YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
5f1559 No.13885708
Why is nintendo the only console maker investing in first party games? Not console war shitposting. I’m generally shocked that Sony first party games disappeared compared to PS3.
a6cd86 No.13885742
Why are you starting a thread with a third party game them?
Anyways, it's because Nintendo doesn't necessarily blow their load on every release and system, and don't need to sell a million+ units within the week. On top of that, they're built a following with their franchises in their 30 years in the market. Almost everybody (Even, nongamers) recognizes them. Meanwhile, Microsoft and Sony lack such recognition with their titles (Outisde of possibly Halo, which was more on Bungie than Microsoft).
3ed991 No.13885762
>>13885708
Is this just an excuse for you to post the SMT5 English reveal without looking like a shill?
0a5651 No.13885775
>>13885708
>SMT
>first party
u wot
544282 No.13885786
>First Party
>SMT
Nintenfarthuffers everyone
6a39d7 No.13885919
Nintendo has to make first party because third party hates them.
40bf46 No.13885947
>>13885708
>SMT
Not first party but I'll answer your question.
Nintendo is a company that only makes consoles and video games for those consoles. Sony and Microsoft aren't video game companies primarily. Sony is an electronics company and MS is a software company.
f3d833 No.13885968
I think OP wanted to say Console Exclusive games and not First Party.
287624 No.13886007
>>13885968
Then if OP wanted to say it then he should be less of a sperg and say it. Now let's wait until OP tells us the one where Eternal Darkness is a 1st party game.
43a8d1 No.13886048
You buy the hardware to get the software. Nintendo and Sega understood that. Sony and Microsoft got more into fighting over third party temporary exclusives while not paying enough attention and care to their own devs. I get the sentiment that you never know where the next big game will come from, so get as many games as possible on your system, but it shouldn't be at the cost of neglecting your own people.
7f0088 No.13886051
>>13885968
But Sony is literally surviving off their exclusives right now
287624 No.13886067
>>13886051
But I thought Sony is dead according to some. :^)
Real patricians have a PC, a console for the console exclusives, and a nintendo whatever. Nintendo's real power is being a good +1 to another system.
7f0088 No.13886084
>>13886067
Sony is almost dead anon. Every one of their branches besides vidya is flailing and the playstation is taking up Microshit's market because they have failed so utterly hard that its frankly unbelievable, but they won't survive without some innovation. They failed handhelds and if they are going to be retarded enough to put up a PS5 and think everything will be okay, they'll end up committing financial suicide a little past the end of 2020, maybe 2021.
5bd2f2 No.13886087
>SMT
>nunintendo exclusive
It's already dead.
287624 No.13886099
>>13886084
>mfw hearing this exact same argument back during the ps2 era
>mfw this is another version of nintendoom but kosher
You sound like the retards that say Nintendo will die or that the vidya crash will happen any day now.
60e074 No.13886100
>>13886087
>nunintendo
Nintendo has actually been like this since the very beginning. Nintendo fans just don't care if they support censorship or not. In fact most of them are perfectly alright with censorship, and even prefer it.
0a5651 No.13886110
>>13886100
I want to fuck mahoro
adceae No.13886113
>>13885708
>Why is nintendo the only console maker investing in first party games
Who the fuck do think funded Killzone, Ryse, Killer Instinct, Quantum Break and whatever Naughty Dog shits out?
>posts a video of SMT as a nintendo first party
Are you fucking stupid?
What a baseless thread
7f0088 No.13886115
>>13886099
>implying Nintendo didn't do fucking terribly in the console market for the last decade
>implying they didn't get monumentally lucky and had to resort to sad things like mobile game fads to stay afloat
Do you think Nintendo would've survived if they had another Wii U? I'm giving Sony a chance by saying that yes, if they actually do something fucking different they will survive and thrive in the market.
Making a PS5 is not innovating at all and will only lead to a slow death, or are you delusional enough to think Sony has the same market power as they did during the PSX and PS2 era?
