[–]▶ No.976171>>976175 >>976214 >>976257 >>976269 >>976272 >>976274 >>986158 >>986269 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/10148
Apparantly systemD isn't cucked enough. I thought they would have adopted this already, but they have not. Poeterring is not a big enough faggot for these people. SystemD is an unwelcoming place for the faggot or the cross dresser. Poeterring is a racist biggot and should be booted from the project.
▶ No.976173>>976204
Ruby's CoC is actually sane. I wound't care if they adopted that.
▶ No.976175>>976180 >>976186 >>976207 >>976216 >>976312
>>976171 (OP)
Ok, which one of you fuckers is larping as amandahnb to derail the SystemD development?
Half of the board would probably do 360 on CoC's and celebrate if SystemD gets fucked by one.
▶ No.976180>>976184
>>976175
Spotted the Poettering.
Doesn't this behavior prevent brilliant people to help on systemd? I think it's time for it to adopt the coc
▶ No.976184>>976190
>>976180
I think the issue is irrelevant in this case since noone brilliant works on systemdicks anyway.
▶ No.976186
>>976175
Systemd is already shitcode soe it wouldn't do anything for them to get a CoC
▶ No.976190
>>976184
The more reason to have one so it will signal that brilliant people is needed :^)
▶ No.976199
Kirbyfan64, made me laugh fucker
▶ No.976204
>>976173
Same for X11 (Xorg).
▶ No.976207>>976214 >>976216 >>976237
>>976175
>360
It's 180 you cockgobbler!
▶ No.976214>>986111
>>976171 (OP)
If Potteryring says "no", do we celebrate his decision or not?
>>976207
It's supposed to be a joke. But it's very stale, so you're right about him being a cockgobbler.
▶ No.976216>>976256
>>976175
>>976207
It's because when you see the CoC, you do a 360 and walk away.
▶ No.976237
>>976207
you have to go back
▶ No.976256
>>976216
It's moonwalk away, idiot.
▶ No.976257>>986268
>>976171 (OP)
systemd didn't already have a CoC from the beginning?
>as a non-binary
lol good luck using any modern CPU then
▶ No.976269>>976278
>>976171 (OP)
based lennart tbh
▶ No.976272
>>976171 (OP)
He litterally made the account to post that.
▶ No.976274
>>976171 (OP)
>Cancer grows another, smaller cancer
And? It's still cancer.
▶ No.976278
>>976269
inb4 lennart has more balls than linus does
▶ No.976287
>amandahnb
Where have I seen this name before?
▶ No.976312>>976333
>>976175
>Half of the board would probably do 360 on CoC's and celebrate if SystemD gets fucked by one
CoCs will always be weaponized marxist bullshit, a death stamp that trojan horse's your project with purple haired trannies, feminists, and niggers
but you never interfere when your enemy is making a mistake
▶ No.976331
Good. Fucking take it, please.
▶ No.976333
>>976312
loll
The irony is, if they spent more time writing code and less time opening every sentence with a list of identity issues this whole matter would never happen.
▶ No.976356
>RP as systemD devs and twitter raid CoC cunts
diversionary tactics are fun times
▶ No.976358>>986334
You know on the bright side, with Linux now being a dead man walking, it's nice to know systemD will now die too. With no host to feed upon, the parasite dies.
▶ No.976361
You know on the bright side, with DOS now being a dead man walking, it's nice to know Apple II will now die too. With no host to feed upon, the parasite dies.
▶ No.976362
You know on the bright side, with Jesus now being a dead man walking, it's nice to know the jewish will now die too. With no host to feed upon, the parasite dies.
▶ No.986001
▶ No.986104
Do not two negatives make a positive?
▶ No.986111>>986164
>>976214
>if Potteryring says "no", do we celebrate his decision or not?
ofc. it would be his first sane decision.
▶ No.986113
do i need to spell it out for (you)? BSD
▶ No.986121
Cancer is getting it's own cancer. Tickles my almonds activator.
▶ No.986145
I'm concerned. Concerned about COCs.
