/v/ - Video Games

I have a friend that is always trying to get me to play this (he even bought me a copy) with him and his friends but this game just isn't for me. I don't really play shooters, and this is autistically deep. I'm not interested enough to learn the game, but I can appreciate what they're trying to accomplish with it.

That being said I think it's retarded for people to demand they dumb it down, there are a million other games they can play.

>optimized

So instead of needing a $2000 dollar computer to get 30 FPS I only need a $1500 dollar one? Amazing

>>15502088

It is. I get a solid 50 FPS on a 770. Fix your rig dude.

>>15502106

See >>15502106

>>15502083

You and I know how normalfags work. They are not content in letting people have their own thing.

>>15502043

Is this seriously optimized now? Uninstalled it ages ago, and I have a new gpu now. (GTX 1060 6GB)

>>15502134

GTX 1080 OC 8 GB

16 GB

i7 3770

Tested this weeked, I still get less than 40 frames on half-populated servers on Low

Good luck running this trash game after 300+ hours of shit frames, trying to optimize and upgrade my pc fuck it, fuck this game

>>15502171

The game runs exactly the same way after 5 years for me even though I have upgraded and replaced all my parts, can you really defend that?

Fuck I miss the way the game felt in the Alpha, only time period I truly enjoyed it.

>Retards think a game that visually looks like trash and runs at 40-50fps is finally optimized

Imagine being THIS fucking delusional. Keep believing the whole "heh it's your PC's fault :^)" meme the devs and their eternal fancucks tell you. Unless your game has every model and texture photoscanned and is rendering grass and shadows hundreds of meters away then there is 0 excuse for a 1070 to run it at less than 120FPS.

>>15502115

>Modern PC games

>Arma 3

Pick one. But I presume you know fuckall about Arma's massively outdated engine

>>15502125

>Buzzwords

>Arma still doesn't utilize multi-core properly

>AI is still shit and slows the game to a crawl

>>This entire thread

Proof that the game is suffering from apple-fanboyism psychology. The fault is always in the critique not the product goy :^)

>>15502332

>game with bad visuals, bad animations, bad UI, bad controls, frankenstein weapons and a dev going to jail for spying on greek military bases is great

So I assume that you don't really play many good video games huh

>>15502332

Cars still merge because of the shitty netcode?

Holy shit, even the amateur multi-player mods do a better job for games that were never meant to be played online… I hoped they would have fixed that a long time ago.

Do helicopters still explode the second their blades touch the ground?

>>15502348

No, they just "break".

They also breaks if it touches a body tho.

Great game.

I ran the game on an i5-3210M laptop and it ran better than on an FX-6350.

Why could a dual-core mobile CPU outperform a 6-core desktop CPU in a MODERN PC GAME, you wonder? Because the i5-3210M had better

single-core performance

Same deal with my pal's rig. He gets the exact same frame rate (40-50) on both ultra and the lowest. View distance makes a marginal change.

>>15502353

Such fix. Truly great.

>>15502319

>My desktop cost $1000 two years ago.

Specs?

Because I want to mock you for wasting money on the wrong parts.

always liked Operation Flashpoint and Arma series, my $700 cheapo rig plays Arma 3 just fine but fuck Bohemia and their DLC kike shit

>>15502488

>Ryzen

Arma devs have always been favoring Intel over AMD, so tough luck, mate. That being said, they suck.

>RX 580

Is that a good Midrange GPU?

>>15502493

pirate_laugh.webm

>>15502145

>>15502171

>>15502488

I bought the game on sale a few days ago. Would I be able to run it myself?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

Dedicated Memory 1.0 GB

Total Memory 4.0 GB

Processor AMD FX(tm)-4300 Quad-Core Processor

Speed 3.8 GHz

>>15502519

You really need to get a better GPU, mine is roughly 4 times more powerful than yours (GTX 560M) and it struggles to achieve constant 40fps @ 720p.

>>15502345

There isn't a single other game that really gives you the same experience and, may A*lah forgive me for uttering the forbidden word, immersion, that ARMA gives. Every other milsim game or mod is just putting bandaids on generic modern shooters, while ARMA really puts you in the 5fps field.

>>15502519

I was running it on an FX-8120 and it ran like total shit in multiplayer, so you can probably expect the same. Haven't tried it since getting a Ryzen. Usually ARMA is bottlenecked by CPUs, not GPUs, and only in multiplayer.

>1070ti

>ryzen 16x series

>still runs like hot dogshit in multiplayer, especially on script heavy gamemodes

>actually runs better on cards that were top end when ARMA 3 had only just released

its just a case of the engine being trash and the devs not updating the game/engine to properly support newer cards.

>>15502043

It is nowhere near optimised and it never will be. Convoy AI is completely broken. Jet AI is broken (CAS jets are easily shot down by technials and APCs). The 3 FPS bug still happens. The devs have pretty much abandoned Arma 3, none of these problems will ever be fixed.

They talk about a new engine for Arma 4, but I expect it will just be another iteration of OFP.

All Bohemia really cares about is making sure Arma 4 is appealing to Life players. They don't need to fix the AI for this, they need more civilian vehicles etc. Laws of War was a taste of what is to come.

>>15502577

>not updating the game/engine to properly support newer cards.

I feel like this is the main reason many people have problems.

That or they're maxing everything on a server with full people, shit ton of ai and mods out the ass and wondering why its not 120 fps.

Felt like it ran ok when I had some 3.3g i5 and gtx 670 while playing with 3 friends and a bunch of ai on self made missions.

>Now that it's optimized

OP's traditional lust for cock.

>>15502043

>>A FUKKEN MCROSS DESTROID

YES

AAAAAW YYYIISSSSSSSSSS!!!