/tech/ - Technology★

>>908243 (OP)

He was probably a nazi. Good riddence.

http://archive.li/YnvcL

http://archive.li/IK1Hq

LLVM's new code of conduct: https://archive.li/XnF2y

Hmmm:

<We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not limited to members of any race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, colour, immigration status, social and economic class, educational level, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, age, size, family status, political belief, religion or lack thereof, and mental and physical ability.

>>908259

>mental and physical ability

Oh, so they are going to let shitty code written by sub 60 IQ down syndrome tards get merged in?

TOXIC ENVIRONMENT ALERT

gcc produces better code for a lot of programs anyway. and gcc 8 seems really promising since it fixes graphite and enhances PGO.

Actual question but sage when replying.

Would our politically incorrect board participants be fine with minorities working on the open source projects like this, granted they have been accepted to the project after going through objective set of metrics for programming skills? Be honest.

>>908280

Nah nah. Don't dodge the question. You very well know what I am actually asking.

>>908282

>what I am actually asking

He very well answered you. If you 'actually' have a different question to ask, be explicit. Or GTFO of """our""" board.

>>908279

>accepted to the project after going through objective set of metrics for programming skills

Why would this be necessary? Niggers, cunts, faggots and trannies should shut up and code. If their code is good, it will be merged. If it's not, it won't. You know, you don't have to submit to a race/gender/sexual orientation test before submitting a PR on github, right? Nobody has to know anything personal about you. Pick a gender-neutral handle and don't use a photo as your avatar.

It's SJWs who wanted to make tech about race and gender and sexuality. Not the people who manage open source projects.

>>908286

I was explicit about my question. Go back to school if you can't read.

>>908287

>Why would this be necessary?

To satisfy our right leaning friends of course.

>Niggers, cunts, faggots and trannies should shut up and code.

This kind of additude is the reason why they are so violent about their case, you know that?

>If their code is good, it will be merged. If it's not, it won't.

Exactly.

>Nobody has to know anything personal about you. Pick a gender-neutral handle and don't use a photo as your avatar.

Maybe they want to be credited for their accomplishments. Some programmers use GitHub to inflate their CV.

>It's SJWs who wanted to make tech about race and gender and sexuality. Not the people who manage open source projects.

Actually, it was the Christians who made it about gender and sexuality. Burning homosexuals alive because some ancient book told you would get you many enemies. You shouldn't be absolutely shocked about that.

>>908291

>Actually, it was the Christians who made it about gender and sexuality.

This would be a relevant comment if all open source project managers were Christians. But they're not, so it isn't.

>>908291

Equality of Opportunity =/ Equality of Outcome. Whatever happened to "judge not by the color of ones skin, but by the content of their character"? By your logic, I guess minorites are lacking character then...therefore lets round up whoever we can find and prop them up as if they earned it.

I don't know who de Espindola is but I wish more people would, like him, have the courage to speak up, to express his opposition openly and refuse to bow down and silently acquiesce. This is fundamental. This is how the SJW racket (or any other, we know more than one) is disarmed, by having widespread outspoken opposition.

Kudos to him.

>sjw process.jpg

>>908279

No. If they are so qualified to code, code in their own countries, in their own companies.

This is a matter that diverse environments, be them at the workplace or at the streets, is a major contributor to social instability and depreciation, prevents the native population to get jobs and housing, as they also prevent wages from rising due to surplus of labor, and actually, they influence the place in ways other than with their work, such as with political activism, or breaking down cultural norms (loud islmaic praying during the day). These people may also bring family, or send money out of the country to them, which is a huge problem today.

https://www.vdare.com/articles/colonization-by-indian-leftists-the-downside-of-merit-based-immigration

>>908296

>Equality of Opportunity =/ Equality of Outcome.

Never claimed otherwise.

>By your logic, I guess minorites are lacking character then...therefore lets round up whoever we can find and prop them up as if they earned it.

Sure, if they do something wrong they should be punished. I guess you are talking about Muslims in this context. Yes, people who violate other people's freedoms should be propped up on sight. This doesn't discriminate between religions, races or sexual orientation.

