/v/ - Video Games

>>15478396

>StarFox becomes Nintendo's Sonic.

I love space shit but ubisoft got to this. It looks pretty bland and boring but it's only an alpha so who knows.

Do a barrel roll forced meme and wolf becomes the new Ow the Edge.

>>15478988

I never got Owe the Edge from the reveal trailer. All I got was a wolf's gotta eat and the food tastes like shit.

>>15478396

>In the future everyone is a mulatto

>>15478396

It just keeps getting worse the farther along you watch.

WHY THE FUCK IS UBISOFT MAKING STARFOX GAMES? NINTENDO IS FUCKING STUPID

>start watching

>first fucking thing is a nappy haired nigger human

WHY THE FUCK IS THIS ALLOWED?

WHO ASKED FOR THIS?

>>15478988

>but it's only an alpha so who knows.

Do you really believe this will be altered in any meaningful way?

Oh wow, is this even made by Japs? This looks like some tumblr shit. I miss that Dinoplanet game with the sexy fox girl.

>>15479206

Rebel Galaxy Outlaw looks promising if the trailer is anything to go by. Any dev willing to take open shots at Scam Yiddizen like that is worth at least a cursory glance from where I'm standing; the hour of almost pure gameplay they uploaded doesn't hurt, either.

>>15479291

Maybe Slippy gets to watch.

They did it, the motherfuckers did it, furries managed to cross Star Fox with actual humans officially. How the hell did this happened? Seems like Sonic '06 all over again seeing how there's no Krystal anymore.

Other than that, game looks fine. It's a new Star Fox game which is what I wanted even if it's not like any of the previous ones maybe except Assault. All I want is cool space dogfights. It seems to be free roaming too so maybe you can get something like Rebel Galaxy? Anyway, I'm excited but seeing how autistic it can be I'm cautious.

>>15478396

Looks like marxist propaganda pushed into a known franchise. Not a game.

Made by Ubisoft guarantees that it will be marxist propaganda pushed into a known franchise. Not a game.

>>15479313

>having any expectations for an Ubishit game

Damn fool

>>15479328

The Mario x Rabbids or whatever they are called wasn't half bad.

>>15479256

Wait, so there will actually be a sequel to Rebel Galaxy? That's nice. I liked it but it was so fucking lacking in so many ways. Soundtracks is still godlike and it was more like EuroTruck: Space Editions with maybe some fight here and there. Nice.

>>15479340

If you watch until the 41:00 mark, then you can see what the customization looks like, which is pretty insane. You have the same control over your brushes and transparency/blur/blend effects as you'd have in a real art program. You can even look at the texture for a ship or the wireframe data in order to help get an idea for how it's rendered.

You can also import ANY IMAGE and use it as a stencil which can be sprayed onto the hull. Can't wait to deck something out with swastikas and meatspin.

Alright, after actually watching the whole trailer, it's still alright. I can just say the switch is truly a gamecube, I bet this will be the Star Fox Adventure of this generation and I will like it too, but

>No Fox on foot

Why?

>>15478396

>tonnes of human characters

>Even if the human crew had been smaller and trimmed the redundant characters (you could have all the important dynamics with 3 characters, maximum) I'd be more conciliatory.

All those character will have their pilot figure (with special ability) and spaceship to go with it, basically more characters, more ways to play and ways to mix up those ship bodies, wings, guns and pilots into your combination (which can be done physically with the toys or digitally in game so it can be played in handheld mode).

>>15479185

This isn't a Starfox game. It's Ubisoft's Starlink: Battle for Atlas, the Switch version has the exclusive crossover content of team Starfox integrated into the story (as well as the Arwing toy with the Switch version of the game).

>>15479444 (checked)

>Why?

Because it's a game about spaceships and being able to hot swap their modular segments on the go. Being on foot would make prevent that.

Isn't it just Skylanders but with space-themed toys you have to buy? It is immediately shit just for that gimmick.

>>15479442

Sounds cool and all but Rebel Galaxy needed so much more. I'm thinking in co-op

>Main player controls the main chip

>Other player can control turrets or small ships

>Actual dog fights

>Rebalance everything towards that

I can only dream, though.

