/tech/ - Technology★

>>985598

that's a text game silly

>>985598

Close.

But your ironic post isn't the future of the internet it's more like 2005-present internet.

the globalists will try to ban encryption, and then after that, local storage

they'll probably fail though, i just hope not too many people will die

>>985596 (OP)

>What's the future of internet? Descentralized?

The internet is decentralized, by design. That was its entire raison d'être.

>>985598

learn 2 crosspost

>>>/hgg/263233

The future is: We're fucked.

>>986053

This is the absolute truth and there is nothing we can do to change that. They won, and we lost.

>>985756

>they'll probably fail though

The kikes never fail. They always win.

Google, Facebook and Cloudflare will act as a global ‘Great Firewall’ endorsed in secret by shadow governments, the EU and the UN.

‘Problematic’ and anonymous users will be silenced by unsolvable captchas.

<<986087

if the juice won why are other beverages still on the market?

>>986092

This is the saddest yet most realistic forecast made ITT, and anyone who believes otherwise is fooling themselves.

It's over. They won.

>>986092

>>986053

People like you are the heroes /tech/ needs. Bluepilled autists can get fucked. THe kikes won, deal with it.

>Descentralized

yes

>VPNs

no. fuck off

>Tor

current, not future. Tor is a bandaid for the web

>>986153

>tor is a bandaid for the web

Explain what your ideal system would look like

It's not a meshnet, because that's even less anonymous than the current version (at least your IP could belong to anyone with your ISP).

>Descentralized

The data points to the opposite direction. Most traffic goes through the big players, it should only get more and more centralized.

>>986161

you need onion routing no matter what. when the internet moves to something with anonymity by default, you'll be onion routing to everything and there wont be a concept of IP addresses or any similar identifier.

it will be like freenet for static content (IEEE or some other body already works on this, I can't remember) and i2p for interactive connections

>>986087

fuck off spamming nigger

>>986092

i could not complete any google captchas on any website for about 3 months, earlier this year

>>987325

That's what they do on 4chan.

>>987233

It's cute that you think that, but base numbers and trends dictate that the whole Internet will be a dictatorship led by Silicon Valley. There is nothing you can say or do to stop this. We already lost.

>>987240

This. One only need look at the trends and data to see that Google and Apple are winning, and our freedom-loving base will fade into nothingness. Forever.

I would like to see more islands in the internet sea. You connect to you and your friends VPN (not an anonymity proxy, but a real LAN-like VPN) and connect to eachothers services. I had hoped wireguard could encourage that, but it'll need a better windows implementation for that to happen.

>>987511

blackpill kike shoo

>>986147

nothing heroic about defeatism, coward.

To all the bluepilled autists who still foolishly have hope in decentralization, read this thread

>>988725

>>988725

>>988725

>>988725

>>988725

the next internet is going to be on the blockchain, every single website you visit you'll have to micropay to view.

>>985756

Ban encryption? In what universe would that happen, and how?

>>987251

The easiest way to have an anonymous internet is to have a logless ISP that cycles dynamic IPs

>>989004

>logless

Relying on someone else to not spy on you is technically the easiest way to not be spied on, but you know that's not what we are looking for

>>989328

They can open source it faggot.

Come up with an argument that can't be used for any anonymous network.

>>989344

>They can open source it faggot.

How are you going to verify that the code running on their servers is the same they are open sourcing? How do you know there's not other code running together and logging things?

How do you know the logging is not done at the kernel or even hardware level, effectively MITMing the open source code?

If you don't trust them on the "no logs" part, how can you trust them on any of those?

Keep in mind we are talking about an ISP, and the network would be anonymous only if they don't fuck up or sabotage it.