Defending your own freedom in presence of an adversary is another case. Don't expect minorites or LGBT people to stand still while their freedoms are being dismantled.

>>908306

Minorities and LGBT people can self-destruct themselves, no one cares.

Stop LARPing as well.

>>908315

Yep, this is what I was looking for. Your issue is not with equality of outcome but rather with equality of oppurtunity. Basically you are just preaching shit you hear from other people and contributing nothing to these arguments, as well as just giving up on your moral high ground. Godspeed.

>>908312

>working on a compiler is "saturating the market"

you're a moron

>>908312

The current system is designed to overcome cases you are talking about. If the minorities is the issue then the companies who don't employ them will ultimately stump on the ones who do, and therefore solving the problem. You are talking in favor of protectionist economies, a dangeous territory indeed.

>>908279

Yes. It's not like the code is a faggot just because the coder is.

Using actual identities on the Internet is cancer anyway. Nobody should know if you're white, brown, trans whatever when it comes to online projects, anything else is just attention whoring.

>>908327

Not at all, take the No as an answer already, diversity is a bad measure for every single economic and social outcome.

>>908330

>take the no as an answer

Why would I. We are just arguing (in good faith) about diversity in tech. You shouldn't be that bothered if we are exchanging opinions free of identities, being Anonymous and all that.

>>908329

This. What is it about identities that turns people into butthurt faggots?

>>908340

That's why you're dumb, you don't know shit, your brain works on feelings.

>>908321

>>908325

>>908328

>>908337

These pictures you have grabbed from /pol/ has nothing to with being qualified to code.

Many mentally ill people actually contribute to science because they have disconnected from their surroundings and get interested in scientific topics instead.

The first computer programmer was a female. The difference between her and the current diversity inclusions stems from the fact that current diversity inclusions are being FORCED into their positions and naturally perform worse. Our inial disagreement here doesn't revolve around feminism, it revolves around outright rejecting people based on their labels, not their actual skills. This also applies to races and different sexual orientations.

>>908341

Again, capitalism should solve it. The process it automatic, why would you go so protectionist about a system that is self healing is beyond me.

>>908345

It's not about capitalism solving anything or being protectionist about anything.

It's about destroying an industry for no reason at all, your arguments are based on inclusion by feelings, even if said person is qualified, they bring with them a massive package of problems and deterioration, intentional or not.

In short, diversity is a workplace destroyer, as it is also a destroyer of other things.

Look at what diversity did to the comic book industry, or movie industries.

Aren't those people *competent*? Of course, they can animate and draw leagues better than myself and most of people, but their sheer idendity and mindset are enough to destroy the industry and render it useless.

>>908346

I'm beating myself over how to express that I'm not defending disqualified or uncooperate people or I am not defending a SJW point of view, and everything I tried so far seems to be failing. There is a mental bar on your head and I'm not going to spare effort to break it anymore. Please read back on my posts and reply again.

>>908348

>It's not about capitalism solving anything or being protectionist about anything.

It's all about that. You are not trying to isolate certain groups of people entirely based on feelings, aren't you?

>your arguments are based on inclusion by feelings

My arguments are based on inclusion by skills and facts. Yours seems to be based on hearsay from /pol/, personal feelings and constantly moving goalposts.

>>908351

Then don't buy it. I remember some comic was canceled because some incompetent diversity hire was behind it. See, the system works after all. The incompetent ones will still be outbeaten by sheer competition. If the comics you are talking about is really bad, people should stop buying them and therefore healing the system once again.

Look at direct examples here in the tech industry, we have dozens of projects who got completely ruined by those people, and they can code very well.

This doesn't prevent them from being pieces of shit.

>Muh! But what if they aren't?

This is not an argument because we're dealing with distribution curves here, so, even if there were outliers, their weight wouldn't outweight the normalcy of crap, completely justifying them discrimination against them. Actually, that's how stereotypes are born, and intelligent people are often more prejudiced of others because they can make these inferences.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28726438

>>908345

>The first computer programmer was a female

No it wasn't.If you want to appear "cs-savvy" you should really avoid Ada Lovelace,Grace Hopper and all the other first females your gender studies professor talked about.

