7267f1 No.14531457
Why was Turok never bigger than Golden Eye? When everybody talks about classic titles for the N64 or FPS games for consoles, they always mention Golden Eye first and not Turok. I recently played the HD remaster and only now do I just realize how good this game was! It feels like all the levels are a connected world filled with secrets and hidden places to explore. It looks better and is more creative with characters than Golden Eye was. It seems bigger and is just more fun to play. Why does Golden Eye get more praise?
b446e2 No.14531461
I don't know. Back in my PC days Turok was bigger than Golden Eye, because i never had N64.
a7a41e No.14531488
>>14531457
Because Goldeneye was the most popular Bond movie in decades and completely reinvigorated the franchise which had been on hiatus after the Timothy Dalton period. Not too mention that Goldeneye was a genuinely great game, a shooter with objectives that was widely available to consumers based on a popular movie at the time.
I spent an untold amount of time playing Goldeneye as a kid, it was as good as they say. Turok is a fine game and Turok 2 was pretty decent as well, I remember enjoying both when I was young as well. But Turok doesn't have personality like Bond, Turok doesn't have a movie. Also after Turok 2 I heard the games got progressively worse, Rage Wars didn't even have a single player campaign if memory serves.
c9d2b9 No.14531490
>>14531457
Goldeneye was more popular because of its multiplayer and because it was in an existing and high-profile universe. It's really not that good a game otherwise particularly compared to PC shooters of the time.
625e2e No.14531493
e17ead No.14531494
Goldneye is a better game, the empty levels of turok filled with boring combat encounters and unimaginative platforming padding the game was far less engaging than objective based game play where you are doing an entirely different thing level to level, where enemies are satisfying to fight and the game is teeming with variety.
Turok is short, has levels way too big for the content in them, the bosses suck, and once you beat the first stage you've essentially got an expectation of what you'll get from the rest. Why did all these turok shit eaters turn up after nightdive got kaisers port in active production? Turok sucks and the only good Turok is 3.
e17ead No.14531497
>>14531490
there are no PC shooters like Goldeneye, and it is better than many of its competition on the PC.
311a84 No.14531517
Turok 2 was more popular than the 1st, on 64 it had fog and lag out the ass if I can remember and no mp didnt help either when you had 4 controller ports.
7267f1 No.14531518
>>14531488
By that logic, movie based games should always be great.
Goldeneye was the death of the Bond film franchise. It turned him into a cuck.
c9d2b9 No.14531528
>>14531497
>there are no PC shooters like Goldeneye,
Because there's no reason to make an FPS as limited as Goldeneye on PC
>and it is better than many of its competition on the PC.
It did some mildly interesting things but overall it's mostly just notable for pushing FPS tech on consoles.
e17ead No.14531531
>>14531528
>Because there's no reason to make an FPS as limited as Goldeneye on PC
goldeneye is less limited than comparable PC shooters of the time. Less rhetoric more meat.
>It did some mildly interesting things but overall it's mostly just notable for pushing FPS tech on consoles.
being an objective based shooter is more than mildly interesting, as well as having enemies with varied reactions based on where you hit them. It also meaningfully impact game play. Give an argument next post.
7267f1 No.14531534
>>14531494
But Goldeneye didn't have any secrets and was too linear. Visually, Turok has held up better. It has better weapons.
a48c78 No.14531536
Goldeneye had multiplayer and had the bond license.
>>14531531
>goldeneye is less limited than comparable PC shooters of the time
Quake 1 was released a year before goldeneye. What the fuck are you smoking?
7267f1 No.14531540
>>14531536
Quake was better than Goldeneye too!
e17ead No.14531541
>>14531534
>But Goldeneye didn't have any secrets and was too linear
secrets are arbitrary. Many levels allowed you to complete objectives in whichever order you wish.
> Turok has held up better.
being able to see more than 20 feet ahead of you makes goldeneye more visually appealing. Plus not having repeating textures making up the entirety of the level.
>It has better weapons.
the first turok had pretty lame standard FPS weapons. Goldeneye has a large variety of weapons across at the time, non-standard weapon archetypes. I'd say they're about even there.
>>14531536
>Quake 1 was released a year before goldeneye.
quake 1 isn't "less limited" than goldeneye, and something being "less limited" isn't a legitimate point. Give it some substance.
a932f8 No.14531543
>>14531541
>quake 1 isn't "less limited" than goldeneye, and something being "less limited" isn't a legitimate point.
>"less limited" isn't a legitimate point.
You were the one who fucking said that here >>14531531
e17ead No.14531548
>>14531543
yes, we have IDs here. Are you going to substantiate it? Give me a PC shooter where you can target enemies from head to toe, each limb, eliciting a different reaction to wherever you tag them. Give me a PC shooter where you can dual wield every weapon with it not being locked to a power up. Give me a PC shooter where every level is built upon completing objectives and not just getting to the end switch, many levels which give you the opportunity to complete those objectives however you wish.
Better yet, stay on fucking subject and tell me how Turok is better than that. Go on.
a7a41e No.14531550
>>14531518
>By that logic, movie based games should always be great.
