[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / creep / islam / leftpol / rolo / sonyeon / strek ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 847bb4b39593f2e⋯.jpg (138.07 KB, 1017x292, 1017:292, Screenshot_2017-12-14-09-4….jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.837779>>837805 >>838069 >>838101 >>838136 >>838365 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

While attempting to find a thread I archived in 2016 this happened.. the oldest archived thread is from June.

Why did they do this?

 No.837797>>837802 >>838549

Someone must have archived the thread again somehow, that's the only logical explanation I can come up with.


 No.837802

>>837797

but everything else is gone.


 No.837805>>837830

>>837779 (OP)

Archive.is considers http://example.com and https://example.com as different sites so you have to search both scopes. Also there might be something wrong with its indexing system as it sometimes don't return all archived pages. In this case you can try searching for

site:archive.is QUERY

on your favorite search engine


 No.837810>>837830

File (hide): d79ca72cd015c30⋯.jpg (36.09 KB, 589x139, 589:139, owo whats this.jpg) (h) (u)


 No.837830>>837846

>>837805

>>837810

i searched with 8ch.net/pol/*, so it should be there.


 No.837846

File (hide): 54be56802ed1253⋯.jpg (204.17 KB, 965x768, 965:768, 1.jpg) (h) (u)

File (hide): 696a4cbf51f46ab⋯.jpg (187.66 KB, 959x771, 959:771, 2.jpg) (h) (u)

>>837830

results are different for http and https


 No.838069>>838072 >>838365 >>858144

>>837779 (OP)

Don't let some website control your archives.

Just do


wget -mpck --user-agent="" -e robots=off --wait 1 <your url>

And you'll have an archived copy forever


 No.838072>>858144

>>838069

That's easy to alter and not easy to share though. Using the site is good for keeping evidence of what content existed at some point in time.


 No.838094

Are you searching for a specific page OP? What was the thread about?


 No.838101

>>837779 (OP)

Storage isn't free.Eventually they will have to decide when to start purging stuff. Dumping shit that hasn't gotten a single hit in 2 years wouldn't be all that surprising.


 No.838136>>838568

>>837779 (OP)

The kikes started the shoah. You best have saved the pages all offline. archive.fo/is has been compromised for some time now see >>>/poltech/490 but there's too much content to shoah to go unnoticed. archive.org is full of kikes already and requires pajeet script and google backup/cache is kikes ofcourse.


 No.838365>>838375

>>837779 (OP)

Average life span of independent website is around 3 years. After that, it's either dead, someone took over, or seagate drive failure occured.

Nothing new. Even archived.org themselves dropped 8chan due to political 'controversies'. All thanks to you pol scumbags, that we're all losing the good stuff:

>foss commune

>pirate stuff

>tor content

>>838069

this. just archive as mhtml or something else. 'cloud' is for faggots.


 No.838375

>>838365

>you pol scumbags

>implying CP wasn't the issue

Cry us a river libtard. Besides OP was already shown to be a faggot.


 No.838549

>>837797

archive.is would hold older archives of the same page.


 No.838568

File (hide): 6f777160e90e7e6⋯.png (183.74 KB, 440x399, 440:399, 14848698202685.png) (h) (u)

>>838136

>archive.fo/is has been compromised for some time now

nice FUD


 No.838616>>838671

>question

Would it be possible to create an IPFS archiver that stores the SSL handshake - which could be used to verify a particular page's authenticity?

E.g. if the response is signed by site's certificate, then that archive has not been tampered with.

Otherwise, if we're only archiving the HTML response, etc, any user could spoof what's returned.


 No.838671

>>838616

Well for archiving purposes this is ok. But for guarenteeing the archive wasn't tampered with before it hit anyone else's server this is useless as the SSL certificate verifier like (((them))) could tamper with it before anyone else gets it.


 No.842983

awo


 No.848956>>858094 >>867569 >>868105

File (hide): e6b888c6ca8d372⋯.jpg (148.86 KB, 1079x528, 1079:528, Screenshot_2018-01-06-11-1….jpg) (h) (u)

What did google mean by this?


 No.848984>>849060

archive.is is compromized since pizzagate shit

stop using it and just tor up/disable javashit


 No.849060>>849062

>>848984

Nice proof.


 No.849062


 No.858094

>>848956

>site may be hacked

oy vey


 No.858144

>>838069

It is 3rd -party authentication, it has nothing to do with "archiving for personal use".

Nice bash scripting though.

>>838072

That is beside the point.

archive.org has a habit of deleting /pol/ content, so that is not as goos as archive.fo

Also we need other alternatives. https://www.topbestalternatives.com/archive.is/


 No.858154


 No.867569>>868143

>>848956

russians


 No.867703>>867714 >>867769

Any working alternative for archive.is/fo?


 No.867714

>>867703

archive.org


 No.867769

>>867703

Yes and no. Archive.is is the only one that ignores the robots.txt file and doesn't delete stuff on request. Archive.org and Megalodon.jp check the robots file first to see if they are allowed to index the site and also delete stuff if the owner send a request.


 No.868105

>>848956

>goys must not visit it


 No.868143

>>867569

>archive.is|fo

>inetnum: 194.1.236.0 - 194.1.239.255

>netname: InternetHosting-net

>country: RU

It's shit.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
31 replies | 4 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / bestemma / creep / islam / leftpol / rolo / sonyeon / strek ][ watchlist ]