>>828616
>All the IRC software
That's just your opinion.
You can always make your own client with pointy-clicky and image fetching built in. It's a completely open protocol.
>The IRC protocol
>- no video, no audio, file transfer sucks, not extensible
Why do I want rando binary files being sent to my computer? Or CIAniggers spamming CP? And if I wanted to do those things why not just use an imageboard?
>- no history or offline message
If you need it then learn how to use gnu-screen or run a bouncer.
>- nickname registration requires e-mail address
Only namefags care about the special snowflake version of their nick.
>- one account is not enought, you need to register on all the different servers to prevent impersonation.
Do you use facebook or twitter to log in to different sites? (((Single sign in)))?
Better networks make a mask based on your domain name. If you wanted to impersonate me you would have to also get on my subnet. And if I was doing something so sekrit that people would bother I wouldn't be using any chat client.
>- no mandatory encryption between the server and the clients (even Discord is better than IRC in this regard)
There are servers/networks that require ssl. That is the admin's choice.
How do you know your proprietary software is implementing the encryption correctly? Or its not back doored?
10,000 meme proprietary do-everything chat platforms like discord have come and gone in the 30 years since IRC was created. It lives on because IT IS so simple and open.