Not at all just why it was widely popular, the brand and name is already established. James Bond movies have been around since the 60s, with films being produced evey 2 years at one point. Ian Flemings novels have been around even longer. However Goldeneye is by far the most successful film to game adaption in vidya history. You could argue Goldeneyes success is responsible for some of the abominations that came afterwards.
As for the movie Goldeneye is was extremely popular at the time. It was far more intelligent and less campy than the Roder Moore era and Brosan had more personality than Timothy Dalton. The central theme in Goldeneye is betrayal, which is always an interesting theme. Sean Beans 006 betrays James, MI6 and later his accomplice Ourumov. General Ourumov betrays the Russian Federation, however his motivations are his view that the Russian Federation is a betrayal of the Soviet Union. Boris the hacker betrays Natalya. The assassin Xenia fucks her prey and then murders them in the act, a betrayal of trust when their guard is down. The villians are all unique and their motivations pretty fleshed out. The only weak point of the movie is that Trevelyn's grand plan is just a bank heist (which Bond calls him out on). I don't understand your reasoning for Bond being a cuck in the film. Other films perhaps, but not Goldeneye.
a48c78 No.14531556
>>14531541
>>quake 1 isn't "less limited" than goldeneye
>fully online multiplayer
>faster movement complete with larger levels
>more enemy variety than just "goon with gun"
>extensive mod support which prevented the game from being invalidated even in the face of sequels
This isn't even counting all the technological accomplishments Quake had.
>>and something being "less limited" isn't a legitimate point
and here we are moving the goalposts
b446e2 No.14531557
Okay guys, lets review few things, Turok and Golden Eye were both released in 1997, what else we have releasing in 1996-1997?
The Terminator: SkyNET, Bethesda Softworks, 1996
Duke Nukem 3D, 3D Realms, 1996
Alien Trilogy, Probe Entertainment, 1996
Heretic: Shadow of the Serpent Riders, Raven Software, 1996
Final Doom, id Software, 1996
Quake, id Software, 1996
Blood, Monolith Productions, 1997
Doom 64, Midway Games, 1997
Redneck Rampage, Xatrix Entertainment, 1997
Shadow Warrior, 3D Realms, 1997
Hexen II, Raven Software, 1997
Star Wars Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II, LucasArts, 1997
Quake II, id Software, 1997
You think with all those releases those two were the most important ones?
a932f8 No.14531561
>>14531548
You claimed that less limited isn't an argument and yet you yourself only said the same thing. I'm not getting drawn into your shitfest I'm asking you to explain why an argument works for you and the very same thing doesn't for someone else.
e17ead No.14531568
>>14531553
>the game solely consisted of going from point a to point b and shoot everything in sight.
and taking pictures, planting trackers, planting bombs. At least play the games you talk about.
>>14531556
there we go, some substance.
>>fully online multiplayer
agreed, although multiplayer is multiplayer and goldeneye has that. Different types.
>>faster movement complete with larger levels
agreed about faster movement, the levels are about the same size, but it varies. Something being big doesn't mean it's good. Goldeneyes levels are also much more dense.
>>more enemy variety than just "goon with gun"
agreed, although enemy variety isn't the goal of goldeneye, it's objective completion. Guards with different guns and AI patterns changed up how you dealt with combat encounters in goldeneye pretty well. Having a guard with a grenade launcher is a world apart from one with dual kobbs.
>>extensive mod support which prevented the game from being invalidated even in the face of sequels
I agree, to an extent. But now that we're done reading the back of the box, lets talk about mechanics and level design, the actual meat of the games as they were at their respective times of relevance.
>>14531559
*tips fedora* heil total biscuit
>>14531561
something being less limited can be worlds apart in what it means on a case by case basis. Either you can be talking about how the levels are point A to point B or how levels can have numerous goals for you to complete in whichever order you choose. Or it can mean having a level editor vs not, or it can mean being able to jump vs being able to not. Substantiate them by saying something meaningful. That's why it doesn't work.
a932f8 No.14531575
>>14531568
Here I'll break it down for you:
>>14531531
This is your post. In it you say only "goldeneye is less limited than comparable PC shooters of the time." and this is apparently fine.
>>14531541
This is another post by you. In it you claim "something being "less limited" isn't a legitimate point". Apparently now only saying less limited is not fine. You are operating a double standard. I have no stake in this argument I just want to see you explain yourself. I suspect you're really a cuckchan rapefugee who forgot we have IDs which would also explain why you're blidingly defending Goldeneye.
e17ead No.14531588
>>14531575
I substantiated how goldeneye is less limited. Many PC shooters were still operating on the doom rules of find keys, hit switches, kill dudes along the way, reach the end of the level. Dudes you shoot either die, flinch (or not), or gib. In Goldeneye they react to where they're hit, have subtle behavior like sneezes, scratches, and fly swatting which does influence how they react to your presence, stealth is an option in goldeneye to a point, with slappers acting as a 1-hit-KO from behind. None of this is things I haven't said already. You should read the thread.
Talking about games in detail and objecting to stupid arguments like le turok is better because it has secrets and is more creative which is as vague as can be – that is absolute cuckchan shit. If you're afraid to talk about the details of the games, what sort of conclusions should I draw about you?
