/v/ - Video Games

Well apparently I'm retarded and can't embed anymore….. its about alien isolation AI

https://hooktube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Nt1XmiDwxhY

>>14165248

>Why are AI stuck in the same spot as they where 20y ago?

Because AI is resource intensive both performance wise and financially. And the bulk of AI development has gone towards heuristic programs like the ones google and facebook use to collect user metadata which aren't useful for vidya. Tailor made AI bots for games also can't be ported easily so developers have to start from scratch every game. Whereas game engines which can undergo version upgrades without having to do the same.

AI is difficult and many players don't seem to care about it being improved. Someone has to make a game with good AI as a prominent feature before the suits decide they want it in their games too.

They bribed and intimidated by ZOG to not learn how AI works so they can use it against us without resistance.

>>14165248

Game publishers play it extremely safe, and worry that better AI will not only drive away casual gamers, but also devalue online modes. Additionally the game developers who want to evolve AI don't have the funds to do so.

>>14165280

you are nothing I will destroy you

>>14165334

I'm going to develop a game with an AI that bans ppl for using spoilers on an imageboard.

>>14165321

sorryfortriggeringyourautismofellowanoniwilltrytoavoidthatnexttime:^}

Because programmers degenerated, all the good ones moved to more lucrative and less stressful jobs so you have smoothbrained millenial soygoblins and pajeets who can't program for shit.

Technology is stagnant while subhuman niggers don't learn to optimize their spaghetti code because

>lmao, just by 4 titans, hook it up to a nuclear power plant, not my problem, buy a petabyte drive, compression is bad.

Audio engineering was better 20 years ago

here's 1998 sound engine.

Also bear in mind that the more complex AI you make, the easier it'll be to abuse it, hitman is a good example of it.

>>14165327

Well yes, but you gotta understand suits in video games are retarded in general.

A good example of this is the pre-release footage of The Last of Us vs the final product. In the pre-release game the AI was super intelligent and could arguably rival a human. However according to rumors AI was dumbed down due to suits and devs at sony worried about the games being too hard for casual gamers and the uncharted crowd. So what we got instead was a movie game.

>>14165350

The prerelease footage was so obviously staged for that piece of shit. They never made good AI and never had any plans to.

>>14165355

True, I don't think modern naughty dog has the talent to make such a system. Especially since all their games play themselves, regardless my point is that the reason we haven't seen any real advancements in vidya AI is because the people with the money don't want to invest in single player, favoring into investing in microtransaction systems and online modes. 2K even admitted as much in their messages to investors.

>>14165350

Agree on that, but tricking suits on thinking memehard=good would help push for a better AI? The means justify the ends

Think about he souls games, how many casual go around saying they beat the hardest game ever? How many cucktaku article state X us like the dark soul of Y

>>14165346

I think sound design is pretty underrated. Typically most good games have something memorable sound-wise whereas mediocre games do not.

I remember before the release of Red Orchestra 2 the developers were touting a situational awareness mechanic that would visually alert you to any threat-worthy noises that happen in proximity. They never did implement this and they never allowed their sound engine to pick up the slack.

The biggest disappointment about that game is the sound design.I think it's what makes it a mediocre game.

>>14165248

Psh, why go to all that effort when throwing players into a fancy rat maze and having them butt heads will sell better?

>>14165367

>2K even admitted as much in their messages to investors.

Well aren't they stuck with sport games? What the fuck do you sell for microtransi

>shoes and jersey

Right

Then single player games like butterlord or hitmen?

>>14165388

>sound design is pretty underrated

My man. Some of my favorite moments involved an excellent aural element.

>>14165270

god i missed using realbot for cs 1.6. by far one the best i've used.

>set up a ton of waypoints on a map to make sure bots are able to path to any cranny

>teach them a few sneak bastard camping spots

>set up custom taunts

>bring friends into the mix

>they think the bots are real people because the bots will copy new techniques and change strategies depending on how successful they were

now bots are just rush machines if any even get put in. i miss my customizable bots and don't have the brains to make one myself

>>14165382

Nah I don't think I'd work. The reason for that is that youtubers already shills games with weird quirks and mechanics in them. A good example of this is Cuphead, it's a niche game that's basically a bunch of bosses. a few levels and plays like Metal Slug. I don't think Cuphead would do nearly as good if it wasn't for the Xboners dire need of exclusives and youtubers like Pewdiepie shilling the fuck out of it. Now while Cuphead was a huge success sales wise, most publishers and AAA developers see it as a failure because it didn't implement an online mode or micro transactions. It sold 2 million, but it didn't make 500 million dollars.

