[–]▶ No.940374>>940385 >>941259 >>941322 >>941442 >>941448 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
>Ad cancer becomes a horribly intrusive problem all across the web
>Adblockers come along and completely cuck webowners out of ad revenue for committing such transgressions
>instead of changing their practices they double down and implement anti-adblock procedures, locking users out of certain features and in some cases outright banning people
>adblock users just write scrips and implement filters to block those too
WHEN WILL THEY LEARN??
Let's have a thread to talk about how to purge this horrid cancer from the web.
▶ No.940378>>940382 >>940413
I block ads using my router/unbound; you can also use uMatrix to dynamically block anything. I don't see the point of an adblocker when these two methods work better. In any case, you'd need to de-commercialize the web if you want ads gone; which is currently impossible.
▶ No.940382>>940390
>>940378
Is there no alternatives to the type of shit they run? You see so called "professional" websites plastered with the same borderline pornography clickbait ads as fucking pornhub.
I also find the We see you're using an adblocker and have disabled certain features of the site message pretty ironic considering that the popups and redirects made the website unusable in the first place.
That router blocking shit is cool too. I always learn something when I post here since I'm a nigger when it comes to tech.
▶ No.940385>>940387 >>940403 >>940412 >>940423 >>940461 >>940480 >>940509 >>940536 >>940555 >>940824 >>941146 >>941160 >>941238 >>941295 >>941319 >>941332 >>941442 >>942074 >>942094 >>942791 >>942801 >>942816 >>942836 >>943741 >>943758 >>944161 >>944165 >>944541 >>944626
>>940374 (OP)
Do you really want a web with no ads?
That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
Basically you would kill sites that make up 99% of web traffic and turn the web into what it was in 93.
Nobody wants that.
▶ No.940387>>940412
>>940385
Is this persiflage...? Most of the people here wouldn't mind the web being more like gopher.
▶ No.940390>>940412 >>940431 >>941260 >>941459
>>940382
>so called "professional" websites plastered with the same borderline pornography clickbait ads as fucking pornhub.
Yes, that is truly pathetic on their part. But, I generally know to avoid those sites -- if they serve ads like that, they're not worth your time. (Also, some people here don't use sites that require Javascript.)
>I also find the We see you're using an adblocker and have disabled certain features of the site message pretty ironic considering that the popups and redirects made the website unusable in the first place.
This is silly too. Most of the time they serve this "message" using Javascript; you can filter it with uMatrix.
>That router blocking shit is cool too. I always learn something when I post here since I'm a nigger when it comes to tech.
A simpler way is to use a hosts file (this doesn't work with every website, mind you). Here's someone that maintains a hosts file:
https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts
▶ No.940403>>940412 >>942794
>>940385
Just about everyone on /tech/ wants that. It just means normalfags who stick to the internet must use things like peertube/bitchute, IPFS, GNUsocial, and tox rather then centralized bullshit like everything you listed. Let it all burn.
▶ No.940412>>940416 >>942794 >>942799
>>940385
>>940387
>>940403
This. As long as encyclopedia and information services stay online through public and private academic institutions which they always have I probably wouldn't miss most of the web. Imageboards would just jump back to IRC. Online shopping would stay afloat due to them moving actual product for revenue. I could see Youtube surviving as an application considering its already very usable on smartTVs and streamboxes. Porn is a blight upon our collective psyche. Facebook's only use is as an extremely bloated virtual rolodex for which there are better alternatives already existing that don't depend on the web 2.0 model.
>>940390
Bro thanks.
▶ No.940413
>>940378
A element blocker like uBlock Origin is still useful though. For example some sites have annoying modals or banners, and you can just remove them with an element blocker.
▶ No.940416>>940419 >>940421 >>941442 >>942794 >>942799
>>940412
IRC doesn't have images. You would kill memes. It also doesn't have a thread model and so much else.
It doesn't require that much web 2.0 tech though so community versions probably survive, maybe even as standalone applications if people want the fancy pop-up stuff.
▶ No.940419>>940430
>>940416
You're saying all this as if people never hosted their small forums on their personal servers for free.
▶ No.940421
>>940416
>IRC doesn't have images.
What are hyperlinks
▶ No.940423
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
Good.