3ed991 No.13886120
>>13886087
Except 4 and its sequel were Nintendo exclusive as well and NOT censored, even with demons, mention of messiahs, and the killing of the Jewish god. These games are not translated by Nintendo, but by Atlus' internal team. I mean, I get the hate, but if you were to compare it to anything, then compare it to P5's translation. That's decent by all standards, unless you're a goon or SJW that wants homophillic shit everywhere.
287624 No.13886124
>>13886115
And do you think ANY vidya company has as much market power now? Take the bias out of your argument and it boils down to normalfags are paying less for vidya thanks to f2p phone games. Sony dying is about as realistic as Nintendo dying.
Konami or Capcom on the other hand…
42b90d No.13886125
>>13886087
You can blame treehouse for that.
Not to mention angel floats around pants/pantyless.
5bd2f2 No.13886134
>>13886120
Hence, the NUnintendo.
>>13886100
Never like this.
Modern Nintendo gives ZERO fucks about the costumers.
7f0088 No.13886146
>>13886124
>sony dying is about as realistic as Nintendo dying
nigger I just said it was possible for Nintendo to die and they lived by the skin of their teeth
287624 No.13886148
>>13886125
>blame treehouse
>not nintendo
>blame the employee, not the retarded boss that hired this liability
3ed991 No.13886150
>>13886134
But 4's sequel came out in September last year. Almost a full year after Xenoblade X. Your statement makes no fucking sense, my dude.
adceae No.13886154
>>13886115
> had to resort to sad things like mobile game fads to stay afloat
Their mobile game didn't perform up to expectations unless you mean the Switch as a whole as a mobile game fad.
>I'm giving Sony a chance by saying that yes, if they actually do something fucking different they will survive and thrive in the market
Sony is already surviving and thriving(the PS4 sold 60 million units already).
The way Nintendo is going, they are gonna carve their own niche where people will buy the Switch for games only on the Switch like they did with the Wii. Currently the Switch is projected to do very well if the current trends continue but only time can tell for sure.
adceae No.13886159
>>13886134
>Never like this.
Are you delusional? NoA has been censoring games since the NES.
287624 No.13886162
>>13886146
>they lived by the skin of their teeth
I would say they had a bit of breathing room. Hell, the entire year head start with the wii u and their exclusive game "prese understand" should have told you that they were not that worried. If anything Microshit lived by the skin of their teeth. For fuck's sake, they made something called the XboxX. They have clearly thrown in the towel.
7f0088 No.13886179
>>13886162
Yeah, maybe my predictions need more of an adjustment, I'm probably overestimating how badly they will crash (though Microsoft is a company that is doing well in a lot more sectors outside of gayman unfortunately so they're kind of the opposite of Sony).
You're probably right, I'm overestimating how fast these companies will crash.
adceae No.13886188
>>13886179
Microsoft as a whole might not crash but their gaming section is under risk. Maybe another flop will give the investors all the ammunition they need to axe it completely.
287624 No.13886209
>>13886179
>I'm probably overestimating how badly they will crash
No fucking kidding. Put it this way. EA is in a bad spot but look how long they have lasted. Kike fueled ideas will not be going anywhere thanks to the modern braindead gamur.
60e074 No.13886221
>>13886134
Bro where the fuck have you been? Did you just not play games when you were young or have you not played any old games? Perhaps you're still young? Nintendo and censorship have come hand in hand since Nintendo has ever existed. They've always cared about what soccedr moms think more than anything else.
42b90d No.13886225
>>13886148
Treehouse dosent always do the translations for games though, and they and up fine.
But whenever they get a hold of a game and have free reign to do whatever thats when things get fucked up.
0a5651 No.13886231
>>13886225
Treehouse didn't do TMS, and look what happened to that.
143d03 No.13887254
I wished every game was on every console, then i wouldn't have to put even more money to play the games i would want to play.
42b90d No.13887348
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
CALLING ALL SMT FAGS
Announcement trailer is in engrish now.
>>13886231
That game was trash ever since its conception.
73262f No.13888503
Because Nintendo is more interested in long term investment AKA good games, while everyone else is cucking out with easy cashgrab AAA western garbage.
73262f No.13888509
>>13886067
There are basically no good exclusives on the PS4. Almost every single good game on it can be played on PC. Why the fuck would you buy a PS4? Any multiplayer games can be played on PC and you dont have to pay for online.