385bc9 No.14531595
since this is thread about old games nobody talks about, I'm going to throw this one out there, Starsiege: Tribes (1998)
0bde33 No.14531602
oy vey remember turok, watch the movie we're going to put out next year
fc680f No.14531604
>>14531457
I think the answer is pretty obvious OP.
fc680f No.14531606
>>14531604
>>14531457
Oh whoops, wrong image.
e17ead No.14531609
>>14531604
personal favorite
4828fb No.14531614
I hardly ever replay Goldeneye compared to Perfect Dark or Turok, but I think the Goldeneye poster has a point. Goldeneye was a genuinely innovative FPS compared to Turok that introduced many things that had previously been unheard of in the genre. Turok was sort of like Doom or Descent with longer levels.
4828fb No.14531627
On the other hand Turok definitely had smarter default controls than Goldeneye, which Rareware noticed and rectified for Perfect Dark. And Iguana must have noticed the context-sensitive body parts in Goldeneye because they had some fun with it in Turok 2.
5bb75c No.14531628
>>14531606
>>14531604
>thread is going nicely
>insecure fags have to come and ruin it
Every damn time. Why does Nintendo trigger you pcfags so much?
5bb75c No.14531631
Also more on topic it's because Goldeneye is was more advanced and honestly just more fun.
e17ead No.14531633
>>14531627
You're ignoring goldeneyes various control schemes, which even allows you to use two controllers for dual analog control.
4dbaae No.14531636
>Doom
>moddable, indefinite content
>fast paced
>multipayer with more than 4 people
>Quake
>same deal
People had better games to be, in all honesty. Goldeneye and Perfect Dark are fantastic, for console games. They'd be even better if they were originally released on PC
49b0bb No.14531641
while Turok is technically a better game
its nowhere near exciting as concept
e17ead No.14531645
>>14531641
turok is an objectively worse game
5bb75c No.14531650
e17ead No.14531653
>>14531647
there's not much to smile about.
49b0bb No.14531654
Native American killing Dinosaurs and time travelling cant beat giant legacy of James Bond
Thats what i am saying
49b0bb No.14531660
who is Turok, why should i care, is what pops up immideatly
James Bond is better written
even thou these are games it still seems to matter
f8b63b No.14531663
>>14531457
>they always mention Golden Eye first
why mention it anyways? perfect dark was superior
49b0bb No.14531665
if Turok had a character arc, it would change a lot of things
e17ead No.14531666
>>14531663
just not with that framerate
a932f8 No.14531672
>>14531588
>If you're afraid to talk about the details of the games, what sort of conclusions should I draw about you?
I already told you I really don't care about the games I'm just asking for some consistency. For example why didn't you reply to this anon >>14531557 ?
f662d8 No.14531678
f8b63b No.14531687
>>14531666
nice trips, you can always emulate it with that kb+m version
9bd7c9 No.14531701
>>14531653
All those three faces are made by completely different technology, and therefore animated differently. Gerald face has real time physics of his beard and hair, realistic facial animation and extremely realistic expressions neither fable nor silent hill 3 had.
c9d2b9 No.14531714
>>14531636
>They'd be even better if they were originally released on PC
You can at least emulate them with mouse controls.
ea813a No.14531723
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>14531701
>12 years of technology, 20x the computer performance made a character look marginally better
>but this is ok because now the long hair blows in the wind, he has mocap facial expressions, and the lighting engine is superior.
anon, how old are you?
9bd7c9 No.14531747
>>14531723
I could see comparison with Yakuza or VTM Bloodlines as possibility. But certainly not SH3 or Fable bullshit.
e17ead No.14531757
>>14531687
no thanks, I don't want any trojans.
>>14531672
right, so a metashitter, so a jew. begone.
>>14531747
the stylization to yakuza's realistic style really makes it one of the better looking games around. The standard NPCs you pass in the world look decent but the more detailed main characters still have that feeling that they look realistic while also having a sort of greater detail to them that reminds me of certain movie star faces.
19232b No.14531787
Goldeneye is a hard pill to swallow compared to Perfect Dark and Goldeneye.
The first game was fine, albeit unremakrable.
The second was a classic that wasn't aging well technically, but the recent PC remaster corrects that and it holds-up now.
The third and Evolution are underrated gems imho.
The 2008 reboot was a bad Halo knockoff.
19232b No.14531789
>>14531787
*Perect Dark and Timesplitters
Fuckkk
48ac02 No.14531809
Honestly I dont know, I have only played the PC versions but I absolutely loved Turok.
Turok 2 is kinda meh for me though, not as fast or as fun as the first one.
e25eb3 No.14531844
>>14531809
Here's a mod for the Turok 2 remaster that makes Joshua run more like Tal'Set.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5gm0zh6926bgt57/Speed%20Mods.rar?dl=0
eadcbf No.14531864
Goldeneye was more unique. It pretty much invented a whole new subgenre, whereas Turok follows the model set by PC FPS pretty closely. It was also the first N64 FPS with multiplayer deathmatches, I believe. That was significant.
a13d1d No.14531908
turok was complete trash where you couldn't see 5 feet infront of yourself because of the n64 fog while it ran at 10fps.
its ok on pc
c9d2b9 No.14532699
>>14531908
>its ok on pc
Most of these games usually are since it removes the limitations.
e713e2 No.14532777
>>14532699
Except the music.
