/tech/ - Technology★

>>831463 (OP)

>Has anyone read it?

Yes.

>Should we all live in an liberagrarian society free from recursive autmation?

We'd most likely die.

Technology in itself isn't bad, but you see the problem with society is that there's too much bloat.

>>831464

>We'd most likely die.

That doesn't answer the question, although that is an implicated "yes".

We should be hunters and gatherers, agriculture is considered harmful.

>>831463 (OP)

>thinks any place can be agrarian.

Equatorial-tropical countries are the only ones feasible for that idea. The problem is /k/ fags will just ruin small communities.

It won't be self-sustaining due to the need of government assistance (while the government themselves can send and fund /k/ fags to fuck you up).

Either way, that's not really stable. Landwar '/k/ommies' and real estate porky fags will be your last boss.

>>831463 (OP)

FUCK OFF FBI, DO YOUR JOB ARREST CLINTON, NEETS ARE YOUR GREATEST ALLY

>>831476

>Equatorial-tropical countries are the only ones feasible for that idea.

What? Vast swathes of Eurasia hosted agrarian societies for millennia.

>Uncle Ted

>liberagrarian

>>831542

What part of OP's post indicated a willingness to break the law?

>>831463 (OP)

Ted would like /pol/. He hits the nail on the head on the psychology of shitlibs but offers no realistic solution and expects everyone else to do the heavy lifting like a /pol/ version of an ideas guy.

>let's burn it all to the ground so people can feel like their lives have meaning

Not gonna happen. An unfeasible idea is a bad idea, like whenever /pol/ says "let's just kill all nonwhites in the US". Would be nice, sure, but they just can't accept that this is incredibly unrealistic. They'd rather just follow their dumb idea straight into the grave.

>>831704

Certainly his ideal is impossible, and he even concedes in his later writings that there's no way to stop the process from repeating again. Any anarcho-primitivist who thinks they have any chance of success is deluded.

I think the big takeaway should be that we consider his arguments against technology before we approve them. Ethical evaluation of our technologies before we release them should be routine, in the same way that researchers justify their experiments on humans or other animals before they conduct them. Does the value your technology provides mankind exceed the harm caused by environmental destruction, atomization, harm of non-compliance or non-use, psychological or physiological dysfunction, etc.?

>>831704

Uncle Ted would hate /pol/ because it's full of fucking idiots.

But if you really want to know, you can write him. I don't know if his address has changed, but it used to be:

No. 04475-046

US Penitentiary --- Max

P.O. Box 8500

Florence, CO 8126-8500

>>831594

>le fbi datamining thread is not fbi datamining thread

kys cia nigger.

>>831704

>Ted

>ideas guy

Nah m8, he put those ideas into practice. We're the ones sitting on the sidelines not doing anything while we let our team lose the game.

>like whenever /pol/ says "let's just kill all nonwhites in the US". Would be nice, sure, but they just can't accept that this is incredibly unrealistic.

It's either going to be whites or nonwhites that get eradicated. Currently it's looking like whites. Not so unrealistic.

But here's the thing, you can't just put up walls and kill everyone else while your birth rates are plummeting. What we need are kids. Lots of them. The rest of the world should be complaining that we're filling their countries up with our kids and flipping their cultures. We need to attack the cause of our low birthrates, and force low birthrates on others, and then we win.

>>831781

>let's overpopulation with overpopulation

KYS, /pol/tard

>>831781

There is no way to win a race to the bottom while keeping standards at the same time. A white kid who grows up to be a self-hating race-mixing shitlib or a feminist or a tranny or a shabbos goy is another point in the anti-whites favor. Nonwhites don't worry about standards, they just keep pumping out babies every 9 months for those sweet, sweet gibs.

>>831803

The people who told you the world is overpopulated also tell you to send food to Africa where they expect to grow to 5 billion by 2100. You fell for the lie. It's just another excuse to convince whites not to breed while they breed your replacements.