>>908357

No, you see, I understand your point, but I just don't care because you're completely wrong.

The market will not correct the mistakes without a price being paid, can't you see that? Things have to implode to self-correct, companies have to go bust, jobs have to be lost, knowledge have to be lost.

Are you willing to self-correct after becoming Brazil or India? After loosing everything?

You see, you can just outright prevent this from happening in the first place.

Also, the free market is a myth, things wouldn't self-correct as much as you predict because oligopolies would form from the last ones standing because every single small business would bust first, the situation would reverse to the losing of economic freedom.

This is exactly what happened in Iceland's Private Society, if you're wondering.

Get out of your dream world.

>>908363

Hell, would you even be able to self-correct after becoming Brazil or India? This would represent a massive lost of economic and technological advancement in the competitive market, you could even regress to African levels if you couldn't stop the downward spiral.

You would have to basically retort to slave labour again after losing so much competitivety, just like India and China before - and remember, this time, they wouldn't be as nice to us as we were to them, the market wouldn't be isolated and utopian as in libertarian textbooks and the powers that would replace us would just make exploration colonies out of us, instead of allowing to us the same competitive edge we gave to them.

This is absolutely naive, completely idootic and economically suicidal.

>>908363

>>908364

Then we will learn from our mistakes, if we make any. The current system has been built by exchanging goods and knowledge from less developed parts of the world and it has come to a point where we can also import talent from these countries. If the system completely falls down, more competent people will take control of it from then on, not budging an inch from the current system. I imagine people were desperate when the Library of Alexandria has been burned down, and look where we are now. Then later on, the Greeks have completely failed as a nation, right from their philosophical and technological high ground. Current system has awarded the USA the crown of technological competence and knowledge. Maybe some European country will get it next time but assuming we are going to remain in our current position forever seems too naive. In the current fashion, Chinese will outcompete the West by the middle of this century. The competition is the most critical thing we need right now.

Let's count the number of projects that are changed due to CoCs

LLVM moving to the new project

Firefox moving to Brave

Libreboot moving to LibreCore/Coreboot

FreeBSD moving to other BSD forks

Name some more

>>908371

So, you would rather live in Venezuela than preventing it from happening in the first place? Also, no, as I said above, the contribution "those" people would bring are far outnumbered by their downsides.

You see, you're blinded. You're no different than a Commie Antifa, you would rather shut down logic and die an agonizing, painful and slow death than to abandon a wrong social science perspective (your economic views, if you're not aware).

If you only knew some history or actual economics, you wouldn't be so much of a puppet.

>So, you would rather live in Venezuela than preventing it from happening in the first place?

I'm saying we can't prevent it in the current system. America won't be policing the world selling iPhones to Indians forever. It will inevitably fall down and another country will replace it. Which country will it be entirely depends on our approach to the current situation.

>You see, you're blinded. You're no different than a Commie Antifa, you would rather shut down logic and die an agonizing, painful and slow death than to abandon a wrong social science perspective (your economic views, if you're not aware).

This is just pure emotional outcry. Recommend some books to "correct" my views instead of spouting bullshit.

>If you only knew some history or actual economics, you wouldn't be so much of a puppet.

>puppet

Oh only if you knew.

>>908375

>I'm saying we can't prevent it in the current system. America won't be policing the world selling iPhones to Indians forever. It will inevitably fall down and another country will replace it. Which country will it be entirely depends on our approach to the current situation.

You can. You would have to violate the NAP though, maybe that's why you don't see it.

>This is just pure emotional outcry.

Not at all, because you're unware of yourself, someone had to say it to you.

>Recommend some books to "correct" my views instead of spouting bullshit.

Web of Debt by Ellen Brown (1)

The Public Bank Solution by Ellen Brown (2)

The Lost Science of Money by Stephen Zarlenga

These books used to be must read to everyone on 8chan apart from leftist idiots, but then after the election the sheer amount of retards was too big to redpill properly. Now we have this broken site situation, full of people like you, who fell from the sky out of shit like reddit, 4chan and youtube after watching muh Thomas Sowell and Milton Freedman, thinking of yourself as a master economist.

