/tech/ - Technology★

>>881426 (OP)

>first pic on their webpage is a nigger with two smartphones, a Mac laptop, and a Starbucks drink

>last pic is another nigger...same nigger? can't tell, they all look the same

>other pic is some brown Asian and a possibly-white but probably-Jew woman

Says it all, really.

Looks like an Ethereum ripoff designed to enrich the founders.

>>881431

It is not another altcoin

I see it overlapping with IPFS, not with Ethereum

Low effort OP, disregarded.

>>>/biz/

>>881458

>>881448

If you dislike the thread, please, abstain for shitposting and just hide it

Lets try to keep a quality in this board

Can it integrate into i2p, Tor or similar anonymizing networks? It can't be fully autonomous if it can't defend against CIA censorship.

>>881534

>Lets try to keep a quality in this board

Deleting the OP would improve the quality of the board.

>Hay guize u herd of X?

>URL to X

This is a template for a shitty post. 0 effort. Fuck off.

I don't believe in holocaust. it is a scam

>>881534

this \/

>>881834

For off topic topics like cryptocurrencies the OP needs to be structured in a way where it's about the technical implementation of it.

Just saying "XYZ. Discuss" doesn't make XYZ tech related.

Name: Holochain (not Holocaust (Lo-NRG))

Use: Holographic storage for distributed applications

License: GPLv3 only *1* *2*

Written in: Go

Developement platform: GitHub *3* (https://github.com/Holochain/holochain-proto)

Source availability: https://github.com/Holochain/holochain-proto.git

Developement started: 2016-12-23 (according to initial commit)

Releases: None (source provided by git clone)

*1* If GPLv4 is ever release they can't upgrade

*2* Read https://librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub

*3*:

<Note: We are considering other 'looser' licensing options (like MIT license) but at this stage are using GPL while we're getting the matter sorted out.

Just doing OP's job for him.

>>881867

Sorry, footnotes are in wrong order:

10,11c10
< *2* Read https://librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub
< *3*:
---
> *2*:
13a13
> *3* Read https://librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub

How difficult would it be to host a chan with similar features to 8ch?

>>881867

https:/gitgud.io/

Do it

Holo a cute desu.

>>881867

>If GPLv4 is ever release they can't upgrade

Any organization is prone to infiltration and corruption into oblivion. What happens if someday Stallman, or his successor decides to release a harmful GPLv4? What happens if that particular person writes GPLv4 as to make any GPL licensed software his intellectual property and subsequently employs a team of trolls to relicense all software of interest?

On a side note, I would appreciate a copyleft license that is not authorian, that doesn't include phrases such as:

>This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

>or (at your option) any later version.

Authority is cancer and so are (((You))).

>>881426 (OP)

How does Holochain compare with EOS?

>>882807

>licenses are authoritarian

????

A software license is a set of boiler plate legal statements given out with each copy of the program through which the copyright holder of the program (i.e. it's creator, unless it's dictated otherwise by any other contracts) grants any owner of such software a license under current intellectual property laws to do as he pleases under the terms of that licensing contract. If you don't like GPL, don't send it along with your copyright notice. If you don't like that GPL exists and want to impose on what people should be able to do with their own copyrighted material, go complain about copyright law instead. You're barking up the wrong tree.