5f1559 No.13888789
>>13886113
Where is killer instinct? Shouldn’t it have a sequel on PS4 by now?
ccb510 No.13888932
>Sony first party games disappeared compared to PS3.
Are you retarded or just shitposting? Not sure.
ccb510 No.13888936
>>13888503
*tips fedora*
*installs osu*
f5cb53 No.13889229
>>13885919
…
Isn't the reason third parties hate them because Nintendo make first party games?
37c4ac No.13889589
It might be good if they don't make it persona lite with braindead combat that's only difficult in the beginning because of poor stat balancing.
>>13888503
Yeah now they're just cucking out with easy cashgrab "Nindies"
The reason you don't see those games on Nintendo is because they don't sell to nintendo owners. If they did they'd get ports like they do to basically every other system.
>>13889229
It's because Nintendo didn't cater to third party devs the same way Microsoft and Sony do and that's on on top of making very poor decisions like sticking with overpriced carts selling underpowered consoles that can't take ports and so on. They've been changing that in the recent decade though which is why you see more of these games. They even got SMTIV as an exclusive. A shame the game was utter shit.
6bc24a No.13890346
>>13888509
Honestly, there are some PS4 exclusives that i'd like playing.
Now how about we take that comment and replace PS4 with Xbox One
1dd9a9 No.13890359
>>13890346
Theres Gravity Rush 2 and Bloodborne.
What else is there even thats exclusive to it?
6bc24a No.13890434
>>13890359
Persona 5, Last Guardian, SotC (unless it's coming out on PC too). While they are porting a lot of these to the PC, there are still some games worth a purchase.
Also is it worth it to start with gravity rush 1 THEN 2? I just picked 1 up today
1dd9a9 No.13890455
>>13890434
>Persona 5
On the PS3
>Last Guardian
Mediocre
>SoTC
Rerelease with no new content and worse art direction.
>there are still some games worth a purchase.
Not really no
>Is it worth it to play a franchise chronologically?
Do you have brain damage?
61a090 No.13890467
1dd9a9 No.13890474
61a090 No.13890485
>>13890474
how are you going to play 0 the remake and 6 on ps3
6bc24a No.13890499
>>13890455
>wanting to play a 10 hour game that's 2 entries long chronologically constitutes brain damage
>An exclusive isn't an exclusive if it doesn't appeal to me
1dd9a9 No.13890514
>>13890485
>how are you going to play 0?
By importing
>How are you going to play 6?
I'm not, but thats the only PS4 exclusive of the franchise and its quality is inferior to its predecessors.
>>13890499
>Should I play a franchise with two games where one was limited to Vita hardware and the other id expanded and not limited to said hardware?
The answer should be fucking obvious, but instead you choose to misinterpret my post.
1dd9a9 No.13890519
>>13890499
>An exclusive isn't an exclusive if it doesn't appeal
If we go by that metric PS4 is full of exclusive shovelware.
We're talking about system sellers here, at least thats what I presumed.
11d218 No.13890526
>>13890499
>Playing any game series in any order other than release order
That's brain damage.
71e5f9 No.13890532
1c3e83 No.13890539
>>13885947
>MS is a software company
How will nintoddlers ever recover?
4a645b No.13890643
>>13886124
>Sony dying is about as realistic as Nintendo dying.
They're losing hundreds of millions of dollars with every film they're producing. Spider-Man made back budget, excluding marketing, but Emoji Movie and Ghostbusters were meant to rake in cash and they flopped hard.
461f0d No.13892782
>>13890514
If you don't want to be misinterpreted, don't try so hard to come off as a smartass and give decent explanations, as opposed to a 5 word sentence
>>13890519
Games which people don't like here often are highly regarded by other people and sell decently. What I got from >>13890455 's dismissal of the last guardian is that it didn't matter if it's an exclusive because it's mediocre, despite it selling decently, and it reaching the requirements of his original post, (what exclusive games does the ps4 have)
ccb510 No.13895289
>>13890359
Uncharted 4, Resogun, Ratchet and Clank, Alienation, Horizon, GT Sport, Infamous: Second Son. Now kindly kill yourself.