Best LiveCD's Distros?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 3 per post.

File (hide): 547bcf4443ec6f3⋯.jpg (3.65 MB, 1500x2250, 2:3, 1485965144862.jpg) (h) (u)

▶Best LiveCD's Distros? Anonymous 04/07/18 (Sat) 22:46:01 No.894648>>894657 >>894854 >>894948 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

To my experience with multiple LiveCds, BusenLabs has been the best at keeping a clean system, usable with low powered hardware, while having an acceptable design.

Second would be Puppy linux in both versions more or less, but you have to be more proficient with linux to use it as a full OS.

Wich ones does /tech/ use, and for what specific purpose.

▶Anonymous 04/07/18 (Sat) 23:06:51 No.894657

>>894648 (OP)

TempleOS

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 00:43:15 No.894695>>894859 >>894887

Gentoo

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 10:28:44 No.894854

>>894648 (OP)

GParted

░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄

░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄

░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█

░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░█

░▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░█

█▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒█

█▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█

░█▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█

░░█░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█

░░░█░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█

░░░░█░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░███████░█

░░░░░▀▄░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█

░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░█

░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░█

░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░█

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 10:51:15 No.894859

>>894695

/thread

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 13:07:40 No.894887

>>894695

SystemRescueCd

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 14:21:04 No.894920

TAILS

▶Anonymous 04/08/18 (Sun) 15:15:43 No.894948>>896536 >>896562

>>894648 (OP)

Unironically slax

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 16:29:06 No.896536>>896562

>>894948

>swtches from Slackware to Debian as a base

>still calls itself "Slax"

false advertising tbh

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 16:29:29 No.896537

KNOPPIX not gud anymoar?

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 16:36:31 No.896540

windows 10 PE SE

http://win10se.cwcodes.net/

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 17:44:43 No.896562>>896607

File (hide): 36b01b9e5f0a390⋯.png (621 KB, 1280x1024, 5:4, slax-6.0.0.png) (h) (u)

>>894948

>>896536

Slax 6.0 was god tier fit

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 19:19:20 No.896600

I use Ubuntu or Kali because gparted makes my life easier when my system stucked because of fuckg grub

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 19:46:05 No.896607

>>896562

10/10 hipsters

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 20:20:01 No.896614

I used puppy on a persistent install usb stick for like 6 months when my hdd broke, must been good since i didnt get around to replace it.

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 20:36:14 No.896624

knoppix is retard proof

who cares tho

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 20:53:46 No.896632>>896654

Anyone here have experience with making Arch Linux live USBs? I want to use one such system for software development. It would contain a pre-selected list of packages. I would simply boot it up, clone my repository and start programming. I'm mentioning Arch Linux specifically because I need extremely recent Linux kernels and tools.

I want everything to stay in RAM, unless I mamually mount a hard disk. How would I go about updating the packages USB image? Imagine some new kernel or compiler lands o the Arch repos; if I use pacman to update it, it'd update the in-RAM system only. How do I get around that?

▶Anonymous 04/11/18 (Wed) 21:49:33 No.896654

>>896632

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Archiso

/tech/ - Technology★

General

WebM

Theme

User JS

Do not paste code here unless you absolutely trust the source or have read it yourself!

Favorites

Customize Formatting

Filters