Right now the video game industry suffers from having bad business people in charge of these companies and relying on market research instead of just looking on the internet and taking the gut punches. Additionally SJWs also control the market research teams which is why they have so much power in the industry. If anything we should be attacking the market research and providing actual factual evidence to these publishers rather than the lies they get from the market research departments.

Either way the reason why we don't have proper innovation in games is a number of factors. Those factors being publishers being obsessed with market research, casual gamers buying the latest sports game, CoD and GTA while also buying the micro transactions, SJWs in HR departments ruining the careers of developers by blacklisting them, the SJW press teaming up with market researchers to try and profit off the industry, business men who don't care about long term growth and only what's in their pockets, "community managers" who have no idea what the fuck they're doing, etc.

>>14165393

>Then single player games like butterlord or hitmen

Like I said, the developer teams who want to improve the AI don't have the budget to do so. most of the money is spent on making the best graphics for sports games rather than making the game with the best gameplay and innovative systems.

>>14165248

That's because anyone capable of coding good AI is no longer working in the vidya industry. In many cases AI have degraded in quality not increased.

>>14165433

Nah, I don't think that's necessarily the case. There's still good people in the industry, especially coming from /v/. The issue is one of finances and social standings. These young developers have talent, but no one to guide them. Like when you see publishers having creative input rather than just managing the money, time and budgets then you start to see issues with the projects.

Because all the talented people has left the business.

>>14165279

Fucking kill yourself.

People don't actually want smarter AI. They want patterns they can learn and adapt to. It's part of the reason why DOOM is so good, you know exactly what every enemy will do/is capable of.

http://askagamedev.tumblr.com/post/76972636953/game-development-myths-players-want-smart

>>14165494

Did someone call for an Earth' Shaker?

Three

Two

One

F I R E

>Why are AI stuck in the same spot as they where 20y ago?

Because for most genres the AI is good enough.

>does a terrible job at being even close to realistic

Realism is not fun. It's not hard to create realistic AI which would see and hear you from realistic distances.

>>14165248

I recall an article in a which an FPS dev talked about how when they implemented better AI schemes, players would feel like enemies were being randomly spawned behind them instead of reacting to actual environmental cues indicating player presence and sneaking up on them

>>14165605

So it's not just that programmers dropped in quality, crippling the ability to produce good AI but also, gamers dropped in quality, crippling the ability to even recognise good AI.

>>14165605

I'm convinced most playtester complaints and just there to justify scrapping something that they think would take too much work. You never see them complain about unskippable cutscenes for example despite playing shit on loop for days.

>>14165605

I think with good communication from your friendly AI, that wouldn't be a problem.

The main issue is, no one in reality fights alone, because a single person is easy to flank and surround.

It's because it's all done with behavior trees, which if you want anything not awful requires a lot of tedious coding. Some are coming out with neural network (true AI) AI. Elon Musk has one for the least worst ASSFAGGOTS called OpenAI. Hooktube embed is video of it.

>>14165388

>Typically most good games have something memorable sound-wise whereas mediocre games do not.

I agree completely with you. Good sound design is such an esoteric thing too. There's no objective measure I know of and you won't find any instructions anywhere to do it right. Who today even thinks about things like how well different sound effects like attack, enemy death and music mix together, yet they can make or break an excellent game.

It's not surprising you see so little care taken for these considerations today when the average consumer doesn't know any better, and actual game enthusiasts are plagued with gameplay only fags that actually feel proud of having a lack standards. Don't get me wrong, you can't have a fun game without good gameplay, but all the other things are what elevates it above a mere pastime.

>>14165779

I call horseshit on OpenAI. Not because of it's merits but how overly praised it was for simply being able to do 1v1s with one of the most simplest heroes to play in a game all about drastically different characters. It's certainly a good starting point but this is simply the chess AI shit and making out that the AI can beat anyone in a contained environment is just fucking hilarious.

>>14165924

It's also a real time game so it can abuse it's virtually instant reaction time just like in fighting games.

>>14165924

>>14165938

It only has to be a starting point- this one was done in 6 months, so imagine one with further cooking.