5aaf17 No.14532780
Turok is badass, and the only real way to play it is on an actual N64.
f21829 No.14532798
>>14531488
the timothy dalton movies were superior to goldeneye
c9d2b9 No.14534622
>>14532777
The music is different on PC?
a27150 No.14534640
>>14532777
>>14534622
The remaster of Turok2 lets you pick which soundtrack you want so see for yourself.
>>14532780
I don't know the Remaster has it's perks
9d0afe No.14534652
>>14531488
Goldeneye was first made with Timothy Dalton in mind. Which btw makes sense because in tone it's a lot like his other Bond-movies.
7267f1 No.14535060
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>14531604
Nintendo fans weren't always soyboys though. Turok and Goldeneye were from back in the 90s when gaming was "EXTREME" and "TOTALLY RADICAL DUDE!"
Good God! Do I miss those days!
7267f1 No.14535074
>>14531550
Taken from Wikipedia:
>With Brosnan, the Bond writers knew that because of the changes in public attitudes, he could not be as overtly sexual and dominant over women as Connery's Bond, and was denounced by M in Goldeneye to be a "sexist, misogynist dinosaur, a relic of the Cold War".
7267f1 No.14535108
>>14531541
>Many levels allowed you to complete objectives in whichever order you wish.
You can do the same in Turok.
>Being able to see more than 20 feet ahead of you makes goldeneye more visually appealing.
But what you're seeing isn't really all that visually appealing. The characters and backgrounds look like blocky shit. Turok has the same problem, but it takes a "less is more" approach by not being as overly abitious as Goldeneye is. The fog ads to the atmosphere.
>The first turok had pretty lame standard FPS weapons.
Don't tell me you prefer the boring realistic weapons of Goldeneye over the Turok's weapons! The fusion cannon is reason alone to play the game! It pre-dates the Fat Man from Fallout!
18e3cc No.14535118
Goldeneye was THE party game. The multiplayer was outstanding. Turok was also too hard for casuals.
7267f1 No.14535155
>>14531641
>>14531660
>>14531654
>>14531665
Turok is a badass time travelling American Indian from the 1800s. He first appeared in comic books back in the 1950s. He's had many reboots and retcons since then. He's fought dinosaurs, aliens, cyborgs (Including cyborg dinosaurs controlled by aliens)
Sounds way more exciting than vanilla James Bond.
e17ead No.14535172
>>14535108
its a red bfg shut the fuck up
7267f1 No.14535176
>>14535172
But unlike the BFG, it blankets the screen with a nuclear explosion.
0b2e0d No.14535182
>>14531457
nonwhite protagonis
e17ead No.14535186
>>14535176
weapons like this are nothing new
a7cb90 No.14535570
>>14535182
This.
People can argue all they want, but this is the main (and rightful) reason.
Put two similar (and good) entertainment pieces together, and the one with the White and Straight Man as the protagonist will always be the preferable one.
18e3cc No.14535654
>>14535570
What if I told you,
That good game ideas,
inherently revolve around such people?
5218f6 No.14535683
>>14535570
>>14535182
>>14535654
who let you fags out of your containment board?
d13c87 No.14535687
Because Turok was absolute shit. Next question.
015271 No.14536106
>>14531497
Goldeneye was the Halo of the 90's. By that, I mean it was the overrated trash consolefags thought of as masterpieces. They did nothing new or exciting, they didn't push tech forward, they didn't even do what they did particularly well. They had marketing and interesting settings behind them, and did stuff console gamers hadn't seen before, but they were beaten to the punch by PC games every time.
>>14531557
I can't believe people are going on about how amazing Goldeneye was when Blood, Jedi Knight, Quake 2, and Hexen 2 came out the same year. Consolefags disgust me.
>>14535118
>Goldeneye was THE party game
>Not Mario Kart 64 Battle Mode
Next thing you're going to tell me is that you played Goldeneye with slappers only like a true faggot.
>>14535683
Can't tell if they're from /pol/ or they're Plebbit incels. Either way, you faggots can go.
c9d2b9 No.14536108
>>14535683
/pol/ and /v/ have always been the same board newfriend.
5cc0d3 No.14537409
f5b082 No.14537435
>>14531604
At least one of those soyboys got rekt by his cat
564d28 No.14537448
>>14531628
I love how you assume they're PCfags and not ex-nintendo fans. A lot of people got burned by them anon.
a8e398 No.14537462
>>14537435
Cats don't attack like this right in the throat unless they sense extreme danger or easy prey, and even with prey they would toy.
The guy probably abuses his cat.
bb3a74 No.14537510
Is this game worth playing on PC?
>>14537435
1c6091 No.14537547
>>14537462
Maybe cats, like dogs can only tolerate so much faggotry albeit with a higher tolerance, and this one dude's soyjoy was enough to push it over the limit
ae6ca0 No.14537568
>>14537462
>easy prey
I'm pretty sure the cat smelled the soy induced weakness
8236f0 No.14537573
eda783 No.14537825
Because James Bond > some shitty kiddy dinosaurs
8c372b No.14537870
>>14531550
>Brosnan had more personality than Timothy Dalton
Are you dense? Brozzo was the blandest of them all (and yes, I'm including Craig). And fuck you, Roger is the Adam West of the Bond actors, he's fun as hell to watch.