>Oh only if you knew.

That's my line. You acting smug while in ignorance just reinforces my view that you're just too lost.

>>908328

>>908328

An Atlantic article? Really??

>>908243 (OP)

I don't usually condone violence but the reactionary movement against feminism needs to be put down brutally.

>>908378

>You can. You would have to violate the NAP though, maybe that's why you don't see it.

Maybe I didn't pay too much attention to the history class, I don't know, but I'm not aware of any country that is seemingly immortal to the everchanging nature of our world. Many thousands of them fallen and became the foundation of current ones.

>Not at all, because you're unware of yourself, someone had to say it to you.

T-thanks I guess?

>Web of Debt by Ellen Brown (1)

>The Public Bank Solution by Ellen Brown (2)

>The Lost Science of Money by Stephen Zarlenga

Will check them out.

>These books used to be must read to everyone on 8chan apart from leftist idiots, but then after the election the sheer amount of retards was too big to redpill properly.

The nature of imageboards are everchanging. 4chan started as a leftist hate machine and became the rightist cancer it is now.

>Now we have this broken site situation, full of people like you, who fell from the sky out of shit like reddit, 4chan and youtube after watching muh Thomas Sowell and Milton Freedman, thinking of yourself as a master economist.

Cry me a river. I never claimed to be the master economist and actually asked you to recommend some books.

>That's my line. You acting smug while in ignorance just reinforces my view that you're just too lost.

Maybe I am, maybe not. But I will actually read up on the books you have recommended and ultimately decide on what to believe and what to oppose. I recommend you to pay a visit to /leftypol/ (I am only saying this because it seems you are at the opposite end of their belief) and read their library as well, well, assuming you are open minded enough to do that.

>>908382

This one just describes what is being taught. So, in fact, is a good save because this are actual and real guidelines.

>>908384

>Open minded enough to do that

My journey was Communist (shitty professors guilty triping) > Conservative > Libertarian > NatSoc > Monarchist.

I've read it all, I've been here for years, and in other places for much longer.

>>908388

wow how lame

for me, libertarian > ancap > ansoc > sjw > liberal > reactionary > mild conservative > hateful murderous racist

>>908391

At some point though you have to acknowledge when you're just a puppet of people who invent trends

>>908279

Nobody fucking cares who you are, just as on this site. The fact that you don't understand that, and even the way you worded this reply, leads me to direct you back where you came from:

>>>reddit.com

>>908277

Unfortunately GCC only has frontends for harmful/shit languages. (except for D. D is kind of good)

>>908279

i don't care even if they didn't, i just think the white dykes who don't even represent them should stop trolling and fucking with people.

>>908372

>Firefox moving to Brave

lolwut

>>908397

why don't you go and write a frontend yourself, rustfag.

>>908243 (OP)

This is great news! Soon it will be dead then they can hire us as consultants!

Everybody wins!!!!!!!!!!

>>908279

Can you code?

>>908329

Damn straight.

Reading this whole thread, it looks as if the forces of fuckwittedness are aiming to make a beachhead here on 8chan.

Good fucking luck.

>>908243 (OP)

>ignore politics in /tech/ they said

>it will go away they said

>it doesn't affect projects they said

>>908291

>This kind of additude is the reason why they are so violent about their case, you know that?

<telling people to ignore race, gender, religion, culture, etc. and treat everyone's work the same makes them violent

It's like SJWs are the actual bigots. Really makes you think.

>>908260

yes

>>908457

>X is/are the real (bigot|(rac|sex|able)ist|(xeno|trans|homo)phobe|nazi|fascist)s amirite!

Although it's factually correct it's not a good argument. Most people are racist and sexist; it's just a matter of which sex or races they are biased in favour of. You appear to not have escaped the jewish conditioning that that stuff is somehow "bad".

>>908467

>http://textfiles.com/hacking/hacker

This is pretty cringe, tbh desu.