▶ No.940429>>940432 >>942074 >>942794
no ads = communism
communism = free software
▶ No.940430>>940447
>>940419
I wasn't really talking about he no adds part, but more the web in 93 part. Pretty much all image boards make use of JS and CSS and other web 2.0 crap.
▶ No.940431>>942794
>>940390
https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts
>fakenews filter
At least the guy gives us a choice.
▶ No.940432>>942794
>>940429
>if you've ever torrented anything, you're a communist
tired of this argument
▶ No.940447
>>940430
You don't need javascript to use centralized imageboards like 8ch. You do need CSS though or it looks like shit. There's always zeronet for p2p meme sharing in a imageboard like fashion.
▶ No.940461>>942794
>>940385
I'd ok with this. And actully I used to get tons of free porn from usenet in the mid 90's, even when all I had was a plain dialup shell account (so no web browsing except via Lynx). And since the ISP's news server was only a couple hops away at most, there wasn't any packet loss (provided your phone connection was good).
▶ No.940480
>>940385
The web was great before advertising. I absolutely want to go back.
▶ No.940509>>940512 >>940536 >>941116
>>940385
I want that. In the early days, pretty only smart people who had actual things to say had web sites. Scientists. Engineers. Doctors. Businessmen had no reason to be on it. They could barely operate computers by themselves.
So what if fagbook dies? Nobody gives a shit, it's useless. What good is it if all it does is connect you to your normie dumbass "friends" you already put up with IRL? Can you imagine how glorious a return to the early internet would be? A return to an expert's internet? Where you can actually learn new things just by talking to people?
People killed the internet. All these people. Fucking morons who don't deserve all the power the internet affords. All they did was attract the businessmen and their scummy businessman ways that corrupt everything. People used to make websites and pay for them out of pocket because they just wanted to get their ideas out there. Now it has to be "monetized" otherwise it won't hhappen at all? Whatever happened to intrinsic motivation?
▶ No.940512>>940525 >>942794
>>940509
>Now it has to be "monetized" otherwise it won't happen at all? Whatever happened to intrinsic motivation?
Too many people. You can't just pay out of pocket for this kind of crap anymore. Get even the slightest bit popular and suddenly you're paying $10,000 a month for bandwidth.
▶ No.940525>>940549 >>942794
>>940512
Not if you have a decent website and aren't sending 5mb worth of javashit down the pipe every time someone requests a webpage.
>put if you don't web 5.0 normalfags won't visit
Who needs them. Fuck normalfags, fuck google, fuck facebook, fuck web design past 1995
▶ No.940536
>>940385
>Do you really want a web with no ads?
Yes.
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
And that's bad ? I'll be happy when these disappears. Also porn sharing will always exist.
>Basically you would kill sites that make up 99% of web traffic and turn the web into what it was in 93.
Best times.
>Nobody wants that.
Almost all people on /tech/ want this cancer who generates botnet after botnet removed.
>>940509
THIS
▶ No.940547>>942918
ITT: The web becomes more accessible and LARPers get upset that they don't have an in-group that generates quality intellectual content.
▶ No.940549>>942077 >>942794
>>940525
What we need is a search engine that will still index these pages and not throw a tantrum because your site doesn't give a rats ass about Mobile shit. Neocities is also a great step at getting the old web back. Tons of shit on there, but there's some real good gems. We need to put an emphasis back on content we care about and not just flashy fucking bullshit, and fullscreen ads with dipshits drinking coffee in the background.
▶ No.940555
>>940385
Our internet is much better than it was +20 years ago. We'll get by on torrenting our porn.
▶ No.940570>>941092 >>941105
Businessman pays Websiteman to put ads for the toast he is selling; Websiteman use this money to do website things. To cover the cost of paying Websiteman, Businessman has to make toast more expensive. Normalman sees ad and buys expensive toast, paying both Businessman and Websiteman. So Normalman ends up paying anyway; internet is not free.
If Normalman pay website directly then Websiteman not need ads. Then Businessman not need to make toast expensive to pay ad so toast becomes cheaper! unless Businessman is asshole then he just gets more money himself.
Some people may say they never buy toast from website but that just means someone else is being cheated into paying for you when he buys his toast; better to be honest and ask him to pay for you.
▶ No.940824>>941136
>>940385
>no free porn sites
As long as hentai stays, I'm down with this.