Also, the main problem with Goldeneye is that it tries way too hard to take itself seriously while taking no risks at all. Wooo! Bond now lives in post-cold war, no biggie he's still doing his thing. Wooo! Bond's boss is a woman, but she's still doing the typical M thing with no addition to her character. Wooo! The villain is his best friend, a character we haven't seen before, have no connection with, whose plan is all over the place and, for someone who knows Bond's every move, he is defeated by a grenade and a run-of-the-mill fight scene.
5aaf17 No.14538097
>>14538093
Wow, a PCfag frogposting cuckchanner. What a unique and interesting character you are.
77430e No.14538221
>>14538097
Pepe you mongoloid.
eadcbf No.14538236
>>14536106
Goldeneye did lots of new things. You not liking it doesn't mean it doesn't count.
bb3a74 No.14538514
>>14538236
It did things shooters had already been well beyond for decades. It did nothing new.
>>14538097
>am i fitting in guys?
304a94 No.14538526
>>14538221
>>14538514
>defending cuckchanners
What a sad state we're in.
bb3a74 No.14538602
>>14538526
Cuckchan doesn't have a monopoly on pepe you fucking retarded newfag.
304a94 No.14538606
>>14538602
Are you blind? Look at the fucking filename.
bb3a74 No.14538620
>>14538606
Yeah, apparently I'm blind.
304a94 No.14538636
>>14538620
We all make mistakes anon just beware the cuckchan menace.
ec4927 No.14538637
>>14538514
Goldeneye did new things though. Levels in Goldeneye actually had objectives, which didn't boil down to keyhunting or fucking stupid puzzles ala Hexen I and II.
d9977d No.14538672
>>14538620
>>14538636
Facebook frog is still shit and foreign.
bb3a74 No.14538799
>>14538637
It's "objectives" weren't anything new.
>>14538672
t. jew
29671b No.14538809
File: ecbcddbe92afcc0⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 70.73 KB, 478x487, 478:487, go back to where you belon….jpg)

>>14538602
dude epic kek #freekekistan xDDD D D D D D D
bb3a74 No.14538825
>>14538809
>a bunch of faggots attempt to subvert kek
>being so new you don't know they stole this shit from here and bastardized it
b03d0e No.14538826
I think the reason why GoldenEye is better than Turok was because GoldenEye had a more straightforward approach to everything(with the small-medium sized maps and objectives stated). In Turok on the other hand, you need to explore huge ass jungle maps (not that it's bad) to find keys scattered around. Imagine doing that with the N64 and its controlled camera movements.
89f48a No.14538854
>>14531628
wtf how did u find my steam profile!!
68d29d No.14539499
Perfect Dark was revolutionary and way ahead of its time. It pushed the N64 to its limits.
As for why GE was so popular, just take a look at Cinemassacre's recent review of it.
>>14531550
>Brosnan
>more personality than Timothy Dalton
Nope.
Pierce Brosnan's portrayal of Bond hasn't aged well. He's a generic "jack of all trades" Bond and his movies are suffer from terrible scripts and retarded action sequences where he goes around gunning people like Rambo.
Dalton was ahead of its time, he was the most accurate Bond true to the novels. He read the books before taking the role. Unfortunately the audience in the 80's was too used to Roger Moore's campiness so they weren't ready for a serious Bond yet. But in 2006 with Casino Royale, people finally accepted a serious Bond by Daniel Craig.
GoldenEye would've been perfect for Dalton.
e17ead No.14539531
>>14536106
sounds like goldeneye getting its rightful praise makes you really asshurt, just like halo does too. Sorry it makes you upset they're better than whatever hipster shit shooters you probably like, such as shogo or chasm the rift. those games are garbage and are rightfully never brought up except by hipsters.
68d29d No.14539569
>>14539499
[cont]
Official Bond rankings:
1. Sean Connery (not even a debate)
2. Timothy Dalton
3. Daniel Craig
4. Pierce Brosnan
5. Roger Moore
6. George Lazenby (although the 1 movie he's in is god tier)
Also GoldenEye is overrated, the best Bond films are:
>The Living Daylights
>On Her Majesty's Secret Service
>For Your Eyes Only
>From Russia With Love
>The Spy Who Loved Me
>Licence To Kill
>Casino Royale
where there's actual espionage involved and not just some generic action movie with gadgets (in which case Goldfinger > GoldenEye).
7267f1 No.14539992
>>14535570
I'm white and I'd rather play the badass Indian instead of the britcuck.
0ec7ac No.14540124
>>14540112
This is why you don't keep cat's.
f0aae8 No.14540131
>>14540124
>This is why you don't keep manchildren.
Fixed that for you.
bb3a74 No.14540132
>>14540124
t. soyboy sperg
b4283f No.14540140
>>14540124
Why the apostrophe?
0ec7ac No.14540142
>>14540131
>>14540132
>animal who never respects you
>Doesn't learn commands
>Attacks you out of instinct
You niggers are the true manchildren, I've grown up around farm cats, the true cats, not that pussy cat house shit you pretend is the true cat.
I respect cats for being predators which benefits us, but convincing yourself they're good pets is insane.