>>831807

Quality doesn't matter if they're produced below repopulation. You'll just wind up with the brightest, most cultured, last white man alive. Who dies.

>>831862

>The people who told you the world is overpopulated also tell you to send food to Africa where they expect to grow to 5 billion by 2100.

So you agree then, great.

>You fell for the lie.

???

>It's just another excuse to convince whites not to breed while they breed your replacements.

>muh race war

I guess Japan does not exist in the /pol/tard's fantasy world.

>>831864

>Quality doesn't matter if they're produced below repopulation. You'll just wind up with the brightest, most cultured, last white man alive. Who dies.

So? It would be a great end. There is no inherent value to life and it will end anyway.

>>831864

My point is, the reproduction game is rigged against whites because they have a more strenuous win condition.

In order to win, whites must outproduce nonwhites AND reproduce only with whites.

In order to win, nonwhites must outproduce whites.

The real enemy here is genetics. The recessive-only nature of whiteness means that a generational line of whiteness is easy to escape but extremely difficult to return to. (Or outright impossible if you believe in the one-drop rule.)

Radicalized tech savvy people like those on /tech/ and /g/ usually recognise what Unabomber wrote in his manifestos yet use their time and efforts to bicker about inconsequential shit instead of doing something about it.

This deviates a bit but read Michael Ruppert's books and Limits to Growth. Our society isn't sustainable and no amount of technological advances will change the limited amounts of resources this planet provides us with.

>>831915

let's spread like locusts suck dry the universe

Hey, OP, congratz on your *chan slide script. It works great, as far as I can see, but you might wanna look and see that-- yeah, this is /tech/ not /pol/ buddy :^)

I see automation as an evolutionary process. There's a good reason we're not living in huts chucking spears at animals and shitting in fields. People can become too reliant on automation and technology, but this is not the fault of the automation or the technology. It's like putting a gun on trial for murder. It makes no sense whatsoever. I've read Industrial Society and it's Future. Some of what he says rings true, but Ted is a modern day Luddite. He thinks the glass is half empty when it's almost full.

>mentally ill fed false flagger appreciation thread

No. Sage.

>>831883

>>831927

>>831937

>>832026

>tfw this guy is the fed

>>831476

>shitting on /k/

Fuck off, kike.

>>831781

>Nah m8, he put those ideas into practice.

No he didn't.

>>831522

Word. Thoughtful use of technology could enhance the environment and our lives, but short sighted and selfish use of technology will doom us. Consider the technology of the metal knife; it can be used for murder, or it can be used to prepare a meal. All technology is a double edged sword in this way, for all technology really does is multiply our power. What we choose to do with that power is the salient question.

>>832276

>Consider the technology of the metal knife; it can be used for murder, or it can be used to prepare a meal.

Or it can be used for murder and it can be used to prepare a meal from your victim's corpse.

Think outside the box, anon.

Computers should never had become accessible to normalfags. It should have stayed a scientific tool.

>>832348

Old computers were used as much for business and government as science though.

Combine Unabomber with David Lane and then you're golden.

>>832348

Disagree. It was an experiment worth making: without PC's there would have been no Internet, which meant to function as library of knowledge AND comms medium. Unfortunately this idea failed in practice and the normies have turned computers and internet into entertainment instead of learning resource (totally different from what we do right now on this imageboard no sarcasm tbh).

But don't worry, the pendulum swings back, and (((they're))) taking back the computers AND internet from normies. Did you pay attention to UEFI secure boot, Intel ME and AMD's similar crap? Or the net neutrality bs? They're taking it all back. Soon enough the only computers available will be tracker chips.

>>832383

False. There was already an Internet without personal computers. Personal computers did not create the Internet.

>>832383

>(((they're))) taking back the computers AND internet from normies

They don't and they won't. The interweb is the strongest electric jew they ever made. They'll only take the ability to use a computer, only leaving the possibility of being used by it.