▶ No.941017>>942794
The first web browser came with a WYSIWYG editor. So every normal non-technical person cold make up a static page and then host it ether at home, ISP servers or on geocities, yes there were even teenage girls on the internets back then. What corporations took from people is the way to express creativity and communicate in their own unique ways, they took people's freedom. First came web forums, as a web alternative to BBS, over-engineered piles of perl and php code, then "social networks" merged upon them, then came blogs like livejournal and blogger, web 2.0 seized the control from people's hands, then myspace that still allowed certain degree of creativity on personal profile pages, then facebook and social media websites alike.
Today it led to such a fucking pile of javascript mess and useless data traffic, that most people on the planet who access Internet over pocket 5-inch terminals by the way, so-called "smart"phones, over literal dial-up speeds and three-digit latencies, have the only left refuge in form of messaging apps where they communicate, read their news, download porn, get doctor's appointments, order pizza, a straight fall back to AOL and CompuServe types of walled garden service. All because modern web even when "mobile-optimized" is so messy and unintuitive to use, takes up too much traffic and consumes too much computing resources to render on battery-operated device.
And yet still web barely does it's intended purpose, what Doug Engelbart and Vannevar Bush wished it to be, Ted Nelson is seen as a old boomer freak somewhere near Terry Davis. The web came to be as glorified malware distribution network owned by 7 corporations instead of being an interplanetary knowledge base owned by people for the people.
▶ No.941092
>>940570
>If Normalman pay website directly then Websiteman not need ads
The big flaw in this is that Normalman will never know that Websiteman even exists.
▶ No.941105
>>940570
Websiteman should get a job or make some friends. That's how we paid for our servers before noseman stuck his schnoz into our little world and ruined everything for everybody.
▶ No.941116
>>940509
Facebook is pure fucking cancer but it's not used just to stay in contact with people locally. It's also used to set up community events and larger community shit. It's cancer and needs replacing but don't sell it short and then offer up a mini version of what makes it useful like it's an alternative.
▶ No.941136
>>940824
but not everyone's a loser like you anon
▶ No.941146
>>940385
>no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook
>kill sites that make up 99% of web traffic and turn the web into what it was in 93
I wish.
▶ No.941160
>>940385
>no google, no youtube, no free porn sites, no facebook
Not seeing the problem here.
▶ No.941238
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
>Basically you would kill sites that make up 99% of web traffic and turn the web into what it was in 93.
Sign me the fuck up.
▶ No.941259
>>940374 (OP)
>WHEN WILL THEY LEARN??
They're wondering the same thing, about people who block ads.
▶ No.941260>>941458
>>940390
>https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts
It seems like a pain in the ass to have to su every single time you want to unfuck a site when you can just make a site an exemption in ublock origin. Is there a simpler way to implement this hosts file?
▶ No.941279>>941343
If your web browser can display non-image ads, you only brought it upon yourself.
You made the bed now lay in it
▶ No.941295
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
sounds perfect to me
▶ No.941319
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
▶ No.941322
>>940374 (OP)
the web is and always was cancer. i don't even use adblock and it makes no difference since I have JS off. having JS on would be equally as cancer as whatever ads you're seeing with JS or like they were when flash was alive
▶ No.941332
>>940385
This gives me an interesting idea. What if we somehow accelerate this process. I don't know how but it would make for a much better internet. Less normalfags ruining our fun.
▶ No.941343
>>941279
My browser now displays text-only ads, because every second webmag article has to be a "sponsored material".
▶ No.941442>>942098
>>940416
Let modern "memes" die. Cancerous non-joke "postironic" meta-humor that are considered "fun" just because it was decided arbitrarily by some cabal of retards. Bring back the "in-jokes" that "memes" used to be, the "you had to be there"/"remember that thread?" factor. /fucko/ threads, for example, are better at being memes than shitty image macros shared among retards that are passed just because they "are memes" and that's it. Recurrent photos shared in an imageboard are acceptable just because they are recurrent, not necesarily "memes for the sake of being defined as memes", and in the end serve the same "ingroup" mechanic that /fucko/ threads do, for example.
So yeah, IDGAF about memes dying.
>>940385
Nice way of ensuring replies; it's obvious from the place this is that everyone would answer "fuck yes, I do".
