>>807020 (OP)
>Even low-depth TN LCDs still can't hit 60Hz without ghosting, IPS is worse yet, 120Hz LCDs, let alone 165Hz, are a total joke
>LCDs also have horrific motion blur, black-frame-insertion barely helps due to ghosting
>All LCDs also have problems with viewing angle distortion of color/brightness, pale blacks, and uneven lighting not shared by any other technology
>The monopolization of digital displays by LCDs has meant that both LCDs and all other digital displays (plasma, OLED, projectors) artificially impose multiple frames of lag
Absolute garbage, native DisplayPort PC gaming OLED displays when?
>>807029
Shouldn't it be the responsibility of software developers to do vector scaling GUIs, and not the responsibility of users to stick with low-rez displays that pander to their laziness?
>>807027
>>807030
>>807033
>>807035
>>807043
>>807816
>>808414
Like >>807755 >>808135 said
THESE ARE NOT TRUE LASER PROJECTORS
Instead, they merely use lasers as lightsources, or even just to boost the output of LEDs, instead of using (typically xenon gas arc) lamps. This light is then, just like any non-CRT projector, sent into a reflector (DLP, LCoS) or shutter (LCD). Even worse, most of these aren't prism-based "triple-chip" but "single-chip" systems, meaning only one primary color (red, green, blue) is projected at a time, creating rainbow artifacts.
A true laser projector uses a laser similarly to a CRT, scanning the beam a pixel at a time, a line at a time, across the entire screen, usually by reflecting it off motorized mirrors.
A good comparison would be quantum dots, which, while also the name of a very promising new direct-emissive pixel technology that has yet to even produce laboratory prototypes, is primarily the name being abused as yet another false advertising campaign by the LCD industry, referring to filters used in LED backlights.
All this said, projectors of any technology are easily superior to anything else for movies, since their primary weaknesses (low brightness so they need a darkened room, laggy) aren't relevant in that application, and they equal or surpass every direct-view technology (even CRT) in every other metric.
>>807335
True, see third pic.
>>807732
>CRTs dead
>plasma dead
>FED/SED strangled in the cradle
>OLED dying
>silicon LED displays mysteriously never seriously attempted in spite of the technology's overwhelming maturity lead
>eInk dying
Just lie down and accept it, anon, this purgatory will never, ever end.