Dogs are and always have been superior.
f6a903 No.14540149
>>14540142
Eh,you can have a bad dog breed,you can't have a bad cat breed.
a7cb90 No.14540154
>>14539992
That is because you are a cuck.
White is superior.
There is no need to have characters that aren't either White or asian in entertainment.
bb3a74 No.14540159
>>14540142
>fallacy
>fallacy
>fallacy
Animal attacked him because he can't handle it. It clearly hates him and he was sperging out getting the animal all riled up. I've seen dogs get uppity over perceived aggression between males and spastic beahavior. My cats, my whole life farm and indoor have never struck me like this even when I'd handle them roughly.
Clearly you are a bad caretaker for the animal.
0ec7ac No.14540161
>>14540149
A dog is an animal that through selection is bred to serve.
Small dogs sure are little runts, but most dogs can be bent to your will through training.
>>14540154
>/pol/ poster
>Says this when he posts on a board regulated by a turkroach
<Y-your a jew will be his only retort.
0ec7ac No.14540168
>>14540159
Then you're are lying out your ass.
Farm cat's never/rarely recognize you.
They're literally cat's in the wild that benefit from the draw rats, and other prey that are attracted to harvest.
Cat's are crazy fucking pyscho's that are not worth viewing as pets, especially since they have a parasite which changes neurological function.
f6a903 No.14540169
>>14540161
That doesn't really go against what i said that certain breeds of dogs are just bad from the get go,where with cats even if they're bad they're nowhere near as bad as dogs can start as.
0ec7ac No.14540180
>>14540169
That's because cat breeds are bred, based on climate and look.
Dog's are bred by utility are were.
Even small dogs had utility 200 years ago when small dog poodle mixes where used as rat hunters which could deal with high humidity climates which cats could not.
That's where the poodle comes from is french, spanish fleets requiring a dog with fur which did not shed and could deal with water.
You have dogs who can lead the blind
Dogs who can sniff out bombs
Dogs who can sniff out narcotics
Dogs who guard
Dogs who can offer companionship
Cats, do only two things
Kill pests,
Make you feel like you're not alone.
DOGS>CATS
bb3a74 No.14540301
>>14540161
Who still uses r/the_/pol/nald? Say something bad about Trump, BANNED.
>>14540168
If a farm cat doesn't recognize you then you never had a close relationship with it to begin with. That's usually the intention unless the owners interact with the animal often.
>doesn't learn commands
http://www.purina.com.au/cats/training/train
https://www.hillspet.com/cat-care/training/kitten-command-training
You can train your cat to shit in the toilet if you want. Not even a dog can do that.
>attacks you out of instinct
Again, has literally never happened to me. My cat who lives on my grandparents vineyard as an outdoor mouser is always overcome with joy to see us, he gets so lonely out there and craves human contact.
A dog is far more likely to attack it's owner, despite cats being the more popular pet. In fact it's the most common animal bite in America.
https://www.caninejournal.com/dog-bite-statistics/
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/animal-bite-accident-statistics.html
Often they may bite when scared or under stress, and cats are no different like we see here. Stay mad soyboy.
>>14540180
>Dogs who can sniff out bombs
Not a pet.
>Dogs who can sniff out narcotics
Not a pet. Lets not even forget the issues with rehabilitating a service dog.
>Dogs who can offer companionship
>implying cats can't do this
>admits this in the same post that they are useful as companions
Just accept that you have a preference you idiot.
>Dogs who guard
Granted a dog is much more suited to this purpose, it's not unheard of to hear stories of cats defending their owners from bears and dogs, as well as defending babies and other animals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftIRIPcsqxo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXhJj9AGLvc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAjtkuDlsv8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgejhM6XGRA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqBnLKxaxSo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfZddEiuv5U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNEC-SdjN3Q
A cat is clearly smarter than a dog, but much more independent. There are pros and cons to each animal, and I've enjoyed taking care of both throughout my life. Polite sage for off topic forcing of my hand in relation to cat vs dog autism.
f6a903 No.14540336
>>14540301
This shit fucking makes me happy,to see cats defending people or scaring away other animals,more if you got them please.
d5a21f No.14540464
>>14531457
multiplayer dumbass
1d28d8 No.14540465
Who the fuck cares, if you wanted to play multiplayer with friends you were playing multiplayer with friends either way.
d5a21f No.14540481
>>14540301
>>14540180
>>14540161
>>14540159
I never got why most women liked cats and men liked dogs, since women look for dog qualities in men and men essentially end up keeping a 125lb cat when they get married
Cats are dainty things that dont really do much at all except groom themselves and whine at you to give them resources like food
Dogs are bumbling retards full of devotion that do everything in their power to gain affection,doing everything from farm labor to risking their life finding bombs to rescuing morons skiing, or just outright running under tanks with bombed strapped to them
baa723 No.14540495
>>14540301
I've met many cats cause I grew up in hipsterville, they were all asshole cats.
I have also met many dogs that were trained to the extent of "sit" and "no" and were all wonderful.
The only bad dogs I've come across are ones that grew up in the ghetto and had an owner that took its frustration out at it.
yet every chocolate lab that I've met has been a hyperactive piece of shit that would never stop barking.
afb225 No.14540496
I haven't played Turok on n64.