>>940374 (OP)
I usually browse with light umatrix rules (no XHR, no frames, no cookies for first-party and no nothing but CSS and images for others) and noscript deactivated. If a site bothers me I go full shoah and turn on noscript, block scripts, etc. It usually works. Otherwise, just F12 and kill the overlays, enable scrolling, etc.
A way of purging I suppose is sending them angry letters/emails. Maybe pipebombs, but the legality of such act would be questionable, depending on where you live.
▶ No.941448
>>940374 (OP)
you see, with internet you have a possibility that might not have striken you yet.
Just like thematic pubs where you go and get exactly the type of thing you are looking for, internet can provide similar environment.
If you are pissed about ads, just use an blocker and do not visit sites that will block your blocker (what cuck point have we achived, america).
Filter your own habits...
▶ No.941458>>941459
>>941260
make a group called "hosts" and put yourself in it, then chown root:hosts /etc/hosts; chmod 0664 /etc/hosts and you're done (no need to use su/sudo anymore)
▶ No.941459>>941464 >>941474 >>941530
>>940390
>>941458
Using a host file for blocking sites is the wrong way to do it. The hosts file in that repository will leave you open to a DNS rebinding like attack. It's much better to have something like unbound for your dns resolver and have it pretend like those domains do not even exist.
▶ No.941464>>941468 >>941527
>>941459
Doesn't the hosts file override all external resolvers?
▶ No.941468>>941474 >>941530
>>941464
The problem is that it will resolve the bad address to 0.0.0.0 (on Linux this means it will try to connect to your machine). The correct way just makes it not resolve at all like the domain doesn't even exist.
▶ No.941474>>941530
>>941459
>>941468
I agree; here's a script:
(curl --silent https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/alternates/fakenews-gambling-porn-social/hosts | grep '^0\.0\.0\.0' | sort) | awk '{print "local-zone: \""$2"\" refuse"}' > hosts
Make sure to specify in your unbound.conf that you want to include this file.
▶ No.941527>>941530 >>941542
>>941464
Only if you tell it to use /etc/hosts by priority, like here:
tmp> cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1
lookup file bind
The hosts file blocking method works, but you have to list every single hostname you want block (and sites like google have tons of them). But with DNS you can just outright block an entire domain (and all its subdomains) with one entry.
▶ No.941530>>941531
>>941527
>>941474
>>941468
>>941459
So something like pi-hole would be much more effective than using a hosts file?
▶ No.941531
>>941530
Yes. Personally I just run the recursive dns resolver on the machine I'm using itself.
▶ No.941542
>>941527
>But with DNS you can just outright block an entire domain (and all its subdomains) with one entry.
Can you do this with the (Linux) version of unbound? On OpenBSD the following works:
local-zone: "google.com." refuse
What allowed me to block every subdomain was the period after ".com" -- but it doesn't work that way on Linux.
▶ No.942074>>942794 >>942820 >>942821
I'm not up to date on the state of anti-anti-adblock measures on Pale Meme, but for anyone else sticking it out that can't figure it out on their own here are some tips:
>For sites that don't rewrite the whole damn page and just show a popup, use the Inspector and delete the nodes of the popup and translucent background preventing you from viewing the page.
Alternatively, use an extension that lets you do it right from the context menu like Nuke Everything or whatever.
>Some sites use CSS animations, so you could try disabling those with a user css or Stylish-type extension or whatever, or you could block the CSS altogether with your adblocker or uMatrix but the website might become hard to read.
>Try blocking some XML requests
Sometimes the anti-adblock relies on it, and you will refresh and be able to stay on the page indefinitely with no popup.
>Open the Network developer tool and filter HTML only, refresh and select the first HTML page to come up, then click preview and expand the toolbar vertically to the top of the browser and the preview pane left as wide as you wish to make it, and have fun.
uMatrix will still block shit, no ads, and the page will stay static - no anti-adblock. :^) I do this as a last resort on sites that require everything enabled but that I still refuse to allow ads on, like a certain popular warez website.
Other information is welcome. It's lonely here in furfag land with everybody switching to webextensions.
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
Stop teasing, I've already given up hope. Jewgle, Faceberg, and porn kikes will be here until the end of the internet.
