/tech/ - Technology★

Information wants to be free anyway.

>>906982 (OP)

Besides, paper is far more secure than digital storage.

Hypnotize children during school photo day and store the information in their brains using a random sequence of keywords and light flashes to unlock the files.

Encrypted on an air gapped computer. Similar to luks, but when you revoke a key it will generate a new master key and reencrypt all the data (but not recursively). It would then have encrypted volumes inside of the main one for people with more security clearance.

>>907023

This. Past a certain point of data importance, low speed and error-proneness of transmission becomes a feature, not a drawback. The former prohibits successful exploitation of brief breaches of security, and the latter necessitates redundancy (that is, necessity of being transmitted by more than one authorized carrier in order to rule out integrity errors, thus thwarting a breach carried by only one person). Both are major benefits.

>>907023

>>907048

This.

WORM drives or once-writable CD's are perfect, prove me wrong.

>>907048

How do you expect people to decrypt documents written on paper? Manually type it into a computer that's probably part of a botnet? Have them decrypt it with a trivial cipher. You wouldn't store confidential stuff in plaintext, would you?

>>907066

One time pads obviously.

>>907070

How would you store the original / master copy then?

Russia stores sensitive data on laser etched plates in extreme miniature, and uses a set of magnifying lenses to decode and display it. The plate alone is worthless without the decoder lens, and it's pretty much indestructible.

They also invented holographic storage and are going to move on to that next.

>it's another low effort /pol/yp thread about DA JOOZ

>>>/leddit/

>>907092

>implying it's literally not the jews

Is this your first day on the internet or what?

>>907029

Air gaps are not without flaws either. For one the computer is potentially vulnerable to things like PowerHammer and sigint attacks. For two passwords are just as vulnerable to social engineering attacks as that library of books is. Three it is easier to transmit the data once you are "in" than it is with a library of books. In fact, smuggling the whole terminal out may not lay outside the realm of possibilities.

The question being asked shouldn't be "Why was it stored on paper in binders." The question should be "How was this individual allowed near the paper and binders to begin with?"

>>907103

>vulnerable to things like PowerHammer and sigint attacks

I haven't heard of those before, but it seems those attacks require compromising the target machine first. If not, you can just run random computations to add noise to the power consumption.

>For two passwords are just as vulnerable to social engineering attacks as that library of books is.

Multiple passwords is to have the ability to revoke access from certain individuals who no longer need access to the encrypted data or who need to have their keys cycled. If there is a leak, you know who exactly it came from.

>implying they didn't just take some pics in Dimona and say they are from Iran

How do we even know those binders are real? Israel has a vested interest in convincing the world that Iran is a threat. On top of that, jews are the most lying, conniving creatures ever to walk the earth.

>>907241

voynich manuscript was translated by some turk roach saying it is some old turkish, you are dumb

>>906982 (OP)

I'd post them on facebook. Marking the message "private" so that nobody sees them, of course.

>>906982 (OP)

>not storing nuclear secrets and launch codes in plaintext in a public pastebin entry

>>907279

proofs?

>>906982 (OP)

I'd store them in an extra-physical plain of existence so that only the enlightened or those destined to could access them.

>>906982 (OP)

free and opensource so anyone can use it. what can they do then?

>>907416

lel I always look at pastebins at random

>>906982 (OP)

A series of QR codes printed on A4 paper (500KiB of data per side) and transferred to a microfilm.