I have played Goldeneye and Perfect Dark on n64.
That's why.
8e4d2d No.14540678
>>14540481
>Cats are dainty things that dont really do much at all except groom themselves and whine at you to give them resources like food
Cat's are strong enough to overpower a full grown woman in a feat of strength if it's terrified enough to grip something for dear life, and that's just something that's common for Vets to deal with if it's trying to kill you the same you see in comedies then good fucking luck your face is coming right off. The reason woman collect cats is to fill an empty void in their heart, you can generally tell based on how many cats they have and if they don't replace their cats.
>>14540495
>yet every chocolate lab that I've met has been a hyperactive piece of shit that would never stop barking.
That's because the puppy mills only sell the hyperactive ones and the owners that buy them are shit or otherwise too inadequate and too lax with them, they need a lot of work. You go outside and you fucking play for hours with physical activities or make him work until he's exhausted. The subtle body language of Humans living with it is much more of an influence on labs then most dogs. Chocolate labs are also one of the smarter breeds, since they'll regularly pickup on keywords you use when they get older and understand what you're saying vaguely but won't care if you don't speak those keywords they pay attention too.
d2b584 No.14540713
>>14531457
Actual answer: because parents knew Goldeneye from the movie and bought it like a normalfag tie-in.
169dc1 No.14540723
I think it's just because GoldenEye had multiplayer before Turok had multiplayer, so it became the de-facto multiplayer shooter.
The fact that it was based on a hit movie helped, as did the "training wheels" that lowered the skill ceiling compared to Turok.
GE had more generous auto-aim and no jumping or falling to deal with, as well as primitive ADS.
Turok had better weapons though.
d2b584 No.14540729
>>14540723
>so it became the de-facto multiplayer shooter
If you were a toddler who gots his N64 for Christmas. Actual FPS players were balls deep in Quake 2.
169dc1 No.14540753
>>14540729
And here we have the colossal hipster cunt who failed basic reading comprehension to give his uninformed two cents only tangentially related to the OP.
Can't have a conversation about why one console game got chosen over another console game on that same console without some dickface chiming in about a different game altogether (which was more synonymous with a completely different platform).
Maybe read the fucking subject of the thread next time.
1d28d8 No.14540787
Holy shit, what are you even still discussing?
4828fb No.14540792
I've always been curious: Are there FPSs before Goldeneye that actually had context-sensitive hit areas? Or even headshots that do different damage from body shots?
169dc1 No.14540794
>>14540792
Pretty sure arcade light-gun games had contextual damage and animations. Virtua Cop and Time Crisis and the like. House of the Dead definitely did but that came out after.
3c831f No.14540798
>>14531488
Nice
>>14531714
I first played Goldeneye with the mouse hack and I can't imagine playing it on original hardware now.
>>14540301
r/the_/pol/nald uses r/the_/pol/nald. The "real" /pol/ migrated to some slow alternative boards here and on other sites and they hate namedropping
7267f1 No.14540926
>>14540154
Aren't American Indians decended from Asians?
7267f1 No.14540929
>>14540142
Dogs are definitely more loyal.
7267f1 No.14540933
>>14540926
Forgot to post this.
7267f1 No.14540950
>>14540729
The N64 was THE console for FPS back in the day when getting a computer was expensive and it was sometimes difficult to get games working on it.
e1654c No.14540968
>>14540933
>possible
wtf, i love guessing
bb3a74 No.14541582
>>14540495
>hipsterville
>asshole cats
See, >>14540112 the numale fears the kitty. (or should anyway) Cats owned by good flyover/conservative folk and vets are great friendly pets usually. You also might get the more distant farm cat and occasional ornery little shit that hates being touched too, rural cats are often more hands off. I thing that urbanites are bad with animals.
>>14540798
Most of those boards are shit though and not just because of inactivity.
>>14540950
I don't ever recall having difficulty getting games running, that's more of a modern phenomenon with me.
d5a21f No.14541744
>>14540678
> reason woman collect cats is to fill an empty void in their heart
but why a cat? Cats cant be bothered to even look at you if you walk into the room, while dogs fall over themselves for affection
c9d2b9 No.14541782
>>14541744
Because cats are dominant and women want to be dominated. Dogs remind them of betas.
d5a21f No.14541814
>>14541782
>chad feline, virgin canine
f6a903 No.14542267
>>14541782
Cats can be pretty subservant too
c9d2b9 No.14543987
>>14542267
Not that i've ever seen.
b2d2f9 No.14545285
>>14531457
Turok had shitty draw distrance and a bad frame rate. It was a good game but I preferred Goldeneye better.
e713e2 No.14546258
>>14540798
>I first played Goldeneye with the mouse hack and I can't imagine playing it on original hardware now.
Well if you never played with an N64 controller then no amount of keyboard + mouse controls is going to help you "get it". I mean shit I played the N64 so much that the N64 controller is second nature in these hands and without the mouse hack trying to control 3 fifths of the N64 selection is a god damned nightmare for me.
5bb75c No.14549120
>>14546258
>Well if you never played with an N64 controller then no amount of keyboard + mouse controls is going to help you "get it". I mean shit I played the N64 so much that the N64 controller is second nature in these hands and without the mouse hack trying to control 3 fifths of the N64 selection is a god damned nightmare for me.