>>940429
>communism = free software
Fuck off kike, nobody's falling for your shit. The only way to keep shit free forever is with an authoritarian license like the GPL that ensures that the users' freedoms are not taken away by jews stealing the source code, improving it with the labor of mostly pajeet wageslaves, and closing the source and selling licenses for normalfag shekels. It's only sweet irony or necessity that the idea of the GPL was invented by a liberal jew (redundant), to stop other jews from acting like jews. The kikes will infest free software projects regardless, as we've seen, but at least the code will remain free if anyone bothers to enforce the license.
I like permissive licenses, I really do, but it fails to protect people for the same reasons libertarianism does. It's begging to be subverted by jews. If there were no jews, there would almost assuredly not be (as much of) a problem with these licenses, but to pretend there's nothing wrong with them is burying your head in the sand. It encourages foul play, and I blame the license for not preventing it, even if the kikes are the real problem.
▶ No.942077>>942803 >>942883
>>940549
So should someone modify a searx instance only to list web 1.0 / no JS sites ?
Sound like quite a pain to do, but could become quite interesting.
▶ No.942094
>>940385
>That means no Google, no Youtube, no free porn sites, no Facebook.
I want this. No Google, no problem. For YouTube, I always wanted a real peer to peer video catalog program, not a webapp. I don't watch porn and fuck Facebook.
▶ No.942098
>>941442
>Nice way of ensuring replies
How does he know?!
▶ No.942791
>>940385
I already have a web with no ads with umatrix, ublock, and violentmonkey running anti anti adblock scripts, haven't seen one for nearly 10 years.
▶ No.942793>>942794
What are you proposing as an alternative then?
Cryptominers seems to be the second best option. Piratebay adopts it, I have seen it in many other places that couldn't turn a profit otherwise. But then you still get entitled niggers like OP who have some sort of distorted vision of the world that somehow webhosting is free of costs because we are living in the communist utopia.
Another alternative I can think of is datamining users and selling that data. This works discord, at least for now but then you will make another thread calling discord a malware, a botnet and so on so forth, without actually offering an alternative to their business model. Would you pay for discord if they adopted end-to-end encryption across their clients (like whatsapp) and open-sourced their shit? Of course not. You would just fork the code, made an autistic alternative to discord that nobody would use. You wouldn't need to worry about the costs though, you would never exceed your usage beyond a bottom-of-the-barrel VPS, in absence of a userbase that is.
So I'm asking again OP, what is your solution to this problem?
▶ No.942794>>942799 >>942804
>>940403
And they will revolt against you, which is the main issue. You have to guide the sheeple first.
>>940412
>Imageboards would just jump back to IRC
Or matrix, XMPP or one of those cryptocurrency storage solutions
>>940416
There are replacements, calm down.
>>940429
>>940432
Ads = Jewry, Jewry = Enslavement
>>940431
>fake news
Now filter the MSM and other kike sites.
>>940461
IPFS hentai when? (for the rest of you faggots)
>>940512
Learn to optimize the site and decentralize the load
>>940525
Sheeples are the only reason why you freetards are not getting things done while /pol/ does.
>>940549
Neocities are weak, I would rather have a type of Tumblr (again for the fags) that are optimized such that it is light while the poz does not bat an eye while migrating.
>>941017
Kids want webgames, so you can't "kill it all", but still I would rather want gameJS to splinter off so that the rest have a lighter experience.
>>942074
>The only way to keep shit free forever is with an authoritarian license like the GPL that ensures that the users' freedoms are not taken away by jews stealing the source code
Mr. Hans, should we start getting the gas for these summerfags?
>>942793
Cryptominers, IPFS/Sia/Maidsafe/Steemit/Joystream, subscription services, academic sites, ANYTHING that is outside jewish control
▶ No.942799>>942814 >>942877
▶ No.942801
>>940385
Oh yes. Please please please. I want web to go back to 1.0 days. So that all the faggotry can die and you can still browse net on snail speed.
▶ No.942803
>>942077
This. We need this so much. I would totally use it to search things.
▶ No.942804>>942812
>>942794
>>The only way to keep shit free forever is with an authoritarian license like the GPL that ensures that the users' freedoms are not taken away by jews stealing the source code
>Mr. Hans, should we start getting the gas for these summerfags?
He is not entirely wrong. I think there are two kind of programs. Stand-alone programs which you use privately. For these GPL does not matter and may hinder freely adaptation by other projects. The other one is social programs, i.e. chat platforms, email etc. Here you want to keep your userbase and stop corporates from luring them out. So you must protect your code and use GPL.
