19930d No.15632816
I know some of you play this. There are no alternatives.
Ships just came out, along with helicopters. Helicopters require a long grind, but ships are now playable by everyone for free right out of the gate. (It was behind a paywall before.) The servers crashed the day they released it (yesterday) but they are back up now.
I haven't seen a war thunder thread ever, I've seen plenty of other shit MMO threads, but never a war thunder one. I think it's a decent game, it's not DCS, but it's the only other game even close and it's a million times more popular.
The best part is you get to seal club consolefags, they all have a "*" next to their name, to clearly indicate they are using an inferior control scheme and will die easily.
3cdf78 No.15632835
is it fun and worth playing?
19930d No.15632843
>>15632835
i have a good time with it. there's a grind but the best games are the low tiers anyway, if you grind all the way up to the jets, jets suck and nobody plays them. all the shit you can buy really doesn't matter "premium" planes that give you more of the in-game currency and research points used to get new planes/tanks/etc, but they're stupidly expensive and overrated, they are just meant for the stupid goyim whales who will happily spend $60 on a 3d model.
nothing you can pay for really affects gameplay. and 90% of the planes/tanks/etc are not premium, it's not like STO where literally every single thing is a paid thing once you hit level cap. It's perfectly playable without spending a dime, I never have. If you buy a monthly subscription all it does is give you some of the jewcoins they use to buy shit, and ups your loot/research from winning like premium planes do, it's not necessary at all. It also get's you into the closed beta for ships, but that's not necessary either, now that ships have been released.
835956 No.15632852
>>15632816
I keep forgetting War Thunder is also planes. Do planefags forget about tankfags too?
75d68c No.15632856
What was World of Warships like? I haven't played it so I don't really know what to expect for this one
19930d No.15632857
it's also perfectly playable on a toaster, you'll get 60fps on min settings, probably having to drop out of 1080p, on old intel integrated. this leads to butthurt for consolefags because they can't turn graphics down.
PC and PS4/Xbox players play on the same servers, with each other, (though PS4 can't play with Xbox, licencing, etc, it's PS4/PC and XBox/PC). PC players get no choice the matchmaker will just throw consolefags into your game.
The butthurt generation is from pics related. Playing tanks consolefags have to deal with the foliage graphics impairing vision, while min settings on PC doesn't, (you can obviously crank the graphics up on PC).
these are old pics ripped from ED, min settings actually looks a little better, but the point is clear.
19930d No.15632859
>>15632852
i just recently switched to doing tanks after planes forever, it really is like two separate games, and now there's ships.
you should eventually research some planes though, you can use them in tank/ship realistic battles after you die once and have enough spawn points to spawn a plane, then you can start raping tanks and ships. Ships are obviously harder to take down.
75d68c No.15632871
>>15632859
>tfw you're probably bullshitting and are probably a shill
>still makes me want to give Wart under another go because I remember liking ground forces before dropping it for some reason I can't remember
e49aed No.15632897
>>15632857
Oh for fucks sake no wonder I keep dying in war thunder so much.
a5a70e No.15632909
>>15632857
I wish I knew about this back when I still played it.
I have it installed, but fuck, getting into again now after all that time would be a pain.
67c1a2 No.15632913
>>15632857
>hide in foliage
>fags turn off foliage so your cover doesn't even matter
what the fuck
6658be No.15632919
>>15632913
they still havent fixed that? guess it wasnt mentioned in secret sovient documents.
94f3f6 No.15634273
>>15632919
They said they did a year or two ago, maybe more, never bothered to check it out for myself.
b36a86 No.15634299
>>15632816
>Kike blunder
>decent game
b97678 No.15634304
>>15634299 ✅
> SAO
> decent anime
You're right about War Thunder though
94936c No.15634338
All the wonderful planes are wasted on this shitty game. Profound sadness!
d41a42 No.15634358
>>15632816
gtfo newfag we complain about this game all the time. Its a shitt ugh grind game with shit devs who constantly sabotage anything good about the game with muh sekrit documents.
40bdec No.15634380
dfe905 No.15634797
in the early versions
>there will be a world war mode!
>ww2 stuff!
>no obnoxious paper shit
now
>maus vs ATGMs
>modern tanks
>paper shit all over the place
>documents say russian planes best!
>more t34s vs less pz4s? fun? nah goy, there has to be equal people on both team ))) we will just put modern tanks vs german ones is balance )))))))))))))))))))))))
>FUCKING HELICOPTERS instead of making BETTER flight models
SHIT game and thats before even mention how the graphics have this really fucking weird blur that looks like low bitrate youtube videos but worse somehow, or maybe extreme draw distances in some games where things become weirdly blurry
IT HURTS YOUR EYES trying to spot shit
oh yeah and you cant even guarantee that you will be in a nation vs nation based match last i checked, you might end up in a game with mixed teams, so t34s and shermans on your team despite being in a pz4.
0/10 physically uncomfortable to play and hurts the eyes
9982d9 No.15635067
>>15632835
It's fun up to Tier 4. Tier 5 and Tier 6 is shit(aside from a few gimmick vehicles which can be fun to play for shits and giggles, but aren't necessarily comptetitive. Maus is eternal.) HEATFS is still too expensive, the matchmaker sucks due to compression, and repair costs of vehicles practically necessitate maintaining a premium account. I say this from a Realistic Battle perspective. Don't have the autism/equipment to play sim, and arcade is just boring.
The new Helicopters are actually quite terrible. They're modeled in with the durability of wet paper, a few plinks of a roof mounted MG-3 will blast them to bits, so the only way to play them is to just sit around way out of range and throw ATGM's at tanks. It's either high risk low reward, or low risk low reward. I'd avoid helicopters entirely until they get their shit straight, because right now they're only somewhat fun in the helicopter-only mode.
Ships are…ehh. It's tanks, but on water pretty much.
Up to T4, both planes and tanks are pretty fun. The grind isn't too bad, you make enough lions to pay for everything just by playing, and there aren't any BS gimmicks like ATGM's, radar SPAA, or helicopters. If you do want to play T5 and T6, avoid playing anything except US or Russia. Germany, British and France are trash, with Britain only being good by virtue of getting carried by US.
Italy still doesn't have tanks, but rumor suggests they'll be out in december. Their fighters are some of the best in game, at least.
It's free to play, so it's not like you lose anything for giving it a try. Only things to pay for is premium time to make research and SL gain faster, or for premium vehicles which are usually just prototypes or gimmicky vehicles(some of the T5 ons are disgustingly OP, though.) Fortunately, there is no real end game, so if you find a few vehicles you like from Tier 1-4, you'll never need premium. There are also events where you can just play the game for premium vehicles, which promptly become rare as they're only available to get for a limited time and then there will never be a way to get them again.
