[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8pol / agatha / animu / ausneets / guarida / kpop / leftpol / monarchy ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): fa4539f0763bb3f⋯.png (12.52 KB, 700x315, 20:9, Rtorrent.png) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.857454>>857476 >>857506 >>857668 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

How do we save rtorrent?

The codebase has become way to convoluted and is rarely updated.

How can we save the greatest torrent client ever?

 No.857458

>>857457

the R in rtorrent stands for rust


 No.857473>>857476

rtorrent hasn't been maintained in over 2 years

It's deprecated


 No.857476>>857496

>>857454 (OP)

What about the codebase is convoluted? What needs to be changed to "save" it, if it works well? Change for change's sake is bad news.

>>857473

>Codebase is good enough to sit untouched

>"Deprecated"

I don't think you know what deprecated means. Deprecated in a software sense a synonym for obsoleted, because software, unlike buildings, does not fail from lack of use.


 No.857496>>857497 >>857499

>>857476

Software might not fail from lack of use but environments change and eventually the software will not run in the new enivornments anymore without change.

Also rtorrent is in dire need of a CoC.


 No.857497

>>857496

>dire need of a CoC

yea thats what it needs more SJW shilling


 No.857499

>>857496

So change the software when the change in environment demands it. Has the current environment changed so much over the two years since the last update?


 No.857505

Just use transmission


 No.857506>>857515 >>857550 >>857799 >>863088

>>857454 (OP)

rtorrent has always been crap.

Too complex and too big of a code base.

btpd is the greatest torrent client.

Too bad it's been unmaintained for so long.

https://github.com/btpd/btpd


 No.857515>>857623 >>857983

>>857506

Which one is the best for mass torrents + massive amounts of data? Even deluge ends up dying with 200 torrents ~ 1 TB of data (of course, not all of these are seeded at the same time, but the mere existence causes delgue to die. The same for transmission)

BitTorrent (when it wasn't shit) was the only one I knew to be able to handle a high load.


 No.857546

Can you guys promise me you will go outside and just sit in the sun for at least 15 minutes each day if you're going to be this autistic about code that literally nobody cares about and has no effect on anyone's life? You don't even have to do anything out there. I just want you guys to be ok. You know?


 No.857550>>857741

>>857506

Once again, why is it important that it doesn't have regular updates? It is already mature to its final form. It shouldn't need updates beyond minor bugfixes.


 No.857623>>857638 >>857689

>>857515

libtorrent?


 No.857638


 No.857641

File (hide): 9dffc9b95927e70⋯.jpg (116.89 KB, 750x736, 375:368, 1516744354902.jpg) (h) (u)

Port it to Plan 9.

Remove all but most critical functionality.

If someone wants "features" they can write shell scripts.


 No.857664

Nothing to be fixed tbh.

Only bug I know is a very minor one where the listing of files don't group correctly by their directories.


 No.857668>>857669

>>857454 (OP)

how about contributing to the project instead of making a dumb thread on /tech/. not me tho, im more of an ideas guy :^)


 No.857669>>857680

>>857668

Should I start re-making the logo?


 No.857680>>857690

>>857669

does it even have a logo?


 No.857689

>>857623

rtorrent is built on libtorrent

libtorrent can handle 1k+ torrents np

deluge is shit, qbittorrent is shit, and transmission is shit.


 No.857690>>857714

>>857680

No idea, I only use qbittorrent and aria2 anyway.


 No.857714

>>857690

it has NO LOGO

ANONS GET ON THIS


 No.857734>>857760

Every time I try to setup rtorrent, I can never get it to work for all these random, obscure reasons. In contrast, transmission-daemon is so darn easy to setup, it's worth the slightly larger overhead. Especially in comparison to i2p.


 No.857741>>857762 >>858361

File (hide): ab42cb0e7a6efa5⋯.png (12.18 KB, 978x510, 163:85, rt.png) (h) (u)

>>857550

Because the code no longer builds with contemporary compilers that're just doing the right thing is a good reason.


 No.857751

I just switched to aria2c for the time being. Hopefully a new KISS cli torrent client will show up eventually.


 No.857754>>857766

1) Use transmission-daemon with stig.

2) Wait for https://github.com/Luminarys/synapse (inb4 Rust, there's no Coc or retarded stuff).


 No.857760>>857775 >>857779

File (hide): acbb7d9494ad988⋯.jpg (154.34 KB, 512x384, 4:3, 1435969379101.jpg) (h) (u)

>>857734

>transmission

>easy to setup but sucks shit

vs

>rtorrent

>hard to setup but best client

Only wizards are allowed to use rtorrent


 No.857762

>>857741

Are you trying to compile git head?