>>908472

most "manifestos" are written by a retarded namefag who thinks he's incredibly important and will be remembered as a great hero.

>>908467

>1986 was 2^5 years ago

>>908345

>The first computer programmer was a female.

https://youtu.be/j9Yn3i-DMKw?t=9m19s

>>908502

>The only affected party here is me goy!

>but goy, don't think of everyone who'll waste their hard earned shekels on a trannyfaggot!

WEW

>https://lobste.rs/s/nf3xgg/i_am_leaving_llvm#c_pwiove

Don't miss semen guzzling faggot pushcx appealing for "politeness" while fires burn in projects infiltrated by racist nigger commies imposing retarded cocs and racism against whites.

>https://lobste.rs/s/nf3xgg/i_am_leaving_llvm#c_gmftz7

Also the insecure dirty brown thing JordiGH

>It just means you don’t have those problems in addition to also being discriminated for being a woman, for being black, for being anything else.

Oh the irony out of insecure darkies.

GOOD NEWS

>https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/122922.html

Replies to that tell me enough ebil white males that built this fucking industry have had enough of being called privileged and racist for bringing tech to the niggerbrain darkies using it to whine. It's war time now and the faggot leftists that attempted to take over tech have lost, we're taking it back.

>>908260

>>908462

This. Niggerbrain shit code impending.

>>908279

NOONE, MEANING WHITES AND KIKES, EVER ASKED ABOUT RACE ONLINE YOU FUCKING NIGGERS STARTED MAKING IT SOMETHING THAT MATTERS IN 2008 WITH NIGGERBAMA GOT ELECTED

>>908291

>Actually

<faggot target locked

>it was the Christians who made it about gender and sexuality

>Burning homosexuals alive

Something something thousand years ago. And fuck them for not doing it to this day. You degenerate sodomites eat fucking feces, you should be burned alive nigger.

>>908358

Autistic shut-ins fapping to neo-nazi maymays and whining about their animu waifus being not real lug around some hefty baggage as well. Can't express their ideas clearly and succinctly enough, can't properly function in an office environment (in any kind of social circle, really), just plain unpleasant company in general. No half-measures, then, all substandards should be purged without discrimination.

>>908358

>counterstereotype training

This phrase is spine-chilling.

>>908658

>whining about their animu waifus being not real

If they were real, they would be 3DPD. What are you on about?

>>908658

Projection: the post

>>908404

Or is it Chrome, I forgot.

>>908967

That's just the natural progression of religion. In a few hundred years, Christianity will be where the Jews are and Islam will be thew new Christianity. Hell, Islam will probably have spawned it's own little demon child by that point. Abraham's faiths are just a conveyor belt.

>>909147

>Christianity will be where the Jews are and Islam will be thew new Christianity

Are you a Markov bot or is there some kind of reasoning behind your words? I honestly can't tell

>Islam will probably have spawned it's own little demon child by that point

Islime has always been divided, there's no need for yet another sect to appear for it to be in absolute chaos

>>908334

Narcissim.

>>908383

>feminism needs to be put down brutally

I agree with that part of your statement

>>908463

severely underrated post

>>908243 (OP)

So he's moved on to writing malware to fsck SJW drives?

>>908279

Only (((SJWs))) care about who a coder is. /tech/ is only concerned with the code.

Your question means you're already logically fucked to begin with and have a race bias.

The more astute among us will realize this shit (sjw and identity politics) only became a thing in tech right after Edward Snowden came to prominence in 2013. That is not to say there wasn't any faggots or communists in FOSS before, but, not to this level of destabilization in every major software project.

I still believe it is a CIA operation to divide and smash consensus in any software project or team that would resist government control of the internet. It has worked quite well.

>>908243 (OP)

Good, I wouldn't want to use or work on any software that has a CoC either. It's like installing Flash to use a chat program, something that only makes sense in a corporate setting where investors are on the line.