>>14165779

>Can only play as one character.

>Said character is supposedly the simplest to play from what I can find on it.

>Can only vs. the same character.

>Can only play in one living room sized area on the map.

>Can't handle a super simple hazard.

>All of this is inside an ASSFAGGOTS aka lowest common denominator land.

If this is "revolutionary" AI, AI will never be a serious thing.

you're not really gonna be satisfied unless we use a neural network in place of AI

and we're far from being able to do that well, let alone efficiently

>>14166033

Since you insist on both wasting dubs and being a retarded mongoloid, have a lecture and educate yourself. These convolutional neural networks are essentially the same as the human brain- the revolutionary part right now is that they exist at all, even if right now their complexity is that of a toddler.

Check out AI War, I haven't played it but remember hearing that the dev has poured a lot of time into the AI in the game and it's leagues better than any other RTS AI. IIRC he accepts demos of any victories against it on the hardest settings and will tweak it to be able to counter it in future.

>>14165481

I call bullshit. In his own anecdote he talks about how his AI outsmarted players when it didnt, the players outsmarted the AI, they ran into hallways and the AI didnt react intelligently. What a stupid blogpost. Also saying players hated it because the AI "outsmarted" them is just typical lazydev. Anyone can program a bot to snipe across the map and headshot someone. Its like his team was trying to make good AI and stopped halfway through because…..why exactly?

>>14166033

>>14165924

It's not just that the hero is simple to play, the mechanics make it virtually impossible to lose in a mirror matchup once you get the slightest advantage. He gets a damage boost for every unit kiled but loses the bonus once if he dies, so if it kills the human player even once it gets a huge advantage that can't really be overcome since it can deny it's own units with the increased damage and keep you from ever getting bonus damage.

I guarantee on literally any other hero in the game it wouldn't be able to do nearly as well even with all the other bullshit stipulations they throw on the match.

>>14166184

Why was this the only game that did this.

>>14166184

is this dragon's dogma?

>>14165303

GalCiv2+3 are the best there is, and they're not that great in fact they're pretty bland to play against after a while.

>>14166184

>self-learning

Nigger, Dragon's Dogma has 9 prebaked AI behaviors, with 5 of them being shit and the other 4 being just about who to target first (strongest enemies, weakest enemies, ranged enemies, etc). The inclinations go from 0 to 1000 in scores. The game arbitrarily decides which retarded events raise one inclination (hurrrr durrr asking for help always means medicant it's not because I want an enchantment) while slightly lowering all the others. The closer an inclination is to 1000, the more likely the pawn is to select a script from that inclination.

That's it, that's all there is to it, they don't learn shit.

>>14166507

They definitely learn, but the degree they learn is vastly overstated by some people. They have certain bits of information that they learn if you defeat enemies in certain ways (wolves are weak to fire, Saurians are weakened if you cut off their tails, etc.).

But, yeah, that shit like "I taught my pawn to play catch!" is bullshit.

>>14166368

No, its dark souls.

>>14166518

That's just bestiary knowledge.

Every monster has three stars in the bestiary, gaining one star unlocks one of these little enemy-specific scripts.

These all all bound to the utilitarian inclination.

You gain starts by defeating X amount of enemies, reading an enemy tactics scroll or pulling off the tactic yourself in a way that the game registers it.

>>14166507

You more or less just described learning behaviors.

>>14166599

>That's just bestiary knowledge.

Yeah. They gained knowledge. The shorter way of saying that is "learning." It's not glamorous or fancy, but it fits the definition. 99% of all machine learning is going to be the equivalent of setting a flag somewhere.

>>14166548

Kaguya Luna isn't an AI, AI's are incapable of huffing glue.

Good AI is not fun to fight. It just fucking rapes your ass or constantly sits in cover waiting for you to move then aimbots you.

We could have good AI. It's just not fun.

>>14166648

I'd say good AI will behave like a human while Hard AI will behave like a robot (which will result in you being raped)

>>14166523

sincerely kill yourself faggot

>>14166777

>>14166957

It was nice knowing you anons

>>14166648

>be game dev

>build AI

>test it out

>it pushes your character down and asspenetrates him

>what the fuck

>>14165248

Great AI can destroy players.

Most players want to escape reality and have fun for a while. They don't want to get destroyed.