Don't bother explaining to pc fags they're all emuniggers who don't understand how the games actually play.
9f76ca No.14549147
>>14531518
>Goldeneye was the death of the Bond film franchise. It turned him into a cuck.
You clearly didn't actually watch it
9f76ca No.14549154
>>14531457
Didn't Turok cost like $70 on release compared to GoldenEye's more reasonable $40?
c9d2b9 No.14554566
>>14549147
Dalton era was better still.
1c29fe No.14561200
>>14554566
>Dalton era was better still.
6aa2b9 No.14561866
But it was. At least in my country. Not everything is about the US.
947fdb No.14562052
>>14531497
>no shooters better than Goldeneye on PC
>Quake
>Duke 3D
>Doom
>Shadow Warrior
>Powerslave
Nigger what?
947fdb No.14562071
>>14545267
>samefagging via torposting
>>14541582
It's hard to use DOS if you're a drooling retard who can't remember basic file structure and a few commands. Though "Expanded" and "Extended" memory still fucks with my head to this day. Glad those days are long past.
The only games today that are "Hard to get running" are games that heavily relied on old DirectX and 3dfx Glide.
a932f8 No.14562593
e17ead No.14562598
>>14562052
>powerslave on PC
>good
I knew my opposition were mouthbreathers, but it usually takes more than one post for them to out themselves.
68d29d No.14562695
>tfw still don't know whether the N64 GE/PD bundle with M+KB support has a virus or not
50% say it's a virus 50% say it's a false positive. I don't know who to believe
e17ead No.14562701
>>14562695
it's a virus but it also trivializes the game. When the game isn't a challenge it becomes unfun
5bb75c No.14569392
>>14562598
What else do you expect from pcfats?
bb3a74 No.14570032
>>14562598
>cherrypicking and ignoring the rest of the post
You're not allowed to call others mouth breathers if you think a massive pile of Reddit nostalgia shit like GoldenEye was a good game.
>>14569392
t. permanently stunted console warring baby
0b9a1f No.14570078
>>14531490
>because it was in an existing and high-profile universe.
umm, anon…
e17ead No.14570089
>>14570032
>buzzwords
>still no argument
reddit is the realm of the mustard race, learn your sides here kid
>>14570078
learn what high profile means
0b9a1f No.14570093
>>14570089
I knew about Turok long before I ever heard of James Bond.
e17ead No.14570094
>>14570093
I'm sure you did
bb3a74 No.14570127
>>14570089
>reddit is the realm of the mustard race, learn your sides here kid
>a-am i fitting in guise!
Please turn off that fucking projector. You never made an argument to begin with, you made the patently false statement, "and it is better than many of it's competition on pc" which no one around here ever supported. It also proves that you are a console shitter who has never played any of those older shooters. Unlike you, I also made an argument. You ignored everything else in the other Anon's post.
To say that the popular competition on PC at the time was worse is a false statement. By virtue of playing with a mouse and keyboard they are better games, let alone being faster and more skill based games.
0b9a1f No.14570134
>>14570094
My dad was cool anon, he could probably beat up your dad even.
e17ead No.14570901
>>14570127
I substantiated my positions earlier, you could read my earlier posts in the thread. I ignored an argument I already won because it wasn't worth bringing up again when I addressed everything already in this thread.
>To say that the popular competition on PC at the time was worse is a false statement
name a more tactical single player focused shooter, one with leaning, as many varied objectives, and AI as elaborate.
you can't.
>By virtue of playing with a mouse and keyboard they are better games
*tips fedora*
> let alone being faster and more skill based games.
arguable but not interesting, I'm more concerned with quality of design.
fc680f No.14571408
a7cb90 No.14571432
>>14540161
They work for us without any money from us.
White is superior.
>>14540926
Americans is what White People dictates them to be.
f6ef5e No.14571719
21063b No.14574672
>>14571432
>Americans is what White People dictates them to be.
>le 56% meme
c9d2b9 No.14578475
>>14570901
You're retarded.
1c29fe No.14580208
>>14562593
>liking worst Bond
f1c331 No.14583610
So has anyone played around with the level editor? i'm having problems moving the floor mesh around on a vertical axis.
e17ead No.14583616
34d6fe No.14583624
Same reason Dino Crisis is forgotten. Pearls among swine.
a932f8 No.14588474
>>14583624
What does that even mean?
dc4e99 No.14588495
>>14541744
Because cats require the minimum of attention from their owners. They're for lazy people.
c9d2b9 No.14592469
f594e2 No.14592530
>>14531457
goldeneye was the first mission objective based FP"S". it had stealth mechanics, and when it released it really changed the genre. perfect dark also did this well. as difficulty increased it actually gave you more to do and didnt just become faster/harder. the missions were "plant this, destroy that, meet with this person, find this item"
Turok, though good. its missions were essentially all gather collectibles or find the thing. which doesnt work well in a shooter since once the enemies are dead, walking through the map is just kind of boring. and sometimes you'd be running laps through it looking for a missing collectible.
c9d2b9 No.14594649
>>14592530
Goldeneye was also shit.