Verdict: I think it's fun. Not stellar, but fun.
75d68c No.15635120
>>15635067
How beeg is the download?
9982d9 No.15635178
>>15635120
~35 gigs, I think.
Suppose that's one problem; their launcher/updater client can take a while.
031e25 No.15635196
Your enjoyment depends on what your goal is. If you're interested in playing the stuff in tier 5/6, don't even bother. Long fucking grind to play an imbalanced clusterfuck. The fun is in the mid-tiers, which is less of a cluster ack and easier to grind for. Plus the mid-tier contains pretty much all the iconic fighters and tanks anyways.
a4a6b5 No.15635208
>>15632816
>There are no alternatives.
>War Thunder naval.
>No alternatives.
I really fucking hope you don't actually believe this.
d52f1c No.15635213
the boats are shit and completely unfun. i dunno about helicopters though. tanks are the best
000000 No.15635260
>>15632843
>jets suck and nobody plays them
Most people just suck at flying jets. But yeah, props are more fun. If you want a 'fun' tier 5, get a rocket. I was flying the sushi back when it only had 4 mins of fuel. Fun times.
a4a6b5 No.15635827
>Doesn't let you start out with lolibotes.
>Makes you start out with toddlerbotes.
>Lolibotes are at the very end of the line.
>Where the fuck are the cruisers.
>DD's control like shit, are slow, bulky, and just feel terrible.
>No stealth or concealment, which is fucking stupid because that's actually a thing in real life.
>Torpedos are clunky, fuck off with that shit.
>Bugging through terrain constantly.
>No feedback on firing at ships, it feels like ass. Don't actually feel rewarded with aim.
>Entire thing feels milquetoast.
>Waited fucking years for it.
I'm going back to World of Warships. Call me when they add in the Loyang and Leningrad and it's not dogshit to play.
70ce32 No.15635873
Game went to absolute shit when they started adding ATGM's to tanks.
669380 No.15636112
>>15634304
That's the spinoff written by a different author. It actually was pretty good.
b8e934 No.15636276
>>15632856
WoWS was slow but fun until they decided they wanted the reddit audience and started neutering everything high skill in the game. They nerfed the shit out of the minekaze and torpedoes in general as morons attempting to lone wolf in a battleship would just die and cry. I don't know what's happened with it recently, I took a look earlier this year and it was now full of fucking lootboxes and I alt+f4ed and uninstalled.
A nice feature it also had was that the playerbase was entirely white. No turd worlders, no chinks, etc.. People would actually chat.
a4a6b5 No.15636279
>>15636276
>Saying this when a lot of clans are filled to the fucking brim with Chinese people.
I actually just got kicked out of my clan for posting content-aware Hirohito.
b8e934 No.15636282
>>15636279
There were no slant-eyes back when it was good.
669380 No.15636330
>>15636276
They are about to completely change how CVs work right now. You will only control a single squadron at a time from a third person view rather than like a pseudo RTS.
4c3581 No.15636368
>>15636330
>they are about to remove the only thing that stops WoWS from being world of tanks on water
glad i dropped that shit a couple years ago
669380 No.15636443
>>15636368
It can't possibly be any worse than their current implementation. As things are now CVs decide which team wins, everyone else is just along for the ride.
87fb5b No.15636472
>>15636276
>the playerbase was entirely white
The EU servers are 90% autistic middle aged british men and angry poles, 5% other slavs and Europeans, and the last 5% is a split between actual kikes playing from Israel and illiterate Turks.
358147 No.15636499
>>15636443
historically accurate
669380 No.15636538
>>15636499
But not fun for the other 22 players.
87fb5b No.15636544
>>15636499
Because World Of Warships is a historically accurate simulation of naval warfare, with destroyers being able to soak 6-7 torpedoes without blowing up if you hit them wrong, and ships lighting on fire instantly if an HE shell from a blueprint only Kraut battleship 1.5 times the size of the Yamato shatters against their armor belt.
19930d No.15637187
>>15635067
>Germany, British and France are trash
i've played nothing but germany and a little japan and I do pretty well in realistic battles. in fact right now at t4 people are bitching and moaning that germany is OP at that level and it's the only way make the silver.
the argument i've been seeing a lot is that the only people who play the really shittier countries, japan for example, germany is better than japan, are pretty good, so war thunder sees this high win/loss ratio and then further gimps/increases repair costs on planes/tanks in the country, further making it shittier, but these decent players still win, and it becomes a feedback loop.
russian shit is all OP but it's a russian game.
the other argument is the entire axis is just cannon fodder for the whales, which primarily spend real money and play U.S/British, so they maintain the axis countries at a disadvantage. naturally none of this is admitted. like i said i haven't had any problems playing only germany. i've played japan a little bit, the planes are paper and get outran by everything but they're more maneuverable, they can outturn just about everything.
19930d No.15637229
>>15636276
>>15636472
i somewhat doubt there's any niggers in war thunder either, but it's true nobody talks, maybe if your in a squadron or something. people don't use the in-game text chat much, and there's VOIP built-in but nobody ever uses it in general public games.
console players are clearly identified so that's not the issue, most players are still using PC, might get 10-20% of a game be console players at most.
15a807 No.15637684
I'm interested. How many GBs is required for this game? How much GBs will the client download for the game files? I have limited bandwidth and time for now.
fbf46a No.15637798
>>15636112
>that shit
>good
end yourself
19930d No.15638065
901530 No.15638104
>>15632852
>I keep forgetting War Thunder is also planes. Do planefags forget about tankfags too?
Allied planefags never forget about tankfags.
55e262 No.15638107
I guess I could try it.
Are there custom lobbies? If it turns out fun would it be gamenight material?
a2820f No.15638115
Gaijin permabanned me for using sound mods. Not gonna do the whole grind again. But at least I'm free now because the game is shit.
19930d No.15638119
>>15638107
there's custom battles you can make, like your own server with your own map and settings on their system, and you can put a password on it, never tried making one.
94b036 No.15638123
>>15638107
>ustom lobbies
Yes
>gamenight material
Wouldn't say no but probably not
7e5dd1 No.15638139
>>15638104
With the timeline of the tanks moving through the late 70's / early 80's, it's time they added an appropriate means of BRRRRRRT
19930d No.15638165
>>15638139
i'd love to see a war-thunder a-10 so i can compare it to DCS A-10 and enjoy the shit taste in my mouth
atleast none of the war thunder planes are in DCS aside from the meme props that DCS added.
b36a86 No.15638211
>>15635067
>repair costs of vehicles practically necessitate maintaining a premium account
Did this get worse?