Multiplayer gives competitive players a great experience without costly programming to create amazing bots.

It's a lose/lose for developers.

>>14167705

You're assuming what I wrote was an autobiography.

You're also a dumbass if you think the vast majority of people that play video games are hardcore gamers. That's why no one caters to people that want extreme challenges. Because there's a marginal market for it. Video games are a way to make money and the market responds to what will make money.

>>14167794

Then define the (((marketing team))) definition of "hardcore gamer" for us.

>>14167802

Someone who buys and plays every game, in full to full completion, and has a minimum of 2.5+ hours for games they don't finish. When I mean "every game" I mean every single game released throughout the year including steam, including AAA releases, and a mishmash of a common collection of games that is considered great although it varies by the region which collection to consider. That's less then 2% of the entire market, the technically correct term you're looking for is "challenge gamer".

Interesting trivia but the primary reason for linear forced cinematic experiences being pushed is not SJWs but Valve finally being able to gather important data like "how many people actually finish the game" for every game it's a grand whopping quarter or less, two thirds don't even make it to the halfway point before dropping the game they played outright. Executives and developers were not happy when they found that out.

>>14167831

> just having the opponent always know your location and score headshots at a high rate isn't good ai.

Escape from Tarkovs AI is so shit about this. The bots are either pathetic or one tap you through walls. And their searching algorithms are nonexistent. They either know exactly where you are or forget you exist.

>>14165367

This is probably the best answer. Good AI takes a dedicated, if small, team of programmers. That needs a real studio. But the studios have investors who want maximum return on investment, which means EA style kikery and multiplayer.

>>14165481

>People don't actually want smarter AI. They want patterns they can learn and adapt to.

Except that isn't true

>>14167906

Let's see buyfags who would buy every game for the sake of it

>autistic kike, likely a rothschild

>cianigger A.I

>steam or GOG increasing it's statistics through a false result

That's three of the twelve accounted for. Who are the other nine autistic spergs?

>>14167970

This, unfortunetelly is the truth. As you can't give the A.I a specific purpose or completely agreed upon purpose without similar or the same ideas being put into it to use. Whether gameplay concepts or shilling.

>>14165532

Realism can be fun if the game is designed and balanced for it. More to the point AI isn't about realistic detection distances, it's about realistic response. An enemy that forgets you're there ten seconds after you shot his buddy is boring.

>>14167987

NEET oil barons who pay lip service to Islam and then buy shitloads of western goods.

Manchildren with Richfag parents, crossover with autistic jew.

The most normalfaggy normalfag to ever normalfag, like Patrick Bateman with aspergers instead of sociopathy.

>>14166648

Aimbotting isn't AI, and it can be fun to have to kill an NPC whose actually using decent tactics.

>>14167643

> Great AI can destroy players.

If that's happening the game is unbalanced. But I think by "AI" you actually mean magical knowledge, aimbots, and other shit that has nothing to do with intelligence.

>>14167824

If a game is fun enough I can play it for thousands of hours without ever actually finishing. (since I play sandbox RPG's) Some games I've played many times and feel I got way more value than I expected, yet never finished.

>>14165327

So you actually have no idea what you're talking about then? Why would anyone want to discuss this subject with you when you're so ignorant about it?

Good AI can be done , and it's generalizable enough to work from one game to another in the same genre. That just hasn't happened yet.

>>14168016

>why discuss this argument if you don't know anything about it

>what's the point of learning new things if no one will talk about it

>I only discuss things I know already

Well I see why you are just shitposting then anon

>>14168007

Look up the Royal Family of Qatar for reference. Or the Saudi royal family for that matter, but then again the house of Saud are pretty much autistic Jews.

>>14167824

>Executives and developers were not happy when they found that out.

Why would they care? It's not like they get less money if people drop the game 3 hours in (unless dlc or multiplayer micro transactions faggotry) if anything they'd be happy about that since it means they can sell other games that might not have been bought if the consumer was still playing the first game

>>14165248

I can imagine the day when real AI becomes a thing, MIT or some tech company like that will probably test it as a 3D avatar in their dev software

One day, NPCs will have a conscience

Maybe it's already the case and it's stuck somewhere on a supercomputer in a fake 3D world, knowing he can be deleted by the simple press of a button

>>14168007

You know that classic game room guy on youtube? Half of his shit was gifted to him by a oil baron from Qatar. This isn't even a joke.

