/tech/ - Technology★

Get your degenerate ass out of here.

The problem is the restriction that are enabled with shit excuses, not the excuses themselves.

Let your kids get fuck in the ass with your third sexual revolution.

>Nudity ML, it's possible to determine what a girl looks like nude using ML

Meh.

Unless it can accurately determine how her vulva looks like (things like innie or outie) I'm not interested, I can imagine a girl naked just fine that's no big deal but actually knowing for sure how each part of her anatomy looks like is what really matters.

>Voice deepfakes

>Nudity ML

I won't call it censorship, but it's certainly held back by the companies making those claims not sharing their data sets. We have all those cool machine learning algorithms right now but no way to reproduce results because they all require expansive and expensive data sets to train.

>pop tech thread

no thanks

>>932294 (OP)

>muh celebs muh celebs muh celebs

Why would anyone want to see a celeb naked?

They're all ugly bimbofied kikes.

>>932300

>>932304

>>932334

What about using deepfakes to fuck with the kikes? Like defamation but for lulz?

>3DPD

>>>/g/

>>932294 (OP)

>Nudity ML

No. You can't just create data where there is nothing. Sure, you could get a basic outline, but you'd still need something along the lines of an x-ray or IR system to see beneath the clothes.

>>932390

This. Isn't the primary audience for such tech normalfags eroding the credibility of cellphone nudes from Stacy classmates?

>>932294 (OP)

The third sexual revolution will be sexbots and artificial wombs making females outdated.

This is just porn. Of celebrities who frequently wear so little they may as well be starring in a porno to start with. Utterly pointless until I can take a picture of the neighbor's 18 year old daughter and the computer spits out a movie featuring her by next morning.

It'll probably still be censored by way of government licenses and proprietary tech ensuring that only the (((correct))) people can make a buck off it.

>>932588

>the neighbor's 18 year old daughter and the computer spits out a movie featuring her by next morning.

C'mon anon, no need to impose artificial restrictions on yourself :^)

>3DPD

But why?

>celebs

>>>/tmz/

>>932599

No, use it to fuck with (((the people who fears us)))

>>932304

Actually, what turns me on is the fact the actual woman is in the room. Some copy wouldn't make my dick as hard, just like sexbots wouldn't be anything but a masturbatory toy. I NEED to know the actual woman is here in the room debasing herself in sex.

>>936961

>>936945

You degenerates are missing the point. BLACKMAILING

>>932294 (OP)

fuck the fuck off back to >>>/g/

deepfakes was utter shit and a prime example of how normalfags believe AI is super advanced now but it's actually still shit. i hope you're trolling

>>932414

defamation doesn't actually have anything to do with kikes. you are probably a Markoff Chain and are confused because you saw the word "defamation" used together with the "anti defamation league" and jewish interests. but actually defamation is a general concept.

>>936980

You have no balls in using it for /pol/ means. Weak.

>>936981

I know what defaming means, if we are making fake videos it IS defamation, I just want to target the powers that be.

>>937128

How would that work?

>>932294 (OP)

We have a technology that could be used to create false video evidence of anyone, giving it unprecedented potential for abuse, and all you can think of is celebrity porn?

Deepfakes are literally rape and their creators should be jailed.

>>937366

The abuse can be used in out favor, bro

>>937375

>>>/tumblr/

>>>/oven/

>not using deepfake tech and a chat AI to make your waifu real

are you a fucking faggot