Last time I played early 2017 it was still possible to make up for financial losses incurred from a few bad T2+ sim battles by playing an hour or two of T3-4 arcade.
t. never touched tanks
>>15638104
>allied planefags
Funny, last time I played combined arms SB it was rare for burger allies to gain chair superiority on any map, loaded P-47s at low alt were little more than free RP even with skilled pilots at hand.
Russians put up more of a fight, but even then they didn't manage to gain complete air superiority all that oftenthough their IL2s were a pain in the ass.
The fact that most allied players apart from Russians barely knew how to airplane in sim mode also helped.
725586 No.15638282
>>15635827
>it's not dogshit to play.
>plays WOWs
669f74 No.15638352
>>15638211
They recently took a sledge hammer to most repair costs and as early as early 2018 slashed RP costs on many vehicles to allow the murderous grind for top tiers to be tolerable. Obviously the new top tier has the same murderous grind Tier V used to have, but hey 3-5 isn't asking for all four limbs anymore.
Actually got me back into playing because it made getting mid tier stuff much easier.
In point of fact I managed to grind through the bong bomber tree to the Canberra which in conjunction with SB EC's makes grinding british aircraft a breeze if not a little boring, but I find flying the Mach 0.8 cookie delivery device funny as hell so I don't mind it.
83e201 No.15638755
>>15632816
Why should I care about WW2-era p2w garbage when Ace Combat 7 is coming out on PC in a few months and Project Wingman isn't far behind? Those are two far better dogfighting sims right there, and Ace Combat has already learned the lesson that helicopters are boring as shit.
b36a86 No.15638784
>>15638755
>ywn have an Ace Combat set during Strangereal's version of WW1
83e201 No.15638872
>>15638784
>tfw Ace Combat's WW1 is established in canon (the Osean War, 1905-1910) but we will never have a game set during that time period with weird WW1 superplanes.
Come to think of it, does aircraft licensing apply that far back? At the very least most WW1/2 aircraft would be public domain now, right?
19930d No.15638903
>>15638755
>i just want to fly around in my weeb arcade game with my anime painted jet that somehow contains 50000 missiles and spam the fire button
43e166 No.15638917
>>15638872
It's a shame game development is so lengthy and expensive nowadays, I'd love to see that spinoff. The fictional setting would be a great excuse to feature lots of real WW1 planes that were seldom actually used.
15a807 No.15638984
>>15638065
That's about the same value with what posted on the official site, but surely the value will be more than that, because of updates.
Has anyone installed the game fresh in the recent week?
How much did you download and how much space does the game take?
At this rate I should pray for a torrent that contains all the games files.
83e201 No.15638988
>>15638917
During the PS2 era Kono had all sorts of plans for spinoffs that would take place in different time periods and span a fuckload of genres (detective game, MG Rising-style action game, etc.). I really wonder why not even a single one came to be.
>>15638903
Excuse me for requiring my flight games to include a modicum of fun
835956 No.15638994
>>15638107
>play months to unlock all the iconic shit
>is it good for a weekend-lasting game night
no
19930d No.15639002
>>15638984
they just did an update for these ships and it was close to 19gb, in the forums it was mentioned that they changed texture compression algo's or something so basically this patch was the entire game again.
My whole war thunder folder is 22gb.
55e262 No.15639071
>>15638994
Depends on whether or not Tier 1 matches are complete ass like WoT's was.
15a807 No.15639072
>>15639002
>19gb patch
Dropped.
Thanks for your helpful answers, folks.
a4a6b5 No.15639222
>>15638282
>WoWs
>Dogshit to play
Nice meme.
4c3581 No.15641801
>>15638165
>be an unbelievably huge fan of the Huey model
>spend a decent chunk of change on a collective, spend a lot of time getting autistic with it, at the point where I genuinely believe that I could safely cold start, take off, fly, navigate and land a real one
>the War Thunder helicopters drop
>they're unbelievably retarded and the Huey has none of the characteristics that make the Huey special
fuck you
4c3581 No.15641809
>>15641801
i meant Huey module for DCS and am also retarded and gay
ad64e6 No.15642515
I stopped playing because instead of tweaking the number of players on each team they balance the game by pitting good old tanks/planes against newer ones. There's also not much balancing by role, you can end up with 2/3rds of your team flying bombers while enemy team is all fighters that easily gain air superiority and destroy all your bombers. The map might not even have any good bombing targets. You'll see some ridiculous shit, like Junkers (that can barely take off on its ancient wet fart engine) going against Hellcats and La-5F, refitted PzIV against KV-2-of-doom and so on. That's years of difference, most low rank german forces are pre-war designs that have to fight stuff that was built from reactive experience gained in WW2. Newer forces also get access to much newer ammo, so most matches are just whack-a-mole games where the mole is usually Axis.
There are some scenarios to play where they tweak numbers instead, but they're very limited and they usually involve T-34's, a lot of them.
586838 No.15642616
The single biggest issue with WT, bigger than iffy balancing, it slowly inching out of scale or the battle ranking spread making you face things a decade more modern, is that it is constructed from the ground up to convince you to cough up the greatest amount of good goy bucks. Let's say you're a new player and want to drive a Nashorn. Just go down the left hand side of the chart, unlocking each vehicle right? Haha, go fuck yourself. You see, to be able to research vehicles of a tier, you need to have a certain number of the previous tier's vehicles also unlocked. So once you hit the Sturmpanzer, you've got to go and work your way through the other columns as well. Of course, you could always just pay up and unlock one of those premium vehicles…
Actually, let's bring those up. In addition to often having slight advantages compared to regular vehicles, the fact that their opponent is less likely to have faced them regularly means that understanding the strengths and weaknesses of premium vehicles is also less likely. However, the higher you go in WT battle rankings, the more likely you are to be facing premium vehicles. This is of course because people are more likely to just give in and pay up rather than try to grind their way through the tech tree.
19930d No.15642650
>>15642616
i don't know about tanks but premium vehicles don't seem to give many advantages in air rb. they nerfed the shit out of the BV, (axis though go figure), but i don't have any issues downing the allied premium shit, because the players that generally pay up to prematurely advance in the tech tree generally suck anyway.