>>909276

WTF kind of bait is this? Snowden changed literally nothing aside from making normalfags pretend to care about privacy. Nerd culture has always been innately SJW. Being able to call people out for violating a pedantic rule with no practical point, like "no racism", is precisely the most favorite thing to do among autistic nerds. For instance, I've noticed this shit from around 2003 or so, and before that I didn't know "racism" is a thing.

>>908624

Damn I miss the BBS days. Telix, door games, hidden warez, 1-on-1 DOOM deathmatch over 9600bps dial-up direct to your opponent's landline. Computing completely inaccessible to and untainted by normalfags. It was a golden age.

>>910312

But computer things were expensive as fuck unless you were a richfag, especially if you lived in eastern Europe where Amiga 500 or even C64 and no internet access at home was common until the late 90 or even beyond. If you wanted to own a computer that would run Doom in 1994 there was no way around spending a few thousand dollars (or have spent them in the preceding years) unless you did as Carmack did and stole a computer.

>>909298

What Snowden surely did change is many companies and institutions tightening their security policies "so there won't be anudda Snowden".

>>908291

>Maybe they want to be credited for their accomplishments. Some programmers use GitHub to inflate their CV.

And they can be, by doing good work and communicating professionally about said work. My prospective employer should know my sex when they greet me for a job interview or read my CV, not by seeing my picture and gender-specific activism on Github. That is just attention whoring, and you know that because you yourself are on 8chan, a place where people go to be anonymous and interact with other anonymous people. You don't need a history of combative social justice evangelism to get a tech job unless you're aiming for a community manager position on Youtube or something. Spare us the false equivalence.

High water mark. The tide is beginning to recede.

>>910460

An Atom netbook from 2009 chokes on most of the """modern web""" (javascript-heavy sites cause it to lag horribly), how would you do with an Amiga which is many orders of magnitude slower?

>my old Amiga 500 with 3 megs RAM and a 40 meg HDD

What software (Workbench version + programs) would you load on that HDD? Let's just assume utility/productivity software and let games load off floppies (or just assume a larger HDD, its size is not really the point but what software you'd use on that machine that would be up to the tasks you'd like to accomplish with a computer).

>>910424

All software was free though.

>>910518

>"Don't copy dat floppy, mkay"

Yea, no

If it was I wouldn't need to fuck around with that stupid cardboard wheel DRM thingy to play my legit copy of Monkey Island

>>910529

>especially if you lived in eastern Europe

that's the part I was replying to

>>910529

this is why you should crack all software before using

ESPECIALLY legit copies

>>908291

18+

christians like everybody else before never believed in gender

>>910553

>Faggotry was illegal according to secular law

as it should be

>>908306

>Don't expect minorities or LGBT people to stand still while their freedoms are being dismantled.

They're the ones trying to dismantle the US constitution. They need to be gassed and so do you.

>>910563

this

>>910563

The classic "Flatland" by Abbott gives an interesting example how degenerate insurgences were dealt with in the olden (think Victorian era) days.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/201/201-h/201-h.htm#chap10

>>909276

Minorities and Social rejects are natural traitors to society, of course it is beneficial to put these people into positions of authority and use them when needed to undermine the will of the people.

>>910683

>my boss being a faggot are the reason society is shit

you're delusional

>>910513

You've completely missed his point. His point was that his workflow is more or less the same today as it was back in the mid 90's, and all that "progress" has brought is software bloat and whole bunch of newfags. I understand where he's coming from. I lost interest in gaming after the second generation of hardware-accelerated games, when everything started feeling "samey". When devs had to create their own software-rendered engines, every game was developed from the ground up in-house and thus had a unique look - and particularly feel - to it. But then along came the 3d-pipeline. Everything converged to cookie-cutter sameness, and gaming suffered enormously.

>>910671

I remember that Gnome debacle, but I didn't remember it was the same group.

Good to point out.

>>908279

>Would our politically incorrect board participants be fine with minorities working on the open source projects like this

Christ this is the absolute state of snowflake coding. No, no one fucking cares but I might call you a worthless currynigger if you were both proven to be

> worthless

and happen to be a

> currynigger

simultaneously.

