/tech/ - Technology★

>>830202

it's only "popular" because Google, Facebook, Twitter, and all the other goyim approved websites are pushing so hard for it. If these groups who heavily support censorship support it so heavily then it's highly suspicious. None of these groups support "neutrality" they want full control so they can determine what's "neutral" and what's not.

And here I was wondering where the ISP shills were.

>>830191 (OP)

>it could potentially increase internet speeds

no

>could even make your browsing experience more customize

bait.tiff

>>830206

>If these groups who heavily support censorship support it so heavily then it's highly suspicious.

It's because they don't want to pay unjust bullshit fees to (((ISPs))) for things the ISPs' customers already paid for.

> they want full control so they can determine what's "neutral" and what's not.

NN doesn't help them at that

>>830214

they don't want to pay the ISP for things they know the customer's WONT pay for. it's like cable TV, only people actually want premium channels, hbo, showtime, etc. if you make people pay the ISP for facekike and youtube you'll see just how many people really like those services and are willing to pay a premium for them, which a lot won't, meaning Jewgle will have the pay the difference if they want to stay included into the fast lane.

>>830239

You're a fucking idiot. What's the difference between sending packets from Facebook, 8chan or an SSH connection to your hone server? None. Absolutely none.

ISPs just want get money from three different sources: consumers, websites and the government without having to actually improve their systems.

>>830247

Additionally, there should be no legal difference between a webesite banning someone and an ISP throttling connections. Net neutrality would have to apply to website owners too for my support.

>>830202

> He thinks it's the Jews.

Do you know what the Jesuits think of Net Neutrality? Look into it.

>>830249

You're just butthurt because you're retarded edgy "opinions" grant you bans.

Go fuck yourself.

>>830244

I never said net neutrality should be a long term solution. Net neutrality, as it stands, is a short term solution. Right now all that is happening is we're losing our short term solution with no long term solution being passed to replace it.

>monopolies won't form if we remove government regulati....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Union#19th_century

>>830268

You haven't been paying attention have you? Companies are able to buy regulations that are tailored to protect their monopolies. Anti-monopoly legislation is an entirely different form of regulation. Regulation in general isn't great, though it can actually do good things in some cases. It should just be limited to stuff like false advertising and food safety though.

>>830191 (OP)

you jewish fucks always offer a service that does the opposite of what you're implying. no

>>830191 (OP)

Yeah and give the companies and goberment the ability to remove any page thay want by blocking the users with fees

you should know... Like 8chan

GO KILL YOURSELF

>>830264

Now those are some mighty edgy opinions.

>>830191 (OP)

Thanks, comcast.

>>830191 (OP)

I like net neutrality. It means that no Internet traffic is inherently more important than other traffic.

>>830325

2edgy4me

I couldn't give a shit either way. I just think it's funny to see kikes having a meltdown about it.

>>830261

The very nature of internet infrastructure means that we should make NN law. ISPs are basically utilities at this point and they should operate by the same rules. Ironically enough, all the faggots bitching about da gubmint don't realize that eliminating NN means the government can simply ask companies to block certain sites now without any oversight.

>>830264

>>830325

I frequent imageboards. I'm already edgier than most.

I don't hate you because you're edgy. I hate you because you are so fucking UNIQUE AND SPECIAL that your entire identity and your entire political knowledge comes from a board designed to contain flaming and trolling. A board called "politically incorrect."

Ten years ago we used to mock the likes of you; the faggots who took Internet seriously. Those days ought to come back because God damn, you're starting to leak IRL.

You are a bunch of obnoxious faggots. You don't contribute anything to any board except shitposting and buzzwords. You are useless even by imageboard standards. Sad.

Fuck you.

>>830463

Quit being a furfag from reddit

>>830198

the biggest jew, george soros, supports it

>>830375

With enough ISP competition, there'd be no need for laws as no one would dare violate Net Neutrality tenets. Everyone would flock to a non fucked ISP.

>>830535

I support local/sub-loop unbundling, but how would you apply that to something like cable, let alone cellular? Until everyone has fiber at the very least, NN will be necessary.

The two don't conflict with each other.

>>830536

Like I said, it's a short term solution that should be fixed by removing the laws that cause this monopolization to happen. I agree with you completely.