In air rb there's time to think, strategy (which equals being above your opponent at all times and letting the retards go in first and waste the enemies altitude). I've only recently started playing tanks, a week or two in, and it seems like the strategy there is find a good hiding spot. Of course i'm just starting to get into T2 and already and seeing what people bitch about with shells bouncing right off other tanks.
Ships is kind of a shitfest right now but they are considering it a beta still.
>>15642515
this is why people quickly learn what is shit and what isn't. the only people that fly ju's are just looking to dick off once in a while or they haven't figured out that they suck, eventually they will switch to bf109's and be done with it. all of the german attackers are pretty much shit. i imagine it's the same with tanks.
you have to research and purchase an aircraft / tank / ship to advance in the tree but you don't have to play it.
19930d No.15642656
>>15642616
>Let's say you're a new player and want to drive a Nashorn
if your a new player how do you know you want to drive a nashhorn, looks? how do you know you even want to spend a bunch of time in that tier? there is a learning experience that occurs as you advance up the tree about what is garbage and what is not garbage.
0990de No.15642672
>>15642656
>See Vehicle you like is in the game.
>"I want to play this vehicle because I think it is rad."
Simple enough really.
ad64e6 No.15642674
>>15642656
You may be right, but it doesn't change the fact that it's designed to be a grindfest. Back before the tree remake you could go all along a single branch and get to jets sooner than you'll get to unlock 3rd tier in current system.
b36a86 No.15642829
>>15642616
Ironically premium players in Air SB are some of the biggest retards on the planet, I can't remember how many orange A7M1s I farmed as a Thunderbolt back in the day.
>>15642650
>all of the german attackers are pretty much shit
Do the Ju-87G and Hs 129 anti-tank cannons werk nowadays?
I tried the cannon Stuka in combined arms years ago and it was complete aids.
725586 No.15642860
>>15639222
>implying its not shit
t. wargayming shill
586838 No.15645384
>>15642656
Some of us are military tech enthusiasts, who like things based on history rather than game meta.
0e512f No.15645699
>>15642616
>f2p game encourages premium stuff and is grindy
No fucking shit. This is the concession everyone must make for any f2p game. Some are worse than others, but complaining about this sort of shit seems completely asanine at this point. You either put up with it and adapt or don't play it.
586838 No.15645848
>>15645699
Plenty of F2P games give you ways to reduce the grind required. MOBAs either tend to have the characters be unlocked or at worse like in LoLs case you can just directly pick which you want to unlock. In that case the grind required comes down to a few hours or days. In WT, if you want to play high tier vehicles you're looking at weeks or even months. A while ago one of the devs/community managers, can't remember which, scoffed at the idea that you should have the in-game repair ability when you unlock a tank. They lock basic functionally away behind either grind or money.
c44ced No.15645903
>tfw I remember the original level and matchmaking system which actually worked
af7b99 No.15646047
>>15645699
Concession? They aren't doing free players any favors. Free players only exist to feed the whales.
b8a47f No.15646051
>>15642860
War Thunder is nothing but grind, what makes WoW worse?
af9fa1 No.15646381
Not to be too much of a shill, but if you're thinking of actually trying out War Thunder, now would be a very good time to grind to the mid tiers.
https://warthunder.com/en/news/5852-special-news-war-thunder-s-birthday-discounts-and-gifts-en
ad64e6 No.15646858
I was thinking about coming back to the game, at least for a while. What are some good German/US tanks to play in RB taking matchmaking into account, so as to never be at too much of a disadvantage? I only found Pz.Kpfw. 38(t) Ausf. F and M5A1 Stuart to be pretty decent so far. I like Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. F2 but it has absolutely retarded rating that pits it against KV-2 and the like.
4d8780 No.15646974
>>15632835
It has by far the worst community I've personally dealt with during my 20+ years of online gaming.
>>15634304
When did people stop understanding what reaction images are?
19930d No.15646979
>>15645848
russians seem to have a natural love of grinding
6cbfcb No.15647295
>>15646858
I always felt that the F2 was able to handle KW-2 quite well.
The Tigers at 5.7 were positioned quite well in the past, I'm not to sure if they still are.
b8aee3 No.15647341
I tried boats and it's all motorboats or really slow fishing boats with slightly bigger guns, you only get destroyers after a huge grinding wall. What the hell were they thinking
516db1 No.15647483
>>15637187
T4 is still pretty okay for Germany in planes. Of course the same people crying OP there are the same that will lose their minds if you aileron roll. As for tanks, BR 4.7 with no uptiers or downtiers (never happening, by the way with the player bleed) is probably the most balanced. Everyone has one hard to pen heavy tank, plenty of good medium tanks, and solid tank destroyers. As for tier 4 tanks, calling Germany OP there is a little funny to me. Tiger IIs are solid, but not hard to pen these days by any means (for non German players, aim for the turret Cheeks), especially compared to T34s (USA) and the premium version, or the tortoise. Panthers are honestly great, but the reverse is hilariously bad. TDs are TDs. All of these rough when uptiering takes place.
It's honestly early Tier 5 where your real hell begins on both tanks and planes. Leo 1 is an alright tank, but has no armor (>80mm), no way to move ammo to safer racks (your driver is protected by a nice rack of ammo from enemy gunfire) ,and viable (read actually capable of penning tanks on part age wise) ammo gets switched around almost every 5 patches. And then the Leo A1A1A1A1 is the same tank again, but with a stabilizer and the promise of fin stabilized sabot if you can reach the thing.
Planes also start being rough. The 262 takes a lot of getting used to, will overheat easily if you keep it at 100%,has trouble actually clearing some runways, and 30mms are not fun to use against fighter planes (slow ammo, especially at those speeds, limited too). The Horten is a solid enough plane, although the it's been a while since I've flown it properly. I don't use the swallow, but it's generally the same problems. Oh, and of course since they are heavy planes, they can't turn for anything (sans the Horten which also has an air brake). Americans will fuck you up (especially since Most of their later tier 5s are actually meant to fight other fighters) ,turn well (for a jet) and have air brakes.
