OP here
>>843255
So you're in favor of as much fragmentation as possible? That's certainly an interesting idea, although I can't say I really agree. I think the fragmentation of GNU/Loonix is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing because it can lead to innovations and new developments as people find their own methods of solving a problem, but also a curse because I think it may be the reason for why GNU/Loonix doesn't have a very polished desktop experience.
>>843288
OOH! A full answer!
>Appimages should be the primary distribution of applications in UNIX systems
there do appear to be a few things like this. I haven't looked into all of them, but there's Snaps, Flatpak, and appimages. Which one do you think is best?
>yes and musl libc is the answer, more software needs to be ported to it like Rust
I'm confused on this one. Are you saying that musl libc needs to be written in rust? If you're gonna go all rustfag on me, you might as well ditch C and just write a rust library in rust, as well as the rust compiler, because clearly any other language is unacceptable.
Ok I'll stop memeing, but I would like a bit more clarity here.
>Yes. Now for the smaller projects like WMs I believe we need to implement small protocols that can be implemented in a Wayland WM/Compositor that becomes standard for DEs as well so fragmentation isn't hell, my proposal is a protocol for brightness, screenshots and video, etc. all that makes a modern X WM usable, as that would be groundbreaking for the UNIX world and Wayland MUST be made so it isn't exclusively for just Linux platforms, Wayland is the future but it needs help, Wayland performance wise is better than X and I use Wayland myself with a WM made by a friend.
Ok so you think there should be a common implementation of all the shit that compositors have to implement, so that the smaller projects can use it and not have to do everything. I like the idea. On the one hand, it kinda sounds a little too similar to X, but on the other hand, what we would have is a modern protocol that works similarly to X, but without the legacy shit that people complain about a lot.
>No clue, the more minimal the better though, we need a return to UNIX minimalism with a futurist design twist unlike that Zionist nonsense material design or KDE shit.
Agreed, but normies like Zionist nonsense, so we need to be sure that experience exists for them, and becomes more polished overall.
>I wish Linux by default removed all the binary blobs
Mostly agreed. I hate proprietary nonsense as much as the next freetard, but the fact of the matter is that people expect all their hardware to 'just werk', and in many cases that can't happen without blobs. It's a sad state of affairs, but that's the reality that we currently live in. The best thing we can do, as consumers, is to buy hardware that works with a libre kernel, and not buy shit that doesn't.