/tech/ - Technology★

I hope someone analyzes this quickly so we can determine once and for all exactly how many military bases the US has around the world. There's over 800 we actually know about but people estimate it's more like 1000. Finally we'll know for sure.

>>859275

What stupid reasoning makes you think this revealed all of the bases?

It was an accident of sorts, revealing many of them, and perhaps some of which the existence was unknown, so analysis of the material by interested parties will be certainly made. But it can't be all of them by any means.

>>859269 (OP)

>how long until the spyware structure set in place gets so overblown and complex that no one can come close to controlling or understanding it, and it starts eroding the ability of the world's system to function?

Are you telling me that is not the case right now?

>>859298

Well, yes, obviously. We have a structure that is already too big to control properly, but still if you consider information that has been worked on in order to stay private, the majotrity of it is still able to remain private. It's true that we can, by the state of things, easily see that world functions as they are can not be considered susteinable, soon or later they will crumble.

And that's what I'm talking about, when private information even of powerful state-actors for example will be very hard or even impossible to hide because the spying infra-structure is so huge and omnipresent. To a point where even things that are simple and taken for granted today, like having a secret base, or organizing a suprise attack will fail 8 times out of 10.

>be secret base

>let people in with wireless devices that you didn't make

>not having some kind of interference bullshit anyway

>>859616

You can't build a faraday cage around such large buildings, nevermind the fact that the end of tracking indicates the start of the base. Even if they had a many-km-wide blackout zone that would still reveal the location of secret bases.

>>859625

Is there a better solution or is it just bad either way? I guess hoping people are not being tracked is a better assumption to make than people not noticing a blackout zone.

>>859653

There is no solution beside forbidding all devices with wireless capabilities such that anyone caught bringing one at any site is dismissed on the first offense, and that's not a valid solution because it ends up throwing away too many possibly non-shit people.

>secret base

>no basic opsec

served

>>859269 (OP)

Any bases "revealed" by this are almost certainly already well-known. The USG isn't stupid, and "fitness trackers" and other privately-owned devices have prohibited inside secure facilities since the days of the original iPod.

>>859269 (OP)

The systems we use will start to change if they don’t disappear entirely

>>859298

It is the case right now 100%

>>859311

>too big to control properly

Things will start getting smaller...

>>859625

>such large buildings

They will get smaller...

>>873320

Yeah. Look in the Western Tibet area. Loooks to be several patrol paths along the Paki-China-India section and base? square/rectangle

>>859298

Was thinking earlier today, someone in the street can take a picture of you, reverse image search, find your real name, then check the electoral role for your home address, and be at your house before you are.

There needs to be a nuclear war or meteor impact that EMPs everything, because fundamentals of life that have been around since the dawn of time are going to disappear.

>>859275

>Finally we'll know for sure.

No we won't. When it comes to the truly important places, the military doesn't allow personal electronics inside at all.

>>859269 (OP)

>Botnetting the botnet

Nice fucking clickbait, OP. Here I thought /tech/ was planning some ebin resistance movement by botnetting (((these))) we are not allowed to identify, but what do I get? Speculation about secret bases that have fuck all to do with us.

Fuck's sake, we really do get the world we deserve.

>>874518

You could use my face, name and SSN all at the same time and you wouldn't find me online. I won't post them here (obviously) but trust me, I have tried it. It's not that hard to keep 0 images of yourself online, at least not over here in Europe.

Unless you've been using Facebook for a number of years, but nobody here would do that, would they?

>>859269 (OP)

>how long until the spyware structure set in place gets so overblown and complex that no one can come close to controlling or understanding it, and it starts eroding the ability of the world's system to function?

レインをすきになりましょう！レインをすきになりましょう！レインをすきになりましょう！レインをすきになりましょう！レインをすきになりましょう！

>>875315

Let's go to Lain?