I love the Komet, but it also is jumped up to a tier where everyone else has experience fighting it, and are also very good at jet fighting, as a word of warning
To echo the anon you're replying to, if you touch this game, stick with tiers 1-4,hell I'd even say 1-3. Tier 5 is pain and it's grind for research is mind numbing,esoecially with the research caps in place
700afd No.15647769
>add helicopters
>AAA can only fire 2.5km before shell disappears or detonates
>Helicopter can just sit 3km above the center of the map and launch atgms at everything like a drone
>Just sit 3km above the enemy spawn in a helicopter
>Planes in general
>just play Ground Plane RB
>kamikaze cruise missile
RIVETING GAMEPLAY
Anything Flying > Everything else
this is a game about aircraft don't bother spending time on anything else
700afd No.15647806
>>15632857
That still hasn't been fixed
Putting setting into potato mode still makes foliage and even buildings disappear at a certain range so targets stick out like a big fat black dot just for you
>>15635827
>he thinks invisible bullshit is okay
a4a6b5 No.15647971
>>15647806
>He doesn't know how ship visibility works in real life.
ad64e6 No.15648077
>>15647769
>Just sit 3km above the enemy spawn in a helicopter
Anybody can spawn their own helicopters, or better yet wreck you from a plane.
>>15647971
Please enlighten us
675303 No.15648190
>>15632816
>There are no alternatives.
i prefer not to play, OP.
f24b4c No.15648203
I play this game for a few days every year to see what the added, most fun I had was with Puma. I like that you can call for artillery, deploy smoke screens and stuff.
4c3581 No.15651393
>>15646858
the Sturmpanzer II is viable in literally any BR and in my opinion is overpowered as fuck, which means it's fun as hell, especially when you're destroying magical snowflake stalinium unicorns and abrams with it
516db1 No.15651421
>>15646858
The trick with F2 vs KV-2 is to always go for the turret. The panther later on can hit it through its hull quite easily, but everything about the KV-2 below the turret is made to swallow shells whole. Aim to the right or left of the barrel and you're killing crew. Check it in the hangar and see where the gunner sits in X-ray view I want to say Soviet gunners are usually on your left/their right and go for that first. The gun can be frightening, but ambushing them is your best advantage,although even a maxed crew can only manage ~20 seconds to reload.
The StuG line of tank destroyers can be quite fun, once you get used to less traverse. One other warning, the panzer J turret is a manual traverse. As in its a lot more slower and much easier to orient the vehicle. If you stick around to play more and decide to get it, treat it like a StuG rather than a proper tank.
fba3e8 No.15651788
>>15632871
>>still makes me want to give Wart under another go because I remember liking ground forces before dropping it for some reason I can't remember
Probably because the grind is insufferable once you hit tier 5 or whatever and much of the armor penetration boils down to luck, especially when you factor in whether or not the devs decided to totally ruin the armor model of the tank you're using with the last patch.
8ac5cd No.15651861
>>15651788
I don't remember reaching tier5 though. I do remember t34s wiping my ass with the floor until I got gud
dfe905 No.15651935
>>15639222
i tried playing this with someone once and couldnt because its region locked
also invisibility fields are fucking stupid in a naval game
its dogshit
>>15646051
>WT is shit so WoW is not
>>15651421
>cant shoot HE down a KV2's loaded barrel and have it explode
what a waste
ad64e6 No.15652427
>>15651393
That's a big gun. Gonna check it out, thanks.
ff3ab3 No.15655896
>>15632816
I used to play it but I got fed up with the grind and monotony. Most people playing are idiots as well.If you guys wanna trade usernames and play together I'll give it a try, I'll most likely be starting from the bottom though.
>ships
>helicopters
Sounds cool but that shit is always a pita to grind.
>seal club consolefags
Sounds fun.
>>15632843
Yeah, unfortunate consequence of the grinding pyramid is that the higher you go, the fewer other people there are.
WT used to be pretty playable for free from what I remember 1-2 years ago. Having gold is probably nice in that it lets you unlock new shit faster, but it doesn't really matter.
>>15632857
>having to pick between quality of your experience vs. having an advantage
I fucking hate this shit, people do it in shooters too turning down shadows and lighting so you can't hide easily. Fucking cancer, servers should be able to enforce identical graphic settings for everyone.
>>15634797
It's a clusterfuck but hey, realism isn't always a condition for fun gameplay. I do agree that I wish they stuck to their original promises and made the later stuff into separate games, but who expects a game dev to keep their word in CY+3?
>>15635067
>It's fun up to Tier 4. Tier 5 and Tier 6 is shit
Isn't that basically how these games are designed? Early few tiers have rapid progression because they're like the fun demo part of the game, then you hit the wall in early-mid game which is your "buy now to see more!" screen. Of course that will come right after you pass the most fun part, and the premium-only content (or effectively premium-only, as in this case) is milquetoast and a recipe for buyer's remorse. Unfortunately these games also like to hide real costs behind shop gold and overprice everything to hell, hoping that the whales won't notice how outrageously they're being scammed.
I wonder if the genre will ever get saturated to the point that all the whales are bankrupt and soon after f2p as we know it implodes.
>It's free to play, so it's not like you lose anything for giving it a try.
Well, time. And if it ends up being a shit experience, you regret not having done something more satisfying instead.
>>15636276
>>15636472
Squadded up with a random middle aged woman once who had pretty decent understanding of tactics. That game has an unusual audience but the chat is not bad.
5ca4ad No.15655935
>>15655896
>I wonder if the genre will ever get saturated to the point that all the whales are bankrupt
Only after casinos go bankrupt.
ff3ab3 No.15655983
>>15655935
You've got a point. But F2P video games were invented what, 15-20 years ago? There must have been accumulated demand from whales surviving all these years with no skinner box. Then early F2P's tapped into that. There's suckers born every minute but there's gotta be a reaction to the initial gold rush. Or maybe Zynga dying was it and we've already passed that.
000000 No.15656507
Daily reminder that only tier 2 and tier 3 tank RBs are worth playing. SBs are also cool if you're autistic enough. Remember to focus on a single nation and pick your main vehicle. If you end up enjoying the game, you can spend some money to get camo and accelerate training. My main is a T34-1942 and I have a crew level of 120 on it.
6d3aa9 No.15656801
>>15651935
>HE down the barrel
Oddly enough I think I have one kill where that occurred, but it was so long ago I honestly don't know if it was intentional or just shitty slav code
ad64e6 No.15660435
>>15652427
I have concluded that Pz IV E is the best tier 1 tank. Now, I'm no expert, but if I got 4.75 kill/death ratio with it and not even close with everything else, I think it's safe to assume that this one is pretty good. Don't mind the winrate on the rest though, it's skewed because I only took them out if we're already losing (Pz IV blown up). Sturmpanzer II projectile arc is way too much of a pain in the ass to handle, it's basically a melee fighter. And it can't even hit anything beyond 1km no matter how hard you try, because enemy will blow you up first. It's extremely hard to kill though, just enough armour to ward off machine gun fire and not enough to cause detonations or much fragments.