>>910752

That's kind of vacuous, though. Curryniggers are worthless by definition.

>>908291

>Burning homosexuals alive because some ancient book told you

This never happened (but it should have).

>>908260

>mental and physical ability

You know what time it is?

TIME TO SHIT ON LLVM

>submit shitty code that does nothing but print smilies

>when it's denied, flip shit

>cite code of conduct

>rinse and repeat 9,001 times doing random shit

>purposely break shit

>purposely implement vulnerabilities

>cite code of conduct

>>908279

I legitimately couldn't care less. One of my superiors is an openly gay SJW who crossdresses in their free time. Another one is a womans right activist.

Despite being a moderate believer in national socialism, I may as well be Hitler to these people.

We sit down in person on a weekly basis, break bread, talk about work, and have a good time. They do good work and so do I. Our personal lives have 0 impact on anything work related. The worst thing that happens is that I wince when I hear "CIS gendered", "inequality", etc.

The majority of my previous bosses have been black women.

I could not care less about who I am working with as long as the work gets done and I'm sure everyone else feels the same way deep down.

Ironically, I think my current company is SJW-majority and we have no CoC, no conflicts, and people are happy with our products.

In my opinion, laying down a CoC is the first step towards defining an undesirable person, having undesirable personal (not professional) criteria is the first step towards ostracizing entire groups of people and is the complete opposite of inclusiveness as far as I'm concerned.

I have yet to be convinced otherwise, that there is any real benefit to a CoC. Truth be told I see it as a wrist brace, it only serves as a means to circumvent dealing with people directly, for limp wristed managers who cannot talk to you directly, who would rather go behind your back to another department, cite the CoC as law, and have you fired instead of risk confrontation.

That is my assumption based on observation and is a whole topic in itself, but if it is the case, that is detrimental to all involved. Imagine being fired and not knowing why, imagine being fired for your personal preferences, your genitalia, or even your skin. What hell is this, I feel like I am in the Poe/Succ circle where everything is ironic and backwards on purpose.

I'd take my current SJW manager over most others, at least he takes care of business directly if he has a problem with you, instead of having some outreach intern relay a message to HR who lets you know you've been silently let go.

>>910823

>their

>>910839

Believe it or not this is what we were taught in my school, long before the pronoun discussion became a thing. I have always preferred using ambiguous "them", "they", "their" when referring to someone, even if their sex is known. I see no reason not to since it works for both sexes and typically makes people the least mad. Basically it's just less overhead. I got lucky that this also makes me less of a target for snowflakes.

>did John send you that patch?

>>Yeah, their patch worked fine.

>did you meet our new intern?

>>I have not met them yet

>Jessica has a nice ass

>>OY VEY THAT'S HARASSMENT GOY

I'm inconsistent right now because I'm drunk and anonymous. I said "he" later and I'm pretty sure that's what he'd prefer anyway. Although when I know someones name, that takes priority over "they"/"them" anyway.

>John's patch turned out to be a hacky mess actually.

>>910837

What would you have thought 30 years ago about someone who would say that in the 60s and beyond everything went to shit, that stereo 33 RPM vinyls and color TV are a pointless gimmick, that CDs and computers are cancer, and that all he needs is his typewriter, vacuum tube radio and tiny monochrome TV, and that he wants to keep living in the 1950s sticking to these things?

>>910897

Probably not much, because I grew up in peculiar circumstances. I wasn't allowed to watch TV, and I didn't have any music except some old stuff on reel-to-reel tapes (which I greatly enjoyed). I also had a big stash of old science magazines going all the way back to WWII era, which I enjoyed reading a lot. I didn't have a computer for a very long time (I was already a teenager at that point).

>>908547

>NOONE, MEANING WHITES AND KIKES, EVER ASKED ABOUT RACE ONLINE YOU FUCKING NIGGERS STARTED MAKING IT SOMETHING THAT MATTERS IN 2008 WITH NIGGERBAMA GOT ELECTED

I second this.

I know /pol/ became the wolf social justice cried about metaphorically, but the greatest disservice to social justice was the social justice movement itself.