/tech/ - Technology★

Why should anyone use this instead of the Tox protocol from a security standpoint?

>>966420

Tox is written by cuckchanners and this is written by fullchanners.

>>966413 (OP)

>putting your work at botnet shithub service.

Good goy.

So it's like, uh... Synctube?

>>966413 (OP)

Where's the Code of Conduct? No place is safe without one. I recommend the Contributor Covenant, which was written by programmer, code witch, and 100% genuine woman Coraline Ada Ehmke.

https://www.contributor-covenant.org/

https://where.coraline.codes/

>>966484

This! OP as a proud non-binary transfat queer person of color, I don't feel safe using your program without a code of conduct!

Instead of the code of conduct use the code of merit.

>>966505

IMMPEEEEEEEAAAACHHHHH

>>966413 (OP)

So it's like shitcord but not botnet? If you want to make it more accessible you vould let people at least lurk as a guest without having to register, especially since that requires you to

RUN NONFREE GOOGLE SPYWARE AND TRAIN THEIR AI BOTNET FOR FREE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>966484

>>966495

>>966505

>>>/oven/ CoC is fpr faggots

>>966538

> All these newfag fedposting

You need to allow login first, otherwise you will get antifags infiltrating and logging everything, kikebag

>>966464

>cuckchan vs 8ch

Now normally I would agree with you. But that doesn't tell me the technical merits of OP's project. With tox you get P2P and E2E without a command and control server like with mumble/teamspeak. Along with being able to use your choice of crypto library at build time per implementation. It can be set to be entirely peer based in searching for chats so you don't need a internet connection, only a local network, to use it such as for a digital walkie talkie with phones why are you using phones you faggot? or with loudspeakers and microphones connected to a local intranet for *insert reason here*.

What are the technical merits of Op's project? Why should I give a fuck?

>>966413 (OP)

< Advertising software that has usernames and logins on a fucking *chan.

>>966551

>You need to allow login first, otherwise you will get antifags infiltrating and logging everything, kikebag

If you want logins, go to IRC or discord. The point of anonymity is that you can't prove who said shit. It doesn't matter if they log everything if they can't link anyone to what was said. That a raid was organized on Anonymous Service does not implicate anyone for it. If you need subtlety, go back to reddit. Anonymous is not subtle.

>>966521

6 more years

>>966551

yeah there's absolutely no advantage to everyone being anonymous just enter your email faggot, whats the worst that can happen

>>966413 (OP)

>using google captcha

neck yourself

>>966464

>Tox is written by cuckchanners and this is written by fullchanners.

What's the difference?

OP here, to answer some questions. I'm not familiar with Tox, it's probably cool but I'm making my own thing, which at least I like and use. It started as an anonymous chat based on localStorage only but it evolved to account based because it unlocked a lot more features, email and captcha verification is to 1) avoid somebody registering thousands of fake accounts 2) make the login email based so no need to remember username 3) being able to recover password.

>What are the technical merits of Op's project? Why should I give a fuck?

Only way to find out is trying it or checking the code I guess. I should make a video though.

>>966667

> Not knowing Matrix/Riot is a thing

> discord, a proprietary service

>>>/g/

>>966740

Tox is deprecated, us Matrix

>>966413 (OP)

Is it possible to cryptographically verify JavaScript code and download it separately, so in case of a server gets overrun by NSA people of color, my browser won't execute malicious scripts automatically?

If it can link externally hosted resources, that's a worst privacy issue that could be imagined.

Captcha can be hosted locally, no need for feeding the Google botnet.

You should also add anonymous chatroom functionality to be taken seriously here, faggot.

>>966659

>With tox you get P2P

<With tox you get DHT

>i don't want to use DHT

>without a command and control server like with mumble/teamspeak

<https://wiki.tox.chat/users/nodes

>With tox you get P2P

>>974958

Merkoba is jewish magick so what do you expect?

hello CIA nigger

>>974958

>Allowing JS

You best be using Tor, nigger.

Looking at it, I'm in.

>>967756

Do you mean luminescent CIA people of colour?

THANKS FOR COMING TO MY BIRTHDAY MADPROPS ILY

>>966464

Neat.

>>966420

>comparing a web-based collaborative shitposting LSD simulator to a distributed comms protocol

Anon, what the fuck are you talking about?

>>966413 (OP)

>chat program

>Hue

I assume you're Brazilian?

>>966704

>>>/cuckchan/