>>15479787

>basically more characters, more ways to play and ways to mix up those ship bodies

You could have easily done that with Star Fox established characters. Think Star Fox Command, but better. The problem is not "Too many characters", but "Too many shitty OCs". I bet star wolf won't even be part of the game.

>It's Ubisoft's Starlink: Battle for Atlas

Oh. So it's pretty much literally who. No shit nobody can even guess what the fuck it was.

>Because it's a game about spaceships and being able to hot swap their modular segments on the go.

I didn't even knew about the game. I just wanted Star Fox Assault, mate.

>>15479206

There's a dogfighting game coming out made by real developers with real Newtonian physics. They're not pozzed and it's looking good, wait a year or two. I forgot the name but I'll look it up when I can.

>>15479787

>the Switch version has the exclusive crossover content of team Starfox integrated into the story (as well as the Arwing toy with the Switch version of the game)

Wait, THAT'S why they're there? Holy shit, it's even worse than I thought.

Oh cool, a flying game. I love space flying games!

>flying pizza cutter

Ok, someone is having a giggle. But, at least it's interesting…

>crew is diversity in space

dropped

>>15479951

You managed to make it past the Ubisoft logo?

>>15479795

It was confirmed for years, the toys aren't forced and you can buy them digital. Just crack the game if you want the stuff for free.

Not even the nintoddlers care about this now? Wow.

>>15488958

Should have gotten a Skylanders/toys to life game reference in there.

>>15501382

While I seen comments of people with multiple gaming hardware wanting to get the Switch version for the Starfox content alone and some wanting Ubisoft to make a new Starfox game because of this despite that meaning that would make it another Starfox game not made by Nintendo.

The biggest problem I seen is that people want the game but the toy aspect is scaring them off (or even some that think it's like No Man's Sky). Ubisoft has done a terrible job of reinforcing that the toy aspect is completely optional and is probably going to lead to the downfall of the game as uninformed people avoid it all together.

This game looks better than that GameCube game with the dinosaurs.

>>15505088

Star Fox has to have the worst rack record out of any Nintendo series.

>>15505439

Starfox is like a sadder sonic

>>15505088

Command had some serious problems, but I think a Command-like game with fixed mechanics and no damn fuel would be welcomed by most sensible players as an interesting evolution of the game's mechanics. Throw in an arcade mode or something for the challenge players and it'd practically print money.

That, or just pick one of Command's endings with a dartboard and see what kind of crazy bullshit they could go with. I'm pretty sure Krystal shacks up with Starwolf in one of the endings, which is funny given her dialogue with Panther in Assault.

>>15505439

>someone saved that screencap I took two years ago and posted in a smash thread once

It's a good feeling.

>>15505280

this, I remember when the finished version of the Starfox 2 rom came out and we all learned that starfox 2 was cancelled for very good reasons

>>15505005

>>15501382

It's almost like Nintendo's audience is furries…

>>15505439

Nintendo handles these games and S&N terribly. They charge 60 dollars for this type of game that can be finished over the course of several hours. If I were them I'd drop the bullshit and charge 30 dollars per game. Also they have to STOP remaking Star Fox 64.

>>15516332

>They charge 60 dollars for this type of game that can be finished over the course of several hours. If I were them I'd drop the bullshit and charge 30 dollars per game.

I find it fucking annoying that Miyamoto has stated that Starfox is an "experiential" game series, yet the only experiment they seem to seem to be doing is "how long can we keep this series dead?" It says something when SF Guard got better reviews than Zero but because it was paired up alongside it, it's been forgotten.

>Also they have to STOP remaking Star Fox 64.

If you think of Starfox 64 as a water filled well, they got all the drinking water with the SF64 3D remake and then just hit a near empty well of muddy water with SFZero. The only good thing Zero existence has done is that Nintendo has to either move forward with a new Starfox title or be desperate enough to want to remake the SNES games (because they aren't gonna touch Adventures/Assault because of outsider development) but since they rejected an offer from Q-Games to remake SNES Starfox 1 for the 3DS (after they made SF64 3D) it's probably not going to happen.