>>15093469
>First off 1 and UO were a poor man's MoH don't pretend those were stellar especially compared to Allied Assault.
Except it fixed most of MoHAAs glaring issues, added mechanics missing from it and added more factions while nailing the atmosphere.
Keep pretending like UO singleplaye isn't better than your shitty Michael Bay movie with no atmosphere and that it's multiplayer isn't better than your shitty unbalanced samey skinnerbox.
>It still had the same style of WaW with some uncannyness thrown in while bringing on the bombasticity of MW2, it was caught between 4/5 and MW2 and everything about BO1 can be described as being caught between 4/5 and MW2's philosophies.
So, it's a mish mash of non atmospheric shit that barely works, thanks for making that clear.
>How did it get raped in BO1, BO2 and onward they added multiple universes and teleportation and other shit that makes DBZ look like tame.
<Muh shitty nonsensical lore
<Totally worth raping the mode by reashing it every 2 years with worse level design instead of making something new
End your life please
>The story was decent
The narrative was ok, the pacing wasn't and killing Petrenko sure as fuck wasn't as it kills any joy from the ending of WaW and puts these grityy WW2 characters into a shitty americanized James Bond movie directed by Michael Bay.
>they stopped taking themselves seriously with BO2 and that's when it truly went to shit
BO was anything but serious you dumbfuck, I can already picture your 13 year old self thinking how mature the game and narrative are when it's literally fucking James Bond.
>that the series became full-on cancer starting with MW3 and BO2.
The series went full Michael Bay cancer with MW2 and never came back, you were just too busy eating shit via Xbox 360 to notice.