>>14175928

They consider it a wasted investment and think a game 75% shorter would be more cost efficient.

>>14175972

Look at thread more closely next time, machine learning is still just an AI trying to make different pathways to get to a predetermined flag. We have had this for years now and everyone making a fuss about it since Elon musk said its important really goes to show how many people here go on reddit. I said it once and I'l say it again, until the learning process ends up with the AI setting another flagpole to reach its goals we will never see sentient AI and seeing as how the best of the best bots right now can barely do the task they are given unless given a lot of fucking time and effort to find all possible variables.

>>14176318

Yeah its not like over 75% of a games funding goes to marketing or anything, a real wasted investment.

>>14175928

From a developers point of view what's the point if nobody is going to see it?

Because video game players are often ignorant of how intelligent the AI of a game is. They might be buggy, but most of modern AI have a lot of complex functions that didn't exist back in the old days. For example, gamers complain about how Fallout 4's AI is shit even though in reality they have the capability to decide when to take cover, flank, and throw a grenade to drive you away from your cover, and it's done more seamlessly than the event location triggers that existed in HL1 and FEAR.

>>14179405

I doesn't even need to have new AI from scratch….like in alien isolation you just need two different for role, one knows what to do and the other do what is told…

>FPS AI

>one controls where the player is and what to send

>one control the sniper to check that area

>one control the tank to move and blast

>one control the soldier to swap the area and look for it

They are all the same type of AI but makes for different roles

Majesty had the best AI of any videogame, prove me wrong

Good or realistic AI is especially hard to make.

Even for a game that is as easy to understand as chess it took millions of dollars, supercomputers and many years of development before they had a competitive chess engine. And even then the best chess AI engine in the world ("Stockfish") which will quite easily beat all the top players, does not play like a human.

because devs don't make good games anymore, they don't even have the skill to balance a game let alone design complex ai for it

>>14183492

> Modern game players aren't capable of exerting this pressure, nor do they exercise any form of natural selection

Pls. Open most played steam games list. 90% of hours played are played in competitive (aka you need to git gud to win) online games.

As other anons in this thread have probably already said, developing a good AI that is also fun is very difficult.

Developing the AI system with only its efficiency in mind will lead to the players getting the feeling that the system is unfair and that enemies are manipulated (spawned, moved etc.) to be behind them.

This is a result of the fact that it is hard to judge what is happening when the enemy is performing offensive action against you while unseen.

As for non-hostile AI, much of it relies on handcrafted schedules, which of course require man hours to make. Your average casual shitter will not miss an in depth AI character system, because they spend very little time playing video games, and rarely make an effort to really immerse themselves into the game.

I like F.E.A.R's approach. While it's not a very complex system, most shit the enemies do is telegraphed in some way, like them shouting to their buddies what theyr'e about to do. This gives the player the ability to prepare for what is about to come, without it feeling unfair.

They rewrite the AI every game so technique and experience is what creates a smarter AI. Too bad neither can be found in the gaming industry since nobody stays long enough to gain experience or think up new techniques.

>>14187049

>Developing the AI system with only its efficiency in mind will lead to the players getting the feeling that the system is unfair and that enemies are manipulated (spawned, moved etc.) to be behind them.

Easily fixed by killcam. Praise COD for good ideas! So "positioning cheating" argument is just developers blabbering bullshit.

>feeling that the system is unfair

Really comes from the another angle. What is difference between good aim and aimbot? Well there is none. Robot to good at his job is not fun. People do miateks and are not perfect all the time. So they expect their opposition been on teh same level as they are. (level of noobs and scrubs who can't git gud). Only then game feels "equal" and therefore fun. And here is the problem, programming "mistakes" is more difficult then programming good job.

Making a good AI requires you to be good at your own game, which is something developers don't do anymore.

>>14186870

>AI

>In competitive multiplayer

You online fags are all kinds of retarded.

>>14165320

This sums it up.

>people are retarded so retarded AI is all they need

>most people play online anyways so even less need for AI

Not a significant selling point.

>>14187422

>reading comprehension

In online PvP game pressure comes form competition with human players. And level of human players has no ceiling of growth. AI is replaced by humans as better and cheaper (it is hard to beat negative costs) alternative.