Pz IV E >>>> Pz 38 (t) F > Flakpanzer 38 > Sturmpanzer II >>>> everything else.
Gonna check out 3.3 rating now. Fun fact: there's literally no way to pierce Churchill VII with any decent ammo on any of 3.3 german tanks aside from one or two crappy rigid shells that deal no damage.
726e6d No.15660581
>>15632857
>800x450
ya nice graphics comparison bro
heres some of my own
4c3581 No.15664910
>>15660435
>Sturmpanzer II projectile arc is way too much of a pain in the ass to handle, it's basically a melee fighter
once you git gud with it it's pretty much unstoppable. slow as fuck projectile but since it arcs so much you can drop it behind cover or on the vulnerable top armor of your target
71a1f3 No.15674020
>download 22gb update for 3 days straight
>log in, start arcade boat match
>game runs at 5 fps, crashes 20 seconds into the match
>turn on old video cards support for 60 fps gameplay on Lunix
>enter arcade boat match with reserve boat
>everyone drives around aimlessly, nothing makes any sense
>throw torpedoes, deploy smoke, occasionally sink a boat somehow, die while running around the cap points
>team is getting its shit kicked in, all caps are in enemy hands
>hop into Bf 109 E-1 after running out of boats
>throw 250kg bomb onto an enemy boat, it dies
>ok I guess
>shoot down 2 airborne fags who don't know how to plane
>start strafing boats because plane bombs don't recharge apparently
>It takes 1-2 runs at most to sink virtually anything at T1-2 with shitty 7.92mm MG17s
>sink one boat after the other, enemy team has no more planes
>plane engine almost dead from accumulated AA fire, keep murdering helpless reserve boats while my team swarms the cap points
<hostile team has run out of vehicles
10/10 great game very balanced, would buy premium shekels.
Are higher naval tiers just as retarded when it comes to planes or did the userbase just grow more retarded over time? I'd expected planes to despawn after a set amount of time but they don't.
4b3e36 No.15678280
>>15632816
>War thunder in 2020
>hop into my little dinky jap tank from the 1930s
>M1A1 Abrams blows me up across the map shooting clean through my front armor
>VTOL shoots a railgun at the Abrams but it misses
>Abrams calls for air support, and a star destroyer arrives via jumpdrive
>VTOL calls in a warp-nuke to blow up the sun and kills every bit of human life
10/10 would play again.
329045 No.15678860
>>15632816
>there are no alternatives
Besides nearly every other helicopter and warship sim
Check em, shill
19930d No.15678954
>>15678860
lack of dubs checked
>Besides nearly every other helicopter and warship sim
there are no alternatives except for World of Tanks and DCS
world of tanks is even more jewish and DCS is too much for casuals.
I don't know what other sims your even referring to. Apache Longbow 2? Silent Hunter? None of these are multiplayer.
4b3e36 No.15679227
>>15678860
Do you have any recommendations ?
I thought the age of sims has pretty much ended 10-15 years ago.
b5ee5c No.15679732
>>15635067
>Ships are…ehh. It's tanks, but on water pretty much.
No shit Sherlock, no fucking shit. Most useless sentence in your essay of shite.
586838 No.15679789
>>15679732
>failing to understand the complexities of naval combat that could have been explored
9366e9 No.15679827
It's not a Sim alternative, but I found Armored Warfare to be an alright alternative to WoT. I just play endless PvE. Also, the devs are kinda desperate for players so there's tons of xp/credit boost events that happen throughout the year. Fuck, they even give away premium time, gold, and even premium tanks. I have 6 premium tanks in my garage that I got for free. So if you want to just smash the AI in PvE with a tolerable grind up the trees, AW isn't too bad.
55e049 No.15688383
>>15632835
At low tiers yes.
395b96 No.15700188
>>15632835
Russian bias aside surprisingly yes.
afdb84 No.15709079
>>15638107
Gamenight fags never play relevant vidya like War Thunder. They have terrible taste and are stuck in the 90s and early 2000s.
f5b91a No.15709316
>>15632816
>There are no alternatives.
>planes
DCS
>helicopters
DCS
>tanks
Steel Beasts Pro
Steel Fury
Steel Armor: Blaze of War
>naval
Cold Waters
d7db82 No.15709328
>>15679789
Nigger, they're only portraying a few torpedo boats, gun boats a couple of basic destroyers and a Battleship or two.
So what complexities are these am I missing?
f26d8f No.15709523
So, trying War Blunder again and it seems like Gayjin lost an awful lot of players.
Every game I joined had bots in it, ranging from half the team being bots, up to only 4 human players.
I guess this is what happens when the playercount drops from 50k to 30k on weekends and even hitting 20k on weekdays.
The only positive change is the grind reduction, most plane's research points were halved, it seems.
My progress after 2 days, not impressive, when you consider the research reduction and that most things you shoot at is very bad AI.
94b036 No.15709545
>>15709523
knowing gayjew, if they halved the research point cost they also halved or at least majorly reduced research point gain
3c8dab No.15709570
>>15709523
Hows the population in ground battles?
I've been thinking of going back to play some realistic but I dont want to fight against bots.
fff762 No.15709580
>>15709523
>bots
Is there proof? Also why are you playing the whack-a-mole mode with lead indicator?
>>15709570
I find a game in historical mode within a minute, I have all servers selected.
669380 No.15709586
>>15709316
WoWS is also better for navel combat. That's saying something.
fff762 No.15709603
I said I'll check out 2 rank ground vehicles >>15660435, but they're all shit because second rank gets uptiered and plays with 3rd rank 9/10 times. Pz IV F2 is probably the best due to being decent all around, but it doesn't matter. Best 3rd tier german tank is Panther D, everyone in historical uses it.
3c8dab No.15709619
>>15709580
>within a minute
Thats kinda long, then again I dont play historical that often.
Used to play like 1.5 years ago and back then it took 10-20 seconds to find a realistic battle with no bots.
I really wish there would be sim battles for the Sd. Kfz. 234/4 but I've never even seen it in one. Playing with it is the only thing that brings me joy in warthunder.
5b288a No.15709944
>>15674020
Unless you play Russian who have god like AA capability Fucking Russian Cold War destroyer with auto cannon burst shells as the first unlock in its tree yes. Planes are absolute cancer
0d279f No.15710086
>>15709328
>they're only portraying a few torpedo boats, gun boats a couple of basic destroyers and a Battleship or two
That's partially my point. Infantry, tank and aerial (to an extent) combat work reasonably well symmetrically and on a small scale. But trying to cram a naval engagement into a 15-minute round doesn't work that well. To make Naval Forces into an interesting gamemode, they would have to do something much different.