▶ No.986155
>systemD about to get CoC'd
what would the difference be?
▶ No.986158>>986174
>>976171 (OP)
https://github.com/amandahnb
That amandahnb has never contributed to a single project on GitHub and her account was made on the same day as that post.
▶ No.986164
>>986111
>Yay! I can't wait to use poettershit!
▶ No.986173
SystemCoC needs a huge CoC in the following languages:
Transanese
The Language of the Gay from Sinai
Old Faggish (An irish language from the medieval times)
Le Grand Fro-Frou (Faggish d'Occitaine)
El Conho duro (Espanol for fags)
Brazilerao Anal
Poortuguese for Fags
ItaliANO Gay
Arab for Transex
etc. etc.
▶ No.986174
>>986158
Are you fluently trspassing the limitations of the sex you were born into?
What is the matter about a new gay account on GibHut?
Are the sores of your anus bleeding?
Good goy, Butt-Hurt?
Aha.
▶ No.986177
2 minuses get a plus.
I'm ready to shill for every minority - based on jewish hackademia - to be included into SystemShit as a safe space.
Currently I'll be honoring the unprivileged:
Tree huggers, Dog Fuckers, Cat lickers, Plant Sodomizers, Humus Eaters, Mushroom passive anal tackers, Tennis ball vaginal smegma, GK Gloves fappers, Ham Fuckers, Egg Anal molesters, Le good ol' playboy in the toilet and what not.
I can't wait to troll the shit out of SystemPoetter.
▶ No.986185>>986189
What other init should I use? OpenRC?
▶ No.986189>>986265
>>986185
runit is a pretty good choice. So simple even a monkey can use it.
▶ No.986265
▶ No.986268
>>976257
cheeky bastard that made me laugh
▶ No.986269
>>976171 (OP)
>Deebly Goncernd
▶ No.986334
>>976358
Funny, but why did the bots get so scared and went after you?
▶ No.986338>>986343 >>986350 >>986352
Doesn't the GPL prohibit additional restrictive terms?
Does appending a writing stating, in a multitude of words, "you cannot contribute if you are not a feminist cunt, and we will hunt you down and have your livelyhood ruined if we deem you offensive", and requiring contributors to agree to said contract constitute such an additional restrictive term in practice?
▶ No.986343>>986345
>>986338
As far as I know, yes. Remember the shitstorm around some github project that tried to implement a clause for ICE to stop using that program? Would have made it non-free software.
If you don't really care though, you can do it. Would be a massive shitstorm though.
▶ No.986345
>>986343
Could we have a separate lawsuit against each and every one of the 40,000 free software projects that have adopted the anti-cock CoC, by contributors who have retained their (C) for copyright infringement?
▶ No.986350>>986352 >>986387
>>986338
>Doesn't the GPL prohibit additional restrictive terms?
it doesn't matter; only the user can violate the GPL, the developer can in no way invalidate their own license or be punished for not following it. The GPL is only for those who are not the owner of the copyright. It does not apply to the owner.
▶ No.986352>>986353
>>986338
>>986350
>Is the developer of a GPL-covered program bound by the GPL? Could the developer's actions ever be a violation of the GPL? (#DeveloperViolate)
<Strictly speaking, the GPL is a license from the developer for others to use, distribute and change the program. The developer itself is not bound by it, so no matter what the developer does, this is not a “violation” of the GPL.
<However, if the developer does something that would violate the GPL if done by someone else,
the developer will surely lose moral standing in the community.
▶ No.986353
▶ No.986361
▶ No.986387
>>986350
Ofcourse, but,
Most OSS projects are a patchwork of contributors each retaining their copyright, however.
Could the project, host, or whomever added the CoC be sued for copyright infringement regarding these new additional terms by one of the contributors?
▶ No.986406
why fix a problem that you created? or doesnt even exist yet?
its making everything more complicated than it is
cross that bridge when you actually need it otherwise nobody would get anything done
▶ No.988428
What Ruby has is actually good. I hope systemd gets the CoC and their whole ship sinks.