 No.857766

>>857754

>Rust

Nah.


 No.857775>>857781

>>857760

>>rtorrent

>>hard to setup but best client

To download anything I press:

> [Return]

> [Shift-Insert]

> Navigate to file

> [C-s]

How is that at all hard


 No.857779>>857782

>>857760

How does a slight overhead equate to being shit? C'mon, the only person you're fooling is yourself. Ignoring the fact that it's far more accessible (apparently bad, according to you elitist teenbros), Transmission is significantly more versatile than rtorrent, and the aria2 shill has finally convinced me that aria2c is far better equipped for simple, light tasks than rtorrent ever could be while being significantly easier to configure. Oh, and it's more lightweight.


 No.857781

>>857775

It's almost as if use case varies from person to person.


 No.857782>>857783

>>857779

do you even torrent? rtorrent is meant for heavy users not scrubs like you who donwload some gay trap porn once a month


 No.857783>>857784

>>857782

I've had +1200 torrents seeding right now with no overhead. I hate to break it to you, but if you're going to resort to ethos in order to win arguments, we're all just going to devolve into the ``works on my machine'' argument with no progression.


 No.857784>>857786

>>857783

>had

>right now

Caught your lies.


 No.857786


 No.857799

>>857506

>No dht

Shame


 No.857802

It's beyond saving.

Just use transmission as a daemon, it's basically the same thing but better.


 No.857818

Another reason to use transmission, it works with libressl, mbedtls and even wolfssl.


 No.857822

transmission is shit to configure tho

if you look at the man pages, there are duplicated settings for daemon and cli client when there's no need for it

rtorrent's configuration was much more nicer


 No.857832>>857837 >>858119

Why torrent when xdcc works fine?


 No.857837>>857860 >>858119

>>857832

is that like newsgroups but free?


 No.857860>>857891 >>858119

>>857837

It's like IRC but actually IRC.


 No.857891>>858119

>>857860

Theres more active xdcc bots then there are active torrents.


 No.857983>>857996

>>857515

My torrent server runs Deluge and currently has 349 live torrents with well over 1TB of data. It's not breaking a sweat. Previously I used transmission with similar numbers and no problem.


 No.857996>>857998 >>858199

>>857983

Strange. I can run PS, 3DS Max, and multiple browsers without issue (i.e. good CPU + a lot of RAM), nevertheless, just my browser + torrent leads to a crash when I have too much. May I ask, what is your largest individual torrent (in GB)?


 No.857998>>858014

>>857996

180GB but that's only a partial download. Biggest Completed is 15GB.

It's not even a beefy machine. It's an old HP microserver: http://n40l.wikia.com/wiki/Base_Hardware_n36l

From the software you're running, it sounds like you're running Windows, and that may be your problem. Many years since I used it, but I vaguely recall there being an issue with having too many open TCP connections. Not something that normally causes problems, but bulk torrenting pushes this to the limit. It might explain why you hit approximately the same limit with different torrent clients.


 No.858014>>858029

>>857998

Well, this is entering the realm of tech support, but, to be precise, the crashing happens when adding my 200GB torrent (I guess because it's a partial download and it's hashing/checking over the blocks?)


 No.858029

>>858014

I'm using transmission with a 225GB torrent, right now (Neon Genesis Evangelion [BDMV]).


 No.858119

>>857860

>>857891

>>857837

>>857832

If you use XDCC over a bouncer/proxy how does it work? Which IP is reported to the bot?


 No.858199>>858230

>>857996

>Windows

THERE'S YOUR FUCKING PROBLEM. Deluge is optimized for running on *nix.


 No.858230

>>858199

>python program using an horrible boostruosity like libtorrent-rasterbar

>optimized for anything


 No.858361>>858425

>>857741

That's problem with libtorrent not rtorrent [1]. Apprently someone forgot major distros started rolling c++ compilers with C++11 features.

[1] https://github.com/rakshasa/libtorrent/issues/158

[2] https://github.com/rakshasa/libtorrent/commit/462f358f8fb3f842c2086b96d396c7d27736add9


 No.858425

>>858361

That's why you set -std= in your makefiles. Fucking retards.


 No.863088

>>857506

This is exactly what I've been looking for. I've never been very sucessfull when trying to set up rutorrent; instead running it in a dtach session works, but I'd rather have a server-client model alà mpd.

A shame there haven't been any activity for six years, and the forks seem to be mostly minor code/documentation improvements.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
54 replies | 4 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 8pol / agatha / animu / ausneets / guarida / kpop / leftpol / monarchy ][ watchlist ]