Imagine they take the NF maps, then enlarge them massively. Make it so that to go from one end to the other you're looking at an hour or more of sailing. Give DDs and whatnot the ability to lay mines, along with minesweepers to clear them out. Maybe allow early-spawn PT boat players to place coastal batteries, along with the ability to manually control those guns while their boat is at rest. Put these pieces together, and you easily end up with the situation where one side (defenders in a ATK/DEF scenario?) mines an archipelago, prompting the opposing force to have to bring their sweepers up, which themselves require escort from DDs to keep enemy DDs/PT boats at bay. But those DDs themselves would be vulnerable to gun batteries, meaning you'd need cruisers or larger ships to knock them out of action. And of course now that you've got cruisers involved the submarine/torpedo boats/planes have nice juicy targets to engage.
Where is the Operation Cerberus scenario where a small German battlegroup tries to sneak their way through the Channel during a foggy morning? How about a group of DD players trying to protect a convoy against a wolfpack? Hell, go ahead with a theoretical scenario where Bismarck is almost to France when the Brits jump her, with Luftwaffe players trying to defend a single naval player against a combined British team.
Now, with War Thunder the way it is, was there ever a chance in hell we'd get something in-depth like this? Of course not. But it would have been a lot more worthwhile than "place roughly equal sized ship across from one another and fight".
d7db82 No.15710125
>>15710086
That actually sounds like fun
Get yourself into game development anon you've got the potential for making interesting game mechanics/ modes. I'd play a game like you just described.
19930d No.15711464
>>15710086
>Now, with War Thunder the way it is, was there ever a chance in hell we'd get something in-depth like this?
i'd be happy if they had larger maps and more planes. there's still 10k people playing war thunder at any one time. there's no reason you can't have atleast air maps with 50 on 50 players. graphics wise the engine can clearly handle it even on a potato, there's maps with more than that number of npc planes.
d497dd No.15711733
>>15710086
The Spain map would be nice for such things with how hueg it is.
Now drop in player-controlled aircraft carriers and shipborne landing craft acting as destructible spawnpoints for planes&tanks, the latter of which can capture airfields and bases which require supply convoys to function else they can't spawn anything, said supply convoys which can be destroyed by aircraft and you'll have yourself a nicely autistic vision of game that'll never ever exist even though it could.
Player aircraft carriers would command squadrons of NPC planes in addition to serving as a spawnpoint for planefags, the non-airbases on air maps would serve as supply depots/manufacturers if not tank spawnpoints themselves.
294689 No.15714429
>>15709944
To be fair the game wasn't designed for that.
f6ca8a No.15716126
Is it normal to get thrown into matched where you have to fight against players with 2.7 battle rating while you still fly your 1.3 plane??
19930d No.15716161
>>15716126
the matchmaker at that br stretches hard. some would say it's them giving people who buy premium something to seal club but it's probably to reduce wait times, most people don't play 1.3 br on the regular.
e32022 No.15716179
>>15716161
How high is the chance to to get into higher tier games with a Battle rating of 2.7? Oh, and which Battle rating has the lowest spread.
>>15709523
I believe bots are there if you just started out. They just added that some months ago, of course you didn’t know when you played the games 3 years ago. Play some more games and they will disappear and get replaced by real players.
19930d No.15716239
>>15716179
I'm not sure what the chance is. In theory your only supposed to get bumped 1 up or 1 down, so it's possible to have a game where you got bumped up and someone else got bumped down and now you've got a 2.3 and a 3.3 in the same game.
As far as bot's there aren't supposed to be any. I've only been suspicious that other people were bots in tanks arcade at low levels, when you've got 6 people just aimlessly going back and forth in spawn. I've never seen any bot on air, but i've only done realistic, and all i do is realistic tanks now, and i never see any bot like behavior their either.
e32022 No.15716248
19930d No.15716252
>>15716179
say the game for you is supposed to be 2.7, your in a br 2.7 plane. it's possible your going to get matched with people in 2.3(1 down) and people in 3.3(1 up). The 2.3 people got fucked and the 3.3 people might have an easier time but I'm pretty sure if you get bumped down your rewards get nerfed also. It does bring some variety to the games, and it obviously cuts down the wait time to get into a game.
The danger with this type of matchmaking is the suspicion that people who pay for premium time and/or buy a premium plane get preferential matchmaking. Preferential matchmaking is a super jewish move, and gaijin says they don't do it, but they would never admit to doing it in the first place because it would destroy the game population.
The advantage for them if they do do it, is you get some dumb goy to pay $50 for a premium plane, and all of the sudden he's magically better (the plane is marginally better, but in reality the matchmaker is now just putting him up against lower br planes and shittier players), he get's a good feeling, and wants to repeat the good feeling by buying more premium planes and premium game time.
I thought there was some jew patent by EA or something with matchmaker fuckery that has this same idea only with premium guns.
1c3373 No.15716301
>>15716252
That's not how it works. 2.7 can get matches with 1.3-4.0, it's +/-1.5.
Also XP-50 (3.7 BR) premium plane was gifted to me and I was fighting higher rating planes in nearly every match, because most players main 4-5 BR Thunderbolts, Fw 190, Spitfires, Lavochkins, Zeroes, because that's where the meat of the game is at. You could buy a premium plane with something like 5.3 BR to abuse that fact, but then that's just battle rating mechanics clashing with population spread, not preferential matchmaking.
>>15716126
Everything below 2.0 BR is at a disadvantage, because those vehicles can't even get downtiered to the full extent (-1.5)
55e049 No.15718386
b77338 No.15731894
>>15716126
BR doesn't work well at the low end of the scale I'm afraid. Grind a bit.
e7199d No.15733659
>Decals rotate
>"Fuck yeah, a German Tank Destroyer decal "
>kill 80 enemies while in a TD
>get to use the Jagdpanzer IV
>it'd essentially being invited to a pizza party, with the condition that you eat some pizza
>only play casually these days, as the grind wore me down like nothing else
>it's the final day, already had about 30 kills
>for some reason, play until 3 in the morning to get a decent looking decal on a game I've loathed for a long time and don't been play anymore
Someone send me some fucking help, I've clearly lost control
8e87de No.15733708
>>15679827
Is anyone even still playing this in NA? I played a year or two ago and it was dead as fuck.
>>15709079
They play those games because they aren't faggy grindfests that would force huge amounts of /v/irgins out of the game by virtue of not having enough tryhard hours.
