287 No.16283498
>>16283352
>latency is an issue
Not when you're making a trash walking gender equality movie simulator
767e57 No.16283515
>>16283498
Or JRPGs, Turn-Based Strategy game, card games or VNs
9cea86 No.16283526
You already accepted not owning your games so you will also accept the big fat streaming dick thats all what PC users can do silently obey
2475cd No.16283530
>implying people don't have breaking points
>implying people don't react when a line has been crossed
>implying this won't be the straw that breaks the camels back
767e57 No.16283534
>>16283530
>what is slow boiling frog
0c2910 No.16283552
The amount of obvious shilling and the faggots readily getting into an argument with said shills is staggering.
79d0c3 No.16283570
>>16283251
Don't worry Anon, I appreciate your work.
b4a809 No.16283687
Good fucking christ, the amount of shills in this thread.
af8a1a No.16283693
>>16283552
Is that Lady naked?
43874e No.16283927
>>16283251
Reminds me of that video I did bitching about Batman & Harley, only better.
>>16283463
the running animation clearly kept going and didn't switch to the "stopping" animation until almost a second later
be06d5 No.16283951
>>16283251
Not bad, but it would work better being broken down into short clips.
4c1b82 No.16284133
No matter how good your internet connection is, there's no way around input lag. And that matters a LOT, which means any game that demands quick reflexes won't be played, even if available. Think something like CS:GO, hell, even Touhou, where a millisecond can define success or failure.
So the games available will be those idiot proof, barely impossible to lose crap that Ubisoft and the like produce.
To add salt to the injure you won't be able to mod your games; you'll have to deal with video compression artifacts; audio compression on top of the compression used in the game; no super extreme high resolution; no vsync; unpredictable spikes in the frame-rate due to connection hiccups… The list can go on.
GaaS will have a niche market, but it won't take the industry in the fear mongering way OP is doing.
000000 No.16284342
You can't win.
>>16268405
No, impotent shill. It won't.
Normalfags are waking up en masse. There won't ever be a total move from one system to another as it was done before. The more companies push for that move, the more you can be assured that they are doing it out of desperation, and not because of mass acceptance.
No change is inevitable. every single change can be stopped permanently.
Always reject the new.
Keep the old. It is better.
f74eaa No.16284349
Reminder that Brazilians have literally nothing of merit to say
818ad7 No.16284375
>>16284342
Anon, it's simply a matter of who scoops up GTA6. I'm unfortunately not joking. If Epic's store gets it as an exclusive, Steam is all but fucked. If Stadia gets it as at least a big headliner and Stadia has Neflix pricing, it will have at least a massive userbase.
7a9f05 No.16284391
Reminder, niggerpill kike isn't hated because he niggerpills, but because he's a massive faggot that doesn't know what fitting in is
And to think that on /vg/ they let him roam around and even believe he's a normal poster
43874e No.16286552
>>16283251
one more comment:
either put your comment text an inch higher so it can be read while youtube's hud is visible or make it stay on screen longer because it zips by too fast
06a3cd No.16286829
>>16268405
>GaaS
The answer is in the question.