▶ No.942812
>>942804
That is why I want the GPL to be more fash in the first place. anti-GPL on one hand is kikery, on the other we have antifa
▶ No.942814>>942818
>>942799
Okay, but Matrix and Pawoo > Rocket and Mastodon > Mattermost and GNUSocial
▶ No.942816
>>940385
nothing that matters relies on ads. anyway i haven't used an adblocker for 10 years but still haven't noticed any ads in that time because JS is turned off
▶ No.942818>>942828
>>942814
literally who > literally who > literally who
▶ No.942820
>>942074
how to disable ads on palememe:
>about:config
>javascript.disabled;0
▶ No.942821>>943782
>>942074
how to disable ads on palememe:
>about:config
>javascript.enabled;0
▶ No.942828>>942840
>>942818
>Never heard of all these FOSS projects
▶ No.942836
>>940385
We all want that. You have to go back.
▶ No.942840
>>942828
>post-snowden kneejerk reaction as a project matters
▶ No.942877
>>942799
Single server, open source alternative to Slack, good for one team, as collaboration software, but not as decentralized email-esque end-to end asymmetrically encrypted system what XMPP is where you can write anyone from anywhere without using a manufacturer-provided chrome-based [s]browser[/s] client.
▶ No.942883
>>942077
Probably don't need that, since simple catalog would be sufficient
http://www.404pagefound.com/
▶ No.942918
>>940547
>t. zuckerburg cuck
Oh no, a man that thinks all his users are, and I quote “dumb fucks” won’t be able to violate the privacy of billions
▶ No.943263>>943303 >>943326 >>943336 >>944323
They learned and blocked all adblocks completely out of android.
>DUDE root the phone! (lose updates, stability, warranty)
No thanx. Native android adblock when? It's 2018..
▶ No.943303>>943306
>>943263
>smartphones
I hope you like sucking Stalin's big fat cock.
▶ No.943306>>943311
>>943303
>nothing personel kid
▶ No.943311
>>943306
t. Uses Stalin's dream
▶ No.943326
>>943263
>updates
Can still get them and can install any OS you want
>stability
Implying rooted phones aren't stable
>warranty
Who cares.
Go back to /g/ faggot.
▶ No.943336
>>943263
>needing a warranty after the first month of ownership
lmao fag
▶ No.943726
▶ No.943741
>>940385
Oh no, what would we every do!!
▶ No.943782>>944163
>>942821
I already have ads disabled. Blocking adblock blockers also requires more than just blocking js, you dense faggot.
▶ No.944161>>944163
>>940385
Nigger are you lost?
▶ No.944163>>944441
>>943782
How the fuck are you finding adblock blocker enabled sites. I do not find such sites in my browsing. I think they are not so common. Can you list some examples?
Which brings the second question. Why the fuck are you still browsing those sites? If I see some site telling me to turn off adblockers, I would instantly put that shit to umatrix block list and never visit (or will be able to visit) that again.
>>944161
No looks like a homo from reddit tbh.
▶ No.944165
>>940385
>Basically you would kill sites that make up 99% of web traffic and turn the web into what it was in 93.
Sounds good.
▶ No.944323
>>943263
>Set VPN between the phone and home
>DNS adblocker at home network
bg 2ez
▶ No.944327>>944356
I recently switched computers and forgot to install ublock. Turns out it's not as bad as I remember it. I surf without adblock now.
▶ No.944356>>944358
>>944327
enjoy getting your shit tracked. There's not even a real downside to using an adblocker.
▶ No.944358
>>944356
How will a domain track you if it can't resolve to your machine?
▶ No.944441
>>944163
To prevent search engine indexing: d a r k u m b r a
Sometimes you are looking for something, and your heart is set on it, but you can't find something anywhere else but the cancerous side of the internet. I agree that warez forums that force you to "sign up to see this content" or "like this post" are cancer. Sometimes what you're looking for is important enough that you just deal with it. I thankfully don't come across adblock blockers very often. I don't remember any others, they were one and dones.
▶ No.944541
>>940385
>turn the web into what it was in 93
>Nobody wants that.
TAKE ME BACK SENPAI
▶ No.944626
>>940385
>anything of this happening
>bad