1c3373 No.15735215
I've returned to WT for about a week and I remember now why I dropped this garbage the first time:
1. Shit game mode design. Every fucking tank match involves capturing the fucking points that have absolutely no use aside form draining enemy tickets. They're empty plots of land that make you a good target. Usually located in urban areas. A literal retard could figure out something better;
2. You're always forced to fight inside the fucking towns, because of points. Once in a blue moon only in sim battles you'll get a map that has some hills to snipe from, but then you'll get fucked in the ass by flanking T-34s if it's a game with less than 20 players;
3. BR and sim battle limitations remove any kind of fun for a non-casual player. Have a couple heavies, some light tanks for recon and some mediums that would have trouble penetrating heavies unless they flank/gang up? Nah, lets just have 10 T-34 vs 10 Panthers;
4. Armor is entirely useless because you always have to go into the bloody towns to gamble on who gets flanked from around the corner. Even if you aren't flanked, anything you can get matched against is capable of penetrating you in the front at point blank anyway;
5. Spawn camping. Most maps are so small you can get killed as soon as you spawn if you joined the match that was going for like 3 minutes. You don't have to choose if you want to interrupt reinforcements or fight for the empty plot of land with blue smoke in the middle, you can do both;
6. P2W bushes that you can place all over the front of your tank even though the crew wouldn't be able to see anything themselves. They give -50% enemy accuracy for precision shots on crew, +1 shot before enemy figures out your location by muzzle flash and projectile trajectory, +100% chance to give AIDS to opponents;
7. Premium captured tanks are allowed in sim battles, good luck trying to figure out if that Pz III is an enemy while he's already calculating range and about to fire at you;
8. Air battles often put land bombers in naval combat only maps, where they'll either get shot by destroyers while trying to bomb them or be unable to land, because landing strip is a ship. Night fighters will be put into day match. All sorts of retarded shit related to specialized aircraft that you can think of;
9. Shit optimization that actually got worse since the last time I played. For reference I can run any game up to year 2013 or so at 60 fps, but can't get 60 fps in WT on the absolute minimum settings (not the ULQ mode), aside from textures and anisotropy;
10. There are actual cheaters in this game that can go unbanned for months. A guy accused someone of being a cheater and said he reported him weeks ago. I checked the replay, and sure enough that fag just went around landing perfect shots with no calculations at 1km+.
There's probably more, but I can't squeeze any more out at the moment.
0e04b3 No.15743145
>>15733659
TDs are so easy to use it's silly sometimes.
19930d No.15744601
>>15735215
>8. Air battles often put land bombers in naval combat only maps, where they'll either get shot by destroyers while trying to bomb them or be unable to land, because landing strip is a ship. Night fighters will be put into day match. All sorts of retarded shit related to specialized aircraft that you can think of;
most of what you said is true but this can be dealt with
land planes can land on carriers if you land with your landing gear up.
night fighters are irrelevant because there's no radar anyway
f9b892 No.15744602
>There are no alternatives.
Yes there is and its called Ace Combat you fucking turk khazar dick sucker.
19930d No.15744636
>>15744602
Ace Combat is an arcade game for children
39808b No.15745906
Lol, they cutted the grind in half, I’m already at battle rating 4.0 after a week on my new account.
19930d No.15746194
>>15746170
you sound salty
b4fc94 No.15746462
>>15746170
>>15746194
Don fight pls
8e341a No.15747209
War thunder is amazing. The closed beta was more polished than the release.
And it was an actually good game to boot, too, but they killed it with updates.
I distinctly remember how in the first day of open beta I read a guy say in the chat "Gaijin devs make other devs look like scammers," I wonder what that guy is up to now.
b73df2 No.15747338
>>15745906
Are you talking about tank beta? If so, I agree. RB was much less casual and SB had spawn points further from the fucking towns. Now SB is the new RB and RB is just a slightly less arcade mode.
114742 No.15747353
>find out there are custom skins
<it's server side
>find an old post on steam forums talking about client-side skins and everything that could be done against the most popular problems
<dev answer is literally just "we won't implement it"
Why did these kikes have to make a game this fun?
8b39ab No.15749759
>>15743145
No argument there man, it helps that the game often uses maps that shove you into essentially lanes like you're playing ASSFAGGOTS, but honestly the ease of use despite lack of a turret is a little shocking. I'm sure if I was playing a modded Steel Fury Karkov or the Tank Crew game that will show up eventually it would be a different story, but I'm not really complaining about it too much, especially since it's fun to play when I am not grinding for fucking parts on some tier 5/6 tank.
If any of you anons are new, I can't say enough to just play as far as tier 3 or maybe 4. Top tier is fucking hell, but me choosing Germans didn't help at that point.
ce3ae5 No.15750559
>>15709316
DCS World is too demanding on my CPU and I dont want to pay for a TrackIR, HOTAS, and pedals atm.
617849 No.15750942
>>15747353
You must still be very new to think the game is actually fun. Just wait a couple of years and watch how those Russian scumbags take load after load on the game. It's literally nothing more than a war vehicle 3D model gacha at this point, because 90% of vehicles are very unfun to play and out of meta. What is the meta? Driving tanks into small circles on the map or one hit bombing supply bases for either game mode. There hasn't been a new game ever. Why even bother adding realistic or simulator modes and then making everybody play king of the hill? That's the dumbest shit ever and let's not talk about the grind balance, premiums and many other things. These are just some of my gameplay gripes mind you there is so much more. I regret spending money and hundreds of hours on this game, although I bought all my stuff before the prices rose by 1000% and you could still pay in ruble from other counties.
f7081e No.15751016
I wonder if the huge amount of ass pained people is somehow related to the large amount of slavs playing this game.
9 out of 10 people I kill will try to use as many respawns as possible to come kill me with first bombs, then crashing their plane on me and lastly driving around the whole map ignoring everyone else just to get back at me.
They really mollycoddle these fucks since kill cam tells them your general location and just about anything but dying will guarantee them a respawn to use on a kamikaze strike.
000000 No.15751152
>>15735215
>6
Yeah, my zis-30's front is entirely covered in bushes and it's a huge advantage.
>7
I don't play SB that often, but if it looks like the enemy, I take the shot. Anyone playing a captured tank in SB is literally asking to be teamkilled.
>9
Wait, there are people who don't play on the ultra low quality mode? Why would you gimp yourself like that?
>10
Eh, I've eyeballed consecutive one shot kills at great distances before. I'm not saying he wasn't cheating though.