>>14187459

>at least part of the problem with ai development definitely stems from the high rate of turn over. people with passion go in, get eaten up and tossed away. i'm not sure how much these devs are taught in their studies about ai either, i know ai (or machine learning) courses around here are all focused on data management which probably doesn't translate to teaching a computer vidya well.

It's not totally vidya but it's a begining

>>14166507

I was sort of more impressed by pawn pathfinding, maybe I'm easily impressed but I thought it was neat they could go basically wherever you can go and would eventually catch up if you got tearing off ahead.

>not just hiring pajeets to play as enemies in ostensibly "single player" games and claim you've achieved humanlike AI

The jews in vidya have yet to achieve maximum jewery.

Didn't an AI beat the shit out of everyone in the Dota 2 competitive scene? I think only one player was able to beat it once but afterwards the AI learnt how he played and he couldn't beat it anymore. It learnt the game by itself. Other than that, the guys who made it said they were planning to make an entire team made out of AIs and they would beat everyone with it.

>>14166073

>even if right now their complexity is that of a toddler

you're retarded, they're infinitely more simple than even a fucking insect, even the most complex have like 12 neurons. The difference is they are highly specialized so they are better at performing a specific task, just like how human hand can do a million different tasks well but an ice pick is pretty much limited to picking ice and being used as a improvised weapon - both things a human hand can do (worse).

It's basically like a jack of all trades vs master of one.

>>14165248

>AI same as 20 years ago.

<Are you fucking retarded?

>Why are AI stuck in the same spot as they where 20y ago?

Because intelligent AI makes video games sell less.

>>14166548

whats going on in this picture?

Kingdom Come Deliverance AI looked dumb in the combat video. Archers ran out of the fence (and the melee defenders didn't) encampment only to get slashed by swordsman. Very sad, I wish they would stay back and use cover, height, and wide angles.

Also the enemy infantry has no line formation, they break and charge into a blob of melee.

Will Volta's new gpu AI Cores be utilized to learn AI to have human-like team play in combat? Archers maintain distance, infantry attempt 2v1s, flanking, cohesive lines maintained during melee?

>>14191791

>will <vendor-locked gimmick> be utilized?

Oh anon.

RTS and TBS games are too complicated to create a good AI. Look at how much effort it took to develop a good one for chess, and chess is much simpler compared to most video games.

In FPS and TPS games, it's pretty easy to make an AI better than the player, but then you would get aimbot headshotted as soon as you stepped out into the open. You would still always lose if they were as intelligent as the player (ignoring the fact that most players are imbeciles) because you're pretty much always outnumbered. And stealth games don't work at all if the AI is intelligent. There's a reason why people in real life don't go around being sneaky ninjas.

Strategy games are stuck between a rock and hard place because if the AI is too smart, the game would be unbeatable, but if the AI is too dumb, it will not be a challenge.

So they come up with a compromise, dumb AI that has some sort of cheat to make them challenging. Obviously, it still doesn't work all that well.

>>14166073

>These convolutional neural networks are essentially the same as the human brain

This is why game ai is shit, the players don't know anything about what they're talking about.

>>14166648

Your argument is held up by a shitty presupposition.

>Good AI = aimbot + camping behavior

It's pretty self evident why this is false.

The real question is: what is good AI?

Obviously, it's one that emulates a variety of humans, who're conscious beings; each with their own intrinsic values, playstyles, and motivations.

However, for games at least, it's only necessary to emulate the properties of conscious beings that matter (for the context of a game environment, which has intrinsic limits). In the context of the particular AI purpose/genre, and hardware/algorithm capabilities.

Such as FEAR utilizing the aspect that conscious beings communicate (they had a neat approach, the agent that was triggered to speak, selected the response line of their ally, and was thus lending credence to the perception of the AI cohesively communicating).

There are many different ways in which conscious beings act, and we're made up of a plethora of behaviors, values, and other intrinsic/extrinsic characteristics.

Another, slightly more verbose example: the "need based" AI of the sims (utility of an action, with a "smell" centric perception system); which demonstrates the lower tiers of maslow's hierarchy (or any other "primal to abstract" values hierarchy).

It's just a matter of emulating the correct characteristics for the environment (much like life itself), and not projecting some ultimate idiolized AI that trivializes you as a conscious being (that has limitations, such as making an aimbot that reacts in a single frame unfair).